SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007 |
|
Commission file number 001-14920 |
|
|
|
McCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED |
||
|
|
|
Maryland |
|
52-0408290 |
(State of incorporation) |
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
18 Loveton Circle |
|
|
Sparks, Maryland |
|
21152 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (410) 771-7301 |
||
|
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: |
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
Common Stock, No Par Value |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Common Stock Non-Voting, No Par Value |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Not applicable.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Check one:
Large accelerated filer |
x |
Accelerated filer |
o |
Non-accelerated filer |
o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates. The aggregate market value shall be computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second quarter.
The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates at May 31, 2007: $295,588,791
The aggregate market value of the non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates at May 31, 2007: $4,336,471,138
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
|
|
Class |
|
Number of Shares Outstanding |
|
Date |
Common Stock |
|
12,737,897 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
Common Stock Non-Voting |
|
115,122,793 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Document |
|
Part of 10-K into Which Incorporated |
Annual Report to Stockholders |
|
|
for Fiscal Year Ended November 30, 2007 |
|
Part I, Part II |
|
|
|
Proxy Statement |
|
|
dated February 20, 2008 |
|
Part III |
PART I
As used herein, the Registrant means McCormick & Company, Incorporated and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.
Item 1. Business
The Registrant is a diversified specialty food company and a global leader in the manufacture, marketing and distribution of flavor products (including spices, herbs, extracts, seasonings and flavorings) and other specialty food products to the entire food industry. The Registrants major sales, distribution and production facilities are located in North America and Europe. Additional facilities are located in Mexico, Central America, Australia, China, Singapore, Thailand and South Africa. The Registrant was formed in 1915 under Maryland law as the successor to a business established in 1889.
The Registrant operates in two business segments: consumer and industrial. The consumer segment sells spices, herbs, extracts, seasoning blends, sauces, marinades and specialty foods to the consumer food market under a variety of brands worldwide, including McCormick, Zatarains, Simply Asia, Thai Kitchen, Ducros, Vahine, Silvo, Club House and Schwartz. The industrial segment sells seasoning blends, natural spices and herbs, wet flavors, coating systems and compound flavors to food manufacturers and the food service industry, served both directly and indirectly through distributors.
Please refer to pages 15 through 17, of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007 for descriptions of the Registrants consumer and industrial businesses, and pages 6, 7, 8, 11 and 16 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007 for a discussion of growth initiatives for the business. Such pages of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007 are incorporated by reference.
For financial information about the Registrants business segments, please refer to pages 18 through 22, Managements Discussion and Analysis, and Note 14, Business Segments and Geographic Areas of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 57 and 58 of the Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, which pages are incorporated by reference.
For a discussion of the Registrants recent acquisition activity, please refer to page 25, Managements Discussion and Analysis, and Note 2, Acquisitions of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 45 of the Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, which pages are incorporated by reference.
Raw Materials
The most significant raw materials to the Registrant are cheese, pepper, soybean oil, wheat, sweeteners, capsicums, garlic and onion. Pepper and other spices and herbs are generally sourced from countries other than the United States. Others, like cheese and onion, are primarily sourced from within the United States. The Registrant is not aware of any government restrictions or other factors that would have a material adverse effect on the availability of these raw materials. Because the raw materials are agricultural products, they are subject to fluctuations in market price and availability caused by weather, growing and harvesting conditions, market conditions and other factors beyond the Registrants control. The Registrant responds to this volatility in a number of ways including strategic raw material purchases, purchases of raw material for future delivery and customer price adjustments.
Customers
The Registrants products are sold directly to customers and also through brokers, wholesalers and distributors. In the consumer segment, products are resold to consumers through retail outlets, including grocery, mass merchandise, warehouse clubs, discount and drug stores under a variety of brands. In the industrial segment, products are used by food and beverage manufacturers as ingredients for their finished goods and by food service customers as ingredients for menu items to enhance the flavor of their foods. Customers for the industrial segment include food manufacturers and the food service industry, which are supplied both directly and through distributors.
The Registrant has a large number of customers for its products. In fiscal year 2007, sales to one of the Registrants customers, PepsiCo, Inc., accounted for 10% of consolidated net sales. Sales to the Registrants five largest customers represented approximately 28.5% of consolidated net sales for this period.
The dollar amount of backlog orders of the Registrants business is not material to an understanding of the Registrants business, taken as a whole. No material portion of the Registrants business is subject to renegotiation of profits or termination of contracts or subcontracts at the election of the U.S. Government.
2
Trademarks, Licenses and Patents
The Registrant owns a number of trademark registrations. Although in the aggregate these trademarks may be material to the Registrants business, the loss of any one of those trademarks, with the exception of the Registrants McCormick, Club House, Ducros, Schwartz, Vahine and Zatarains trademarks, would not have a material adverse effect on the Registrants business. The McCormick trademark is extensively used by the Registrant in connection with the sale of virtually all of the Registrants food products worldwide. The terms of the trademark registrations are as prescribed by law and the registrations will be renewed for as long as the Registrant deems them to be useful.
