UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2005 |
|
Commission file number 001-14920 |
McCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Maryland |
|
52-0408290 |
(State of incorporation) |
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
18 Loveton Circle |
|
21152 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code: |
|
(410) 771-7301 |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, No Par Value |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Common Stock Non-Voting, No Par Value |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Not applicable.
Indicate By check mark if the registrant is a well-know seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No ý
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates at May 31, 2005: $333,132,269.
The aggregate market value of the non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates at May 31, 2005: $4,004,841,587.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class |
|
Number of Shares Outstanding |
|
Date |
Common Stock |
|
14,435,607 |
|
December 30, 2005 |
Common Stock Non-Voting |
|
118,176,901 |
|
December 30, 2005 |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Document |
|
Part of 10-K into which incorporated |
Annual Report
to Stockholders |
|
Part I, Part II |
|
|
|
Registrants
Proxy Statement |
|
Part III |
PART I
As used herein, the Registrant means McCormick & Company, Incorporated and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.
Item 1. Business
The Registrant, a diversified specialty food company, is a global leader in the manufacture, marketing and distribution of spices, herbs, seasonings and other flavors to the entire food industry. The Registrant was formed in 1915 under Maryland law as the successor to a business established in 1889.
The Registrant operates in two business segments: consumer and industrial. The Registrant sold its packaging segment during the third quarter of 2003. The consumer segment sells spices, herbs, extracts, seasoning blends, sauces, marinades and specialty foods to the consumer food market under a variety of brands, including McCormick and Zatarains in the US, Ducros and Silvo in continental Europe, Club House in Canada and Schwartz in the U.K. The industrial segment sells seasoning blends, spices, herbs, wet flavors, compound flavors and coating systems to food manufacturers and the food service industry, served both directly and indirectly through distributors.
Please refer to pages 14, 15 and 21, for discussions on our Consumer and Industrial businesses, and page 5, A Discussion with Bob Lawless, of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005 for a description of the business. Such pages of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005 are incorporated herein by reference.
For financial information about the Registrants business segments, please refer to pages 22 through 27, Managements Discussion and Analysis, and Note 16, Business Segments and Geographic Areas of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 54 and 55 of the Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005, which pages are incorporated herein by reference.
Raw Materials
The most significant raw materials to the Registrant are cheese, packaging supplies, pepper, capsicums, garlic, onion and vanilla. Black pepper, vanilla beans and other spices and herbs are generally sourced from countries other than the United States. The Registrant is not aware of any government restrictions or other factors that would have a material adverse effect on the availability of these raw materials. Because the raw materials are agricultural products, they may be subject to price volatility caused by weather and other unpredictable factors. The Registrant responds to this volatility in a number of ways including strategic raw material purchases, purchases of raw material for future delivery and customer price adjustments.
Customers
The Registrants products are sold directly to customers and also through brokers, wholesalers and distributors. In the consumer segment, products are generally resold to consumers through grocery, mass merchandise, discount and drug stores. In the industrial segment, products are used by food and beverage manufacturers as ingredients for their finished goods and by food service customers as ingredients for menu items to enhance the flavor of their foods. Customers for the industrial segment include food processors and the food service industry, which are supplied both directly and through distributors.
The Registrant has a large number of customers for its products. No single customer accounted for as much as 10% of consolidated net sales in 2005. Sales to the Registrants five largest customers represented approximately 29.2% of consolidated net sales.
The dollar amount of backlog orders of the Registrants business is not material to an understanding of the Registrants business, taken as a whole. No material portion of the Registrants business is subject to renegotiation of profits or termination of contracts or subcontracts at the election of the U.S. Government.
Trademarks, Licenses and Patents
The Registrant owns a number of trademark registrations. Although in the aggregate these trademarks may be material to the Registrants business, the loss of any one of those trademarks, with the exception of the Registrants McCormick, Zatarains, Schwartz, Club House and Ducros trademarks, would not have a material adverse effect on the Registrants business. The McCormick trademark is extensively used by the Registrant in connection with the sale of virtually all of the Registrants food products worldwide. The terms of the trademark registrations are as prescribed by law
2
and the registrations will be renewed for as long as the Registrant deems them to be useful.
The Registrant has entered into a number of license agreements authorizing the use of its trademarks by affiliated and non-affiliated entities. The loss of these license agreements would not have a material adverse effect on the Registrants business. The term of the license agreements is generally 3 to 5 years or until such time as either party terminates the agreement. Those agreements with specific terms are renewable upon agreement of the parties.
The Registrant owns various patents, but they are not viewed as material to the Registrants business.
Seasonal Nature of Business
Due to seasonal factors inherent in the business, the Registrants sales and income are lower in the first two quarters of the fiscal year and increase in the third and fourth quarters. The seasonality reflects customer and consumer buying patterns, primarily in the consumer segment.
Working Capital
In order to meet increased demand for its consumer products during its fourth quarter, the Registrant usually builds its inventories during the third quarter. The Registrant generally finances working capital items (inventory and receivables) through short-term borrowings, which include the use of lines of credit and the issuance of commercial paper. For a description of the Registrants liquidity and capital resources, see Note 7 Financing Arrangements of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 47 and 48 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005, which pages are incorporated by reference, and the Financial Condition section of Managements Discussion and Analysis on pages 27 through 29 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005, which pages are incorporated by reference.
Competition
The Registrant is a global leader in the manufacture and sale of spices, herbs, extracts, seasonings and flavorings and competes in a geographic market that is international and highly competitive. For further discussion, see pages 21 and 22 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005, which pages are incorporated by reference.
Research and Development
Many of the Registrants products are prepared from confidential formulae developed by its research laboratories and product development teams. Expenditures for research and development were $42.1 million in 2005, $39.3 million in 2004 and $33.2 million in 2003. The amount spent on customer-sponsored research activities is not material.
Environmental Regulations
Compliance with federal, state and local provisions related to protection of the environment has had no material effect on the Registrants business. There were no material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities in 2005 and there are no material expenditures planned for such purposes in 2006.
3
Employees
The Registrant had approximately 8,000 employees worldwide as of December 31, 2005. The Registrant believes its relationship with employees to be good. The Registrant has no collective bargaining contracts in the United States. At the Registrants foreign subsidiaries, approximately 1,200 employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements or similar arrangements.
Financial Information About Geographic Locations
For information on the net sales and long-lived assets of the Registrant, see Geographic Areas within Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 54 and 55 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005, which pages are incorporated by reference, and the Market Risk Sensitivity section of Managements Discussion and Analysis on pages 31 through 33 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005, which pages are incorporated by reference.
Foreign Operations
The Registrant is subject in varying degrees to certain risks typically associated with a global business, such as local economic and market conditions, restrictions on investments, royalties and dividends and exchange rate fluctuations. Approximately 39% of net sales in 2005 were from international operations.
Forward-Looking Information
For a discussion of forward-looking information, see the Forward-Looking Information section of Managements Discussion and Analysis on page 35 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005, which page is incorporated by reference.
Available Information
The Registrants Internet website address is: www.mccormick.com. The Registrant makes available free of charge through its website its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after such documents are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The Registrants website also includes the Registrants Corporate Governance Guidelines, Business Ethics Policy and charters of its Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. These documents are also available in print to any shareholder upon request.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following are certain risk factors that could affect the Registrants business, financial results and results of operations. These risk factors should be considered in connection with evaluating the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because these factors could cause the actual results and conditions to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. Before you buy the Registrants common stock, you should know that making such an investment involves some risks, including the risks described below. The risks that have highlighted here are not the only ones that the Registrant faces. If any of the risks actually occur, the Registrants business, financial condition or results of operations could be negatively affected. In that case, the trading price of the Registrants stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
4
Fluctuations In The Foreign Currency Markets May Negatively Impact Us.
The Registrant is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency cash flows primarily related to raw material purchases. The Registrant is also exposed to fluctuations in the value of foreign currency investments in subsidiaries and unconsolidated affiliates and cash flows related to repatriation of these investments. Additionally, the Registrant is exposed to volatility in the translation of foreign currency earnings to U.S. dollars. Primary exposures include the U.S. dollar versus the functional currencies of our major markets (Euro, British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, Australian dollar, Mexican peso, Chinese renminbi and Japanese yen). On occasion, the Registrant may enter into forward and option contracts to manage these foreign currency risks. However, these contracts may not effectively limit or eliminate the Registrants exposure to a decline in operating results due to foreign currency translation. Therefore, the Registrant cannot assure you that future exchange rate fluctuations will not have a negative impact on its business, financial position or operating results.
Increases In Interest Rates May Negatively Impact Us.
The Registrant has total outstanding short-term borrowings of approximately $105.4 million at an average interest rate of approximately 4.0% on November 30, 2005. The Registrants policy is to manage our interest costs using a mix of fixed and variable rate debt. The Registrant also uses interest rate swaps to achieve a desired proportion of fixed and variable rate debt. The Registrant utilizes derivative financial instruments to enhance its ability to manage risk, including interest rate exposures that exist as part of its ongoing business operations. The Registrant does not enter into contracts for trading purposes, nor is it a party to any leveraged derivative instrument. The Registrants use of derivative financial instruments is monitored through regular communication with senior management and the utilization of written guidelines. However, its use of these instruments may not effectively limit or eliminate its exposure to a decline in operating results due to changes in interest rates. Therefore, the Registrant cannot assure you that future interest rate increases will not have a material negative impact on its business, financial position or operating results.
Price Fluctuations In The Commodity Markets May Negatively Impact Us.
The Registrant purchases certain raw materials that are subject to price volatility caused by weather and other unpredictable factors. The most significant raw materials are cheese, packaging supplies, pepper, capsicums, garlic and onion. While future movements of raw material costs are uncertain, a variety of programs, including strategic raw material purchases, purchases of raw material for future delivery and customer price adjustments, help it address this risk. Generally, the Registrant does not use derivatives to manage the volatility related to this risk. Even if it did use such instruments, however, their use might not effectively limit or eliminate its exposure to a decline in operating results due to changes in commodity prices. Therefore, the Registrant cannot assure you that future commodity price fluctuations will not have a negative impact on its business, financial position or operating results.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
5
Item 2. Properties
The Registrants principal executive offices and primary research facilities are owned and are located in suburban Baltimore, Maryland.
The following is a list of the Registrants principal manufacturing properties, all of which are owned except for the facilities in Commerce, California and Sydney, Australia, which are leased:
United States
Hunt Valley, Maryland consumer and industrial
(4 principal plants)
Salinas, California consumer and industrial
Commerce, California consumer
Dallas, Texas industrial
Atlanta, Georgia industrial
South Bend, Indiana industrial
Canada
London, Ontario consumer and industrial
Mexico
Cuautitlan de Romero Rubio, Mexico industrial
United Kingdom
Haddenham, England consumer and industrial
Paisley, Scotland industrial
Littleborough, England consumer and industrial
France
Carpentras consumer and industrial
Monteux - - consumer (2 principal plants)
The Netherlands
Papendrecht - - consumer
Australia
Melbourne consumer and industrial
Sydney consumer and industrial
China
Shanghai consumer and industrial
Guangzhou consumer and industrial
In addition to distribution facilities and warehouse space available at its manufacturing facilities, the Registrant leases regional distribution facilities in Belcamp, Maryland, Salinas, California, and Dallas, Texas and owns a distribution facility in Monteux, France. The Registrant also owns, leases or contracts several other properties used for manufacturing consumer and industrial products and for sales, warehousing, distribution and administrative functions.
6
The Registrant believes its plants are well maintained and suitable for their intended use. The Registrant further believes that these plants generally have adequate capacity and can accommodate seasonal demands, changing product mixes and certain additional growth. Many additions and improvements have been made to these facilities over the years and the plants manufacturing equipment includes equipment of the latest type and technology.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
There are no material pending legal proceedings in which the Registrant or any of its subsidiaries is a party or in which any of their property is the subject.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matter was submitted during the fourth quarter of Registrants fiscal year 2005 to a vote of security holders.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
In addition to the executive officers described in the Registrants Proxy Statement for 2005 incorporated by reference in Item 10 of this Report, the following individuals are also executive officers of the Registrant: Paul C. Beard, Kenneth A. Kelly, Jr., Lawrence E. Kurzius, Charles T. Langmead, Robert W. Skelton, Mark T. Timbie and Alan D. Wilson.
Mr. Beard is 51 years old and has had the following work experience during the last five years: 3/02 to present Vice President, Finance & Treasurer; 1/00 to 3/02 Vice President & General Manager, Global Restaurant Division.
Mr. Kelly is 51 years old and has had the following work experience during the last five years: 2/00 to present Vice President and Controller; 7/97 to 2/00 Vice President, Finance & Administration/McCormick Schilling Division.
Mr. Kurzius is 48 years old and has had the following work experience during the last five years: 9/05 to present President, U.S. Consumer Foods; 1/05 to 9/05 Vice President and General Manager, Sales and Marketing; 1/97 to 12/04 Mr. Kurzius was President and CEO of Zatarains Brands, Inc., which was acquired by McCormick in 2003. Mr. Kurzius joined Zatarains in 1991.
Mr. Langmead is 48 years old and has had the following work experience during the last five years: 9/05 to present President, U.S. Industrial Group; 2/02 to 9/05 - Vice President & General Manager, Food Service & Global Restaurant Divisions; 4/99 to 2/02 Vice President & General Manager, Food Service Division.
Mr. Skelton is 58 years old and has had the following work experience during the last five years: 11/02 to present Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary; 6/97 to 11/02 - Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary.
Mr. Timbie is 51 years old and has had the following work experience during the last five years: 9/05 to present President, International; 1/04 to 9/05 President, International Consumer Products Group; 3/01 to 12/03 President, McCormick Canada; 10/99 to 2/01 Vice President & General Manager, Perimeter Group/Consumer Markets.
7
Mr. Wilson is 48 years old and has had the following work experience during the last five years: 9/05 to present President, North American Consumer Foods and U.S. Supply Chain; 1/03 to 9/05 President, U.S. Consumer Foods; 3/01 to 12/02 Vice President & General Manager, Sales & Marketing; 12/98 to 2/01 President, McCormick Canada.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Registrant has disclosed in Note 18, Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 55 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005, which page is incorporated by reference, the information relating to the market price and dividends paid on the Registrants common stocks. The market price of the Registrants common stock at the close of business on December 30, 2005 was $30.64 for the Common Stock and $30.92 for the Common Stock Non-Voting.
The Registrants Common Stock Non-Voting and voting Common Stock are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange. The approximate number of holders of Common Stock of the Registrant based on record ownership as of December 31, 2005 was as follows:
Title of Class |
|
Approximate
Number |
|
Common Stock, no par value |
|
2,100 |
|
Common Stock Non-Voting, no par value |
|
10,900 |
|
The following table summarizes the Companys purchases of Common Stock (CS) and Common Stock Non-Voting (CSNV) during the fourth quarter of 2005:
8
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Period |
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Average |
|
Total Number of |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 1,2005 to |
|
CS7,000 |
|
$ |
29.73 |
|
7,000 |
|
$6.2 million |
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
CSNV0 |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2005 to |
|
CS20,000 |
|
$ |
30.87 |
|
20,000 |
|
$380.6 million |
|
October 31, 2005 |
|
CSNV800,000 |
|
$ |
31.27 |
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 1, 2005 to |
|
CS25,000 |
|
$ |
30.77 |
|
25,000 |
|
$362.1 million |
|
November 30, 2005 |
|
CSNV586,577 |
|
$ |
30.20 |
|
586,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
CS52,000 |
|
$ |
30.66 |
|
52,000 |
|
$362.1 million |
|
|
CSNV1,386,577 |
|
$ |
30.82 |
|
1,386,577 |
|
|
Note: During the quarter, the Company continued to purchase against its $300 million authorization approved by the Board of Directors in the fourth quarter of 2003, and completed all of its available purchases under that authorization in October 2005. In June 2005, the Board of Directors approved an additional $400 million share repurchase authorization. As of November 30, 2005, $362.1 million remained of the $400 million authorization. In the absence of an acquisition, the Company expects that it will complete all of its available purchases under this authorization by the end of fiscal year 2007.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
This information is set forth on the line items titled Net sales-under EITF 01-09, Net income from continuing operations, Earnings per share Diluted - Continuing operations, Common dividends declared, Long-term debt and Total assets for the years 2001 through 2005 in the Historical Financial Summary on page 56 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005, which line items are incorporated by reference. See also Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies on pages 42 through 44 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005 and Note 3 Discontinued Operations on page 45 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005, which pages are incorporated by reference.
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This information is set forth in Managements Discussion and Analysis on pages 21 through 35 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005, which pages are incorporated by reference.
9
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
This information is set forth in the Market Risk Sensitivity section of Managements Discussion and Analysis on pages 31 through 33 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005, which pages are incorporated by reference, and in Note 8 Financial Instruments on pages 48 and 49 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005, which pages are incorporated by reference.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The financial statements and supplementary data are included on pages 38 through 56 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005, which pages are incorporated by reference. The Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, on such financial statements is included on pages 36 and 37 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005, which page is incorporated by reference. The supplemental schedule for 2003, 2004 and 2005 is included on page 15 of this Report on Form 10-K.
The unaudited quarterly data is included in Note 18, Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 55 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005, which page is incorporated by reference.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Registrant maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that information, which is required to be disclosed, is accumulated and communicated to management in a timely manner. The Registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated as of November 30, 2005 the effectiveness of this system of disclosure controls and procedures, and have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Managements report on the Registrants internal controls over financial reporting and the report of the Registrants Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on internal controls over financial reporting are included on page 36 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005, which page is incorporated by reference.
Certifications
The certifications of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are filed as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Additionally, as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Listed Company Manual, the Registrants Chief Executive Officer filed a
10
certification with the NYSE on April 21, 2005 reporting that he was not aware of any violation by us of the NYSEs Corporate Governance listing standards.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Information responsive to this item is set forth in Part I of this Report in the section titled Executive Officers of the Registrant and in the sections titled Election of Directors and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in the Registrants definitive proxy statement for 2006, incorporated by reference herein, to be filed within 120 days after the end of the Registrants fiscal year (the 2006 Proxy Statement).
The Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to all employees, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and its Board of Directors. A copy of the code of ethics is available on the Registrants Internet website at www.mccormick.com and is available in print to any shareholder upon request. The Registrant intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 10 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of its code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on its website at the Internet website address set forth above.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections titled Report on Executive Compensation, Summary Compensation Table, Compensation of Directors, Pension Plan Table, Stock Options - Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year, Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values, Equity Compensation Plan Information, Mid-Term Incentive Plan and Performance Graph Shareholder Return in the Registrants 2006 Proxy Statement.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Transactions
Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections titled Principal Stockholders, Election of Directors and Equity Compensation Plan Information in the Registrants 2006 Proxy Statement.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Information responsive to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled Independence of Directors in the Registrants 2006 Proxy Statement.
11
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section titled Report of Audit Committee and Fees of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in the Registrants 2006 Proxy Statement.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this report:
1. The consolidated financial statements for McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries which are listed in the Table of Contents appearing on page 14 of this Report.
2. The financial statement schedule required by Item 8 of this Form 10-K is listed in the Table of Contents appearing on page 14 of this Report.
3. The exhibits that are filed as a part of this Form 10-K and required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K and Item 15(c) of this Form 10-K are listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index at pages 16 through 20 of this Report.
12
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
McCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED |
|||||
|
|
|
|||
By: |
/s/ Robert J. Lawless |
|
Chairman, President & |
January 27, 2006 |
|
|
Robert J. Lawless |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Principal Executive Officer: |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
By: |
/s/ Robert J. Lawless |
|
Chairman, President & |
January 27, 2006 |
|||||
|
Robert J. Lawless |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
Principal Financial Officer: |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
By: |
/s/ Francis A. Contino |
|
Executive Vice |
January 27, 2006 |
|||||
|
Francis A. Contino |
President - Strategic |
|
||||||
|
Planning & Chief Financial |
|
|||||||
|
Officer |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
Principal Accounting Officer: |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
By:. |
/s/ Kenneth A. Kelly, Jr |
|
Vice President & |
January 27, 2006 |
|||||
|
Kenneth A. Kelly, Jr. |
Controller |
|
||||||
13
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons, being a majority of the Board of Directors of McCormick & Company, Incorporated, on the date indicated:
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS: |
|
DATE: |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Barry H. Beracha |
|
|
January 27, 2006 |
Barry H. Beracha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James T. Brady |
|
|
January 27, 2006 |
James T. Brady |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John P. Bilbrey |
|
|
January 27, 2006 |
John P. Bilbrey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Francis A. Contino |
|
|
January 27, 2006 |
Francis A. Contino |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edward S. Dunn |
|
|
January 27, 2006 |
Edward S. Dunn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ J. Michael Fitzpatrick |
|
|
January 27, 2006 |
J. Michael Fitzpatrick |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Freeman A. Hrabowski, III |
|
|
January 27, 2006 |
Freeman A. Hrabowski, III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Lawless |
|
|
January 27, 2006 |
Robert J. Lawless |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Margaret M. V. Preston |
|
|
January 27, 2006 |
Margaret M. V. Preston |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William E. Stevens |
|
|
January 27, 2006 |
William E. Stevens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Karen D. Weatherholtz |
|
|
January 27, 2006 |
Karen D. Weatherholtz |
|
|
14
TABLE OF CONTENTS AND RELATED INFORMATION
Included in the Registrants 2005 Annual Report to Stockholders, the following consolidated financial statements are incorporated by reference in Item 8*:
Consolidated Statement of Income for the years ended November 30, 2005, 2004 & 2003
Consolidated Balance Sheet, November 30, 2005 & 2004
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended November 30, 2005, 2004 & 2003
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity for the years ended November 30, 2005, 2004 & 2003
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - - Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - - Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Included in Part IV of this Annual Report:
Supplemental Financial Schedule:
II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Schedules other than those listed above are omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required or because the information called for is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
*Pursuant to Rule 12b-23 issued by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, a copy of the 2005 Annual Report to Stockholders of the Registrant for its fiscal year ended November 30, 2005 is being furnished with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
15
Supplemental Financial Schedule II Consolidated
McCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(IN MILLIONS) (1)
Column A |
|
Column B |
|
Column C |
|
Column D |
|
Column E |
|
||||
Description |
|
Balance |
|
Additions |
|
Deductions |
|
Balance |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Year ended November 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
$ |
.3 |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended November 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended November 30, 2003 |
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
Notes:
(1)The table excludes discontinued operations.