The Registrant has entered into a number of license agreements authorizing the use of its trademarks by affiliated and non-affiliated entities. The loss of these license agreements would not have a material adverse effect on the Registrants business. The term of the license agreements is generally three to five years or until such time as either party terminates the agreement. Those agreements with specific terms are renewable upon agreement of the parties.
The Registrant owns various patents, but they are not viewed as material to the Registrants business.
Seasonality
Due to seasonal factors inherent in the business, the Registrants sales, income and cash from operations generally are lower in the first two quarters of the fiscal year, increase in the third quarter and are significantly higher in the fourth quarter due to the holiday season. The seasonality reflects customer and consumer buying patterns, primarily in the consumer segment.
Working Capital
In order to meet increased demand for its consumer products during its fourth quarter, the Registrant usually builds its inventories during the third quarter. The Registrant generally finances working capital items (inventory and receivables) through short-term borrowings, which include the use of lines of credit and the issuance of commercial paper. For a description of the Registrants liquidity and capital resources, see Note 6 Financing Arrangements of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 48 and 49 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, which pages are incorporated by reference, and the Liquidity and Financial Condition section of Managements Discussion and Analysis on pages 22 through 25 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, which pages are incorporated by reference.
Competition
The Registrant is a global leader in the manufacture and sale of flavor products (including spices, herbs, extracts, seasonings and flavorings) and other specialty food products, and competes in a geographic market that is international and highly competitive. The Registrants strategies for competing in each of its segments include a focus on price and value, product quality and innovation, and superior service. Additionally, in the consumer segment, the Registrant focuses on brand recognition and loyalty, effective advertising and promotional programs, and the identification and satisfaction of consumer preferences. For further discussion, see pages 12, and 15 through 17 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, which pages are incorporated by reference.
3
Research and Development
Many of the Registrants products are prepared from confidential formulae developed by its research laboratories and product development teams. Expenditures for research and development were $49.3 million in 2007, $45.0 million in 2006 and $43.1 million in 2005. The amount spent on customer-sponsored research activities is not material.
Environmental Regulations
The cost of compliance with federal, state and local provisions related to protection of the environment has had no material effect on the Registrants business. There were no material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities in 2007 and there are no material expenditures planned for such purposes in 2008.
Employees
The Registrant had approximately 7,500 employees worldwide as of December 31, 2007. The Registrant believes its relationship with employees to be good. The Registrant has no collective bargaining contracts in the United States. At the Registrants foreign subsidiaries, approximately 1,200 employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements or similar arrangements.
Financial Information About Geographic Locations
For information on the net sales and long-lived assets of the Registrant, see Note 14, Business Segments and Geographic Areas of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages 57 and 58 of the Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, and the Market Risk Sensitivity section of Managements Discussion and Analysis on pages 28 through 30 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, which pages are incorporated by reference.
Foreign Operations
The Registrant is subject in varying degrees to certain risks typically associated with a global business, such as local economic and market conditions, restrictions on investments, royalties and dividends and exchange rate fluctuations. Approximately 40% of sales in 2007 were from international operations.
Forward-Looking Information
For a discussion of forward-looking information, see the Forward-Looking Information section of Managements Discussion and Analysis on page 33 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, which page is incorporated by reference.
Available Information
The Registrants Internet website address is: www.mccormick.com. The Registrant makes available free of charge through its website its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after such documents are
4
electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The Registrants website also includes the Registrants Corporate Governance Guidelines, Business Ethics Policy and charters of its Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. These documents are also available in print to any shareholder upon request.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following are certain risk factors that could affect the Registrants business, financial condition and results of operations. These risk factors should be considered in connection with evaluating the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because these factors could cause the actual results and conditions to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. Before you buy the Registrants common stock, you should know that making such an investment involves some risks, including the risks described below. The risks that have been highlighted here are not the only ones that the Registrant faces. If any of the risks actually occur, the Registrants business, financial condition or results of operations could be negatively affected. In that case, the trading price of the Registrants securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Damage To The Registrants Reputation Or Brand Name Could Negatively Impact The Registrant.
The Registrants reputation for manufacturing high quality products is widely recognized. In order to safeguard that reputation, the Registrant has adopted rigorous quality assurance and quality control procedures which are designed to ensure conformity to specification and compliance with law. The Registrant also continually makes efforts to increase its brand awareness and relevance, and to maintain and improve relationships with its customers and consumers. A serious breach of the Registrants quality assurance or quality control procedures, or deterioration of its quality image, or impairment of its customer or consumer relationships, could have a material negative impact on its financial condition and results of operations.
Issues Regarding Procurement Of Raw Materials May Negatively Impact The Registrant.
The Registrants purchases of raw materials are subject to fluctuations in market price and availability caused by weather, growing and harvesting conditions, market conditions, governmental actions and other factors beyond the Registrants control. The most significant raw materials are cheese, pepper, soybean oil, wheat, sweeteners, capsicums, garlic and onion. While future movements of raw material costs are uncertain, the Registrant seeks to mitigate the market price risk in a number of ways, including strategic raw material purchases, purchases of raw material for future delivery and customer price adjustments. The Registrant has not used derivatives to manage the volatility related to this risk. Any actions taken in response to market price fluctuations may not effectively limit or eliminate the Registrants exposure to changes in raw material prices. Therefore, the Registrant cannot provide assurance that future raw material price fluctuations will not have a negative impact on its business, financial condition or operating results.
In addition, the Registrant may have very little opportunity to mitigate the availability risk of certain raw materials due to the effect of weather on crop yield, political unrest in the producing countries, changes in governmental agricultural programs and other factors beyond the Registrants control. Therefore, the Registrant cannot provide assurance that future raw material availability will not have a negative impact on its business, financial condition or operating results.
5
Further, political, socio-economic, and cultural conditions, as well as disruptions caused by terrorist activities, in developing countries create risks for food safety. Although the Registrant has adopted rigorous quality assurance and quality control procedures which are designed to ensure the safety of its imported products, the Registrant cannot provide assurance that such events will not have a negative impact on its business, financial condition or operating results.
The Registrants Profitability May Suffer As A Result Of Competition In Its Markets.
The food industry is intensely competitive. Competition in the Registrants product categories is based on price, product innovation, product quality, brand recognition and loyalty, effectiveness of marketing and promotional activity and the ability to identify and satisfy consumer preferences. From time to time, the Registrant may need to reduce the prices for some of its products to respond to competitive and customer pressures. Such pressures also may impair the Registrants ability to take appropriate remedial action to address commodity and other cost increases.
The Registrants Operations May Be Impaired As A Result Of Disasters, Business Interruptions Or Similar Events.
A natural disaster such as an earthquake, fire, flood, or severe storm, or a catastrophic event such as a terrorist attack, an epidemic affecting the Registrants operating activities, major facilities, or employees and customers health, or a computer system failure, could cause an interruption or delay in the Registrants business and loss of inventory and/or data or render the Registrant unable to accept and fulfill customer orders in a timely manner, or at all. In addition, some of the Registrants inventory and production facilities are located in areas that are susceptible to harsh weather; a major storm, heavy snowfall or other similar event could prevent the Registrant from delivering products in a timely manner. The Registrant cannot provide assurance that its disaster recovery plan will address all of the issues it may encounter in the event of a disaster or other unanticipated issue, and the Registrants business interruption insurance may not adequately compensate it for losses that may occur from any of the foregoing. In the event that an earthquake, natural disaster, terrorist attack or other catastrophic event were to destroy any part of the Registrants facilities or interrupt its operations for any extended period of time, or if harsh weather or health conditions prevent the Registrant from delivering products in a timely manner, the Registrants business, financial condition and operating results could be seriously harmed.
The Registrant May Not Be Able To Successfully Consummate Proposed Acquisitions Or Divestitures Or Integrate Acquired Businesses.
From time to time, the Registrant may acquire other businesses and, based on an evaluation of its business portfolio, divest existing businesses. These potential acquisitions and divestitures may present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including diversion of management attention from existing businesses, difficulty with integrating or separating personnel and financial and other systems, increased expenses, assumption of unknown liabilities, and indemnities and potential disputes with the buyers or sellers. In addition, the Registrant may be required to incur asset impairment charges (including charges related to goodwill and other intangible assets) in connection with acquired businesses which may reduce its profitability. If the Registrant is unable to consummate these transactions, or successfully integrate and grow acquisitions and achieve contemplated revenue synergies and cost savings, its financial results could be adversely affected.
6
The Registrants Foreign Operations Are Subject To Additional Risks.
The Registrant operates its business and markets its products internationally. In 2007, 40% of the Registrants sales were generated in foreign countries. The Registrants foreign operations are subject to the risks described in this section, as well as risks related to fluctuations in currency values, foreign currency exchange controls, discriminatory fiscal policies, compliance with foreign laws, enforcement of remedies in foreign jurisdictions and other economic or political uncertainties. In particular, the Registrants subsidiaries conduct their businesses in local currency and, for purposes of financial reporting, their results are translated into U.S. dollars based on average exchange rates prevailing during a reporting period. During times of a strengthening U.S. dollar, the Registrants reported net revenues and operating income will be reduced because the local currency will translate into fewer U.S. dollars. Additionally, international sales are subject to risks related to imposition of tariffs, quotas, trade barriers and other similar restrictions. All of these risks could result in increased costs or decreased revenues, either of which could adversely affect the Registrants profitability.