16
EXHIBIT INDEX
ITEM 601 |
|
REFERENCE OR PAGE |
|
|
|
(2) Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or succession |
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
|
(3) Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws |
|
|
|
|
|
Restatement of Charter of McCormick & Company, Incorporated dated April 16, 1990 |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4 of Registration Form S-8, Registration No. 33-39582 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 1991. |
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment to Charter of McCormick & Company, Incorporated dated April 1, 1992 |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4 of Registration Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-59842 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19, 1993. |
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment to Charter of McCormick & Company, Incorporated dated March 27, 2003 |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4 of Registration Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-104084 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2003. |
|
|
|
By-Laws of McCormick & Company, Incorporated Restated and Amended on September 17, 2002 |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 11, 2002. |
Amendment to the By-Laws of McCormick & Company, Incorporated dated January 27, 2004 |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3(i) of the Registrants Form 10-K for the period ended November 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 27, 2004. |
|
|
|
(4) Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures |
|
|
|
|
|
(i) See Exhibit 3 (Restatement of Charter) |
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) Summary of Certain Exchange Rights, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2001. |
17
(iii) Indenture dated December 5, 2000 between Registrant and SunTrust Bank, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4(iii) of Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 14, 2003. Registrant hereby undertakes to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon its request, copies of additional instruments of Registrant with respect to long-term debt that involve an amount of securities that do not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of the Registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601b(4)(iii)(A). |
||
|
|
|
(9) Voting Trust Agreement |
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
|
(10) Material contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
(i) Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 26, 2003 among Kerr Group, Inc., Kerr Acquisition Sub I, LLC and Setco, Inc., a former wholly-owned subsidiary of Registrant, which agreement is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(i) of Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 14, 2003.* |
||
|
||
(ii) Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 26, 2003 among Kerr Group, Inc., Kerr Acquisition Sub II, LLC and Tubed Products, Inc., a former wholly-owned subsidiary of Registrant, which agreement is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(ii) of Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 14, 2003.* |
||
|
||
(iii) Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 26, 2003 among Kerr Group, Inc., Kerr Acquisition Sub II, LLC and O.G. Dehydrated, Inc., a former wholly-owned subsidiary of Tubed Products, Inc., which agreement is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(iii) of Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 14, 2003.* |
||
|
||
(iv) Registrants supplemental pension plan for certain senior officers, as amended and restated effective June 19, 2001, is contained in the McCormick Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, a copy of which was attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2001, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2001, and incorporated by reference herein. Amendment Number 1 to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective January 1, 2005, which agreement is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(iv) of Registrants 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 27, 2005. ** |
||
|
||
(v) The 2001 Stock Option Plan, in which officers and certain other management employees participate, is set forth on pages 33 through 36 of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement dated February 15, 2001, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2001, and incorporated by reference herein.** |
18
(vi) The 1997 Stock Option Plan, in which officers and certain other management employees participate, is set forth in Exhibit B of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement dated February 19, 1997, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 1997, and incorporated by reference herein.** |
|
(vii) The 2002 McCormick Mid-Term Incentive Plan, which is provided to a limited number of senior executives, is set forth on pages 23 through 31 of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement dated February 15, 2002, as filed with the Commission on February 15, 2002, and incorporated by reference herein.** |
|
(viii) 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, in which officers and certain other management employees participate, is set forth in Exhibit A of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement dated February 17, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2004, and incorporated by reference herein.** |
|
(ix) 2004 Directors Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, provided to members of the Registrants Board of Directors who are not also employees of the Registrant, is set forth in Exhibit B of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement dated February 17, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2004, and incorporated by reference herein.** |
|
(x) Directors Share Ownership Program, provided to members of the Registrants Board of Directors who are not also employees of the Registrant, is set forth on page 28 of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement dated February 17, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2004, and incorporated by reference herein.** |
|
(xi) Deferred Compensation Plan, as restated on January 1, 2000, and amended on August 29, 2000, September 5, 2000 and May 16, 2003, in which directors, officers and certain other management employees participate, a copy of which Plan document and amendments was attached as Exhibit 10(viii) of the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 14, 2003, and incorporated by reference herein.** |
|
(xii) 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2005, in which directors, officers and certain other management employees participate, which agreement is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(xii) of Registrants 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 27, 2005. |
|
(xiii) The 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in which employees participate, is set forth in Exhibit A of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement dated February 16, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 16, 2005, and incorporated by reference herein.** |
19
(xiv) Stock Purchase Agreement dated May 7, 2003 among the Registrant, Zatarains Brands, Inc., and the stockholders set forth on the stockholder signature pages of the Agreement, which agreement is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(vii) of Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 11, 2003. |
||
|
||
(xv) $400,000,000 Credit Agreement, dated January 25, 2005 among Registrant and Certain Financial Institutions, which agreement is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(xv) of Registrants 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 27, 2005. |
||
|
||
(xvi) Consulting agreement between Registrant and Robert W. Schroeder dated January 1, 2004, which agreement is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(xv) of Registrants Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 29, 2004.** |
||
|
||
(xvii) Retirement Agreement between Registrant and John C. Molan dated January 27, 2004, which agreement is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(xvi) of the Registrants 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 8, 2004.** |
||
|
||
(11) Statement re computation of per share earnings |
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
|
(12) Statement re computation of ratios |
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
|
(13) Annual report to security holders, Form 10-Q and 10-QSB, or quarterly report to security holders |
|
The Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2005 is attached as Exhibit 13. |
|
|
|
(14) Code of Ethics |
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
|
(16) Letter re change in certifying accountant |
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
|
(18) Letter re change in accounting principles |
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
|
(21) Subsidiaries of the registrant |
|
Attached as Exhibit 21. |
|
|
|
(22) Published report regarding matters submitted to vote of securities holders |
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
|
(23) Consents of experts and counsel |
|
Attached as Exhibit 23. |
|
|
|
(24) Power of attorney |
|
Not applicable. |
|
|
|
(31) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications |
|
Attached. |
|
|
|
(32) Section 1350 Certifications |
|
Attached. |
|
|
|
(99) Additional Exhibits |
|
None. |
20
* Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.
** Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
21
Exhibit 13
|
MCCORMICK & COMPANY 2005 ANNUAL REPORT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MCCORMICK MAKES |
|
|
|
YOUR FOOD TASTE GREAT. |
|
|
|
WE KNOW FLAVOR |
|
|
|
INSIDE OUT |
|
|
In homes around the world, McCormick is the taste you trust. When you eat out, chefs rely on our seasonings, condiments and coatings to create your favorite menu items. And as a supplier to leading food companies, we add great taste to snacks, side dishes, cereal, beverages and other products. Every day you are likely to enjoy a product flavored by McCormick.
With 116 years in the business, we know flavor inside out.
Table of Contents
2 |
Letter to Shareholders |
|
|
5 |
A Discussion with Bob Lawless |
|
|
6 |
We Know Flavor Inside Out |
|
|
14 |
McCormick At-a-Glance |
|
|
18 |
Leadership at McCormick |
|
|
20 |
Financial Information |
|
|
57 |
Investor Information |
Business Description
McCormick is a global leader in the manufacture, marketing and distribution of spices, herbs, seasonings and other flavors to the entire food industry. Customers range from retail outlets and food service providers to food manufacturers. Founded in 1889 and built on a culture of Multiple Management, McCormick has approximately 8,000 employees.
Financial Highlights
for the year ended
November 30 (millions except per share data) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
% change |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,592.0 |
|
$ |
2,526.2 |
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gross profit |
|
1,036.6 |
|
1,007.9 |
|
2.8 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gross profit margin |
|
40.0 |
% |
39.9 |
% |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating income |
|
343.5 |
|
332.7 |
|
3.2 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating income margin |
|
13.3 |
% |
13.2 |
% |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
214.9 |
|
214.5 |
|
0.2 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Percent to sales |
|
8.3 |
% |
8.5 |
% |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings per share from continuing operations diluted |
|
1.56 |
|
1.52 |
|
2.6 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Average shares outstanding diluted |
|
138.1 |
|
141.3 |
|
(2.3 |
)% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dividends paid |
|
$ |
86.2 |
|
$ |
76.9 |
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dividends paid per share |
|
.64 |
|
.56 |
|
14.3 |
% |
The scent for this years annual report is clove.
1
Over the last few years, we have taken bold steps to position our business for ongoing long-term growth our restructuring plan announced in 2005 will continue to position us for growth on this journey.
|
|
Robert J. Lawless |
|
Fellow shareholders,
We have just completed what was our toughest year during my time as chairman and CEO of McCormick. Our 2005 financial results did not reflect the ongoing long-term success and momentum of our business.
Several significant challenges overshadowed an otherwise strong performance. These included a unique vanilla market, difficult business conditions in Europe, the impact of Hurricane Katrina and sales in our industrial business that did not meet our expectations.
The good news is that we have been taking actions to address those challenges...actions that we believe will position us for continued growth. So while were disappointed in our 2005 financial results, we view them as a temporary setback in our strong long-term performance.
We remain unique in the food industry in our ability to make all types of food at all types of eating occasions taste great. That, along with the actions were taking, makes me confident that we will quickly return to achieving the superior results that investors expect from McCormick.
A Temporary Setback in Our Long-Term Performance
The impacts of the recent vanilla market, difficult business conditions in Europe and Hurricane Katrina were significant and led to overall disappointing financial results. In addition, we did not meet our objectives for sales growth in the industrial business due in part to lower vanilla prices and delays in certain product introductions by our customers. These factors, and special charges related to our restructuring plan, led to earnings per share of $1.56 for 2005. That compares with $1.52 in earnings per share for 2004.
While Im not happy with that result I am pleased with several aspects of our performance.
We overcame the negative pressure from our industrial business and achieved a 3% sales increase from some key sales growth initiatives:
Introducing products that quickly became successful in retail markets.
Improving our marketing effectiveness (for example, sales of grinders increased 26% and sales of grilling products increased 21%.)
Acquiring the Silvo brand at the end of 2004.
Increasing our global reach with snack food seasonings and through restaurant chains in the Asia/Pacific region.
In 2005, cost savings of $33 million exceeded our $25 million goal. These savings, along with our pricing actions, more than offset the higher costs of packaging and fuel, as well as the impact from the years significant challenges.
2
We continued to generate significant cash, which we used to pay dividends and repurchase our shares. We have increased our dividends in each of the last 19 years and at the end of 2005 increased our dividend by13%. We also repurchased $186 million of our shares, following repurchases of $174 million in 2004 and $120 million in 2003. In June 2005, our Board authorized a new $400 million share repurchase program.
As we look back on the past year, we believe the challenges of 2005 are generally behind us. We are pleased with the key aspects of our performance that should get us back on our strong track record of increased sales and profit.
Actions to Position Us for Growth
Over the last few years, we have taken bold steps to position our business for ongoing long-term growth.
We have continued to improve significantly our business processes through B2K, a global initiative that makes effective use of state-of-the-art information technology. B2K began in the United States in 2002, and Europe will implement it during 2006.
We became fully focused on what we do best providing flavor that makes food taste great. That focus included acquiring Zatarains, Silvo and Uniqsauces, and selling our packaging business and our U.K. brokerage operation.
We transitioned our Board to a majority of independent directors, while also developing an outstanding leadership team.
Our restructuring plan announced in 2005 will continue to position us for growth on this journey:
Improving our supply chain and lowering costs.
Optimizing our industrial business.
Further developing and strengthening our leadership team.
Improving our supply chain will include the consolidation of global manufacturing, rationalization of distribution facilities, making the way we go-to-market more efficient and eliminating administrative redundancies. These are significant steps for McCormick that will improve margins for both our consumer and industrial businesses.
Optimizing our industrial business means focusing our resources on those customers and products that offer good margins and the highest growth prospects. Following an in-depth review of our industrial business in 2005, we will reduce the number of customers and products we supply by approximately 25% during the next three years. While this will adversely impact industrial sales by 2-5% during this period, we expect minimal impact on profits. Because we are eliminating lower margin business and reducing or redeploying our resources that support these customers, we are projecting increased margins for the industrial business.
Over the next three years, the charges associated with the supply chain actions and optimization of our industrial business are expected to be $130-$150 million. By 2008, these steps should lower our annual costs approximately $50 million.
Further developing and strengthening our leadership team will help guide our growth. Organizational changes were made to reflect our worldwide growth and the evolution of our customer base. These changes will enable us to take advantage of our regional capabilities while maintaining coordination with our global customers. Bob Davey, who has contributed to our success for nearly 30 years, is retiring from the Company and our Board. Also retiring from McCormicks Board is Ned Dunn, who has served as a director and important member of our Compensation Committee since 1998. John Bilbrey, Senior Vice President of The Hershey Company and President of Hershey International, has joined our Board.
We are pleased with the key aspects of our performance that should get us back on our strong track record of increased sales and profits.
|
|
|
|
TEN YEAR STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE |
|
3
Were Unique We Provide Great Taste
Our business is making food taste great. With 116 years in the business, we know flavor inside out.
In a year of improvement initiatives and challenges, our employees remained focused on the business developing innovative products, manufacturing high-quality products and serving our customers.
Demand for our products continues to grow. Consumers want bold and zesty flavors. They seek convenience and reliable results. They want healthier lifestyles, lower salt or fat in their diets without skimping on taste. We provide the products to meet these needs and more.
We have great customers who are growing in their core markets and expanding internationally.
These are all characteristics of our business that make us confident of ongoing long-term success.
Our strategy to improve margins, invest in the business and grow sales and profits is as effective now as it was in1998 when we developed and implemented it. With improved margins we are offsetting higher costs, investing in additional marketing support and product development, and increasing profits.
During the past five years, our annual sales have increased an average of 7%. In that same time, our earnings per share have grown an average of 10% annually. Although our share price declined in 2005, our total shareholder return has exceeded that of the S&P 500 Stock Index and the average of other food companies for the last five years.
I thank the employees of McCormick for making our success possible. I am confident that 2005 was a temporary setback in our progress. Working together, we will be implementing some key initiatives for the business and reestablish our record of strong and consistent growth. We thank you for your continued support and look forward to building value for you.
Robert J. Lawless, Chairman, President and CEO
FIVE YEAR SHAREHOLDER RETURNS |
|
|
|
|
Our strategy to improve margins, invest in the business and grow sales and profits is as effective as it was in 1998 when we developed and implemented it.
4
A Discussion with Bob Lawless
What made 2005 a temporary setback in your track record of strong long-term performance?
We face and meet challenges every year, and we did a good job with the extraordinary number and types of challenges that developed during 2005. However, two of those challenges had a particularly significant impact on our earnings:
A dramatic decline in the cost of vanilla early in 2005 the first of its kind in more than 20 years lowered our first-half earnings per share by approximately 5 cents.
Flat sales in our industrial business compared with an average sales increase of 5% over the last five years further reduced our earnings per share.
Weve taken actions to address these challenges. In our industrial business, by focusing our development capabilities on strategic customers with good margins and strong growth prospects, we will restore this business to its historical growth rates. As for vanilla, changes in sourcing and customer negotiations will make future volatility less likely.
We are confident that our strategies and growth initiatives, our cost reduction efforts and experience in running our business will have us back on track in 2006.
What are your key drivers of sales growth?
New products are a vital part of our sales growth. In recent years, at least 10% of our annual sales came from products launched within the current and two preceding years.
Our innovative marketing enhances our growth potential. For example, in the United States, we are relaunching our major consumer product lines with new packaging, new merchandising and new items. This rollout began late in 2005 and will continue through 2006. Geographically, we are expanding into new markets with our current products, with new products and through acquisitions. In our existing markets, we are seeking to acquire brands that have a strong flavor profile complementing our existing product lineup.
What makes McCormick different? Why is it a good investment?
First, we overcome obstacles quickly. Despite the significant challenges of 2005, we were able to deliver a 3% sales increase and 3% increase in earnings per share. Second, with focused leadership and motivated employees, we continue to execute well, even in a period of challenges. During 2005, we demonstrated this ability with our progress in implementing B2K in Europe, the integration of the Silvo acquisition, the quick recovery of our Zatarains operations following Hurricane Katrina and the relaunch of our entire dry seasoning mix line in the U.S.
Third, our customers count on us for great flavors. This is the key element of our successful and long-standing relationships. The fourth area I want to point to is our willingness to challenge ourselves. We continue to seek ways to improve our leadership and organization, our capabilities and processes, our products and marketing, and our relationships with customers and suppliers.
This is a great business making food taste terrific. No one does that better than McCormick. We are uniquely positioned to continue building shareholder value.
We continue to seek ways to improve our leadership and organization, our capabilities and processes, our products and marketing, and our relationships with customers and suppliers.
5
Inside the grocery store, we take a leading role in driving sales. In more than 20,000 U.S. retail stores we recently restaged our entire line of seasoning mixes with more appealing packaging, more effective merchandising and some exciting new products.
6
Because we know flavor were the clear market leader and were driving category growth. Our brands have a strong leading share whether it is McCormick in the United States, Schwartz in the United Kingdom, Ducros in France or our brands in other key markets.
In addition to providing our customers with the leading retail brand, we are often their source for store-branded products.
Maintaining market leadership requires acting like a leader by bringing innovation, news and excitement to the consumer. In the United States, the United Kingdom and France, we restaged our entire line of seasoning mixes with more appealing packaging, more effective merchandising and some exciting new products. We are following that with a comprehensive relaunch of our U.S. spice and seasoning line in 2006. It has been nearly 20 years since we had such a significant and comprehensive initiative behind these products, and we believe it will reenergize and enhance consumer demand.
Our increased advertising over recent years continues to have impact. In 2005, we focused our U.S. advertising on grinders, GrillMates® and Zatarains®. We also developed ways to better meet the needs of Hispanic consumers, among whom we are the top brand in our category. With advertising and the launch of new products, we increased sales of Hispanic-targeted products by 20% in 2005.
With better merchandising, new products and improved packaging, we are driving category growth. In 2005, our primary category in the United States rose 3%. In the United Kingdom the increase was 3%, in Canada it was 4% and in Australia the category increased 6%.
Our market share exceeds that of the next largest competitor in key markets.
We are driving category growth with effective marketing and innovative new products.
7
Because we know flavor our innovative new products are driving sales. Our sensory capabilities starting with developing the products and ending with consumer testing are among the best in the industry.
11% of 2005 net sales were from products introduced in the last three years.
Today, more than 70% of sales are from value-added products, up from around 60% just five years ago.
Our skills and processes lead to consumer-preferred products and with continued focus on efficiencies, were increasing our productivity. New product sales per development professional have increased 40% during the last three years.
In our consumer business, we are introducing wet products such as a line of cooking pastes in North America, Europe and the Asia/Pacific region. In the United States, varieties like teriyaki beef and country herb chicken offer greater convenience and more options than traditional seasoning blends. Our spice grinders, grilling products and Zatarains® Ready-to-Serve Rice are just a few of our innovative products that have quickly become family favorites.
In our industrial business, our customers who are food manufacturers launched new fruit snacks, cereals, beverages, meal kits, snack chips and snack bars all of which contain key flavors that we provide. We collaborate with our food service customers and have recently developed creative new products to flavor items on their menus bread toppings for sub sandwiches, exotic dressings that go in wraps, sauces to top steak and grilled fish, and dessert seasonings sprinkled on specialty coffee and tea.
Making food taste great is an ongoing process, and we have a promising pipeline of innovative products that will be a key driver of sales growth in 2006 and beyond.
8
Outside or in,
McCormick is the taste behind your favorite foods. In 2005 we grew global sales of grilling products 21% and grinders 26%. We have few boundaries as we seek new ways to add flavor.
9
Because we know flavor customers rely on us for superior quality and service. Whether it is a restaurant chef, a leading food company or a retail grocery chain, our customer relationships are paramount.
We enjoy strategic relationships with many industry leaders. Here are just a few of the premier customers that have recognized McCormick with awards for innovation, service and quality.
Darden
McDonalds
PepsiCo
Subway
Sysco
Wendys
YUM!
In the U.S. we supply 9 of the top 10 quick service restaurants, 19 of the top 20 food companies and all 20 of the top retail grocery chains. Our customers count on us for dynamic product ideas, flavor expertise and knowledge about the consumer and marketplace.
Our state-of-the-art technology matches the pace of a business environment that is continuously challenging and rapidly changing. Our formula management initiatives increase the speed of product development. In 2006, well be using radio frequency tagging (RFID) to meet customer requirements to improve logistics.
Many major food and restaurant companies including McDonalds, PepsiCo, Sysco and others recognize us as a premier supplier. Many of our customer relationships go back more than 25 years. We have multi-functional teams whose priorities are to ensure we meet and exceed our customers expectations. We are also building and nurturing relationships with strategic customers for both our consumer and industrial businesses.
As our customers expand with new store formats and into new regions, were able to achieve parallel growth. For example, quick service and casual dining restaurant sales are projected to increase 4-5% through 2008. And well grow with them. Thats the case with all of our customers domestically and internationally. As they grow, we grow.
10
Inside the restaurant kitchen, chefs rely on McCormick to create their signature dishes. In China, an increase in eating out contributed to a 7% increase in industrial sales in the Asia/Pacific region in 2005.
11
Because we know flavor were part of all the latest trends. Whether consumers are seeking convenience, healthier food or an indulgence treat, were well-positioned to provide the flavor and make their choice taste great.
More than 2.5 million unique visitors accessed our web site, www.mccormick.com, in 2005. One of our features is A Taste for Health where consumers find ideas for healthy, great-tasting meals.
Many of the latest trends create a demand for our development capabilities and flavor solutions.
According to a recent NPD group study Eating Patterns in America, taste is the No.1 factor when choosing food to make and eat at home. We flavor many on-trend products. In our consumer business, we have a line of products for fruits and vegetables in North America, Europe and the Asia/Pacific region. With product innovation and through acquisitions, we have built a 30 percent U.S. market share in seafood complements sauces, coatings and marinades. Our new lineup of seasoning mixes offers a convenient way to get a great tasting dinner on the table in 30 minutes or less.
For restaurants, we provide condiments, seasonings, coatings and more. This gives us the ability to participate in a wide range of menu items. Our customers extend from quick service restaurants to fine dining establishments. No matter where people choose to eat, we can provide the flavor and make their meal taste terrific.
The possibilities to flavor food products are nearly limitless. Snack foods, dairy products, side dishes and beverages are just a few of the many grocery store items for which we provide the flavor. In the past four years, more than 13,000 products in the United States have been fortified with added health benefits. We are working on advanced flavors to develop the enhancers, replacers and maskers that make these types of products taste great.
Flavor is fun and drives what we all choose to eat and enjoy. With our various product lines and geographic reach, no matter where or what you eat each day, you are likely to taste a great McCormick flavor.
12
Outside biking or working out indoors at the health club, consumers around the world have an increased interest in healthier food, but also demand great taste. Thats where McCormick steps in. We develop great flavors for snack bars, beverages and much more.
13
McCormick At-a-Glance
|
|
Consumer Business |
|
Industrial Business |
|
|
|
|
|
What We Do |
|
Make food taste great with seasoning |
|
Help our customers make food taste great |
|
|
blends, spices, herbs, extracts, sauces, |
|
with seasoning blends, coating systems, |
|
|
marinades and specialty foods marketed |
|
wet flavors, compound flavors and more. |
|
|
as our brands and private label products. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Customers |
|
Retail outlets that include grocery, mass |
|
Food manufacturers and food service |
|
|
merchandise, discount and drug stores. |
|
customers that we serve both directly and |
|
|
|
|
indirectly through distributors. |
|
|
|
|
|
How Were Doing |
|
Achieving a leading share in our largest |
|
Achieving a leading share in key |
|
|
markets: |
|
markets: |
|
|
Nearly 50 percent market share in the |
|
Sales of snack seasonings. |
|
|
United States, the United Kingdom and |
|
Sales to food distributors. |
|
|
the Netherlands. |
|
Continually increasing our well-recognized |
|
|
More than 50 percent market share in |
|
reputation with the industry: |
|
|
France and Canada. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our capabilities and expertise in |
|
|
Achieving category leadership with our |
|
culinary, sensory and other areas make |
|
|
brands including: |
|
us stand out from our competitors. |
|
|
McCormick in the United States |
|
|
|
|
and Mexico. |
|
|
|
|
Schwartz in the United Kingdom. |
|
|
|
|
Ducros in France. |
|
|
|
|
Club House in Canada. |
|
|
|
|
Silvo in the Netherlands. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How Were Growing |
|
Developing innovative new products: |
|
Supporting the global expansion of our |
|
|
Growing consumer demand for great |
|
industry-leading customers: |
|
|
flavors and convenience. |
|
Expansion of our capabilities where our |
|
|
|
|
customers are growing Europe and |
|
|
Increasing our marketing effectiveness: |
|
the Asia/Pacific region. |
|
|
Better promotion, advertising and |
|
|
|
|
merchandising. |
|
Building current and new strategic |
|
|
|
|
partnerships: |
|
|
Expanding our distribution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Focused resources on increased |
|
|
Into new markets in Europe and the |
|
collaboration. |
|
|
Asia/Pacific region. |
|
|
|
|
With acquisitions of niche brands and |
|
Developing consumer-preferred |
|
|
products that complement our existing |
|
value-added products: |
|
|
brands and products. |
|
Drive sales and expand margins. |
|
|
|
|
Target high-growth trends wellness, |
|
|
|
|
convenience and indulgence. |
14
Industrial Product Capabilities
COMPOUND FLAVORS
Beverage flavors
Dairy flavors
Confectionery flavors
PROCESSED FLAVORS
Meat flavors
Savory flavors
SEASONINGS
Seasoning blends
Salty snack seasonings
Side dish seasonings (rice, pasta, potato)
Sauces and gravies
COATING SYSTEMS
Batters
Breaders
Marinades
Glazes
Rubs
WET FLAVORS
Sandwich sauces
Condiments
Seafood cocktail sauces
Salad dressings
Flavored oils
INGREDIENTS
Spices and herbs
Extracts
Essential oils and oleoresins
Tomato powder
From locations around the world, our consumer brands reach nearly100 countries. Our industrial business provides a wide range of products to multinational restaurants and food processors. McCormick flavors span the globe.
Consumer Brands |
|
|
|
|
15
McCormick At-a-Glance
Our community service efforts enrich communities around the world. In 2005, a grant was made to help children in El Salvador.
By showing concern for one another, we have helped the less advantaged around the globe.
Our charitable commitment has its roots in our founding. Today,116 years later, it remains a vibrant part of who we are, from the plant floor to the executive suite, from Baltimore to Beijing.
McCormicks formal program of charitable giving helps fund worthwhile causes. Projects that are civic, health, welfare, education and the arts receive the most attention. These grants are made in communities around the world where we have facilities. Programs like the McCormick Unsung Heroes Awards, student scholarships and Charity Day, which fosters employee giving to a wide range of causes, have existed for more than 60 years. Additionally, many of our global employees devote their time and talents to numerous community endeavors. Their involvement ranges from serving on boards to grassroots-level volunteering.
In 2004, we added another chapter to our history of benevolence by creating the McCormick Community Service Award. The program recognizes those employees who best exemplify McCormicks commitment to improve our communities. A grand prize winner receives $25,000 for his or her charity of choice. Several finalists receive $5,000 each for their charities.