The Consolidation Of Customers May Put Pressures On The Registrants Operating Margins And Profitability.
The Registrants customers, such as supermarkets, warehouse clubs and food distributors, have consolidated in recent years and consolidation is expected to continue throughout the U.S., the European Union and other major markets. Such consolidation could present a challenge to margin growth and profitability in that it has produced large, sophisticated customers with increased buying power who are more capable of operating with reduced inventories, resisting price increases, and demanding lower pricing, increased promotional programs and specifically tailored products. These factors and others could have an adverse impact on the Registrants future sales growth and profitability.
Fluctuations In Foreign Currency Markets May Negatively Impact The Registrant.
The Registrant is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency cash flows primarily related to raw material purchases. Most of this exposure is due to foreign operations needing to purchase raw materials in U.S. dollars. The Registrant also is exposed to fluctuations in the value of foreign currency investments in subsidiaries and unconsolidated affiliates and cash flows related to repatriation of these investments. Additionally, the Registrant is exposed to volatility in the translation of foreign currency earnings to U.S. dollars. Primary exposures include the U.S. dollar versus the Euro, British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, Australian dollar, Mexican peso, Chinese renminbi and Thai baht. On occasion, the Registrant may enter into forward and option contracts to manage these foreign currency risks. However, these contracts may not effectively limit or eliminate the Registrants exposure to a decline in operating results due to foreign currency exchange changes. Therefore, the Registrant cannot provide assurance that future exchange rate fluctuations will not have a negative impact on its business, financial position or operating results.
Increases In Interest Rates May Negatively Impact The Registrant.
The Registrant had total outstanding short-term borrowings of approximately $149.2 million at an average interest rate of approximately 5.28% on November 30, 2007. The Registrants policy is to manage its interest costs using a mix of fixed and variable rate debt. The Registrant also uses interest rate swaps to achieve a desired proportion of fixed and variable rate debt. The Registrant utilizes derivative financial instruments to enhance its ability to manage risk, including interest rate exposures that exist as part of its ongoing business operations. The Registrant does not enter into contracts for trading purposes, nor is it a party to any leveraged derivative instrument. The Registrants use of
7
derivative financial instruments is monitored through regular communication with senior management and the utilization of written guidelines. However, the Registrants use of these instruments may not effectively limit or eliminate its exposure to changes in interest rates. Therefore, the Registrant cannot provide assurance that future interest rate increases will not have a material negative impact on its business, financial position or operating results.
The Pending Acquisition Of The Assets Of Lawrys May Pose Risks To The Registrants Business.
The Registrant has entered into an asset purchase agreement with Conopco, Inc. under which the Registrant agreed to purchase specified assets used in connection with the manufacturing, marketing, distributing and selling of food products under the Lawrys and Adolphs brands, including the Lawrys® and Adolphs® trade names, trademarks, and service marks, and all associated goodwill. There may be risks or costs resulting from the Lawrys acquisition that are not presently known to the Registrant. Various factors, including regulatory approval, may delay or prevent us from completing the acquisition and increase the costs associated with the acquisition. For example, the Registrant has agreed with Conopco to divest its Season-All® business if the divesture becomes necessary to obtain clearance under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (HSR). The Registrant has agreed to pay Conopco a $30 million termination fee, subject to certain limited conditions, in the event that HSR clearance is not obtained.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
The Registrants principal executive offices and primary research facilities are owned and are located in suburban Baltimore, Maryland.
The following is a list of the Registrants principal manufacturing properties, all of which are owned except for the facilities in Commerce, California and Melbourne, Australia which are leased:
|
United States |
|
|
|
Atlanta, Georgia industrial |
|
|
Commerce, California consumer |
|
|
Dallas, Texas industrial |
|
|
Hunt Valley, Maryland consumer and industrial |
|
|
(3 principal plants) |
|
|
New Orleans, Louisiana consumer |
|
|
South Bend, Indiana industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada |
|
|
|
London, Ontario consumer and industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
|
|
Cuautitlan de Romero Rubio, Mexico industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
|
Haddenham, England consumer and industrial |
|
|
Littleborough, England consumer and industrial |
8
|
France |
|
|
|
Carpentras consumer and industrial |
|
|
Monteux consumer (2 principal plants) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Netherlands |
|
|
|
Papendrecht consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
|
|
|
Melbourne consumer and industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
China |
|
|
|
Guangzhou consumer and industrial |
|
|
Shanghai consumer and industrial |
In addition to distribution facilities and warehouse space available at its manufacturing facilities, the Registrant leases regional distribution facilities in Belcamp, Maryland, Salinas, California, and Dallas, Texas and owns a distribution facility in Monteux, France. The Registrant also owns, leases or contracts other properties used for manufacturing consumer and industrial products and for sales, warehousing, distribution and administrative functions.