The winner of the award presented in 2005 was Rogelio Pineda, an Information Technology Manager at McCormick de Centro America in El Salvador. Rogelio volunteers with an organization called Club Activo 20-30 San Salvador. It assists children, particularly those who are disabled or orphaned. Recently, the club has helped fund a school building for 700 underprivileged children, helped obtain wheelchairs for others, funded difficult to obtain medical treatments, brought entertainment to thousands of children and raised money to support public schools with essential supplies.
The club is constantly involved in projects to raise funds for our programs, Rogelio said. So winning the McCormick Community Service Award was truly a blessing. I have liked to help people all of my life, and the club gives me that chance. The best prize we can get is to see a smile on the face of a child who has little reason to smile. Our club slogan says it all: A person never stands so tall as when kneeling to help a child.
16
We call them Shared Values. They are points of focus that are the essence of our corporate culture. One of those values is simply Concern for One Another. It is demonstrated in our approach to community service.
Hurricane Katrina
Helping those in need is at the core of our community service. The reality of that mission struck much closer to home in August 2005 than we ever could have imagined. Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans and much of the Gulf Coast of the United States. McCormicks Zatarains operation, based in Gretna, Louisiana, is near New Orleans. It was not flooded like much of the area, but the facility did suffer wind and water damage. Of greater importance, hundreds of Zatarains employees had their lives seriously disrupted with some losing their homes. While struggling to get the business functioning again, the Zatarains staff felt compelled to help their affected area and distributed 100,000 Ready to Serve Meals to neighboring communities. Tireless hours have been spent ensuring that customer orders are filled as the recovery work in Gretna continues.
McCormick employees from around the world were affected by the suffering of their co-workers in Louisiana. In response, a special fundraising effort with global employee donations was held to provide assistance for the Zatarains employees who must rebuild their lives. McCormick matched employee donations dollar for dollar.
Around the world and close to home, McCormicks volunteer efforts improve the quality of life in our communities. Its rooted in our Shared Value, Concern for One Another.
Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast and dramatically impacted the lives of our Zatarains employees and the business in Gretna, Louisiana. Zatarains donated food to neighboring communities, and the employees rallied together to ensure the continued operation of the business. McCormick employees around the world made financial donations to assist their beleaguered colleagues in Louisiana. It was a community service effort unlike any other in McCormicks history.
17
Board of Directors
During 2005, we made organizational changes to respond to the growth of our businesses worldwide and the evolution of our customer base. Our new structure takes advantage of our regional capabilities while retaining coordination with our global customers. Named to lead the consumer and industrial businesses were (left to right) Chuck Langmead, Mark Timbie and Alan Wilson.
Executive Officers
Robert J. Lawless
Chairman of the Board, President & Chief Executive Officer
Paul C. Beard
Vice President Finance &Treasurer
Francis A. Contino
Executive Vice President Strategic Planning & Chief Financial Officer
Kenneth A. Kelly, Jr.
Vice President & Controller
Lawrence E. Kurzius
President U.S. Consumer Foods
Charles T. Langmead
President U.S. Industrial Group
Robert W. Skelton
Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
Mark T. Timbie
President International
Karen D. Weatherholtz
Senior Vice President Human Relations
Alan D. Wilson
President North American Consumer Foods and U.S. Supply Chain
Corporate Governance
McCormicks mission is to enhance shareholder value. McCormick employees conduct business under the leadership of the Chief Executive Officer and the oversight and direction of the Board of Directors. Both management and the Board of Directors believe that the creation of long-term shareholder value requires us to conduct our business honestly and ethically and in accordance with applicable laws. We also believe that shareholder value is well served if the interests of our employees, customers, suppliers, consumers, and the communities in which we live, are appropriately addressed.
McCormicks success is grounded in its value system as evidenced by our core values.
We are open and honest in business dealings inside and outside McCormick. We are dependable and truthful and keep our promises.
Our employees and our Board of Directors are committed to growing our business in accordance with our governance structure, principles and code of ethics.
Our key ingredient is the people of McCormick...
|
Ethical Behavior |
|
Teamwork |
|
High Performance |
|
Innovation |
|
Concern for One Another |
= |
Success |
18
Barry H. Beracha 63
Executive Vice President
Sara Lee Corporation (retired)
Chief Executive Officer
Sara Lee Bakery Group (retired)
Chicago, Illinois
Director since 2000
Compensation Committee member*
James T. Brady 65
Managing Director, Mid-Atlantic
Ballantrae International, Ltd.
Ijamsville, Maryland
Director since 1998
Audit Committee member*
J. Michael Fitzpatrick 59
President & Chief Operating Officer
Rohm and Haas Company (retired)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Director since 2001
Compensation Committee member
Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee member
Robert J. Lawless 59
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer
McCormick & Company, Inc.
Director since 1994
William E. Stevens 63
Chairman, BBI Group
St. Louis, Missouri
Director since 1988
Audit Committee member
John P. Bilbrey 49
Senior Vice President
The Hershey Company
President Hershey International
Hershey, Pennsylvania
Director since 2005
Compensation Committee member
Francis A. Contino 60
Executive Vice President
Strategic Planning and
Chief Financial Officer
McCormick & Company, Inc.
Director since 1998
Freeman A. Hrabowski, III 55
President
University of Maryland
Baltimore County
Baltimore, Maryland
Director since 1997
Nominating / Corporate Governance
Committee member*
Margaret M.V. Preston 48
Executive Vice President
Mercantile Private Wealth Management
Mercantile Safe Deposit & Trust Company
Baltimore, Maryland
Director since 2003
Audit Committee member
Karen D. Weatherholtz 55
Senior Vice President
Human Relations
McCormick & Company, Inc.
Director since 1992
* Denotes committee chairman
19
Financial Information
21 |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Executive Summary |
23 |
|
Results of Operations 2005 compared to 2004 |
25 |
|
Results of Operations 2004 compared to 2003 |
27 |
|
Financial Condition |
29 |
|
Acquisitions |
29 |
|
B2K |
30 |
|
Special Charges |
31 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
31 |
|
Market Risk Sensitivity |
33 |
|
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments |
34 |
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements |
34 |
|
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
34 |
|
Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions |
35 |
|
Forward-Looking Information |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Report of Management |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Consolidated Statement of Income |
39 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet |
40 |
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows |
41 |
|
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
44 |
|
Acquisitions |
45 |
|
Discontinued Operations |
45 |
|
Special Charges |
47 |
|
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
47 |
|
Investments in Affiliates |
47 |
|
Financing Arrangements |
48 |
|
Financial Instruments |
49 |
|
Pension and 401(k) Retirement Plans |
51 |
|
Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions |
52 |
|
Income Taxes |
53 |
|
Stock-Based Compensation Plans |
53 |
|
Earnings Per Share |
53 |
|
Capital Stocks |
53 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
54 |
|
Business Segments and Geographic Areas |
55 |
|
Supplemental Financial Statement Data |
55 |
|
Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Historical Financial Summary |
20
Managements Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
Business Overview
McCormick & Company is a global leader in the manufacture, marketing and distribution of spices, herbs, seasonings and other flavors to the entire food industry. Our major sales, distribution and production facilities are located in North America and Europe, and our products reach nearly 100 countries around the world. Additional facilities are based in Mexico, Central America, Australia, China, Singapore, Thailand and South Africa. In 2005, approximately 39% of sales were outside the U.S.
We operate in two business segments, consumer and industrial. In 2005, our consumer business was 54% of sales and our industrial business was 46% of sales. Consistent with market conditions in each segment, our consumer business has a higher overall profit margin than our industrial business.
Our consumer business supplies a variety of retail outlets that include grocery, mass merchandise, discount and drug stores. Customers are serviced both directly and indirectly through distributors or wholesalers. Products for our consumer segment include spices, herbs, extracts, seasoning blends, sauces, marinades and specialty foods. In 2005, 66% of net sales were in the Americas, 30% in Europe and 4% in the Asia/Pacific region. In our primary markets, we supply both branded and private label products and have a leading share that is more than twice the size of the next largest competitor. We are growing our consumer business by developing innovative products, increasing marketing effectiveness, expanding distribution and acquiring leading brands and niche products.
Our industrial business works closely with customers to develop leading products that become marketplace winners. We supply both food manufacturers and the food service industry. Food service customers are supplied both directly and indirectly through distributors. Products for our industrial segment include seasoning blends, spices, herbs, wet flavors, compound flavors and coating systems. In 2005, 74% of net sales were in the Americas, 18% in Europe and 8% in the Asia/Pacific region. We have many competitors who also supply products to food manufacturers, as well as the food service industry. We are driving sales for our industrial business by supporting the global expansion of our customers, building current and new strategic partnerships, and developing consumer-preferred, value-added products.
With our consumer and industrial segments, we have the customer base and product development skills to provide flavor solutions for all types of eating occasions, whether it is cooking at home, dining out, purchasing a quick service meal or enjoying a snack.
We purchase a significant amount of raw materials from areas throughout the world. The most significant raw materials are cheese, packaging supplies, pepper, capsicums, garlic, onion and vanilla. Some of these are subject to price volatility caused by weather, market conditions, growing and harvesting conditions, governmental actions and other
21
unpredictable factors. While future movements of raw material costs and availability are uncertain, we respond to this volatility in a number of ways including strategic raw material purchases, purchases of raw material for future delivery and customer price adjustments.
Strategy for Growth
Our strategy is to improve margins, invest in our business and increase sales and profits.
We have increased margins with cost-savings programs, new capabilities and processes introduced through our B2K program, acquisitions of high-margin brands and the introduction of higher-margin, more value-added products. Since 2000, gross profit margin has increased 4.8 percentage points. Our B2K program is a global initiative that is significantly improving business processes through state-of-the-art information technology. Utilizing B2K, we have improved the supply chain throughout McCormick. In 2005, $33 million of cost savings were realized, comprised of $21 million of cost of goods sold and $12 million of selling, general and administrative savings. This followed $24 million of cost savings in 2004.
As the next step in our progress with margin improvement, we announced in September 2005 significant actions to improve our global supply chain. We also conducted a comprehensive review of our industrial business that identified additional actions to improve this business. These actions were put together in a comprehensive restructuring plan which the Board approved in November 2005. This restructuring plan is expected to reduce complexity and create an organization that is more focused on growth opportunities in both the consumer and industrial businesses. This plan is described in more detail later in MD&A and in note 4 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
In addition to increasing profits, a portion of the higher margin has supported investment in business growth initiatives. Since 2000, we have significantly increased our investment in areas such as advertising, promotion and product development to drive sales. Based on our strong business fundamentals and improvement actions underway, we believe our business can generate sales growth of 3-5% and an 8 -10% increase in earnings per share through 2008. This sales growth will continue to be achieved through innovative new products, effective marketing, distribution gains and acquisitions.
Our business generates strong cash flow which has increased in recent years. Actions to grow net income and reduce inventory should lead to further gains. We have consistently paid dividends and expect to increase dividends at a rate similar to the increase in earnings per share. Additional cash is being used to fund strategic acquisitions to extend our business into new product niches or new markets. Another use of cash is share repurchase. An active share repurchase program is lowering shares outstanding and improving value for McCormick shareholders.
22
Results of Operations 2005 compared to 2004
for the year ended November 30 (millions except per share data) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,592.0 |
|
$ |
2,526.2 |
|
Gross profit |
|
1,036.6 |
|
1,007.9 |
|
||
Gross profit margin |
|
40.0 |
% |
39.9 |
% |
||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
681.9 |
|
677.7 |
|
||
Percentage of sales |
|
26.3 |
% |
26.8 |
% |
||
Operating income |
|
343.5 |
|
332.7 |
|
||
Operating income margin |
|
13.3 |
% |
13.2 |
% |
||
Earnings per share from continuing operations diluted |
|
1.56 |
|
1.52 |
|
||
For the year ended November 30, 2005, we reported sales of $2.6 billion, an increase of 2.6% versus 2004, including a 1.0% increase from favorable foreign exchange rates. Key initiatives that drove sales in 2005 included acquisitions, new products, improved marketing and price increases. Sales from Silvo, acquired at the end of 2004, contributed 1.5% to the sales increase. During 2005, net sales were negatively impacted by several factors. First, industrial sales were reduced by lower pricing of vanilla products and the elimination of lower-margin products in Europe. Second, consumer sales in the fourth quarter were affected by the impact of Hurricane Katrina on sales in the Gulf region of the U.S. Third, consumer sales of a limited range of higher volume spice and herb items in France continued to be adversely impacted by low priced products in alternative retail channels. We estimate that these three factors lowered sales for 2005 by approximately 2%.
Gross profit margin increased to 40.0% in 2005 from 39.9% in 2004. In 2005, we exceeded our goal of lowering costs by $25 million, achieving savings of $33 million. Improved segment mix through a higher proportion of consumer versus industrial sales and pricing actions also improved gross profit margin. Significant cost increases in certain raw materials, packaging and fuel offset much of the gross profit margin increase.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were higher in 2005 than 2004 on a dollar basis but declined as a percentage of net sales. The dollar increase was primarily due to increased distribution expenses and higher sales promotion expenses. The increase in distribution expenses was primarily due to higher fuel costs. In our consumer business, we increased sales promotion expenses in order to launch several new products and to support our brand name. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales was primarily due to lower incentive compensation associated with our 2005 results. In addition, advertising was down slightly as we suspended some of our advertising for the Zatarains brand following Hurricane Katrina.
Special charges were $11.2 million in 2005 compared to a credit of $2.5 million in 2004. The 2004 special charges included a net gain of $8.7 million recorded in 2004 for funds received from a class action lawsuit that was settled in our favor. The charges in the current year are primarily due to the implementation of the new restructuring plan, discussed later in MD&A and in note 4 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
Interest expense in 2005 increased $7.2 million. Average borrowings during the year increased slightly, however, higher interest rates on our variable rate debt during 2005 accounted for most of this increase.
Other income decreased to $0.4 million in 2005 compared to $2.1 million in 2004 due to lower interest income.
The effective tax rate was 32.7% in 2005 up from 30.3% in 2004. The increase in the effective tax rate was due to the final utilization of certain net operating loss carryforwards in 2004 which were no longer available in 2005 and the mix of earnings among the different tax jurisdictions in which we operate.
Income from unconsolidated operations increased 41% in 2005 compared to 2004. This increase is mainly attributable to higher income from our joint venture in Mexico where more effective marketing programs and promotions, new product launches, reduced expenses and lower soybean oil costs all contributed to the improved performance.
Net income was $214.9 million in 2005 compared to $214.5 million in 2004. Diluted earnings per share in 2005 were $1.56 and included an $11.2 million charge ($0.05 per share) for actions taken under our restructuring plan. In 2004 earnings per share were $1.52 and included a special credit of $2.5 million. Earnings per share rose as a result of higher sales, an increase in unconsolidated income and lower shares outstanding, offset in part by the increase in special charges, a higher effective tax rate, an increase in interest expense and a decrease in other income.
23
Consumer Business
for the year ended November 30 (millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,401.8 |
|
$ |
1,339.8 |
|
Operating income |
|
283.1 |
|
269.7 |
|
||
Operating income margin |
|
20.2 |
% |
20.1 |
% |
||
In 2005, sales from our consumer business increased 4.6% compared to 2004. Sales from Silvo, acquired in November 2004, added 2.8% to sales and favorable foreign exchange rates added 0.9%. The additional increase of 0.9% was mainly driven by pricing actions taken in 2005. In the Americas, consumer business sales increased 2.9% with 2.6% of the sales increase from price and product mix, 0.6% from favorable foreign exchange and a slight volume decrease of 0.3%. During the fourth quarter, demand for our McCormick and Zatarains consumer products in the U.S. Gulf Region was lower due to the effects of Hurricane Katrina. This had a negative impact of approximately 1% on the full year results. The remaining increase was driven by more effective marketing, new product introductions and pricing actions. In Europe, sales rose 9.9%, with Silvo adding 10.0%, favorable foreign exchange contributing 1.4%, both offset by decreases from volume, price and product mix of 1.5%. We continue to experience difficult retail conditions for a limited range of larger volume spice and herb products in France. While progress has been made in slowing the migration of sales to alternative channels, the poor economic conditions in France are complicating the recovery. In this region we have been successfully growing sales of value-added products such as dessert items, pastes and grinders with retail customers. Sales in the Asia/Pacific region decreased 3.4% due to unfavorable volume, price and product mix of 6.7% partly offset by favorable foreign exchange of 3.3%. Volumes in China were affected by our reduction in the number of distributors as we move to a higher quality network. Sales in the Asia/Pacific region are less than 5% of our consumer business.
Operating income from our consumer business increased 5.0% to $283.1 million. The operating income increase was driven by strong sales performance, cost reduction efforts and pricing actions. Operating income margin (operating income as a percentage of net sales) increased from 20.1% in 2004 to 20.2% in 2005. Cost savings on supply chain initiatives more than offset increases in special charges, fuel and the negative profit impact of challenging market conditions in Europe, particularly in France.
Special charges in the consumer business increased to $10.1 million in 2005 from $1.0 million in 2004. Special charges in the consumer business for 2005 included certain severance costs associated with the closing of our consumer manufacturing plant in Salinas, California, closing costs for a small plant in Belgium and costs associated with the reorganization of the distribution networks in the U.S. and Europe. Special charges in the consumer business for 2004 consisted of additional costs associated with the finalization of the production facilities consolidation in Canada.
Industrial Business
for the year ended November 30 (millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,190.2 |
|
$ |
1,186.4 |
|
Operating income |
|
105.3 |
|
113.6 |
|
||
Operating income margin |
|
8.8 |
% |
9.6 |
% |
||
For 2005, sales from the industrial business rose 0.3% as compared to 2004. Favorable foreign exchange added 1.0% to sales while unfavorable volume, price and product mix decreased sales 0.7%. As anticipated, lower vanilla pricing in 2005 decreased sales approximately 2% and actions to eliminate lower margin products in Europe decreased sales approximately 1%. Sales in the Americas rose 0.9% with favorable foreign exchange adding 0.9%. In this region, lower vanilla pricing reduced sales approximately 3%. The remaining sales increase of approximately 3% was due to strength in snack food seasonings, certain new product successes and improved sales in the food service distributor channel. In Europe, sales declined 4.5% as unfavorable volume, price and product mix reduced sales 5.5% offset by favorable foreign exchange which added 1.0%. Included in the 5.5% decrease from volume, price and product mix was the impact of the elimination of lower margin products which decreased sales approximately 4%. In the Asia/Pacific region, sales increased 7.2% with a 4.9% increase from higher volume, price and product mix and 2.3% from foreign exchange. The increase was driven by strong sales of snack seasonings and to quick service restaurants which continue to expand their stores.
Operating income from our industrial business decreased 7.3% to $105.3 million and operating income margin was 8.8% in 2005, down from 9.6% in 2004.The sale of high cost vanilla beans during a period of declining prices, reduced operating income approximately $15 million during 2005, offsetting the benefit of cost reduction efforts. Operating
24
income in 2004 was reduced by a $6.2 million operational accounting adjustment at an industrial plant in Scotland.
Special charges in the industrial business decreased to $0.1 million in 2005 from $3.0 million in 2004. Special charges in the industrial business for 2004 consisted of additional costs associated with the consolidation of production facilities in Canada and additional costs related to the consolidation of manufacturing facilities in the U.K.
Results of Operations 2004 compared to 2003
for the year ended November 30 (millions except per share data) |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,526.2 |
|
$ |
2,269.6 |
|
Gross profit |
|
1,007.9 |
|
898.6 |
|
||
Gross profit margin |
|
39.9 |
% |
39.6 |
% |
||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
677.7 |
|
597.6 |
|
||
Percentage of sales |
|
26.8 |
% |
26.3 |
% |
||
Operating income |
|
332.7 |
|
295.5 |
|
||
Operating income margin |
|
13.2 |
% |
13.0 |
% |
||
Earnings per share from continuing operations diluted |
|
1.52 |
|
1.40 |
|
||
For the year ended November 30, 2004, we reported net sales from continuing operations of $2.5 billion, an increase of 11.3% above 2003. Sales growth was the result of a 4.2% volume increase, 3.7% from favorable foreign exchange rates, 2.2% in the first half of the year from the acquisition of Zatarains and a 1.2% increase in pricing and product mix. The acquisition of Silvo on November 1, 2004 added $4.5 million in sales in 2004. During 2004, we achieved higher volume with new products, expanded distribution and more effective marketing.
Gross profit margin increased to 39.9% in 2004 from 39.6% in 2003. The gross profit margin increase was due to cost reductions of $24 million. Sales of more value-added products and pricing actions in our consumer business also improved gross profit margin. Higher costs of employee benefits, fuel and a competitive operating environment in Europe during 2004 partly offset the gross profit margin increase.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were higher in 2004 than 2003 on both a dollar basis and as a percentage of net sales. These increases were primarily due to increased distribution expenses, higher advertising expenses and increased employee benefit costs. The increase in distribution expenses was primarily due to higher fuel costs, as well as freight and warehousing costs associated with new product introductions, and incremental distribution costs related to the acquired Zatarains business. The increase in employee benefit costs was mainly the result of higher pension costs in 2004 compared to 2003. In our consumer business, advertising expenses increased in order to launch several new products and to support our brand name.
Special charges were a credit of $2.5 million in 2004 compared to a charge of $5.5 million in 2003. This change was primarily due to a net gain of $8.7 million recorded in 2004 for funds received from a class action lawsuit that was settled in our favor.
Pension expense was $30.0 million and $22.1 million for the years ended November 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. In connection with the valuation performed at the end of 2003, the discount rate was reduced from 7.0% to 6.0% and the expected long-term rate of return on assets was reduced from 9.0% to 8.5%. These changes along with the increased amortization of prior actuarial losses increased pension expense in 2004.
Interest expense from continuing operations increased $2.4 million. Higher average debt levels during 2004 contributed to this increase, partially offset by repayment of higher rate long-term debt.
Other income decreased to $2.1 million in 2004 compared to $13.1 million in 2003 due to two significant transactions recorded in 2003. In 2003, we benefited from $5.4 million of interest income received on the Ducros purchase price refund and a one-time gain of $5.2 million from the sale of an interest in non-strategic royalty agreements. We entered into the non-strategic royalty agreements in 1995 and since then had benefited modestly from tax credits and royalty income.
Our effective tax rate was 30.3% in 2004, down from 30.9% in 2003. The decrease in the effective tax rate was due to mix of earnings among the different taxing jurisdictions in which we operate and the settlement of tax audits for less than amounts previously accrued.
Income from unconsolidated operations decreased 11.0% in 2004 when compared to 2003. This decline was mainly attributable to lower income from our Signature Brands and Japan joint ventures. Our Signature Brands business, a cake decorating business in the U.S., was impacted by a decline in the overall U.S. cake mix category. Our retail joint venture in Japan moved their business to a
25
new distributor in 2004 with the objective of building sales in this market over time. We experienced a period of startup costs associated with the transition to this new distributor. Income from our joint venture in Mexico was equal to last year.
Income from continuing operations was $214.5 million in 2004 compared to $199.2 million in 2003. Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations increased $0.12, comprised of $0.18 from higher sales and operating margin and a $0.02 benefit from fewer shares outstanding and a lower effective tax rate, offset by a $0.05 decline in other income, a $0.02 increase in interest expense and minority interest, and a $0.01 decline in income from unconsolidated operations.
Consumer Business
for the year ended November 30 (millions) |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,339.8 |
|
$ |
1,162.3 |
|
Operating income |
|
269.7 |
|
230.9 |
|
||
Operating income margin |
|
20.1 |
% |
19.9 |
% |
||
In 2004, sales from our consumer business increased 15.3% compared to 2003. Higher volumes added 10.0% to sales, with 4.3% of the volume increase due to the impact in the first half of the year of the Zatarains business. Favorable foreign exchange added 4.3% and positive price and product mix added 1.0%. Sales rose 16.1% in the Americas, with 14.6% of the sales increase from higher volume, 0.8% from price and product mix, and 0.7% from foreign exchange. New products, more effective marketing and distribution gains drove an 8.1% volume increase, with the remaining 6.5% attributable to the Zatarains acquisition. Price increases on certain products were partially offset by the change in mix of products sold. Sales in Europe rose 14.1%, with favorable foreign exchange contributing 11.7%, the Silvo acquisition in November 2004 adding 1.3% and price and product mix adding 1.1%. Excluding the foreign exchange and Silvo sales benefits, sales in Europe remained relatively flat. New product and distribution gains were offset by more intense competitive conditions, particularly in France. The spice and seasoning category in France was affected by private label and economy products, particularly with the expansion of discount retail chains into this market. Sales in the Asia/Pacific region increased 11.2%, with favor able foreign exchange contributing 10.4% and higher volume adding 2.7%, partially offset by a 1.9% decline due to unfavorable price and product mix. Volume was affected by an initiative in China to de-emphasize lower margin products. New private label business in Australia contributed to an unfavorable price and product mix.