The Registrant believes its plants are well maintained and suitable for their intended use. The Registrant further believes that these plants generally have adequate capacity and can accommodate seasonal demands, changing product mixes and additional growth. Many additions and improvements have been made to these facilities over the years and the plants manufacturing equipment includes equipment of the latest type and technology.
There are no material pending legal proceedings in which the Registrant or any of its subsidiaries is a party or in which any of their property is the subject.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of Registrants fiscal year 2007.
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Registrant has disclosed in Note 16, Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 59 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, which page is incorporated by reference, the information relating to the market price and dividends paid on the Registrants classes of common stock. The market price of the Registrants common stock at the close of business on December 31, 2007 was $37.95 for the Common Stock and $37.91 for the Common Stock Non-Voting.
9
The Registrants Common Stock and Common Stock Non-Voting are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange. The approximate number of holders of Common Stock of the Registrant based on record ownership as of December 31, 2007 was as follows:
|
|
Approximate Number |
Title of Class |
|
of Record Holders |
Common Stock, no par value |
|
2,000 |
Common Stock Non-Voting, no par value |
|
10,500 |
The following table summarizes the Companys purchases of Common Stock (CS) and Common Stock Non-Voting (CSNV) during the fourth quarter of 2007:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
||||||||
Period |
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
Average |
|
Total Number of |
|
Approximate Dollar |
September 1, 2007 to September 30, 2007 |
|
CS 0 |
|
$0 |
|
CS 0 |
|
$51.2 million |
|
CSNV 225,000 |
|
$35.46 |
|
CSNV 225,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2007 to October 31, 2007 |
|
CS 58,913 |
|
$36.58 |
|
CS 58,913 |
|
$49.1 million |
|
CSNV 0 |
|
$0 |
|
CSNV 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 1, 2007 to November 30, 2007 |
|
CS 0.378 |
|
$35.16 |
|
CS 0.378 |
|
$49.1 million |
|
CSNV 0 |
|
$0 |
|
CSNV 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
CS 58,913.378 |
|
$36.58 |
|
CS 58,913.378 |
|
$49.1 million |
|
CSNV 225,000 |
|
$35.46 |
|
CSNV 225,000 |
|
|
Note: In June 2005, the Board of Directors approved an additional $400 million share repurchase authorization. As of November 30, 2007, $49.1 million remained of the $400 million authorization. This amount is expected to be sufficient for 2008 share repurchases in view of the anticipated acquisition of the Lawrys business.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
This information is set forth on the line items titled Net sales, Net income from continuing operations, Earnings per share Diluted - Continuing operations, Common dividends declared, Long-term debt and Total assets in the Historical Financial Summary on page 60 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, which line items are incorporated by reference. See also Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies on pages 43 through 45 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, which pages are incorporated by reference.
10
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This information is set forth in Managements Discussion and Analysis on pages 15 through 37 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, which pages are incorporated by reference.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
This information is set forth in the Market Risk Sensitivity section of Managements Discussion and Analysis on pages 28 through 30 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, which pages are incorporated by reference, and in Note 7 Financial Instruments on pages 49 and 50 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, which pages are incorporated by reference.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The financial statements and supplementary data are included on pages 39 through 59 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, which pages are incorporated by reference. The report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, on such financial statements is included on page 38 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, which pages are incorporated by reference. The supplemental schedule for 2005, 2006 and 2007 is included on page 18 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The unaudited quarterly data is included in Note 16, Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on page 59 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, which page is incorporated by reference.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Registrant maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that information which is required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to management in a timely manner. The Registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated as of November 30, 2007 the effectiveness of this system of disclosure controls and procedures, and have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Managements report on the Registrants internal controls over financial reporting and the report of the Registrants Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on internal controls over financial reporting are included on pages 37 and 38 of the Registrants Annual Report to Stockholders for 2007, which pages are incorporated by reference. No change occurred in the Registrants internal controls
11
over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)) during the last fiscal quarter which was identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(a) as materially affecting, or reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Certifications
The certifications of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are filed as Exhibits 31 and 32 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Additionally, as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Listed Company Manual, the Registrants Chief Executive Officer filed a certification with the NYSE on April 13, 2007 reporting that he was not aware of any violation by the Registrant of the NYSEs Corporate Governance listing standards.
In connection with the retirement of Mr. Lawless as Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2008, the Registrant entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Lawless, the current Chairman of the Registrants Board of Directors. The agreement provides that Mr. Lawless, when and as requested by Mr. Wilson, the Registrants current Chief Executive Officer, will provide consulting services and advice to the Registrant and participate in various external activities and events for the benefit of the Registrant. The agreement, which was approved by the Compensation Committee of the Registrants Board of Directors on January 22, 2008 and was executed on January 23, 2008, has a term of twelve months beginning January 1, 2008 and may be renewed for additional periods of time thereafter upon mutual written agreement. Mr. Lawless is to provide up to 400 hours of consulting services per year to the Registrant, subject to his reasonable availability. For his services and commitments, the Registrant will pay Mr. Lawless a consulting fee at a rate equal to $20,000 per month for each month during the term of the agreement. The Registrant will also reimburse Mr. Lawless for reasonable expenses that he incurs in providing these services.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers of the Registrant and Corporate Governance
Information responsive to this item is set forth in the sections titled Corporate Goverannce, Election of Directors and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in the Registrants Proxy Statement for 2008, incorporated by reference herein, to be filed within 120 days after the end of the Registrants fiscal year (the 2008 Proxy Statement).
In addition to the executive officers described in the 2008 Proxy Statement incorporated by reference in Item 10 of this Report, the following individuals are also executive officers of the Registrant: Paul C. Beard; Kenneth A. Kelly, Jr.; Charles T. Langmead; Cecile K. Perich; and Robert W. Skelton.
Mr. Beard is 53 years old and, during the last five years, has held the following position with the Registrant: March 2002 to present Vice President, Finance & Treasurer.
Mr. Kelly is 53 years old and, during the last five years, has held the following position with the Registrant: February 2000 to present Vice President & Controller.
Mr. Langmead is 50 years old and, during the last five years, has held the following positions with the Registrant: September 2005 to present President, U.S. Industrial Group; February 2002 to September 2005 Vice President & General Manager, Food Service & Global Restaurant Divisions.
12
Ms. Perich is 56 years old and, during the last five years, has held the following positions with the Registrant: February 2007 to present Vice President Human Relations; January 1997 to February 2007 Vice President Human Relations, U.S. Industrial Group.
Mr. Skelton is 60 years old and, during the last five years, has held the following position with the Registrant: November 2002 to present Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary.
The Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to all employees, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and its Board of Directors. A copy of the code of ethics is available on the Registrants Internet website at www.mccormick.com and is available in print to any shareholder upon request. The Registrant intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 10 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of its code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on its website at the Internet website address set forth above.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections titled Compensation of Directors, Compensation Discussion And Analysis, Compensation Committee Report, Summary Compensation Table, Grants of Plan-Based Awards, Narrative to the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table, Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End, Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Last Fiscal Year, Pension Benefits, Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation, Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control, Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation and Equity Compensation Plan Information in the 2008 Proxy Statement.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Transactions
Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by reference to the sections titled Principal Stockholders, Election of Directors and Equity Compensation Plan Information in the 2008 Proxy Statement.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Information responsive to this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled Corporate Governance in the 2008 Proxy Statement.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section titled Report of Audit Committee and Fees of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in the 2008 Proxy Statement.
13
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this Report:
1. The consolidated financial statements for McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries which are listed in the Table of Contents appearing on page 17 of this Report.
2. The financial statement schedule required by Item 8 of this Form 10-K which is listed in the Table of Contents appearing on page 17 of this Report.
3. The exhibits that are filed as a part of this Form 10-K and required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K and Item 15(c) of this Form 10-K are listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index at pages 19 through 21 of this Report.