Operating income from our consumer business increased 16.8% to $269.7 million, despite a $14.7 million increase in advertising expense. The operating income increase was driven by strong sales performance, cost reduction efforts and pricing actions. Operating income margin (operating income as a percentage of net sales) increased from 19.9% in 2003 to 20.1% in 2004. Cost savings on supply chain initiatives more than offset increases in fuel, employee benefits, advertising costs, international reorganization costs, as well as the difficult competitive environment in Europe. Special charges in the consumer business decreased to $1.0 million in 2004 from $1.8 million in 2003. Special charges in the consumer business for 2004 consisted of additional costs associated with the finalization of the production facilities consolidation in Canada. Special charges in the consumer business for 2003 consisted of costs associated with the production facilities consolidation in Canada and the realignment of consumer sales operations in Australia.
As discussed previously, we sold the Jenks brokerage business in the U.K. on July 1, 2003 and accordingly, results of this business were classified as discontinued operations.
Industrial Business
for the year ended November 30 (millions) |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,186.4 |
|
$ |
1,107.3 |
|
Operating income |
|
113.6 |
|
108.9 |
|
||
Operating income margin |
|
9.6 |
% |
9.8 |
% |
||
For 2004, sales from our industrial business rose 7.1% as compared to 2003. Higher volumes added 2.7%, favorable foreign exchange added 3.0% and price and product mix added 1.4%. Sales in the Americas rose 5.7% due to a 4.2% volume increase that was largely driven by sales of new products such as coating systems and sales of snack food seasonings. Favorable price and product mix contributed 1.0% and foreign exchange added another 0.5%. Strength in warehouse club sales also contributed to sales growth and more than offset continued weakness in the food service distributor channel. Higher costs for certain raw materials including vanilla, cheese and soybean oil were passed through in higher pricing. In Europe, sales rose 12.3% with foreign exchange contributing 12.0% of increase. A favorable
26
price and product mix increase of 4.2% offset a 3.9% volume decline. A shift in emphasis from lower to higher margin products resulted in reduced sales of certain lower margin products. In the Asia/Pacific region, sales increased 8.8%, with 5.5% of increase from foreign exchange and 4.3% from higher volume, partially offset by a 1.0% unfavorable price and product mix. The volume increase related to higher sales to quick service restaurants and of snack food seasonings.
Operating income from our industrial business rose 4.3% to $113.6 million, despite a $6.1 million increase in research and development costs. Operating income margin was 9.6% in 2004, down from 9.8% in 2003. Increases in operating margin due to emphasis on more value-added, higher margin products and cost reduction efforts were more than offset by certain cost increases. In the fourth quarter of 2004, a $6.2 million adjustment, which arose in prior quarters, was recorded after we identified and corrected the operational accounting at an industrial plant in Scotland. Higher fuel, employee benefit costs and special charges as well as international reorganization costs also contributed to the decline. Special charges in the industrial business increased to $3.0 million in 2004 from $2.3 million in 2003. Special charges in the industrial business for 2004 consisted of additional costs associated with the consolidation of production facilities in Canada and additional costs related to the consolidation of manufacturing facilities in the U.K. Special charges in the industrial business for 2003 consisted of costs associated with the consolidation of production facilities in Canada and severance and other costs related to the consolidation of industrial manufacturing in the U.K.
Financial Condition
We generate strong cash flow from operations which enables us to fund operating projects and investments that are designed to meet our growth objectives, make substantial share repurchases, increase our dividend and fund capital projects and restructuring costs.
In the consolidated statement of cash flows, the changes in operating assets and liabilities are presented excluding the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, as these do not reflect actual cash flows. Accordingly, the amounts in the consolidated statement of cash flows do not agree with changes in the operating assets and liabilities that are presented in the consolidated balance sheet. In addition, the net cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities are presented excluding the effects of discontinued operations.
In the consolidated statement of cash flows, net cash provided by continuing operating activities was $339.2 million in 2005 compared to $349.5 million in 2004 and $201.8 million in 2003. When 2005 is compared to 2004, the change in operating cash flow was primarily the result of a reduction in receivables in 2005 as compared to an increase in 2004 and higher dividends received from unconsolidated affiliates in 2005 compared to 2004. These favorable cash flows were offset by an increase in inventory in 2005 as compared to 2004 when inventory decreased and a decrease in other liabilities in 2005 compared to an increase in 2004. The decrease in accounts receivable was primarily due to a large amount of collections made near year end in France and the U.K. Due to the success of our joint venture in Mexico and our Signature Brands joint venture, we received significantly more dividend payments in 2005 compared to 2004. In 2005, inventory increased slightly. However, in 2004 inventory decreased $28 million in anticipation of lower cost vanilla beans in 2005. The decrease in other liabilities in 2005 compared to an increase in 2004 was due to the timing of liability payments.
Net cash used in continuing investing activities was $77.0 million in 2005 versus $141.5 million in 2004 and $100.7 million in 2003. Net capital expenditures (capital expenditures less proceeds from the sale of fixed assets) were $71.5 million in 2005, $67.0 million in 2004 and $81.7 million in 2003. Net capital expenditures are generally in line with the rate of depreciation except in 2003, when B2K spending was higher than in 2004 and 2005. Acquisition of business cash flow was for a small business in France in 2005, the Silvo business in 2004 and the Zatarains and Uniqsauces businesses in 2003. Net capital expenditures are expected to be higher in 2006 due to spending on the 2005 restructuring plan.
Net cash used in continuing financing activities was $294.4 million in 2005, $178.4 million in 2004 and $137.7 million in 2003. Our total borrowings decreased $67.6 million in 2005, compared to an increase of $19.3 million in 2004 and an increase of $16.4 million in 2003. Part of the decrease in 2005 is due to a corresponding decrease in cash of approximately $40 million. In the fourth quarter of 2005, we paid off $30 million of medium-term notes at maturity.
27
In the second quarter of 2004, we issued a total of $50 million in medium-term notes under our existing $375 million shelf registration. The $50 million of medium-term notes mature on April 15, 2009 and pay interest semi-annually at a rate of 3.35%. The proceeds of this issuance were used to pay down short-term debt. In 2005, we purchased 5.4 million shares of common stock for $185.6 million under our share repurchase programs versus 5.1 million shares of common stock for $173.8 million in 2004 and 4.5 million shares of common stock for $119.5 million in 2003. In the fourth quarter of 2005, we completed our $300 million share repurchase authorization and began to buy against our $400 million authorization approved by the Board of Directors in June 2005. As of November 30, 2005, $362 million remained under the $400 million share repurchase program. In the absence of significant acquisition activity, we expect to complete all available purchases under this authorization by the end of 2007. The common stock issued in 2005, 2004 and 2003 relates to our stock compensation plans.
Dividend payments increased to $86.2 million in 2005, up 12.1% compared to $76.9 million in 2004 and up 34.5% compared to $64.1 million in 2003. Dividends paid in 2005 totaled $0.64 per share, up from $0.56 per share in 2004 and $0.46 per share in 2003. In November 2005, the Board of Directors approved a 12.5% increase in the quarterly dividend from $0.16 to $0.18 per share. During the last five years, dividends per share have risen at a compounded annual rate of 12.5%.
Our pension plans had a shortfall of plan assets over accumulated benefit obligations at their 2005 and 2004 measurement dates of $164.6 million and $162.8 million, respectively. These shortfalls were due to the continued low interest rate environment and lower than assumed asset returns in prior years. In 2005 the shortfall increased, leading to a $0.8 million increase in minimum pension liability. This compares to a decrease in minimum pension liability of $7.2 million in 2004. Cash payments to pension plans, including unfunded plans, were $32.8 million in 2005, $30.6 million in 2004 and $27.2 million in 2003. We plan to make 2006 pension plan contributions similar to those made in 2005. Future increases or decreases in pension liabilities and required cash contributions are highly dependent on changes in interest rates and the actual return on plan assets. We base our investment of plan assets, in part, on the duration of each plans liabilities. Across all plans, 69% of assets are invested in equities and 31% in fixed income investments.
Our ratio of debt-to-total-capital (total capital includes debt, minority interest and shareholders equity) was 40.7% as of November 30, 2005, a decrease from 40.9% at November 30, 2004 and below our target range of 45-55%. The decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in our total debt of $68.2 million. During the year, the level of our short-term debt varies. It is usually lower, however, at the end of the year. The average short-term borrowings outstanding for the year ended November 30, 2005 and 2004 were $299.3 million and $295.2 million, respectively.
The reported values of our assets and liabilities held in our non-U.S. subsidiaries and affiliates have been significantly affected by fluctuations in foreign exchange rates between periods. During the year ended November 30, 2005, the exchange rates for the Euro and British pound sterling were substantially lower versus the U.S. dollar than in 2004. Exchange rate fluctuations resulted in a decrease in accounts receivable of $22 million, inventory of $11 million, goodwill of $62 million and other comprehensive income of approximately $97 million since November 30, 2004.
In January 2005, we filed a new shelf registration statement with the Securities Exchange Commission to issue up to $500 million of medium-term notes in the U.S. In 2005, we entered into forward starting interest rate swaps to manage the interest rate risk associated with the anticipated issuance of $100 million fixed rate medium-term notes expected to be issued in late 2005 under the new shelf registration statement. Our intention was to cash settle these swaps upon issuance of the medium-term notes thereby effectively locking in the fixed interest rate in effect at the time the swaps were initiated. We have designated these outstanding interest rate swap contracts as hedges of the future cash interest payments. Subsequent to our 2005 fiscal year end, we issued $200 million of 5.20% medium-term notes which are due in 2015. The net proceeds will be used to repay long-term debt maturing in 2006. At November 30, 2005, the loss on these swaps was deferred in other comprehensive income and will be amortized over the ten-year life of the medium-term notes as a component of interest expense. Subsequent to year-end these swaps were settled for a loss of $0.2 million. Hedge ineffectiveness associated with these hedges was not material at November 30, 2005.
We have available credit facilities with domestic and foreign banks for various purposes. The amount of unused credit facilities at November 30, 2005 was $512.0 million.
28
Management believes that internally generated funds and the existing sources of liquidity under our credit facilities are sufficient to meet current liquidity needs and longer-term financing requirements. If an acquisition would require funds in excess of existing sources of liquidity, funding from additional credit facilities or equity issuances would be sought.
Acquisitions
On November 1, 2004, we purchased C.M. van Sillevoldt B.V. (Silvo), the market leader in the Dutch spices and herbs consumer market, for 58 million in cash (equivalent to $74.5 million) funded with cash from operations and current credit facilities. Silvo sells spices, herbs and seasonings under the Silvo brand in the Netherlands and the India brand as well as private label store brands in Belgium. The brand has a strong heritage, high recognition among consumers and is the leading brand of herbs and spices in the Netherlands. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method, and the results of operations have been included in our consolidated results from the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the tangible net assets purchased of $59.4 million was initially classified as goodwill in the consumer segment in 2004. In the fourth quarter of 2005, we completed the purchase price allocation for the Silvo acquisition. A detailed analysis of the intangible assets resulted in our conclusion that the excess purchase price should be accounted for as the value of the acquired brand and good will. No other intangible assets were identified as a result of this analysis. We concluded that a large portion of the value of the excess purchase price resides in the Dutch consumers cultural connections with the Silvo brand name. Based on an analysis of the premium value that is derived from consumer loyalty and trust in the Silvo brands quality, we assigned $35.0 million of the excess purchase price to this unamortizable brand. Given Silvos strong brand name recognition in the marketplace, we intend to use and support the brand name indefinitely. The remaining $24.4 million of excess purchase price remained as good will in the consumer segment.
In the second quarter of 2004, we completed the purchase price allocation for the Zatarains acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets purchased was $176.2 million, which includes $3.4 million of fees directly related to the acquisition. An analysis of the various types of intangible assets resulted in a determination that the excess purchase price should be classified as the value of the acquired brand name and goodwill. No other intangible assets were identified as a result of this analysis. We have concluded that a substantial portion of the value of the excess purchase price resides in consumer trust and recognition of the Zatarains brand name as authentic New Orleans-style cuisine. As a result, we have assigned $106.4 million of the excess purchase price to this unamortizable brand based on an analysis of the premium value that is derived from consumer loyalty and trust in the brands quality. Zatarains brand name has been used since 1889, and we intend to use and support the brand name indefinitely. The remaining $69.8 million of excess purchase price remained as goodwill in the consumer segment.
B2K
Late in 1999, we initiated the B2K program as a global program of business process improvement. B2K is designed to re-engineer transactional processes, strengthen the product development process, extend collaborative processes with trading partners, optimize the supply chain and generally enhance our capabilities to increase sales and profit. An integral part of B2K is the design and implementation of an enterprise-wide state-of-the-art technology and information system platform.
The implementation of B2K in our U.S. operations was completed in 2004. We began to rollout B2K to our international operations in 2005 with implementation in Europe to be completed early in 2006. Remaining implementation efforts for other international locations are targeted for completion by the end of 2007.
To date, $135 million of costs associated with B2K have been capitalized and $39 million has been expensed. Additional capital spending of approximately $11 million and an additional expense of approximately $8 million is anticipated under this program. Capital costs under the B2K program are for computer hardware, software and software development and are reflected in property, plant and equipment in the consolidated balance sheet. Costs expensed under the B2K program include costs of business re-engineering, data conversion and training, and are reflected in both cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statement of income.
29
Managements Discussion and Analysis
Special Charges
As the next step in our progress with margin improvement, we announced in September 2005 significant actions to improve the effectiveness of our supply chain and reduce costs. At that time, we also stated that a comprehensive review of our global industrial business was underway to identify improvements. These actions were included in a comprehensive restructuring plan which the Board approved in November 2005. As part of this plan, over the next three years, we will consolidate our global manufacturing, rationalize our distribution facilities, improve our go-to-market strategy and eliminate administrative redundancies. In addition, for the industrial business, we will reallocate resources to key customers and take pricing actions on lower volume products to meet new margin targets. A new business-wide forecasting process is being installed and the use of technology will be accelerated to monitor and manage the business. Through 2008, these actions are intended to reduce the number of industrial business customers and products in the U.S. by approximately 25%. Sales related to these customers and products represent approximately 2- 5% of industrial business sales in the U.S. As these sales have minimal profit, this reduction will lead to higher margins. These reductions will also facilitate the consolidation of certain manufacturing.
We expect that the restructuring plan will reduce complexity and increase the organizational focus on growth opportunities in both the consumer and industrial businesses. In addition, we are projecting that $50 million of annual cost savings will be achieved by 2008. In 2006, we expect to realize at least $10 million of savings and estimate that another $30 million will be realized in 2007. We expect to drive margin improvement and increase earnings per share, as well as invest a portion of these savings in sales growth drivers such as brand advertising.
Total pre-tax charges under this restructuring plan are estimated to be $130-$150 million with approximately 75% in the consumer segment and 25% in the industrial segment. Of these charges, approximately 60% will consist of severance and other personnel costs, 15% will consist of asset write-offs and 25% will consist of other exit costs. In the fourth quarter of 2005, $10.7 million ($7.2 million after-tax) of charges were recorded of which $10.1 million related to our consumer business. These charges include certain severance costs associated with the closing of our manufacturing plant in Salinas, California, closing costs for a small plant in Belgium and costs associated with the reorganization of the sales and distribution networks in the U.S. and Europe. Following the $10.7 million charge recorded in 2005, we expect to record up to $85 million during the 2006 fiscal year. The remaining portion will occur fairly evenly between 2007 and 2008. For the total plan, the cash related portion of the charges will be approximately $85 - $100 million, of which approximately $60 million will be spent in 2006. We intend to fund this spending through internally generated funds. Much of the cash costs will be related to employee severance. The actions being taken are expected to reduce our global workforce by 800 -1,000 over the three year period. A significant number of the employees who will be impacted were notified by January 2006.
In 2001, we adopted a plan to streamline our operations which was completed in 2005. This plan included the consolidation of several distribution and manufacturing locations, the reduction of 392 administrative and manufacturing positions, and the reorganization of several joint ventures. The cost of the total plan was $30.9 million ($21.1 million after tax). Total cash expenditures in connection with these costs approximated $16.2 million, which was funded through internally generated funds. The remaining $14.7 million of costs associated with the plan consisted of write-offs of assets. Annualized cash savings from the plan were approx imately $8.0 million ($5.3 million after-tax). Savings under the plan are being used for spending on initiatives such as brand support and supply chain management. These savings are included within the cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of income.
During the year ended November 30, 2005, we recorded special charges of $0.5 million ($0.3 million after-tax). The costs recorded in 2005 primarily are severance costs.
During the year ended November 30, 2004, we recorded special charges of $6.2 million ($4.3 million after-tax). The costs recorded in 2004 primarily include costs related to the consolidation of industrial manufacturing facilities in the U.K. and Canada, the reorganization of a consumer joint venture and additional severance costs. During 2004, total cash expenditures in connection with the 2001 restructuring plan were $4.7 million. Also included in special charges/(credits) is a net gain of $8.7 million ($5.5 million after-tax) related to funds received from a class action lawsuit that was settled in our favor in the second quarter of 2004. This matter dated back to 1999 when a number of
30
class action lawsuits were filed against manufacturers and sellers of various flavor enhancers for their violation of antitrust laws. We, as a purchaser of such products, participated as a member of the plaintiff class. In the second quarter of 2004, we received $11.1 million as a settlement of this claim and as a result of the settlement, were required to settle claims against us for a portion of this gross amount. The net gain recorded was $8.7 million. This amount was recorded as a special credit and was not allocated to the business segments.
During the year ended November 30, 2003, we recorded special charges related to continuing operations of $5.5 million ($3.6 million after-tax). The costs recorded in 2003 included additional costs associated with the consolidation of production facilities in Canada, net of a gain on the sale of a manufacturing facility, severance and other costs related to the consolidation of industrial manufacturing in the U.K. and the realignment of our consumer sales operations in Australia. During 2003, total cash expenditures in connection with the plan were $4.7 million. During 2002 and 2001, we recorded total charges of $18.7 million ($12.9 million after-tax) from continuing operations associated with the 2001 restructuring plan.
Discontinued Operations
On August 12, 2003, we completed the sale of substantially all the operating assets of our packaging segment (Packaging). Packaging manufactured certain products used for packaging our spices and seasonings as well as packaging products used by manufacturers in the vitamin, drug and personal care industries. Under the terms of the sale agreement, Packaging was sold for $132.5 million in cash. The proceeds were used to pay off a substantial portion of the commercial paper borrowing related to the Zatarains acquisition in 2003. We recorded a net gain on the sale of Packaging of $11.6 million (net of income taxes of $7.9 million) in the third quarter of 2003. Included in this gain was a net pension and postretirement curtailment gain of $3.3 million and the write-off of goodwill of $0.7 million. We also entered into a multi-year, market priced agreement with the acquirer to purchase certain packaging products.
On July 1, 2003 we sold the assets of Jenks Sales Brokers (Jenks), a division of our wholly-owned U.K. subsidiary, to Jenks senior management for $5.8 million in cash. Jenks provided sales and distribution services for other consumer product companies. We recorded a net loss on the sale of Jenks of $2.6 million (net of an income tax benefit of $0.6 million) in the third quarter of 2003. Included in this loss is a write-off of goodwill of $0.4 million.
The operating results of Packaging and Jenks were classified as Income from discontinued operations, net in the consolidated statement of income. Jenks was previously reported as part of our consumer segment, and Packaging was previously reported as a separate segment. Certain fixed overhead charges previously allocated to Packaging were reallocated to the other business segments. The cash flows of Packaging and Jenks were reported as Net cash (used in)/provided by discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
Market Risk Sensitivity
We utilize derivative financial instruments to enhance our ability to manage risk, including foreign exchange and interest rate exposures, which exist as part of our ongoing business operations. We do not enter into contracts for trading purposes, nor are we a party to any leveraged derivative instrument. The use of derivative financial instruments is monitored through regular communication with senior management and the utilization of written guidelines. The information presented below should be read in conjunction with notes 7 and 8 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
Foreign Exchange Risk We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency in the following main areas: cash flows related to raw material purchases; the translation of foreign currency earnings to U.S. dollars; the value of foreign currency investments in subsidiaries and unconsolidated affiliates and cash flows related to repatriation of these investments. Primary exposures include the U.S. dollar versus functional currencies of our major markets (Euro, British pound sterling, Australian dollar, Canadian dollar, Mexican peso, Japanese yen and Chinese renminbi). We enter into foreign currency exchange contracts to facilitate managing foreign currency risk.
The following table summarizes the foreign currency exchange contracts held at November 30, 2005. All contracts are valued in U.S. dollars using year-end 2005 exchange rates and have been designated as hedges of foreign currency transactional exposures, firm commitments or anticipated transactions, all with a maturity period of less than one year.
31
Managements Discussion and Analysis
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts at November 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Currency |
|
Notional |
|
contractual |
|
Fair |
|
|||
Currency sold |
|
received |
|
value |
|
exchange rate |
|
value |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
(millions) |
|
(USD/fc) |
|
(millions) |
|
|||
Euro |
|
USD |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar |
|
USD |
|
21.1 |
|
.84 |
|
$ |
(.6 |
) |
||
We have a number of smaller contracts with an aggregate notional value of $1.0 million to purchase or sell various other currencies, such as the Australian dollar, Japanese yen and the Singapore dollar as of November 30, 2005. The aggregate fair value of these contracts was zero at November 30, 2005.
At November 30, 2004, we had foreign currency exchange contracts for the Euro, British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, Australian dollar, Japanese yen and South African rand with a notional value of $51.1 million, all of which matured in 2005. The fair value of these contracts was $(3.9) million at November 30, 2004.
Contracts with durations which are less than 5 days and used for short-term cash flow funding are not included in the notes or table above.
During 2005, the foreign currency translation component in other comprehensive income was principally related to the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on our net investments in France, the U.K., Canada and Australia. We did not hedge our net investments in subsidiaries and unconsolidated affiliates.
Interest Rate Risk Our policy is to manage interest rate risk by entering into both fixed and variable rate debt arrangements. We also use interest rate swaps to minimize worldwide financing costs and to achieve a desired mix of fixed and variable rate debt. The table that follows provides principal cash flows and related interest rates, excluding the effect of interest rate swaps, by fiscal year of maturity at November 30, 2005 and 2004. For foreign currency-denominated debt, the information is presented in U.S. dollar equivalents. Variable interest rates are based on the weighted-average rates of the portfolio at the end of the year presented.
Year of Maturity at November 30, 2005
(millions) |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Fair value |
|
|||||||
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
.6 |
|
$ |
.4 |
|
$ |
150.1 |
|
$ |
48.1 |
|
$ |
251.2 |
|
$ |
450.4 |
|
$ |
474.3 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
3.16 |
% |
1.70 |
% |
7.70 |
% |
3.33 |
% |
6.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Variable rate |
|
$ |
105.5 |
|
$ |
.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
$ |
119.6 |
|
$ |
119.6 |
|
||
Average interest rate |
|
4.01 |
% |
6.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
4.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Year of Maturity at November 30, 2004
(millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Fair value |
|
|||||||
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
32.5 |
|
$ |
196.1 |
|
$ |
.3 |
|
$ |
149.9 |
|
$ |
104.4 |
|
$ |
483.2 |
|
$ |
523.5 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
5.95 |
% |
7.33 |
% |
|
|
7.69 |
% |
4.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Variable rate |
|
$ |
140.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
$ |
155.0 |
|
$ |
155.0 |
|
|||
Average interest rate |
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Note: The table above displays the debt by the terms of the original debt instrument without consideration of interest rate swaps. These swaps have the following effects. The variable interest rate on $75 million of commercial paper is hedged by interest rate swaps through 2011. Net interest payments on the $75 million will be fixed at 6.35% during this period. Interest rate swaps, settled upon the issuance of the medium-term notes maturing in 2006 and 2008, effectively fixed the interest rate on $294 million of the notes at a weighted-average fixed rate of 7.62%. The fixed interest rate on $100 million of the 6.4% medium-term notes due in 2006 is effectively converted to a variable rate by interest rate swaps through 2006. Net interest payments on these notes are based on LIBOR plus 3.595% during this period. The fixed interest rate on $50 million of 3.35% medium-term notes due in 2009 is effectively converted to a variable rate by interest rate swaps through 2009. Net interest payments are based on LIBOR minus 0.21% during this period. In December 2005, we issued $200 million of 5.20% medium-term notes due in 2015. Net interest payments are fixed at 5.20% during this period. The net proceeds will be used to pay down long-term debt maturing in 2006. As a result, the current portion of medium-term notes maturing in 2006 were reclassified from current to long-term in the table above to reflect the 2015 maturity date of the new issuance.
32
Commodity Risk We purchase certain raw materials which are subject to price volatility caused by weather, market conditions, growing and harvesting conditions, governmental actions and other unpredictable factors. While future movements of raw material costs are uncertain, we respond to this volatility in a number of ways, including strategic raw material purchases, purchases of raw material for future delivery and customer price adjustments. Generally, we do not use derivatives to manage the volatility related to this risk.
Credit Risk The customers of our consumer business are predominantly food retailers and food wholesalers. Consolidations in these industries have created larger customers, some of which are highly leveraged. In addition, competition has increased with the growth in alternative channels including mass merchandisers, dollar stores, warehouse clubs and discount chains. This has caused some customers to be less profitable. This has increased our exposure to credit risk. Several customers over the past two years have filed for bankruptcy protection; however, these bankruptcies have not had a material effect on our results. We believe that the risks have been adequately provided for in our bad debt allowance.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following table reflects a summary of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of November 30, 2005:
Contractual Cash Obligations Due by Year
|
|
|
|
Less |
|
|
|
|
|
More |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
than 1 |
|
1-3 |
|
3-5 |
|
than 5 |
|
|||||
(millions) |
|
Total |
|
year |
|
years |
|
years |
|
years |
|
|||||
Short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
105.4 |
|
$ |
105.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Long-term debt (a) |
|
464.6 |
|
.7 |
|
$ |
150.6 |
|
$ |
62.4 |
|
$ |
250.9 |
|
||
Operating leases |
|
60.8 |
|
15.1 |
|
22.9 |
|
15.2 |
|
7.6 |
|
|||||
Interest payments |
|
237.8 |
|
32.3 |
|
51.7 |
|
33.0 |
|
120.8 |
|
|||||
Raw material purchase obligations (b) |
|
104.3 |
|
104.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other purchase obligations (c) |
|
7.5 |
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
980.4 |
|
$ |
265.3 |
|
$ |
225.2 |
|
$ |
110.6 |
|
$ |
379.3 |
|
(a) $195.9 million of long-term debt due in 2006 was classified in the More than 5 years column based on our ability and intent to refinance.
(b) Raw material purchase obligations outstanding as of year-end may not be indicative of outstanding obligations throughout the year due to our response to varying raw material cycles.
(c) Other purchase obligations primarily consist of advertising media commitments.
Note: In 2006, our pension and postretirement funding is expected to be approximately $42 million. Pension and postretirement funding can vary significantly each year due to changes in legislation and our significant assumptions. As a result, we have not presented pension and postretirement funding in the table above.
Commercial Commitments Expiration by Year
|
|
|
|
Less |
|
|
|
|
|
More |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
than 1 |
|
1-3 |
|
3-5 |
|
than 5 |
|
||||
(millions) |
|
Total |
|
year |
|
years |
|
years |
|
years |
|
||||
Guarantees |
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby and trade letters of credit |
|
12.2 |
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Lines of credit |
|
512.0 |
|
112.0 |
|
|
|
$ |
400.0 |
|
|
|
|||
Total commercial commitments |
|
$ |
532.9 |
|
$ |
131.6 |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
$ |
400.0 |
|
|
|
33
Managements Discussion and Analysis
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We had no off -balance sheet arrangements as of November 30, 2005 and 2004.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations. The Interpretation clarifies the accounting for a conditional asset retirement obligation as identified in SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. Interpretation No. 47 is effective for our 2006 fiscal year. We believe there will be no material effect upon adoption of this Interpretation.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and superseding APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 123R requires us to expense grants made under our stock compensation plans. That cost will be recognized over the vesting period of the plans. Pro forma compensation expense related to stock options subject to accelerated vesting upon retirement is currently recognized over the entire period of actual employment (up to the date of actual retirement). Upon adoption of SFAS No. 123R, compensation expense related to accelerated vesting will be recognized up to the date on which the employee becomes eligible to retire, regardless of the date on which the employee actually retires. If there are no changes made to our stock option plan, we believe this change will have a material effect upon adoption of this statement. SFAS No. 123R allows for adoption using either the modified prospective or modified retrospective methods. We anticipate using the modified prospective method when we adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2006. The FASB has recently issued interpretations of certain aspects of SFAS 123R and is still considering additional interpretations. The result of these interpretations could have a material effect on our adoption of this standard. We will review interpretations as issued, and accordingly, make changes prior to adoption.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, which is effective for our 2006 fiscal year. We anticipate no significant effect upon adoption of this statement.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. We adopted Interpretation No. 46 as it relates to special purpose entities in the fourth quarter of 2003. As a result of this adoption we consolidated the lessor of a leased distribution center and recorded a cumulative effect of an accounting change of $2.1 million (net of income tax benefit of $1.2 million).
Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
In preparing the financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), we are required to make estimates and assumptions that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenue and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information disclosed by us, including information about contingencies, risk and financial condition. We believe, given current facts and circumstances, our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, adhere to GAAP and are consistently applied. Inherent in the nature of an estimate or assumption is the fact that actual results may differ from estimates and estimates may vary as new facts and circumstances arise. In preparing the financial statements, we make routine estimates and judgments in determining the net realizable value of accounts receivable, inventory, fixed assets and prepaid allowances. We believe our most critical accounting estimates and assumptions are in the following areas:
Customer Contracts
In several of our major markets, the consumer business sells our products by entering into annual or multi-year contracts with our customers. These contracts include provisions for items such as sales discounts, marketing allowances and performance incentives. The discounts, allowances and incentives are expensed based on certain estimated criteria such as sales volume of indirect customers, customers reaching anticipated volume thresholds and marketing spending. We routinely review these criteria and make adjustments as facts and circumstances change.
Goodwill and Intangible Asset Valuation
We review the carrying value of goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets annually utilizing discounted cash flow models. Changes in estimates of future cash flows caused by items such as unforeseen events or changes in market conditions could negatively affect the fair value of these assets and result in an impairment charge. We cannot predict the occurrence of events that might adversely affect the reported value of goodwill and brand name assets that
34
were $663.9 million and $141.4 million, respectively, at November 30, 2005. The current fair values of our reporting units are significantly in excess of carrying values, and accordingly management believes that only significant changes in the cash flow assumptions would result in an impairment of goodwill. We intend to continue to support our brand names and dont anticipate any impairments.
Income Taxes
We estimate income taxes and file tax returns in each of the taxing jurisdictions in which we operate. At the end of each year, taxes are estimated. Tax returns are generally filed in the third or fourth quarter of the subsequent year. A reconciliation of the estimate to the final tax return is done at that time which will result in changes to the original estimate. We are subject to tax audits in each of the jurisdictions, which could result in changes to the taxes paid. The amount of these changes could vary by jurisdiction and are recorded when known. Management has recorded valuation allowances to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In doing so, management has considered future taxable income and on-going tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance.
Pension and Postretirement Benefits
Pension and other postretirement plans costs require the use of assumptions for discount rates, investment returns, projected salary increases, mortality rates and health care cost trend rates. The actuarial assumptions used in our pension and postretirement benefit reporting are reviewed annually and compared with external benchmarks to ensure that they appropriately account for our future pension and postretirement benefit obligations. While we believe that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences between assumed and actual experience may affect our operating results. A 1% change in the actuarial assumption for the discount rate would impact pension and postretirement benefit expense by approximately $12 million. A 1% change in the expected return on plan assets would impact pension expense by approximately $4 million. In addition, see the preceding sections of MD&A and notes 9 and 10 of notes to consolidated financial statements for a discussion of these assumptions and the effects on the financial statements.
Stock-Based Compensation
We estimate the fair value of our stock-based compensation using fair value pricing models which require the use of significant assumptions for expected volatility of stock, dividend yield, life of options and risk-free interest rate. In the first quarter of 2005, we changed the valuation model used for estimating the fair value of options granted from a Black-Scholes option pricing model to a lattice option pricing model. We continue to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of our ESPP. The impact is disclosed in note 1 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
Forward-Looking Information
Certain information contained in this report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of section 21(E) of the Securities Exchange Act. We intend the forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements in this section. All statements regarding our expected financial plans, future capital requirements, forecasted, demographic and economic trends relating to our industry, ability to complete internal restructuring programs and to realize anticipated cost savings from such programs, ability to complete acquisitions, to realize anticipated cost savings and other benefits from acquisitions, to recover acquisition-related costs and similar matters are forward-looking statements. In some cases, these statements can be identified by our use of forward-looking words such as may, will, should, anticipate, continue, estimate, expect, plan, believe, predict, potential or intend. The forward-looking information is based on various factors and is derived using numerous assumptions. However, these statements are only predictions based on current facts and circumstances and reasonable assumptions about future events. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results to be materially different from our expectations include actions of competitors, customer relationships, our ability to realize expected cost savings and margin improvements, market acceptance of new products, actual amounts and timing of special charge items, removal and disposal costs, final negotiations of third-party contracts, the impact of stock market conditions on our share repurchase program, fluctuations in the cost and availability of supply chain resources and global economic conditions, including interest and currency rate fluctuations, and inflation rates. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
35
Report of Management
We are responsible for the preparation and integrity of the consolidated financial statements appearing in our Annual Report. The consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles and include amounts based on managements estimates and judgments. All other financial information in this report has been presented on a basis consistent with the information included in the financial statements.
We are also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting. We maintain a system of internal controls that is designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the fair and reliable preparation and presentation of the consolidated financial statements, as well as to safeguard assets from unauthorized use or disposition.
Our control environment is the foundation for our system of internal controls over financial reporting and is embodied in our Business Ethics Policy. It sets the tone of our organization and includes factors such as integrity and ethical values. Our internal controls over financial reporting are supported by formal policies and procedures which are reviewed, modified and improved as changes occur in business conditions and operations.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed solely of outside directors, meets periodically with members of management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors to review and discuss internal controls over financial reporting and accounting and financial reporting matters. The independent auditors and internal auditors report to the Audit Committee and accordingly have full and free access to the Audit Committee at any time.
We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Although there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal controls over financial reporting, based on our evaluation, we have concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting were effective as of November 30, 2005.
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on managements assessment of internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.
Robert J. Lawless Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
Francis A. Contino Executive Vice President, Strategic Planning & Chief Financial Officer
Kenneth A. Kelly, Jr. Vice President & Controller, Chief Accounting Officer
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of McCormick & Company, Incorporated
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Report of Management, that McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2005, based on the criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to
36
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2005, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries as of November 30, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended November 30, 2005, and our report dated January 24, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Baltimore, Maryland
January 24, 2006
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Financial Statements
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of McCormick & Company, Incorporated
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries as of November 30, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended November 30, 2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries at November 30, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended November 30, 2005, in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in note 1 of the notes to consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for a variable interest entity upon adoption of certain provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46) on September 1, 2003.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated January 24, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Baltimore, Maryland
January 24, 2006
37
Consolidated Statement of Income
for the year ended November 30 (millions except per share data) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,592.0 |
|
$ |
2,526.2 |
|
$ |
2,269.6 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
1,555.4 |
|
1,518.3 |
|
1,371.0 |
|
|||
Gross profit |
|
1,036.6 |
|
1,007.9 |
|
898.6 |
|
|||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
681.9 |
|
677.7 |
|
597.6 |
|
|||
Special charges (credits) |
|
11.2 |
|
(2.5 |
) |
5.5 |
|
|||
Operating income |
|
343.5 |
|
332.7 |
|
295.5 |
|
|||
Interest expense |
|
48.2 |
|
41.0 |
|
38.6 |
|
|||
Other income, net |
|
0.4 |
|
2.1 |
|
13.1 |
|
|||
Income from consolidated operations before income taxes |
|
295.7 |
|
293.8 |
|
270.0 |
|
|||
Income taxes |
|
96.7 |
|
89.0 |
|
83.4 |
|
|||
Net income from consolidated operations |
|
199.0 |
|
204.8 |
|
186.6 |
|
|||
Income from unconsolidated operations |
|
20.6 |
|
14.6 |
|
16.4 |
|
|||
Minority interest |
|
4.7 |
|
4.9 |
|
3.8 |
|
|||
Net income from continuing operations |
|
214.9 |
|
214.5 |
|
199.2 |
|
|||
Discontinued operations, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|||
Gain on sale |
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|||
Net income before cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
214.9 |
|
214.5 |
|
212.9 |
|
|||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|||
Net income |
|
$ |
214.9 |
|
$ |
214.5 |
|
$ |
210.8 |
|
Earnings per share basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
$ |
1.57 |
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
Net income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
.03 |
|
|||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
.06 |
|
|||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
|
|
|
(.02 |
) |
|||
Net income |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
$ |
1.57 |
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
Earnings per share diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
Net income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
.03 |
|
|||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
.06 |
|
|||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
|
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|||
Net income |
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, pages 42- 55.
38
Consolidated Balance Sheet
at November 30 (millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
$ |
70.3 |
|
Receivables, less allowances of $5.4 for 2005 and $6.7 for 2004 |
|
369.3 |
|
407.6 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
344.0 |
|
350.2 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
56.6 |
|
35.9 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
800.2 |
|
864.0 |
|
||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
469.7 |
|
486.6 |
|
||
Goodwill, net |
|
663.9 |
|
712.9 |
|
||
Intangible assets, net |
|
158.3 |
|
115.2 |
|
||
Prepaid allowances |
|
42.3 |
|
56.8 |
|
||
Investments and other assets |
|
138.3 |
|
134.1 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,272.7 |
|
$ |
2,369.6 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
105.4 |
|
$ |
140.2 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
.7 |
|
33.0 |
|
||
Trade accounts payable |
|
198.2 |
|
195.1 |
|
||
Other accrued liabilities |
|
394.7 |
|
404.4 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
699.0 |
|
772.7 |
|
||
Long-term debt |
|
463.9 |
|
465.0 |
|
||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
280.7 |
|
211.2 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
1,443.6 |
|
1,448.9 |
|
||
Minority interest |
|
29.2 |
|
31.0 |
|
||
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, no par value; authorized 320.0 shares; issued and outstanding: 2005 14.5 shares, 2004 14.6 shares |
|
152.6 |
|
130.0 |
|
||
Common stock non-voting, no par value; authorized 320.0 shares; issued and outstanding: 2005 118.1 shares, 2004 120.9 shares |
|
234.3 |
|
206.0 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
385.4 |
|
434.1 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
27.6 |
|
119.6 |
|
||
Total shareholders equity |
|
799.9 |
|
889.7 |
|
||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,272.7 |
|
$ |
2,369.6 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, pages 42- 55.
39
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
for the year ended November 30 (millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income |
|
$ |
214.9 |
|
$ |
214.5 |
|
$ |
210.8 |
|
Net income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|||
Net income from continuing operations |
|
214.9 |
|
214.5 |
|
199.2 |
|
|||
Adjustments to reconcile net income from continuing operations to net cash provided by continuing operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
74.6 |
|
72.0 |
|
65.3 |
|
|||
Deferred income taxes |
|
5.9 |
|
(1.7 |
) |
15.6 |
|
|||
Income from unconsolidated operations |
|
(20.6 |
) |
(14.6 |
) |
(16.4 |
) |
|||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Receivables |
|
16.8 |
|
(35.5 |
) |
9.8 |
|
|||
Inventories |
|
(3.0 |
) |
33.8 |
|
(50.0 |
) |
|||
Prepaid allowances |
|
14.5 |
|
27.2 |
|
13.5 |
|
|||
Trade accounts payable |
|
9.4 |
|
5.7 |
|
(17.1 |
) |
|||
Other assets and liabilities |
|
(2.5 |
) |
38.5 |
|
(38.7 |
) |
|||
Dividends received from unconsolidated affiliates |
|
29.2 |
|
9.6 |
|
20.6 |
|
|||
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities |
|
339.2 |
|
349.5 |
|
201.8 |
|
|||
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Acquisitions of businesses |
|
(5.5 |
) |
(74.5 |
) |
(202.9 |
) |
|||
Purchase price adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|||
Capital expenditures |
|
(73.8 |
) |
(69.8 |
) |
(91.6 |
) |
|||
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
133.9 |
|
|||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
2.3 |
|
2.8 |
|
9.9 |
|
|||
Net cash used in continuing investing activities |
|
(77.0 |
) |
(141.5 |
) |
(100.7 |
) |
|||
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Short-term borrowings, net |
|
(34.8 |
) |
(14.3 |
) |
17.2 |
|
|||
Long-term debt borrowings |
|
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
|||
Long-term debt repayments |
|
(32.8 |
) |
(16.5 |
) |
(.8 |
) |
|||
Proceeds from exercised stock options |
|
45.0 |
|
53.0 |
|
29.5 |
|
|||
Common stock acquired by purchase |
|
(185.6 |
) |
(173.8 |
) |
(119.5 |
) |
|||
Dividends paid |
|
(86.2 |
) |
(76.9 |
) |
(64.1 |
) |
|||
Net cash used in continuing financing activities |
|
(294.4 |
) |
(178.4 |
) |
(137.7 |
) |
|||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
(7.8 |
) |
15.6 |
|
19.0 |
|
|||
Net cash used in discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|||
Increase /(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(40.0 |
) |
45.2 |
|
(22.2 |
) |
|||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
70.3 |
|
25.1 |
|
47.3 |
|
|||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
$ |
70.3 |
|
$ |
25.1 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, pages 42- 55.
40
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity
(millions) |
|
Common |
|
Common |
|
Common |
|
Retained |
|
Accumulated |
|
Total |
|
||||
Balance, November 30, 2002 |
|
15.6 |
|
124.4 |
|
$ |
230.7 |
|
$ |
458.9 |
|
$ |
(97.3 |
) |
$ |
592.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210.8 |
|
|
|
210.8 |
|
||||
Currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130.7 |
|
130.7 |
|
||||
Change in realized and unrealized gains on derivative financial instruments, net of tax of $0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.2 |
|
.2 |
|
||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.4 |
) |
(14.4 |
) |
||||
Net change in unrealized gain on pension assets, net of tax of $0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.8 |
|
.8 |
|
||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328.1 |
|
||||
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83.3 |
) |
|
|
(83.3 |
) |
||||
Shares purchased and retired |
|
(.1 |
) |
(4.4 |
) |
(6.8 |
) |
(113.8 |
) |
|
|
(120.6 |
) |
||||
Shares issued, including tax benefit of $6.4 |
|
1.1 |
|
.6 |
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
||||
Stock based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
||||
Equal exchange |
|
(1.3 |
) |
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Balance, November 30, 2003 |
|
15.3 |
|
121.9 |
|
$ |
262.6 |
|
$ |
472.6 |
|
$ |
20.0 |
|
$ |
755.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214.5 |
|
|
|
214.5 |
|
||||
Currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.9 |
|
92.9 |
|
||||
Change in realized and unrealized gains on derivative financial instruments, net of tax of $0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
1.5 |
|
||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
4.4 |
|
||||
Net change in unrealized gain on pension assets, net of tax of $0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.8 |
|
.8 |
|
||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314.1 |
|
||||
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79.2 |
) |
|
|
(79.2 |
) |
||||
Shares purchased and retired |
|
(.8 |
) |
(4.7 |
) |
(13.0 |
) |
(173.8 |
) |
|
|
(186.8 |
) |
||||
Shares issued, including tax benefit of $20.6 |
|
2.8 |
|
1.0 |
|
86.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
86.4 |
|
||||
Equal exchange |
|
(2.7 |
) |
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Balance, November 30, 2004 |
|
14.6 |
|
120.9 |
|
$ |
336.0 |
|
$ |
434.1 |
|
$ |
119.6 |
|
$ |
889.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214.9 |
|
|
|
214.9 |
|
||||
Currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97.4 |
) |
(97.4 |
) |
||||
Change in realized and unrealized gains on derivative financial instruments, net of tax of $3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
6.2 |
|
||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.8 |
) |
(.8 |
) |
||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122.9 |
|
||||
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88.5 |
) |
|
|
(88.5 |
) |
||||
Shares purchased and retired |
|
(.2 |
) |
(5.2 |
) |
(12.0 |
) |
(175.1 |
) |
|
|
(187.1 |
) |
||||
Shares issued, including tax benefit of $13.8 |
|
1.7 |
|
.8 |
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
||||
Equal exchange |
|
(1.6 |
) |
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Balance, November 30, 2005 |
|
14.5 |
|
118.1 |
|
$ |
386.9 |
|
$ |
385.4 |
|
$ |
27.6 |
|
$ |
799.9 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, pages 42- 55.
41
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our majority-owned or controlled subsidiaries and affiliates. Significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Investments in unconsolidated affiliates, over which we exercise significant influence, but not control, are accounted for by the equity method. Accordingly, the share of net income or loss of such unconsolidated affiliates is included in consolidated net income.
Use of Estimates
Preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual amounts could differ from these estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity date of 3 months or less are classified as cash equivalents.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using standard or average costs which approximate the first-in, first-out costing method.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is stated at historical cost and depreciated over its estimated useful life using the straight line method for financial reporting and both accelerated and straight-line methods for tax reporting. The estimated useful lives range from 20 to 40 years for buildings and 3 to 12 years for machinery, equipment and computer software.
Repairs and maintenance costs incurred to restore or keep capital assets at an acceptable level of operating condition, but without an increase in the previously estimated useful life or capacity of the asset are expensed as incurred.
Software Development Costs
We capitalize costs associated with software developed or obtained for internal use. Capitalized internal use software development costs include only (1) external direct costs of materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining the software, (2) payroll and payroll-related costs for employees who are directly associated with and who devote time to the project, and (3) interest costs incurred, when material, while developing the software. Capitalization of these costs ceases when the project is substantially complete and ready for its intended purpose. Capitalized internal use software development costs are amortized using the straight-line method over a range of 3 to 8 years, but not exceeding the expected life of the product. We capitalized $11.5 million of software and software development costs during the year ended November 30, 2005, $14.1 million during the year ended November 30, 2004 and $25.1 million during the year ended November 30, 2003.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed at least annually for impairment using the discounted cash flow method. Impairment assessments for goodwill are done on a reporting unit level. Separable intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized over their useful lives. An impaired intangible asset would be written down to fair value, using the discounted cash flow method.
Prepaid Allowances
Prepaid allowances arise when we prepay sales discounts and marketing allowances to certain customers in connection with multi-year sales contracts. These costs are capitalized and amortized against net sales. The majority of our contracts are for a specific committed customer sales volume while others are for a specific time duration. Prepaid allowances on volume based contracts are amortized based on the actual volume of customer purchases, while prepaid allowances on time based contracts are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the contract. The amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheet are stated at the lower of unamortized cost or managements estimate of the net realizable value of these allowances.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the product has been delivered to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. We reduce revenue for estimated product returns, allowances and price discounts based on historical experience.
Trade allowances, consisting primarily of customer pricing allowances, merchandising funds and consumer coupons, are offered through various programs to customers and consumers. Revenue is recorded net of trade allowances.
Receivables consist of amounts billed and currently due from customers. We have an allowance for doubtful accounts to reduce our receivables to their net realizable value. We estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts based on several factors including aging of receivables and historical collection experience.
42
Shipping and Handling
Shipping and handling costs are included in the selling, general and administrative expense caption in the consolidated statement of income. Shipping and handling expense was $80.8 million, $75.3 million and $60.9 million for the years ended November 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and are included in the selling, general and administrative expense caption in the consolidated statement of income. Research and development expense was $42.1 million, $39.3 million and $33.2 million for the years ended November 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Advertising
Advertising costs, which include the development and production of advertising materials and the communication of this material through various forms of media, are expensed in the period the advertising first takes place. Advertising expense is included in the selling, general and administrative expense caption in the consolidated statement of income. Advertising expense was $45.2 million, $49.2 million and $34.5 million for the years ended November 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
We use the intrinsic value method as defined in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, to account for stock options issued to employees and directors. Accordingly, no compensation expense is recognized for these stock options since all options granted have an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying stock on the grant date. During 2003, we recorded $1.2 million (net of income taxes of $0.5 million) of stock compensation expense in discontinued operations as a result of accelerated vesting of certain options related to the employees of the discontinued operations. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per common share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based compensation.