14
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
McCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED
By: |
/s/ Alan D. Wilson |
|
President & Chief |
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
|
Alan D. Wilson |
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Principal Executive Officer:
By: |
/s/ Alan D. Wilson |
|
President & Chief |
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
|
Alan D. Wilson |
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Principal Financial Officer:
By: |
/s/ Gordon M. Stetz, Jr. |
|
Executive Vice |
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
|
Gordon M. Stetz, Jr. |
President & Chief Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officer |
|
|
|
Principal Accounting Officer:
By: |
/s/ Kenneth A. Kelly, Jr. |
|
Vice President & |
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
|
Kenneth A. Kelly, Jr. |
Controller |
|
|
|
15
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons, being a majority of the Board of Directors of McCormick & Company, Incorporated, on the date indicated:
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS: |
|
DATE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John P. Bilbrey |
|
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
|
John P. Bilbrey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James T. Brady |
|
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
|
James T. Brady |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Francis A. Contino |
|
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
|
Francis A. Contino |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ J. Michael Fitzpatrick |
|
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
|
J. Michael Fitzpatrick |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Freeman A. Hrabowski, III |
|
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
|
Freeman A. Hrabowski, III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Lawless |
|
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
|
Robert J. Lawless |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael D. Mangan |
|
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
|
Michael D. Mangan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph W. McGrath |
|
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
|
Joseph W. McGrath |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Margaret M. V. Preston |
|
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
|
Margaret M. V. Preston |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ George A. Roche |
|
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
|
George A. Roche |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William E. Stevens |
|
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
|
William E. Stevens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alan D. Wilson |
|
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
|
Alan D. Wilson |
|
|
|
16
TABLE OF CONTENTS AND RELATED INFORMATION
Included in the Registrants 2007 Annual Report to Stockholders, the following consolidated financial statements are incorporated by reference in Item 8*:
Schedules other than those listed above are omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required or because the information called for is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
*Pursuant to Rule 12b-23 issued by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, a copy of the 2007 Annual Report to Stockholders of the Registrant for its fiscal year ended November 30, 2007 is being furnished with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
17
Supplemental Financial Schedule II Consolidated
McCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(IN MILLIONS) (1)
Column A |
|
Column B |
|
Column C |
|
Column D |
|
Column E |
|
||||
Description |
|
Balance |
|
Additions |
|
Deductions |
|
Balance |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Year ended November 30, 2007 Allowance for doubtful receivables |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
$ |
.4 |
|
$ |
.6 |
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended November 30, 2006 Allowance for doubtful receivables |
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended November 30, 2005 Allowance for doubtful receivables |
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
$ |
.3 |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Notes: None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restatement of Charter of McCormick & Company, Incorporated dated April 16, 1990 |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4 of Registration Form S-8, Registration No. 33-39582 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 1991. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment to Charter of McCormick & Company, Incorporated dated April 1, 1992 |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4 of Registration Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-59842 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19, 1993. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment to Charter of McCormick & Company, Incorporated dated March 27, 2003 |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4 of Registration Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-104084 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2003. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By-Laws of McCormick & Company, Incorporated Restated and Amended on June 26, 2007 |
|
Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3(i) of the Registrants Form 8-K dated June 26, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 2, 2007. |
|
(4) |
Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures |
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
See Exhibit 3 (Restatement of Charter) |
|
|
|
|
(ii) |
Summary of Certain Exchange Rights, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2001. |
|
|
|
|
(iii) |
Indenture dated December 5, 2000 between Registrant and SunTrust Bank, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4(iii) of Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 14, 2003. Registrant hereby undertakes to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon its request, copies of additional instruments of Registrant with respect to long-term debt that involve an amount of securities that do not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of the Registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601b(4)(iii)(A). |
|
|
|
|
(iv) |
Indenture dated December 7, 2007 between Registrant and The Bank of New York, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of Registrants Form 8-K dated December 4, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 10, 2007. Registrant hereby undertakes to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon its request, copies of additional instruments of Registrant with respect to long-term debt that involve an amount of securities that do not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of the Registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601b(4)(iii)(A). |
|
|
|
|
(v) |
Form of 5.20% Notes due 2015, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrants Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 6, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
(vi) |
Form of 5.80% Notes due 2011, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrants Form 8-K dated July 10, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 13, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
(vii) |
Form of 5.75% Notes due 2017, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrants Form 8-K dated December 4, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 10, 2007. |
|
|
|
19
(10) |
Material contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
Registrants supplemental pension plan for certain senior officers, as amended and restated effective June 19, 2001, is contained in the McCormick Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, a copy of which was attached as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2001, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2001, and incorporated by reference herein. Amendment Number 1 to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective January 1, 2005, which agreement is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(iv) of Registrants 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 27, 2005.* |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(ii) |
The 2001 Stock Option Plan, in which officers and certain other management employees participate, is set forth on pages 33 through 36 of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement dated February 15, 2001, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2001, and incorporated by reference herein.* |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(iii) |
The 1997 Stock Option Plan, in which officers and certain other management employees participate, is set forth in Exhibit B of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement dated February 19, 1997, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 1997, and incorporated by reference herein.* |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(iv) |