(millions except per share data) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
Net income as reported |
|
$ |
214.9 |
|
$ |
214.5 |
|
$ |
210.8 |
|
Add: stock-based compensation recorded, net of tax |
|
.2 |
|
.3 |
|
1.2 |
|
|||
Deduct: stock-based compensation expense, net of tax |
|
(14.4 |
) |
(15.5 |
) |
(12.7 |
) |
|||
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
200.7 |
|
$ |
199.3 |
|
$ |
199.3 |
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Basic as reported |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
$ |
1.57 |
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
Basic pro forma |
|
1.49 |
|
1.45 |
|
1.43 |
|
|||
Diluted as reported |
|
1.56 |
|
1.52 |
|
1.48 |
|
|||
Diluted pro forma |
|
1.45 |
|
1.41 |
|
1.40 |
|
The per share weighted-average fair value of stock options and options under our employee stock purchase plan (ESPP) granted was $7.05, $6.79 and $4.70 in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. In the first quarter of 2005, we changed the valuation model used for estimating the fair value of options granted from a Black-Scholes option pricing model to a lattice option pricing model. This change was made because we believe that the lattice option pricing model provides a better estimate of fair value of options granted. The lattice model can incorporate a range of possible outcomes over an options term and can be adjusted for changes in certain assumptions over time. The Black-Scholes model assumptions are more constant over time, which is not always consistent with an employees exercise behavior. In accordance with APB 20, Accounting Changes, this change was made for options granted to employees and directors beginning in the first quarter of 2005. A total of 2.4 million stock options were granted in 2005 at a weighted average fair value of $7.47 per share. The Black-Scholes model would have produced a value that was approximately 15% higher. The 2005 decrease in pro forma stock based employee compensation expense as a result of this change was approximately $0.6 million ($0.4 million after-tax) and is reflected in the preceding table. The ESPP continues to be valued using the Black-Scholes model as employee exercise patterns are not relevant to this plan. The fair values were computed using the following range of assumptions for our various stock compensation plans:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Risk-free interest rates |
|
2.4- 4.2% |
|
3.3- 3.8% |
|
1.7- 3.3% |
|
Dividend yield |
|
1.7- 1.9% |
|
1.8% |
|
2.0% |
|
Expected volatility |
|
12.4- 20.5% |
|
21.75% |
|
19.1- 22.3% |
|
Expected lives |
|
1.9- 5.9 years |
|
5.0- 6.0 years |
|
1.6- 6.0 years |
|
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations. The Interpretation clarifies the accounting for a conditional asset retirement obligation as identified in SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. Interpretation No. 47 is effective for our 2006 fiscal year. We believe there will be no material effect upon adoption of this Interpretation.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and superseding APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 123R requires us to expense grants made under our stock compensation plans. That cost will be recognized over the vesting period of the plans. Pro forma compensation expense related to stock options subject to accelerated vesting upon retirement is currently recognized over the entire period of actual employment (up to the date of actual retirement). Upon adoption of SFAS No. 123R, compensation expense related to accelerated vesting will be
43
recognized up to the date on which the employee becomes eligible to retire, regardless of the date on which the employee actually retires. If there are no changes made to our stock option plan, we believe this change will have a material effect upon adoption of this statement. SFAS No. 123R allows for adoption using either the modified prospective or modified retrospective methods. We anticipate using the modified prospective method when we adopt this statement in the first quarter of 2006. The FASB has recently issued interpretations of certain aspects of SFAS 123R and is still considering additional interpretations. The result of these interpretations could have a material effect on our adoption of this standard. We will review interpretations as issued, and accordingly make changes prior to adoption.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, which is effective for our 2006 fiscal year. We anticipate no significant effect upon adoption of this statement.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. We adopted Interpretation No. 46 as it relates to special purpose entities in the fourth quarter of 2003. As a result of this adoption, we consolidated the lessor of a leased distribution center and recorded a cumulative effect of an accounting change of $2.1 million (net of income tax benefit of $1.2 million).
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. The effect of these reclassifications is not material to the consolidated financial statements.
2. ACQUISITIONS
On November 1, 2004, we purchased C.M. van Sillevoldt B.V. (Silvo), the market leader in the Dutch spices and herbs consumer market, for 58 million in cash (equivalent to $74.5 million) funded with cash from operations and current credit facilities. Silvo sells spices, herbs and seasonings under the Silvo brand in the Netherlands and the India brand as well as private label store brands in Belgium. The brand has a strong heritage, high recognition among consumers and is the leading brand of herbs and spices in the Netherlands. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method, and the results of operations have been included in consolidated results from the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the tangible net assets purchased of $59.4 million was initially classified as goodwill in the consumer segment in 2004. In the fourth quarter of 2005, we completed the purchase price allocation for the Silvo acquisition. A detailed analysis of the intangible assets resulted in our conclusion that the excess purchase price should be accounted for as the value of the acquired brand name and goodwill. No other intangible assets were identified as a result of this analysis. We concluded that a large portion of the value of the excess purchase price resides in the Dutch consumers cultural connections with the Silvo brand name. Based on an analysis of the premium value that is derived from consumer loyalty and trust in the Silvo brands quality, we assigned $35.0 million of the excess purchase price to this unamortizable brand. Given Silvos strong brand name recognition in the marketplace, we intend to use and support the brand name indefinitely. The remaining $24.4 million of excess purchase price remained as goodwill in the consumer segment.
On June 4, 2003, we purchased Zatarains, the leading New Orleans-style food brand in the United States, for $180.0 million in cash funded with commercial paper borrowings. Zatarains manufactures and markets flavored rice and dinner mixes, seafood seasonings and many other products that add flavor to food. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method, and the results of operations have been included in our consolidated results from the date of acquisition. In the second quarter of 2004, we completed the purchase price allocation for the Zatarains acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets purchased was $176.2 million, which includes $3.4 million of fees directly related to the acquisition. An analysis of the various types of intangible assets resulted in a determination that the excess purchase price should be classified as the value of the acquired brand name and goodwill. No other intangible assets were identified as a result of this analysis. We have concluded that a substantial portion of the value of the excess purchase price resides in consumer trust and recognition of the Zatarains brand name as authentic New Orleans-style cuisine. As a result, we have assigned $106.4 million of the excess purchase price to this unamortizable brand based on an analysis of the premium value that is derived from consumer loyalty and trust in the brands quality. Zatarains brand name has been used since 1889, and we intend to use and support the brand name indefinitely. The remaining $69.8 million of excess purchase price remained as goodwill in the consumer segment.
On January 8, 2003, we acquired the Uniqsauces business, a condiment business based in Europe, for $19.5 million in cash. Uniqsauces manufactures and markets condiments to retail grocery and food service customers, including quick service restaurants. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method, and the results of operations have been included in consolidated results from the date of acquisition. The purchase price of this acquisition was allocated entirely to fixed assets and working capital. No goodwill was recorded as a result of this acquisition.
44
On August 31, 2000, we acquired Ducros, S.A. and Sodis, S.A.S. (Ducros) from Eridania Beghin-Say, for 2.75 billion French francs (equivalent to $379 million). The Ducros purchase contract provided for a potential adjustment to the purchase price with interest from the date of purchase. On April 29, 2003, we settled the purchase price adjustment with the prior owners of Ducros and received payment of 49.6 million (equivalent to $55.4 million). Of the $55.4 million received, $5.4 million represented interest earned on the settlement amount from the date of acquisition in accordance with the terms of the original purchase agreement. The interest income was included in Other income, net in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended November 30, 2003. The remaining $50.0 million of the settlement amount was recorded as a reduction to goodwill related to the acquisition.
3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On August 12, 2003, we completed the sale of substantially all the operating assets of our packaging segment (Packaging). Packaging manufactured certain products used for packaging our spices and seasonings as well as packaging products used by manufacturers in the vitamin, drug and personal care industries. Under the terms of the sale agreement, Packaging was sold for $132.5 million in cash. The proceeds were used to pay off a substantial portion of the commercial paper borrowing related to the Zatarains acquisition in 2003. We recorded a net gain on the sale of Packaging of $11.6 million (net of income taxes of $7.9 million) in the third quarter of 2003. Included in this gain was a net pension and postretirement curtailment gain of $3.3 million and the write-off of goodwill of $0.7 million. We also entered into a multi-year, market priced agreement with the acquirer to purchase certain packaging products.
On July 1, 2003 we sold the assets of Jenks Sales Brokers (Jenks), a division of our wholly-owned U.K. subsidiary, to Jenks senior management for $5.8 million in cash. Jenks provided sales and distribution services for other consumer product companies and was previously reported as a part of our consumer segment. We recorded a net loss on the sale of Jenks of $2.6 million (net of an income tax benefit of $0.6 million) in the third quarter of 2003. Included in this loss is a write-off of goodwill of $0.4 million.
The operating results of Packaging and Jenks were classified as Income from discontinued operations, net in the consolidated statement of income. Interest expense was allocated to discontinued operations based on the ratio of the net assets of the discontinued operations to the total net assets of McCormick. The cash flows of Packaging and Jenks were reported as Net cash (used in)/provided by discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of cash flows. The disclosures in the notes to consolidated financial statements exclude discontinued operations.
Summary operating results for the discontinued businesses were as follows:
(millions) |
|
2003 |
|
|
Net sales Packaging |
|
$ |
120.3 |
|
Net sales Jenks |
|
59.6 |
|
|
Net sales discontinued operations |
|
$ |
179.9 |
|
Pretax income Packaging |
|
$ |
12.4 |
|
Interest expense allocation |
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
Income taxes |
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
Net income Packaging |
|
6.0 |
|
|
Pretax loss Jenks |
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
Interest expense allocation |
|
(.1 |
) |
|
Income taxes |
|
.6 |
|
|
Net loss Jenks |
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
Net income discontinued operations |
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
The following table presents summarized cash flow information of the discontinued operations for the year ended November 30, 2003:
(millions) |
|
2003 |
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
Investing activities |
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
Financing activities |
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(4.6 |
) |
4. SPECIAL CHARGES
As the next step in our progress with margin improvement, we announced in September 2005 significant actions to improve the effectiveness of our supply chain and reduce costs. At that time, we also stated that a comprehensive review of our global industrial business was underway to identify improvements. These actions were included in a comprehensive restructuring plan which the Board approved in November 2005. As part of this plan, over the next three years, we will consolidate our global manufacturing, rationalize our distribution facilities, improve our go-to-market strategy and eliminate administrative redundancies. In addition, for the industrial business, we will reallocate resources to key customers and take pricing actions on lower volume products to meet new margin targets. A new business-wide forecasting process is being installed and the use of technology will be accelerated to monitor and manage the business. Through 2008, these actions are intended to reduce the number of industrial business customers and products in the U.S. by approximately 25%.
We are projecting that $50 million of annual cost savings will be achieved by 2008. We expect to drive margin improvement and increase earnings per share, as well as invest a portion of these savings in sales growth drivers such as brand advertising. These savings are expected to be recorded in both cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of income.
45
Total pre-tax charges under this restructuring plan are estimated to be $130-$150 million, with approximately 75% in the consumer segment and 25% in the industrial segment. Of these charges, approximately 60% will consist of severance and other personnel costs, 15% of asset write-offs and 25% of other exit costs. The cash related portion of the charges will be approximately $100 million. The actions being taken are expected to reduce our global workforce by 800 -1,000 over the three-year period.
In the fourth quarter of 2005, we recorded $10.7 million ($7.2 million after-tax) of charges under the restructuring plan, of which $10.1 million related to the consumer segment and $0.6 million related to Corporate. These charges include certain severance costs associated with the closing of our consumer manufacturing plant in Salinas, California, closing costs for a small plant in Belgium and costs associated with the reorganization of the sales and distribution networks in the U.S. and Europe.
Subsequent to year end, we offered an early retirement program, under the restructuring, to certain groups of U.S. employees. The expense of this program, will be recorded in 2006, when estimable.
The major components of the special charges and the remaining accrual balance relating to the 2005 restructuring plan as of November 30, 2005 follow:
|
|
Severance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
and personnel |
|
Asset |
|
Other |
|
|
|
||||
(millions) |
|
costs |
|
write-downs |
|
exit costs |
|
Total |
|
||||
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Special charges |
|
$ |
8.1 |
|
$ |
.5 |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
Amounts utilized |
|
(.1 |
) |
(.5 |
) |
(1.4 |
) |
(2.0 |
) |
||||
|
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
|
|
$ |
.7 |
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
In 2001, we adopted a plan to streamline our operations which was completed in 2005. This plan included the consolidation of several distribution and manufacturing locations, the reduction of 392 administrative and manufacturing positions, and the reorganization of several joint ventures. The cost of the total plan was $30.9 million ($21.1 million after-tax). Total cash expenditures in connection with these costs approximated $16.2 million, which was funded through internally generated funds. The remaining $14.7 million of costs associated with the plan consisted of write-offs of assets. Annualized cash savings from the plan were approximately $8.0 million ($5.3 million after-tax). Savings under the plan are being used for spending on initiatives such as brand support and supply chain management. These savings are included within the cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of income.
During the year ended November 30, 2005, we recorded special charges of $0.5 million ($0.3 million after-tax). The costs recorded in 2005 primarily are severance costs.
During the year ended November 30, 2004, we recorded special charges of $6.2 million ($4.3 million after-tax). The costs recorded in 2004 primarily include costs related to the consolidation of industrial manufacturing facilities in the U.K. and Canada, the reorganization of a consumer joint venture and additional severance costs. During 2004, total cash expenditures in connection with the 2001 restructuring plan were $4.7 million. Also included in special charges/(credits) is a net gain of $8.7 million ($5.5 million after-tax) related to funds received from a class action lawsuit that was settled in our favor in the second quarter of 2004. This matter dated back to 1999 when a number of class action lawsuits were filed against manufacturers and sellers of various flavor enhancers for their violation of antitrust laws. We, as a purchaser of such products, participated as a member of the plaintiff class. In the second quarter of 2004, we received $11.1 million as a settlement of this claim and as a result of the settlement, were required to settle claims against us for a portion of this gross amount. The net gain recorded was $8.7 million. This amount was recorded as a special credit and was not allocated to the business segments.
During the year ended November 30, 2003, we recorded special charges related to continuing operations of $5.5 million ($3.6 million after-tax). The costs recorded in 2003 included additional costs associated with the consolidation of production facilities in Canada, net of a gain on the sale of a manufacturing facility, severance and other costs related to the consolidation of industrial manufacturing in the U.K. and the realignment of our consumer sales operations in Australia. During 2003, total cash expenditures in connection with the plan were $4.7 million. During 2002 and 2001, we recorded total charges of $18.7 million ($12.9 million after-tax) from continuing operations associated with the 2001 restructuring plan.
The major components of the special charges and the remaining accrual balance relating to the 2001 restructuring plan as of November 30, 2003, 2004 and 2005 follow:
|
|
Severance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
and personnel |
|
Asset |
|
Other |
|
|
|
||||
(millions) |
|
costs |
|
write-downs |
|
exit costs |
|
Total |
|
||||
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Special charges |
|
4.7 |
|
$ |
(.6 |
) |
1.4 |
|
5.5 |
|
|||
Amounts utilized |
|
(4.2 |
) |
.6 |
|
(3.0 |
) |
(6.6 |
) |
||||
|
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
|
$ |
.1 |
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Special charges |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
$ |
.8 |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
Amounts utilized |
|
(2.9 |
) |
(.8 |
) |
(2.9 |
) |
(6.6 |
) |
||||
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
|
$ |
.4 |
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Special charges |
|
$ |
.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
.5 |
|
||
Amounts utilized |
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(.4 |
) |
(4.9 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
5. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following table displays the intangible assets that continue to be subject to amortization and intangible assets not subject to amortization as of November 30, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
||||
(millions) |
|
amount |
|
amortization |
|
amount |
|
amortization |
|
||||
Amortizable intangible assets |
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
$ |
.6 |
|
$ |
.3 |
|
Non-amortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Brand name |
|
141.4 |
|
|
|
106.4 |
|
|
|
||||
Goodwill |
|
739.0 |
|
75.1 |
|
793.7 |
|
80.8 |
|
||||
Trademark |
|
8.9 |
|
.8 |
|
9.7 |
|
1.2 |
|
||||
|
|
889.3 |
|
75.9 |
|
909.8 |
|
82.0 |
|
||||
Total goodwill and intangible assets |
|
$ |
899.3 |
|
$ |
77.1 |
|
$ |
910.4 |
|
$ |
82.3 |
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the years ended November 30, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||||||
(millions) |
|
Consumer |
|
Industrial |
|
Consumer |
|
Industrial |
|
||||
Beginning of year |
|
$ |
664.9 |
|
$ |
48.0 |
|
$ |
664.9 |
|
$ |
43.8 |
|
Goodwill acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
59.4 |
|
|
|
||||
Goodwill transferred and deferred taxes |
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
(106.4 |
) |
|
|
||||
Foreign currency fluctuations |
|
(58.7 |
) |
(3.6 |
) |
47.0 |
|
4.2 |
|
||||
End of year |
|
$ |
619.5 |
|
$ |
44.4 |
|
$ |
664.9 |
|
$ |
48.0 |
|
6. INVESTMENTS IN AFFILIATES
Summarized year-end information from the financial statements of unconsolidated affiliates representing 100% of the businesses follows:
(millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
Net sales |
|
$ |
460.3 |
|
$ |
428.3 |
|
$ |
403.0 |
|
Gross profit |
|
183.7 |
|
157.3 |
|
159.6 |
|
|||
Net income |
|
41.3 |
|
28.8 |
|
32.6 |
|
|||
Current assets |
|
$ |
181.5 |
|
$ |
189.2 |
|
$ |
168.2 |
|
Noncurrent assets |
|
99.0 |
|
94.1 |
|
101.7 |
|
|||
Current liabilities |
|
102.4 |
|
97.4 |
|
100.7 |
|
|||
Noncurrent liabilities |
|
13.9 |
|
23.4 |
|
25.5 |
|
Our share of undistributed earnings of affiliates was $57.3 million at November 30, 2005. Royalty income from unconsolidated affiliates was $10.5 million, $9.7 million and $9.3 million for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
7. FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
Our outstanding debt is as follows:
(millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commercial paper (1) |
|
$ |
104.2 |
|
$ |
134.4 |
|
Other |
|
1.2 |
|
5.8 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
105.4 |
|
$ |
140.2 |
|
Weighted-average interest rate of short-term borrowings at year-end |
|
4.00 |
% |
2.12 |
% |
||
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
||
5.78%-7.77% medium-term notes due 2006 |
|
$ |
47.0 |
|
$ |
79.0 |
|
6.40%-6.80% medium-term notes due 2006 to 2008 (2) (3) |
|
298.6 |
|
298.4 |
|
||
3.35% medium-term notes due 2009 (4) |
|
47.8 |
|
48.6 |
|
||
7.63%-8.12% medium-term notes due 2024 |
|
55.0 |
|
55.0 |
|
||
Other |
|
16.2 |
|
17.0 |
|
||
|
|
464.6 |
|
498.0 |
|
||
Less current portion |
|
.7 |
|
33.0 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
463.9 |
|
$ |
465.0 |
|
(1) The variable interest rate on $75 million of commercial paper is hedged by interest rate swaps through 2011. Net interest payments are fixed at 6.35% during this period.
(2) Interest rate swaps, settled upon the issuance of the medium-term notes, effectively fixed the interest rate on $294 million of the notes at a weighted average fixed rate of 7.62%.
(3) The fixed interest rate on $100 million of 6.40% medium-term notes due in 2006 is effectively converted to a variable rate by interest rate swaps through 2006. Net interest payments are based on LIBOR plus 3.60% during this period.
(4) The fixed interest rate on the 3.35% medium-term notes due in 2009 is effectively converted to a variable rate by interest rate swaps through 2009. Net interest payments are based on LIBOR minus .21% during this period.
Maturities of long-term debt during the years subsequent to November 30, 2006 are as follows (in millions):
2007 $0.5 |
2008 $150.1 |
2009 $48.1 |
2010 $14.3 |
Thereafter $250.9 |
Subsequent to our 2005 fiscal year end, we issued $200 million of 5.20% medium-term notes which are due in 2015. The net proceeds will be used to repay long-term debt maturing in 2006. Since we have the ability and intent to refinance, $195.9 million of current maturity of long-term debt has been reclassified to long-term in the 2005 balance sheet.
47
We have available credit facilities with domestic and foreign banks for various purposes. The amount of unused credit facilities at November 30, 2005 was $512.0 million, of which $400.0 million supports a commercial paper borrowing arrangement. Of these unused facilities, $112.0 million expire in 2006 and $400.0 million expire in 2010. Some credit facilities in support of commercial paper issuance require a commitment fee. Annualized commitment fees at November 30, 2005 and 2004 were both $0.3 million.
Rental expense under operating leases was $24.6 million in 2005, $23.5 million in 2004 and $23.0 million in 2003. Future annual fixed rental payments for the years ending November 30 are as follows (in millions):
2006 $15.1 |
2007 $12.4 |
2008 $10.5 |
2009 $8.2 |
2010 $7.0 |
Thereafter $7.6 |
At November 30, 2005, we had guarantees outstanding of $8.7 million with terms ranging from one to three years. At November 30, 2005 and 2004, we had outstanding letters of credit of $12.2 million and $12.3 million, respectively. These letters of credit typically act as a guarantee of payment to certain third parties in accordance with specified terms and conditions. The unused portion of our letter of credit facility was $33.8 million at November 30, 2005.
8. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
We utilize derivative financial instruments to enhance our ability to manage risk, including foreign currency and interest rate exposures, which exist as part of our ongoing business operations. We do not enter into contracts for trading purposes, nor are we a party to any leveraged derivative instrument. The use of derivative financial instruments is monitored through regular communication with senior management and the utilization of written guidelines.
All derivatives are recognized at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet and recorded in either other assets or other accrued liabilities. In evaluating the fair value of financial instruments, including derivatives, we use third-party market quotes or calculate an estimated fair value on a discounted cash flow basis using the rates available for instruments with the same remaining maturities.
Foreign Currency
We are potentially exposed to foreign currency fluctuations affecting net investments, transactions and earnings denominated in foreign currencies. We selectively hedge the potential effect of these foreign currency fluctuations by entering into foreign currency exchange contracts with highly-rated financial institutions.
Contracts which are designated as hedges of anticipated purchases denominated in a foreign currency (generally purchases of raw materials in U.S. dollars by operating units outside the U.S.) are considered cash flow hedges. The gains and losses on these contracts are deferred in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in cost of goods sold, at which time the net amount deferred in other comprehensive income is also recognized in cost of goods sold. Gains and losses from hedges of assets, liabilities or firm commitments are recognized through income, offsetting the change in fair value of the hedged item.
At November 30, 2005, we had foreign currency exchange contracts maturing within one year to purchase or sell $24.0 million of foreign currencies versus $51.1 million at November 30, 2004. All of these contracts were designated as hedges of anticipated purchases denominated in a foreign currency to be completed within one year or hedges of foreign currency denominated assets or liabilities. Hedge ineffectiveness was not material.
Interest Rates
We finance a portion of our operations with both fixed and variable rate debt instruments, primarily commercial paper, notes and bank loans. We utilize interest rate swap agreements to minimize worldwide financing costs and to achieve a desired mix of variable and fixed rate debt.
In 2005, we entered into forward starting interest rate swaps to manage the interest rate risk associated with the anticipated issuance of $100 million fixed rate medium-term notes expected to be issued in late 2005. We designated these outstanding interest rate swap contracts as hedges of the future cash interest payments. The loss on these swaps of $0.2 million was deferred in other comprehensive income and will be amortized over the ten-year life of the medium-term notes as a component of interest expense. Hedge ineffectiveness associated with these hedges was not material at November 30, 2005. Subsequent to year end, the medium-term notes were issued and the swaps were settled.
In 2004, we entered into an interest rate swap contract with a total notional amount of $50 million to receive interest at 3.36% and pay a variable rate of interest based on six-month LIBOR minus 0.21%. We designated this swap, which expires on April 15, 2009, as a fair value hedge of the changes in fair value of the $50 million of medium-term notes maturing on April 15, 2009. No hedge ineffectiveness is recognized as the interest rate swaps provisions match the applicable provisions of the debt.
48
In 2003, we entered into interest rate swap contracts for a total notional amount of $100 million to receive interest at 6.4% and pay a variable rate of interest based on six-month LIBOR plus 3.60%. We designated these swaps, which expire on February 1, 2006, as fair value hedges of the changes in fair value of $100 million of the $150 million 6.40% fixed rate medium-term notes maturing on February 1, 2006. No hedge ineffectiveness is recognized as the interest rate swaps provisions match the applicable provisions of the debt.
The variable interest on $75 million of commercial paper is hedged by forward starting interest rate swaps for the period through 2011. Net interest payments on this commercial paper are effectively fixed at 6.35% during the period. The unrealized gain or loss on these swaps is recorded in other comprehensive income, as we intend to hold these interest rate swaps until maturity and maintain $75 million of commercial paper outstanding through 2011. Hedge ineffectiveness was not material. Subsequent to the starting date of these swaps, the net cash settlements are reflected in interest expense in the applicable period.
We incurred a $14.7 million loss on the settlement of swaps used to hedge the 2001 issuance of $294 million of medium-term notes. The loss on these swaps was deferred in other comprehensive income and is being amortized over the five to seven year life of the medium-term notes as a component of interest expense. Amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income to interest expense for settled interest rate swaps were $2.5 million each in 2005, 2004 and 2003 and are included in the net change in unrealized gain or loss on derivative financial instruments in the statement of shareholders equity.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amount and fair value of financial instruments at November 30, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
||||
(millions) |
|
amount |
|
value |
|
amount |
|
value |
|
||||
Other investments |
|
$ |
36.1 |
|
$ |
36.1 |
|
$ |
27.2 |
|
$ |
27.2 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
464.6 |
|
488.5 |
|
498.0 |
|
538.2 |
|
||||
Derivative related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest rates |
|
(9.1 |
) |
(9.1 |
) |
(11.8 |
) |
(11.8 |
) |
||||
Foreign currencies |
|
(0.6 |
) |
(0.6 |
) |
(3.9 |
) |
(3.9 |
) |
||||
Because of their short-term nature, the amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, receivables, short-term borrowings and trade accounts payable approximate fair value. The fair value of other investments, long-term debt and derivative financial instruments were based on quoted market prices.
Investments in affiliates are not readily marketable, and it is not practicable to estimate their fair value. Other investments are comprised of fixed income and equity securities held on behalf of employees in certain employee benefit plans and are stated at fair value. The cost of these investments was $34.8 million and $28.6 million at November 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
We are potentially exposed to concentrations of credit risk with trade accounts receivable, prepaid allowances and financial instruments. Because we have a large and diverse customer base with no single customer accounting for a significant percentage of trade accounts receivable and prepaid allowances, there was no material concentration of credit risk in these accounts at November 30, 2005. We evaluate the credit worthiness of the counterparties to financial instruments and consider nonperformance credit risk to be remote.
9. PENSION AND 401(K) RETIREMENT PLANS
We sponsor defined benefit pension plans in the U.S. and certain foreign locations. In addition, we sponsor 401(k) retirement plans in the U.S. and contribute to government-sponsored retirement plans in locations outside the U.S.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
A September 30th measurement date is utilized to value plan assets and obligations for all of our defined benefit pension plans.
The significant assumptions used to determine benefit obligations are as follows:
|
|
United States |
|
International |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Discount rate |
|
5.9 |
% |
6.0 |
% |
5.0 |
% |
5.3 - 5.8 |
% |
Salary scale |
|
4.0 |
% |
4.0 |
% |
3.0 - 4.2 |
% |
3.5 - 4.2 |
% |
Expected return on plan assets |
|
8.5 |
% |
8.5 |
% |
6.5 - 7.5 |
% |
6.5 - 8.5 |
% |
The expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption is based on weighted-average expected returns for each asset class. Expected returns reflect a combination of historical performance analysis and the forward-looking views of the financial markets, and include input from actuaries, investment service firms and investment managers.
49
Our pension expense is as follows:
|
|
United States |
|
International |
|
||||||||||||||
(millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
11.9 |
|
$ |
11.6 |
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
Interest costs |
|
20.7 |
|
19.8 |
|
19.3 |
|
7.5 |
|
6.7 |
|
5.4 |
|
||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(20.3 |
) |
(18.6 |
) |
(17.0 |
) |
(6.9 |
) |
(7.0 |
) |
(6.7 |
) |
||||||
Amortization of prior service costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.1 |
|
.1 |
|
.1 |
|
||||||
Amortization of transition assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.1 |
) |
(.1 |
) |
(.1 |
) |
||||||
Curtailment loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.1 |
|
||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
11.4 |
|
11.5 |
|
7.4 |
|
1.2 |
|
.6 |
|
|
|
||||||
Less: discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
$ |
23.7 |
|
$ |
24.3 |
|
$ |
18.7 |
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
Rollforwards of the benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets and a reconciliation of the pension plans funded status at the measurement date, September 30, follow:
|
|
United States |
|
International |
|
||||||||
(millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||
Change in benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year |
|
$ |
349.6 |
|
$ |
334.4 |
|
$ |
141.8 |
|
$ |
110.6 |
|
Service cost |
|
11.9 |
|
11.6 |
|
5.6 |
|
5.4 |
|
||||
Interest costs |
|
20.7 |
|
19.8 |
|
7.5 |
|
6.7 |
|
||||
Employee contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
1.8 |
|
||||
Plan changes and other |
|
|
|
|
|
.4 |
|
(.9 |
) |
||||
Plan settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
||||
Special termination benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
.5 |
|
|
|
||||
Actuarial loss |
|
9.4 |
|
2.5 |
|
23.9 |
|
11.3 |
|
||||
Benefits paid |
|
(13.5 |
) |
(18.7 |
) |
(7.5 |
) |
(4.9 |
) |
||||
Foreign currency impact |
|
|
|
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
11.8 |
|
||||
Benefit obligation at end of year |
|
$ |
378.1 |
|
$ |
349.6 |
|
$ |
161.1 |
|
$ |
141.8 |
|
Change in fair value of plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
|
$ |
237.7 |
|
$ |
205.4 |
|
$ |
90.9 |
|
$ |
73.0 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
25.2 |
|
27.1 |
|
15.8 |
|
7.5 |
|
||||
Employer contributions |
|
22.0 |
|
22.0 |
|
8.7 |
|
6.7 |
|
||||
Employee contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
1.8 |
|
||||
Plan settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
||||
Benefits paid |
|
(11.5 |
) |
(16.8 |
) |
(7.5 |
) |
(4.9 |
) |
||||
Net transfer in (out) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.9 |
) |
||||
Foreign currency impact |
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
7.7 |
|
||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
|
$ |
273.4 |
|
$ |
237.7 |
|
$ |
101.2 |
|
$ |
90.9 |
|
Funded status |
|
$ |
(104.7 |
) |
$ |
(111.9 |
) |
$ |
(59.9 |
) |
$ |
(50.9 |
) |
Unrecognized net actuarial loss |
|
132.6 |
|
139.6 |
|
59.9 |
|
50.7 |
|
||||
Unrecognized prior service cost |
|
.4 |
|
.4 |
|
.7 |
|
.4 |
|
||||
Unrecognized transition liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.1 |
) |
||||
Employer contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
.8 |
|
1.0 |
|
||||
Net amount recognized |
|
$ |
28.3 |
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
Included in the United States in the preceding table is a benefit obligation of $39.1 million and $36.0 million for 2005 and 2004, respectively, related to an unfunded pension plan. The accrued liability related to this plan was $35.2 million and $31.7 million as of November 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The assets related to this plan are held in a Rabbi Trust and accordingly have not been included in the preceding table. These assets were $24.6 million and $19.0 million as of November 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consist of the following:
|
|
United States |
|
International |
|
||||||||
(millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||
Prepaid pension cost |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
||
Accrued pension liability |
|
$ |
(50.5 |
) |
$ |
(61.3 |
) |
(44.6 |
) |
(34.3 |
) |
||
Intangible assets |
|
.4 |
|
.4 |
|
.6 |
|
.3 |
|
||||
Deferred income taxes |
|
29.0 |
|
33.5 |
|
13.3 |
|
10.2 |
|
||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
49.4 |
|
55.5 |
|
30.5 |
|
23.6 |
|
||||
Net amount recognized |
|
$ |
28.3 |
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
The accumulated benefit obligation is the present value of pension benefits (whether vested or unvested) attributed to employee service rendered before the measurement date and based on employee service and compensation prior to that date. The accumulated benefit obligation differs from the projected benefit obligation in that it includes no assumption about future compensation levels. The accumulated benefit obligation for the U.S. pension plans was $323.9 million and $299.1 million as of September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for the international pension plans was $146.3 million and $124.9 million as of November 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Our actual and target weighted-average asset allocations of U.S. pension plan assets as of September 30, 2005 and 2004, by asset category, were as follows:
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
||
Asset Category |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Target |
|
Equity securities |
|
69.0 |
% |
68.0 |
% |
70.0 |
% |
Debt securities |
|
29.1 |
% |
30.3 |
% |
30.0 |
% |
Other |
|
1.9 |
% |
1.7 |
% |
|
|
Total |
|
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
The average actual and target asset allocations of the international pension plans assets as of November 30, 2005 and 2004, by asset category, were as follows:
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
|
||
Asset Category |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Target |
|
Equity securities |
|
66.0 |
% |
64.7 |
% |
65.0 |
% |
Debt securities |
|
32.0 |
% |
32.5 |
% |
35.0 |
% |
Real estate |
|
|
|
.2 |
% |
|
|
Other |
|
2.0 |
% |
2.6 |
% |
|
|
Total |
|
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
50
The investment objectives of the pension benefit plans are to secure the benefit obligations to participants at a reasonable cost to us. The goal is to optimize the long-term return on plan assets at a moderate level of risk, by balancing higher-returning assets such as equity securities, with less volatile assets, such as fixed income securities. The assets are managed by professional investment firms and performance is evaluated quarterly against specific benchmarks.
Equity securities in the U.S. plan included McCormick stock with a fair value of $28.8 million (0.9 million shares and 10.5% of total U.S. pension plan assets) and $33.6 million (0.9 million shares and 13.5% of total U.S. pension plan assets) at November 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Dividends paid on these shares were $0.6 million in 2005 and $0.5 million in 2004.
Pension benefit payments in our major plans are made from assets of the pension plans. It is anticipated that future benefit payments for the U.S. plans for the next 10 fiscal years will be as follows:
|
|
United States |
|
|
(millions) |
|
Expected Payments |
|
|
2006 |
|
$ |
16.0 |
|
2007 |
|
17.1 |
|
|
2008 |
|
18.6 |
|
|
2009 |
|
20.7 |
|
|
2010 |
|
22.0 |
|
|
2011-2015 |
|
138.3 |
|
|
It is anticipated that future benefit payments for the international plans for the next 10 fiscal years will be as follows:
|
|
International |
|
|
(millions) |
|
Expected Payments |
|
|
2006 |
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
2007 |
|
4.2 |
|
|
2008 |
|
4.3 |
|
|
2009 |
|
4.5 |
|
|
2010 |
|
4.8 |
|
|
2011-2015 |
|
31.8 |
|
|
In 2006, we expect to contribute approximately $28 million to our U.S. pension plans, including $6 million to our plan that has assets held in a Rabbi Trust. In addition, we expect to contribute approximately $6 million to our international pension plans in 2006.
401(k) Retirement Plans
For the U.S. McCormick 401(k) Retirement Plan, we match 100% of the participants contribution up to the first 3% of the participants salary, and 50% of the next 2% of a participants salary. Certain of our U.S. subsidiaries sponsor separate 401(k) retirement plans. Our contributions charged to expense under all 401(k) Retirement Plans were $5.7 million, $5.7 million and $5.4 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
At the participants election, all 401(k) Retirement Plans held 3.9 million shares, with a fair value of $120.5 million, of our stock at November 30, 2005. Dividends paid on these shares in 2005 were $2.5 million.
10. POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS
We currently provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits to certain U.S. employees who were covered under the active employees plan and retire after age 55 with at least 10 years of service (earned after age 45). The benefits provided under these plans are based primarily on age at date of retirement.
Our other postretirement benefit expense follows:
(millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
Service cost |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
Interest costs |
|
5.0 |
|
5.3 |
|
5.7 |
|
|||
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
(1.1 |
) |
(1.1 |
) |
(1.4 |
) |
|||
Amortization of (gains)/losses |
|
.2 |
|
1.1 |
|
.9 |
|
|||
One time recognition of curtailment gain |
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|||
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|||
Postretirement benefit expense |
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
Rollforwards of the benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets and a reconciliation of the plans funded status at November 30, the measurement date, follow:
(millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Change in benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year |
|
$ |
92.4 |
|
$ |
95.9 |
|
Service cost |
|
3.2 |
|
2.7 |
|
||
Interest costs |
|
5.0 |
|
5.3 |
|
||
Employee contributions |
|
2.6 |
|
2.6 |
|
||
Trend rate assumption change |
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
||
Actuarial (gain)/loss |
|
(1.9 |
) |
(6.7 |
) |
||
Benefits paid |
|
(8.5 |
) |
(7.4 |
) |
||
Benefit obligation at end of year |
|
$ |
97.3 |
|
$ |
92.4 |
|
Change in fair value of plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Employer contributions |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
Employee contributions |
|
2.6 |
|
2.6 |
|
||
Benefits paid |
|
(8.5 |
) |
(7.4 |
) |
||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Funded status |
|
$ |
(97.3 |
) |
$ |
(92.4 |
) |
Unrecognized net actuarial loss |
|
17.0 |
|
14.6 |
|
||
Unrecognized prior service cost |
|
(6.6 |
) |
(7.7 |
) |
||
Other postretirement benefit liability |
|
$ |
(86.9 |
) |
$ |
(85.5 |
) |
Estimated future benefit payments for the next 10 fiscal years are as follows:
|
|
Retiree |
|
Retiree Life |
|
|
|
|||
(millions) |
|
Medical |
|
Insurance |
|
Total |
|
|||
2006 |
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
$ |
.7 |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
2007 |
|
5.9 |
|
.8 |
|
6.7 |
|
|||
2008 |
|
6.1 |
|
.8 |
|
6.9 |
|
|||
2009 |
|
6.5 |
|
.9 |
|
7.4 |
|
|||
2010 |
|
6.8 |
|
.9 |
|
7.7 |
|
|||
2011-2015 |
|
39.4 |
|
5.4 |
|
44.8 |
|
|||
The assumed discount rate was 5.9% and 6.0% for 2005 and 2004, respectively.
51
For 2006, the assumed annual rate of increase in the cost of covered health care benefits is 9.0% (8.0% last year). It is assumed to decrease gradually to 5.0% in the year 2011 (4.5% last year) and remain at that level thereafter. Changing the assumed health care cost trend would have the following effect:
|
|
1-Percentage- |
|
1-Percentage- |
|
||
(millions) |
|
point increase |
|
point decrease |
|
||
Effect on total of service and interest cost components in 2005 |
|
$ |
.5 |
|
$ |
(.4 |
) |
Effect on benefit obligation as of November 30, 2005 |
|
7.0 |
|
(6.2 |
) |
||
In December of 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act) was enacted in the U.S. The Act introduced a prescription drug benefit under Medicare as well as a federal subsidy of 28% of drug costs between $250 and $5,000, tax-free (the Subsidy), to sponsors of retiree health benefit plans that provide a benefit that meets certain criteria. Our other postretirement plans covering U.S. retirees currently provide certain prescription benefits to eligible participants. Our actuaries have determined that one of our prescription drug plans for retirees, retired prior to January 1, 2004, provides a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D under the Act.
In connection with the adoption of FASB Staff Position 106-2, the Act had the effect of reducing the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by $9.9 million. This resulted in an unrecognized net gain to the plan, which is currently being amortized. The annual reduction in our other postretirement benefits expense due to the Subsidy is expected to be approximately $1.6 million, which includes the amortization of the unrecognized net gain.
11. INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
(millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Federal |
|
$ |
62.5 |
|
$ |
67.4 |
|
$ |
48.2 |
|
State |
|
4.8 |
|
7.7 |
|
4.1 |
|
|||
International |
|
23.5 |
|
15.6 |
|
15.5 |
|
|||
|
|
90.8 |
|
90.7 |
|
67.8 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Federal |
|
10.1 |
|
1.5 |
|
15.3 |
|
|||
State |
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|||
International |
|
(5.2 |
) |
(3.2 |
) |
(1.1 |
) |
|||
|
|
5.9 |
|
(1.7 |
) |
15.6 |
|
|||
Total income taxes |
|
$ |
96.7 |
|
$ |
89.0 |
|
$ |
83.4 |
|
The components of income from consolidated continuing operations before income taxes follow:
(millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
Pretax income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
United States |
|
$ |
208.6 |
|
$ |
204.5 |
|
$ |
175.6 |
|
International |
|
87.1 |
|
89.3 |
|
94.4 |
|
|||
|
|
$ |
295.7 |
|
$ |
293.8 |
|
$ |
270.0 |
|
A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory rate with the effective tax rate follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Federal statutory tax rate |
|
35.0 |
% |
35.0 |
% |
35.0 |
% |
State income taxes, net of federal benefits |
|
1.3 |
|
1.7 |
|
1.3 |
|
Tax effect of international operations |
|
(3.3 |
) |
(5.8 |
) |
(5.3 |
) |
Tax credits |
|
(.3 |
) |
(.5 |
) |
(.8 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
|
(.1 |
) |
.7 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
32.7 |
% |
30.3 |
% |
30.9 |
% |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are comprised of the following:
(millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Employee benefit liabilities |
|
$ |
71.6 |
|
$ |
68.1 |
|
Accrued expenses and other reserves |
|
18.3 |
|
27.5 |
|
||
Inventory |
|
6.1 |
|
8.4 |
|
||
Net operating and capital loss carryforwards |
|
9.2 |
|
11.5 |
|
||
Other |
|
9.2 |
|
16.0 |
|
||
Valuation allowance |
|
(8.0 |
) |
(13.3 |
) |
||
|
|
106.4 |
|
118.2 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation |
|
61.9 |
|
54.7 |
|
||
Intangible assets |
|
69.2 |
|
17.1 |
|
||
Other |
|
6.0 |
|
21.3 |
|
||
|
|
137.1 |
|
93.1 |
|
||
Net deferred tax asset (liability) |
|
$ |
(30.7 |
) |
$ |
25.1 |
|
At November 30, 2005, our non-U.S. subsidiaries have tax loss carryforwards of $18.2 million. Of these carryforwards, $8.3 million expire through 2015 and $9.9 million may be carried forward indefinitely. The current statutory rates in these countries range from 26% to 37%.
At November 30, 2005, our non-U.S. subsidiaries have capital loss carryforwards of $13.6 million. Of these carryforwards, $1.8 million expire in 2009 and $11.8 million may be carried forward indefinitely. The current statutory rates in these countries range from 15% to 30%.
A valuation allowance has been provided to record deferred tax assets at their net realizable value. The $5.3 million net decrease in the valuation allowance was due to an additional valuation allowance of $0.9 million related to losses generated in 2005 which may not be realized in future periods, offset by a decrease in the valuation allowance of $6.2 million. The $6.2 million decrease is due to lower foreign currency exchange rates of $1.2 million and the remainder primarily due
52
to valuation allowances no longer required as the underlying expenses that created the deferred tax assets were disal lowed in a tax audit.
U.S. income taxes are not provided for unremitted earn ings of international subsidiaries and affiliates where our intention is to reinvest these earnings permanently or to repatriate the earnings when it is tax effective to do so. Accordingly, we believe that any U.S. tax on repatriated earnings would be substantially offset by U.S. foreign tax credits. Unremitted earnings of such entities were $273.7 million at November 30, 2005.
12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
Under our various stock option plans, options to purchase shares of our Common Stock were granted to employees and directors. The option price for shares granted under these plans is the fair market value on the grant date and the grants have 10-year terms.
Our ESPP enables employees to purchase McCormick common stock non-voting at the lower of the stock price at grant date or exercise date. Options granted under this plan have a two-year term.
A summary of our stock option activity for the years ended November 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003 follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||||||||
(shares in millions) |
|
Shares |
|
Weighted- |
|
Shares |
|
Weighted- |
|
Shares |
|
Weighted- |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Beginning of year |
|
17.4 |
|
$ |
21.81 |
|
17.4 |
|
$ |
18.60 |
|
14.6 |
|
$ |
17.25 |
|
Granted |
|
2.7 |
|
$ |
37.91 |
|
4.1 |
|
$ |
30.71 |
|
4.6 |
|
$ |
22.57 |
|
Exercised |
|
(2.4 |
) |
$ |
19.07 |
|
(3.9 |
) |
$ |
16.75 |
|
(1.6 |
) |
$ |
17.43 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(.2 |
) |
$ |
28.64 |
|
(.2 |
) |
$ |
24.16 |
|
(.2 |
) |
$ |
20.58 |
|
End of year |
|
17.5 |
|
$ |
24.58 |
|
17.4 |
|
$ |
21.81 |
|
17.4 |
|
$ |
18.60 |
|
Exercisable - end of year |
|
10.2 |
|
$ |
20.47 |
|
8.7 |
|
$ |
18.24 |
|
8.8 |
|
$ |
16.69 |
|
A summary of our stock options outstanding at November 30, 2005 follows:
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding |
|
Options exercisable |
|
||||||
(shares in millions) |
|
Shares |
|
Weighted- |
|
Weighted- |
|
Shares |
|
Weighted- |
|
||
$11.00 - $17.84 |
|
2.7 |
|
3.5 |
|
$ |
14.06 |
|
2.7 |
|
$ |
14.06 |
|
$17.85 - $24.68 |
|
8.3 |
|
5.9 |
|
$ |
20.87 |
|
5.9 |
|
$ |
20.44 |
|
$24.69 - $31.51 |
|
3.8 |
|
7.7 |
|
$ |
30.54 |
|
1.2 |
|
$ |
30.48 |
|
$31.52 - $38.35 |
|
2.7 |
|
8.1 |
|
$ |
37.91 |
|
.4 |
|
$ |
35.28 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
6.3 |
|
$ |
24.58 |
|
10.2 |
|
$ |
20.47 |
|
Under all stock purchase and option plans, there were 9.9 million and 12.6 million shares reserved for future grants at November 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Included in stock options exercised are non-cash option swaps and taxes paid with shares of $1.5 million, $12.8 million and $1.1 million for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These amounts have been excluded from common stock issued and acquired by purchase in the consolidated cash flow statement as these are non-cash transactions.
13. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The reconciliation of shares outstanding used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended November 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003 follows:
(millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares outstanding - basic |
|
134.5 |
|
137.0 |
|
139.2 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and ESPP |
|
3.6 |
|
4.3 |
|
3.4 |
|
Average shares outstanding - diluted |
|
138.1 |
|
141.3 |
|
142.6 |
|
14. CAPITAL STOCKS
Holders of Common Stock have full voting rights except that (1) the voting rights of persons who are deemed to own beneficially 10% or more of the outstanding shares of Common Stock are limited to 10% of the votes entitled to be cast by all holders of shares of Common Stock regardless of how many shares in excess of 10% are held by such person; (2) we have the right to redeem any or all shares of stock owned by such person unless such person acquires more than 90% of the outstanding shares of each class of our common stock; and (3) at such time as such person controls more than 50% of the vote entitled to be cast by the holders of outstanding shares of Common Stock, automatically, on a share-for-share basis, all shares of Common Stock Non-Voting will convert into shares of Common Stock.
Holders of Common Stock Non-Voting will vote as a separate class on all matters on which they are entitled to vote. Holders of Common Stock Non-Voting are entitled to vote on reverse mergers and statutory share exchanges where our capital stock is converted into other securities or property, dissolution of the Company and the sale of substantially all of our assets, as well as forward mergers and consolidation of the Company.
15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are a party to various pending legal proceedings and claims, tax issues and other matters arising out of the normal course of business. Although the results of pending claims and litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, in managements opinion, the final outcome of these proceedings and claims, tax issues and other matters will not have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
53
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
16. BUSINESS SEGMENTS AND GEOGRAPHIC AREAS
Business Segments
We operate in two business segments: consumer and industrial. The consumer and industrial segments manufacture, market and distribute spices, herbs, seasoning blends and other flavors throughout the world. The consumer segment sells to retail outlets, including grocery, mass merchandise, discount and drug stores under a variety of brands, including McCormick and Zatarains in the U.S., Ducros, Vahine and Silvo in continental Europe, Club House in Canada and Schwartz in the U.K. The industrial segment sells to other food manufacturers and the food service industry both directly and indirectly through distributors.
In each of our segments, we produce and sell many individual products which are similar in composition and nature. It is impractical to segregate and identify profits for each of these individual product lines.
We measure segment performance based on operating income. Although the segments are managed separately due to their distinct distribution channels and marketing strategies, manufacturing and warehousing are often integrated to maximize cost efficiencies. We do not segregate jointly utilized assets by individual segment for internal reporting, evaluating performance or allocating capital. Asset-related information has been disclosed in aggregate.
Accounting policies for measuring segment operating income and assets are substantially consistent with those described in note 1 of the notes to consolidated financial statements, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Because of manufacturing integration for certain products within the segments, products are not sold from one segment to another but rather inventory is transferred at cost. Intersegment sales are not material. Corporate and other includes general corporate expenses and charges not directly attributable to the segments. Corporate assets include cash, deferred taxes, certain investments and fixed assets.
(millions) |
|
Consumer |
|
Industrial |
|
Total |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
|||||
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,401.8 |
|
$ |
1,190.2 |
|
$ |
2,592.0 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,592.0 |
|
|
Special charges |
|
10.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
10.2 |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
11.2 |
|
||||
Operating income |
|
283.1 |
|
105.3 |
|
388.4 |
|
(44.9 |
) |
343.5 |
|
|||||
Income from unconsolidated operations |
|
17.5 |
|
3.1 |
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|||||
Goodwill, net |
|
619.5 |
|
44.4 |
|
663.9 |
|
|
|
663.9 |
|
|||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
2,122.7 |
|
150.0 |
|
2,272.7 |
|
|||||
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
70.9 |
|
2.9 |
|
73.8 |
|
|||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
11.0 |
|
74.6 |
|
|||||
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,339.8 |
|
$ |
1,186.4 |
|
$ |
2,526.2 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,526.2 |
|
|
Special charges (credits) |
|
1.0 |
|
3.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
$ |
(6.5 |
) |
(2.5 |
) |
||||
Operating income |
|
269.7 |
|
113.6 |
|
383.3 |
|
(50.6 |
) |
332.7 |
|
|||||
Income from unconsolidated operations |
|
12.3 |
|
2.3 |
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|||||
Goodwill, net |
|
664.9 |
|
48.0 |
|
712.9 |
|
|
|
712.9 |
|
|||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
2,179.1 |
|
190.5 |
|
2,369.6 |
|
|||||
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
65.6 |
|
4.2 |
|
69.8 |
|
|||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
61.1 |
|
10.9 |
|
72.0 |
|
|||||
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,162.3 |
|
$ |
1,107.3 |
|
$ |
2,269.6 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,269.6 |
|
|
Special charges |
|
1.8 |
|
2.3 |
|
4.1 |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
5.5 |
|
||||
Operating income |
|
230.9 |
|
108.9 |
|
339.8 |
|
(44.3 |
) |
295.5 |
|
|||||
Income from unconsolidated operations |
|
14.8 |
|
1.6 |
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|||||
Goodwill, net |
|
664.9 |
|
43.8 |
|
708.7 |
|
|
|
708.7 |
|
|||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
2,003.9 |
|
141.6 |
|
2,145.5 |
|
|||||
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
74.9 |
|
16.7 |
|
91.6 |
|
|||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
56.1 |
|
9.2 |
|
65.3 |
|
54
Geographic Areas
We have net sales and long-lived assets in the following geographic areas:
(millions) |
|
United |
|
Europe |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
||||
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,581.4 |
|
$ |
638.1 |
|
$ |
372.5 |
|
$ |
2,592.0 |
|
Long-lived assets (1) |
|
553.5 |
|
645.9 |
|
92.5 |
|
1,291.9 |
|
||||
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,558.9 |
|
$ |
610.5 |
|
$ |
356.8 |
|
$ |
2,526.2 |
|
Long-lived assets (1) |
|
511.5 |
|
709.1 |
|
94.1 |
|
1,314.7 |
|
||||
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,401.4 |
|
$ |
538.2 |
|
$ |
330.0 |
|
$ |
2,269.6 |
|
Long-lived assets (1) |
|
519.7 |
|
569.3 |
|
86.2 |
|
1,175.2 |
|
(1) Long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization.
17. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT DATA
Supplemental income statement, balance sheet and cash flow information follows:
(millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Finished products and work-in-process |
|
$ |
187.0 |
|
$ |
196.7 |
|
Raw materials |
|
157.0 |
|
153.5 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
344.0 |
|
$ |
350.2 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
28.4 |
|
$ |
28.0 |
|
Buildings |
|
263.9 |
|
258.1 |
|
||
Machinery and equipment |
|
592.6 |
|
631.2 |
|
||
Construction in progress |
|
78.9 |
|
71.7 |
|
||
Accumulated depreciation |
|
(494.1 |
) |
(502.4 |
) |
||
|
|
$ |
469.7 |
|
$ |
486.6 |
|
Investments and other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investments in affiliates |
|
$ |
71.9 |
|
$ |
76.2 |
|
Other investments |
|
36.1 |
|
27.2 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
30.3 |
|
30.7 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
138.3 |
|
$ |
134.1 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Payroll and employee benefits |
|
$ |
63.1 |
|
$ |
86.5 |
|
Sales allowances |
|
126.5 |
|
121.3 |
|
||
Income taxes |
|
25.4 |
|
21.0 |
|
||
Other |
|
179.7 |
|
175.6 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
394.7 |
|
$ |
404.4 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Pension |
|
$ |
97.8 |
|
$ |
99.1 |
|
Postretirement benefits |
|
86.9 |
|
85.5 |
|
||
Deferred taxes |
|
79.2 |
|
7.2 |
|
||
Other |
|
16.8 |
|
19.4 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
280.7 |
|
$ |
211.2 |
|
(millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
Depreciation |
|
$ |
74.1 |
|
$ |
71.5 |
|
$ |
64.8 |
|
Interest paid |
|
49.1 |
|
41.0 |
|
39.0 |
|
|||
Income taxes paid |
|
78.9 |
|
77.6 |
|
80.7 |
|
|||
Interest capitalized |
|
2.1 |
|
2.7 |
|
2.7 |
|
|||
(millions) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax where applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
$ |
113.4 |
|
$ |
210.8 |
|
Unrealized loss on foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
(.5 |
) |
(2.8 |
) |
||
Fair value of open interest rate swaps |
|
(3.7 |
) |
(6.0 |
) |
||
Unamortized value of settled interest rate swaps |
|
(1.7 |
) |
(3.3 |
) |
||
Minimum pension liability adjustment |
|
(79.9 |
) |
(79.1 |
) |
||
|
|
$ |
27.6 |
|
$ |
119.6 |
|
Dividends paid per share were $0.64 in 2005, $0.56 in 2004 and $0.46 in 2003.
18. SELECTED QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)
(millions except per share data) |
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
||||
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
603.6 |
|
$ |
628.6 |
|
$ |
622.7 |
|
$ |
737.1 |
|
Gross profit |
|
228.2 |
|
241.3 |
|
243.3 |
|
323.8 |
|
||||
Operating income |
|
58.0 |
|
71.2 |
|
78.9 |
|
135.4 |
|
||||
Net income |
|
36.1 |
|
42.8 |
|
48.0 |
|
88.0 |
|
||||
Basic earnings per share |
|
.27 |
|
.32 |
|
.36 |
|
.66 |
|
||||
Diluted earnings per share |
|
.26 |
|
.31 |
|
.35 |
|
.65 |
|
||||
Dividends paid per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Common Stock and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Common Stock Non-Voting |
|
.16 |
|
.16 |
|
.16 |
|
.16 |
|
||||
Market price - Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
High |
|
39.00 |
|
38.05 |
|
34.68 |
|
33.50 |
|
||||
Low |
|
36.60 |
|
33.58 |
|
31.70 |
|
29.00 |
|
||||
Market price - Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Non-Voting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
High |
|
39.06 |
|
38.25 |
|
34.81 |
|
33.53 |
|
||||
Low |
|
36.00 |
|
33.56 |
|
31.66 |
|
29.24 |
|
||||
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
572.4 |
|
$ |
596.2 |
|
$ |
613.5 |
|
$ |
744.1 |
|
Gross profit |
|
221.7 |
|
231.9 |
|
239.2 |
|
315.1 |
|
||||
Operating income |
|
61.4 |
|
69.7 |
|
74.0 |
|
127.6 |
|
||||
Net income |
|
38.1 |
|
42.9 |
|
46.2 |
|
87.3 |
|
||||
Basic earnings per share |
|
.28 |
|
.31 |
|
.34 |
|
.64 |
|
||||
Diluted earnings per share |
|
.27 |
|
.30 |
|
.33 |
|
.62 |
|
||||
Dividends paid per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Common Stock and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Common Stock Non-Voting |
|
.14 |
|
.14 |
|
.14 |
|
.14 |
|
||||
Market price - Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
High |
|
31.25 |
|
35.45 |
|
35.97 |
|
37.50 |
|
||||
Low |
|
28.86 |
|
31.22 |
|
32.40 |
|
33.10 |
|
||||
Market price - Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Non-Voting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
High |
|
31.27 |
|
35.56 |
|
36.07 |
|
37.41 |
|
||||
Low |
|
28.84 |
|
31.00 |
|
32.25 |
|
33.14 |
|
55
Historical Financial Summary
(millions except per share data) |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
1999 |
|
1998 |
|
1997 |
|
1996 |
|
1995 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
For the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net sales under EITF 01-09 (1) |
|
$ |
2,592.0 |
|
$ |
2,526.2 |
|
$ |
2,269.6 |
|
$ |
2,044.9 |
|
$ |
1,939.1 |
|
$ |
1,863.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net sales prior to EITF 01-09 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,092.9 |
|
1,945.1 |
|
$ |
1,837.2 |
|
$ |
1,722.3 |
|
$ |
1,621.1 |
|
$ |
1,571.1 |
|
$ |
1,543.3 |
|
||||||
Percent increase |
|
2.6 |
% |
11.3 |
% |
11.0 |
% |
5.5 |
% |
4.1 |
% |
5.9 |
% |
6.7 |
% |
6.2 |
% |
3.2 |
% |
1.8 |
% |
11.1 |
% |
|||||||||||
Operating income |
|
343.5 |
|
332.7 |
|
295.5 |
|
262.4 |
|
219.6 |
|
200.5 |
|
149.2 |
|
163.9 |
|
153.9 |
|
92.3 |
|
152.2 |
|
|||||||||||
Income from unconsolidated operations |
|
20.6 |
|
14.6 |
|
16.4 |
|
22.4 |
|
21.5 |
|
18.6 |
|
13.4 |
|
6.2 |
|
7.7 |
|
5.6 |
|
2.1 |
|
|||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
|
214.9 |
|
214.5 |
|
199.2 |
|
173.8 |
|
137.1 |
|
124.5 |
|
88.1 |
|
95.3 |
|
89.4 |
|
45.4 |
|
77.8 |
|
|||||||||||
Net income (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) |
|
214.9 |
|
214.5 |
|
210.8 |
|
179.8 |
|
146.6 |
|
137.5 |
|
103.3 |
|
103.8 |
|
98.4 |
|
41.9 |
|
97.5 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Per common share (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Earnings per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
$ |
1.22 |
|
$ |
.98 |
|
$ |
.89 |
|
$ |
.61 |
|
$ |
.65 |
|
$ |
.59 |
|
$ |
.28 |
|
$ |
.48 |
|
Discontinued operations (2) (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
.09 |
|
.04 |
|
.07 |
|
.09 |
|
.07 |
|
.06 |
|
.06 |
|
.03 |
|
.12 |
|
|||||||||||
Extraordinary item |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.05 |
) |
|
|
|||||||||||
Accounting change (3) (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income |
|
1.56 |
|
1.52 |
|
1.48 |
|
1.26 |
|
1.05 |
|
.99 |
|
.72 |
|
.71 |
|
.65 |
|
.26 |
|
.60 |
|
|||||||||||
Earnings per share basic (2) (3) (5) (6) |
|
1.60 |
|
1.57 |
|
1.51 |
|
1.29 |
|
1.06 |
|
1.00 |
|
.72 |
|
.70 |
|
.65 |
|
.26 |
|
.60 |
|
|||||||||||
Common dividends declared (8) |
|
.66 |
|
.58 |
|
.49 |
|
.425 |
|
.405 |
|
.385 |
|
.35 |
|
.325 |
|
.305 |
|
.285 |
|
.265 |
|
|||||||||||
Market Non-Voting closing price |
|
31.22 |
|
36.45 |
|
28.69 |
|
23.79 |
|
21.50 |
|
18.63 |
|
16.03 |
|
16.69 |
|
13.25 |
|
12.32 |
|
11.82 |
|
|||||||||||
- end of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Book value per share |
|
6.03 |
|
6.57 |
|
5.50 |
|
4.23 |
|
3.36 |
|
2.63 |
|
2.72 |
|
2.68 |
|
2.66 |
|
2.88 |
|
3.20 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
At Year-End (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,272.7 |
|
$ |
2,369.6 |
|
$ |
2,145.5 |
|
$ |
1,930.8 |
|
$ |
1,772.0 |
|
$ |
1,659.9 |
|
$ |
1,188.8 |
|
$ |
1,259.1 |
|
$ |
1,256.2 |
|
$ |
1,326.6 |
|
$ |
1,614.3 |
|
Current debt |
|
106.1 |
|
173.2 |
|
171.0 |
|
137.3 |
|
210.8 |
|
551.9 |
|
100.6 |
|
163.6 |
|
121.3 |
|
108.9 |
|
297.3 |
|
|||||||||||
Long-term debt |
|
463.9 |
|
465.0 |
|
448.6 |
|
450.9 |
|
451.1 |
|
157.2 |
|
238.4 |
|
247.4 |
|
276.5 |
|
291.2 |
|
349.1 |
|
|||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
|
799.9 |
|
889.7 |
|
755.2 |
|
592.3 |
|
463.1 |
|
359.3 |
|
382.4 |
|
388.1 |
|
393.1 |
|
450.0 |
|
519.3 |
|
|||||||||||
Total capital (9) |
|
1,399.1 |
|
1,558.9 |
|
1,397.0 |
|
1,199.4 |
|
1,138.0 |
|
1,079.8 |
|
721.4 |
|
799.1 |
|
790.9 |
|
850.1 |
|
1,165.7 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Statistics & Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Percentage of net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Gross profit under EITF 01- 09 (1) |
|
40.0 |
% |
39.9 |
% |
39.6 |
% |
39.1 |
% |
38.0 |
% |
35.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Gross profit prior to EITF 01- 09 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.5 |
% |
38.5 |
% |
36.2 |
% |
35.0 |
% |
35.5 |
% |
36.0 |
% |
34.9 |
% |
|||||||||||
Operating income under EITF 01- 09 (1) |
|
13.3 |
% |
13.2 |
% |
13.0 |
% |
12.8 |
% |
11.3 |
% |
10.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating income prior to EITF 01- 09 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
10.3 |
% |
8.1 |
% |
9.5 |
% |
9.5 |
% |
5.9 |
% |
9.9 |
% |
|||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
|
8.3 |
% |
8.5 |
% |
8.8 |
% |
8.5 |
% |
7.1 |
% |
6.7 |
% |
4.8 |
% |
5.5 |
% |
5.5 |
% |
2.9 |
% |
5.0 |
% |
|||||||||||
Effective tax rate |
|
32.7 |
% |
30.3 |
% |
30.9 |
% |
31.0 |
% |
32.6 |
% |
35.5 |
% |
40.4 |
% |
35.7 |
% |
36.8 |
% |
38.6 |
% |
35.7 |
% |
|||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (4) |
|
$ |
74.6 |
|
$ |
72.0 |
|
$ |
65.3 |
|
$ |
53.4 |
|
$ |
60.7 |
|
$ |
49.7 |
|
$ |
46.1 |
|
$ |
43.7 |
|
$ |
38.6 |
|
$ |
52.6 |
|
$ |
52.2 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
73.8 |
|
$ |
69.8 |
|
$ |
91.6 |
|
$ |
100.4 |
|
$ |
96.8 |
|
$ |
42.0 |
|
$ |
41.0 |
|
$ |
37.8 |
|
$ |
34.2 |
|
$ |
63.8 |
|
$ |
71.3 |
|
Debt-to-total-capital |
|
40.7 |
% |
40.9 |
% |
44.4 |
% |
49.0 |
% |
58.2 |
% |
65.7 |
% |
47.0 |
% |
51.4 |
% |
50.3 |
% |
47.1 |
% |
55.5 |
% |
|||||||||||
Average shares outstanding (7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Basic |
|
134.5 |
|
137.0 |
|
139.2 |
|
139.5 |
|
137.8 |
|
137.6 |
|
142.8 |
|
146.6 |
|
151.4 |
|
161.2 |
|
162.4 |
|
|||||||||||
Diluted |
|
138.1 |
|
141.3 |
|
142.6 |
|
142.3 |
|
140.2 |
|
139.2 |
|
144.0 |
|
147.6 |
|
151.8 |
|
161.4 |
|
162.6 |
|
(1) In 2002, McCormick implemented EITF 01-09. Results have been reclassified for 2001 and 2000.
(2) McCormick sold both Gilroy Foods, Incorporated and Gilroy Energy Company, Inc. in 1996.
(3) In 1999, McCormick changed its actuarial method for computing pension expense.
(4) In 2002, McCormick adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Prior year results have not been adjusted.
(5) In 2003, McCormick sold its packaging segment and Jenks Sales Brokers in the U.K. All years have been restated for the sale of the packaging segment. Only 2002 and 2001 have been restated for the sale of Jenks.
(6) In 2003, McCormick consolidated the lessor of a leased distribution center in accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as revised.
(7) All share data adjusted for 2-for-1 stock split effective April 2002.
(8) Includes fourth quarter dividends which, in some years, were declared in December following the close of each fiscal year.
(9) Total capital includes debt, minority interest and shareholders equity.
56
Investor Information
World Headquarters
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
18 Loveton Circle
Sparks, MD 21152-6000
U.S.A.
(410) 771-7301
www.mccormick.com
Stock Information
New York Stock Exchange
Symbol: MKC
Anticipated Dividend Dates 2006
Record Date |
|
Payment Date |
|
04/03/06 |
|
04/17/06 |
|
07/07/06 |
|
07/21/06 |
|
10/06/06 |
|
10/20/06 |
|
12/29/06 |
|
01/19/07 |
|
McCormick has paid dividends every year since 1925.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
621 East Pratt Street
Baltimore, MD 21202
Certifications
The Company has filed the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certifications required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in its Form 10-K. Additionally, the Chief Executive Officer has provided the required annual certifications to the New York Stock Exchange.
Investor Inquiries
Our investor website, ir.mccormick.com, has our corporate governance principles, as well as annual reports, Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) filings, press releases, webcasts and other information.
To obtain without cost a copy of the annual report filed with the SEC on Form 10-K or for general questions about McCormick or information in our annual or quarterly reports, contact Investor Relations at the world headquarters address, investor website or telephone:
Report ordering:
(800) 424-5855 or (410) 771-7537
Investor and securities analysts inquiries:
(410) 771-7244
Registered Shareholder Inquiries
For questions on your account, statements, dividend payments, reinvestment and direct deposit, and for address changes, lost certificates, stock transfers, ownership changes or other administrative matters, contact our transfer agent.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Shareowner Services
161 North Concord Exchange Street
South St. Paul, MN 55075 -1139
(877) 778- 6784, or (651) 450- 4064
www.wellsfargo.com/shareownerservices
You may access your account information via the Internet at www.shareowneronline.com
Investor Services Plan (Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Purchase Plan)
The Company offers an Investor Services Plan which provides shareholders of record the opportunity to automatically reinvest dividends, make optional cash purchases of stock, place stock certificates into safekeeping and sell shares through the Plan. Individuals who are not current shareholders may purchase their initial shares directly through the Plan. All transactions are subject to the limitations set forth in the Plan prospectus, which may be obtained by contacting Wells Fargo Shareowner Services at:
(877) 778-6784 or (651) 450- 4064
www.wellsfargo.com
/shareownerservices
Stock Price History
3 months ended |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Close |
|
|||
11/30/05 |
|
$ |
33.53 |
|
$ |
29.24 |
|
$ |
31.22 |
|
08/31/05 |
|
34.81 |
|
31.66 |
|
33.91 |
|
|||
05/31/05 |
|
38.25 |
|
33.56 |
|
33.84 |
|
|||
02/28/05 |
|
39.06 |
|
36.00 |
|
37.99 |
|
|||
11/30/04 |
|
37.41 |
|
33.14 |
|
36.45 |
|
|||
Annual Meeting
The annual meeting of shareholders will be held at 10 a.m., Wednesday, March 22, 2006, at Marriotts Hunt Valley Inn, 245 Shawan Road (Exit 20A off I-83 north of Baltimore), Hunt Valley, Maryland 21031.
Online Receipt of Annual Report and Proxy Statement
If you are a registered shareholder and would like to access next years proxy statement and annual report over the Internet, go to www.econsent.com/mkcv/ to enroll for this service.
Trademarks
Use of ® or TM in this annual report indicates trademarks owned or used by McCormick & Company, Incorporated and its subsidiaries and affiliates.
57
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
18 Loveton Circle
Sparks, Maryland 21152-6000 U.S.A.
410-771-7301
www.mccormick.com
EXHIBIT 21
Subsidiaries of The Registrant
The following is a listing of Subsidiaries of the Registrant including the name under which they do business and their jurisdictions of incorporation. Certain subsidiaries are not listed since, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary as of December 31, 2005.
|
Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|
|
|
|
Mojave Foods Corporation |
|
Maryland |
McCormick de Centro America, S.A. de C.V. |
|
El Salvador |
McCormick Europe, Ltd. |
|
United Kingdom |
McCormick International Holdings Ltd. |
|
United Kingdom |
McCormick France Holdings S.A.S. |
|
France |
McCormick France, S.A.S. |
|
France |
Dessert Products International S.A.S. |
|
France |
McCormick (U.K.) Ltd. |
|
Scotland |
McCormick South Africa Pty Limited |
|
South Africa |
McCormick Foods Australia Pty. Ltd. |
|
Australia |
McCormick (Guangzhou) Food Company Limited |
|
Peoples Republic of China |
Shanghai McCormick Foods Company Limited |
|
Peoples Republic of China |
McCormick Ingredients Southeast Asia Private Limited |
|
Republic of Singapore |
McCormick Pesa, S.A. de C.V. |
|
Mexico |
La Cie McCormick Canada Co. |
|
Province of Nova Scotia, Canada |
McCormick Global Ingredients Limited |
|
Cayman |
McCormick Cyprus Limited |
|
Cyprus |
McCormick Hungary Group Financing Limited |
|
Hungary |
Zatarains Brands, Inc. |
|
Louisiana |
Uniqsauces |
|
United Kingdom |
McCormick Netherlands Holdings B.V. |
|
The Netherlands |
McCormick Switzerland GmbH |
|
Switzerland |
EXHIBIT 23
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries of our reports dated January 24, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries, McCormick & Company, Incorporated managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of McCormick & Company, Incorporated, included in the 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders of McCormick & Company, Incorporated.
Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries listed in Item 15(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and in the related Prospectuses (if applicable):
Form |
|
Registration Number |
|
Date Filed |
S-8 |
|
333-123808 |
|
4/4/2005 |
S-8 POS |
|
333-104084 |
|
3/23/2005 |
S-3 |
|
333-122366 |
|
1/28/2005 |
S-8 |
|
333-114094 |
|
3/31/2004 |
S-8 |
|
333-104084 |
|
3/28/2003 |
S-3/A |
|
333-46490 |
|
1/23/2001 |
S-8 |
|
333-93231 |
|
12/21/1999 |
S-8 |
|
333-74963 |
|
3/24/1999 |
S-3 |
|
333-47611 |
|
3/9/1998 |
S-8 |
|
333-23727 |
|
3/21/1997 |
S-3 |
|
33-66614 |
|
7/27/1993 |
S-3 |
|
33-40920 |
|
5/29/1991 |
S-8 |
|
33-33724 |
|
3/2/1990 |
S-3 |
|
33-32712 |
|
12/21/1989 |
S-3 |
|
33-24660 |
|
3/16/1989 |
S-3 |
|
33-24659 |
|
9/15/1988 |
S-8 |
|
33-24658 |
|
9/15/1988 |
of our reports dated January 24, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of McCormick & Company, Incorporated, McCormick & Company, Incorporated managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of McCormick & Company, Incorporated, included in the 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders of McCormick & Company, Incorporated, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended November 30, 2005.
|
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|
|
|
|
Baltimore, Maryland |
|
|
January 24, 2006 |
|
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Robert J. Lawless, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of McCormick & Company, Incorporated, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of McCormick & Company, Incorporated (the registrant);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
Date: |
January 27, 2006 |
|
/s/ Robert J. Lawless |
|
|
Robert J. Lawless |
|||
|
Chairman, President & Chief |
|||
|
Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
I, Francis A. Contino, Executive Vice President Strategic Planning & Chief Financial Officer of McCormick & Company, Incorporated, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of McCormick & Company, Incorporated (the registrant);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
Date: |
January 27, 2006 |
|
/s/ Francis A. Contino |
|
|
Francis A. Contino |
|||
|
Executive Vice President Strategic |
|||
|
Planning & Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of McCormick & Company, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending November 20, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Lawless, Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
/s/ Robert J. Lawless |
|
||
|
Robert J. Lawless |
|||
|
Chairman, President & Chief |
|||
|
Executive Officer |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
Date: |
January 27, 2006 |
|
|
|
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of McCormick & Company, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending November 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Francis A. Contino, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Supply Chain of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
/s/ Francis A. Contino |
|
||
|
Francis A. Contino |
|||
|
Executive Vice President Strategic |
|||
|
Planning & Chief Financial Officer |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
Date: |
January 27, 2006 |
|
|
|