The 2002 McCormick Mid-Term Incentive Plan, which is provided to a limited number of senior executives, is set forth on pages 23 through 31 of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement dated February 15, 2002, as filed with the Commission on February 15, 2002, and incorporated by reference herein.* |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(v) |
2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, in which officers and certain other management employees participate, is set forth in Exhibit A of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement dated February 17, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2004, and incorporated by reference herein.* |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(vi) |
2004 Directors Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, provided to members of the Registrants Board of Directors who are not also employees of the Registrant, is set forth in Exhibit B of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement dated February 17, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2004, and incorporated by reference herein.* |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(vii) |
Directors Share Ownership Program, provided to members of the Registrants Board of Directors who are not also employees of the Registrant, is set forth on page 28 of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement dated February 17, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2004, and incorporated by reference herein.* |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(viii) |
Deferred Compensation Plan, as restated on January 1, 2000, and amended on August 29, 2000, September 5, 2000 and May 16, 2003, in which directors, officers and certain other management employees participate, a copy of which Plan document and amendments was attached as Exhibit 10(viii) of the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 14, 2003, and incorporated by reference herein.* |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(ix) |
2005 Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 2005, in which directors, officers and certain other management employees participate, which agreement is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(xii) of the Registrants Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 27, 2005.* |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(x) |
$400,000,000 Credit Agreement, dated January 25, 2005 among Registrant and Certain Financial Institutions, which agreement is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(xv) of the Registrants 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 27, 2005. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(xi) |
The 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in which employees participate, is set forth in Exhibit A of the Registrants definitive Proxy Statement dated February 16, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 16, 2007, and incorporated by reference herein.* |
||
|
|
|
20
|
(xii) |
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated November 13, 2007, between the Registrant and Conopco, Inc., which agreement is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K dated November 13, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2007. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
(xiii) |
Consulting Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2007, among the Registrant, CKB Consulting LLC and Robert J. Lawless.* Attached |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(13) |
Annual Report to Stockholders 2007 |
Attached. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21) |
Subsidiaries of the registrant |
Attached. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23) |
Consents of experts and counsel |
Attached. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31) |
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications |
Attached. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32) |
Section 1350 Certifications |
Attached. |
|
|
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
21
Exhibit 10(xiii)
CONSULTING AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made as of the 1st day of January, 2007, by and between McCormick & Company, Incorporated, a Maryland corporation having its principal office at 18 Loveton Circle, Sparks, Maryland 21152 (McCormick) and CKB Consulting LLC, a Florida corporation having its principal office at 23641 Waterside Drive, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 (Consultant) and Robert J. Lawless, an individual residing at the same address, as the principal stockholder of Consultant and guarantor of Consultants obligations hereunder (RJL).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Consultant provides business consulting services to senior management of corporations and employs RJL as its principal consultant; and
WHEREAS, McCormick desires to obtain the personal services of RJL to provide guidance and advice to McCormicks senior executives with respect to the management of a number of McCormicks joint venture relationships, matters of policy, organizational design and structure, strategy, and other significant issues affecting McCormicks business; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has agreed to provide the personal services of RJL to McCormick for such purposes; and
WHEREAS, McCormick, the Consultant, and RJL desire to enter into a written agreement which sets forth the respective rights and obligations of the parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants set forth in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows:
1. Retention/Scope of Services. McCormick hereby retains the Consultant in order to avail itself of specialized management consulting services. Consultant shall provide McCormick with certain unique personal services which can only be performed by RJL based on his several years of previous experience as Chief Executive Officer of McCormick. Such personal services shall include providing guidance and advice to senior executives at McCormick with respect to the management of a number of McCormicks joint venture relationships, matters of policy, organizational design and structure, strategy, other significant issues affecting McCormicks global business and such other assistance as may be requested from time to time by Alan D. Wilson, President and Chief Executive Officer. Consultant will make RJL available to McCormick, as reasonably requested, for a period of time not to exceed 400 hours during any calendar year.
2. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date hereof and shall continue until December 31, 2008 and may be renewed for additional periods of time thereafter upon written agreement of the parties, subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of McCormick. In the event of any termination of this Agreement in advance of the expiration date as provided hereafter, McCormick will pay Consultant for all months, or fractions thereof, which have elapsed as of the date of termination. No termination of this Agreement, whether pursuant to this Section or otherwise, shall in any way affect Consultants obligations under Sections 6, 7 and 8 hereof which are expressly understood to survive termination.
3. Fees/Expenses. During the term of this Agreement, McCormick shall pay Consultant a consulting fee at a rate equal to Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000) per month for each month during the term of this Agreement. In addition to the aforesaid fee, McCormick shall reimburse Consultant for all reasonable expenses for travel, food and lodging incurred by Consultant in performing such services hereunder. Consultant will invoice McCormick for all expenses as incurred, said invoices to include appropriate documentation to verify such expenses. McCormick will pay such invoices within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice.
4. Independent Contractor. The parties hereto understand that Consultant is an independent contractor, that no employment relationship is created by this Agreement between McCormick and RJL, and that neither the Consultant nor RJL shall therefore act or hold itself or himself out as an employee, agent, partner or joint venturer of or with McCormick.
5. Termination Events. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, this Agreement shall cease and terminate immediately upon the occurrence of any of the following events:
a. The death or incapacity of RJL;
b. A failure or refusal by RJL to render the consulting services requested of Consultant by McCormick, or the commission of any act of gross negligence or fraud or any failure to act which constitutes gross negligence or fraud on the part of RJL or the Consultant and which is reasonably determined to be detrimental to the welfare of McCormick or injurious to McCormicks reputation; or
c. The breach or non-observance by RJL or the Consultant of any of the covenants or stipulations herein contained or any default or misconduct constituting gross negligence or fraud on the part of RJL or the Consultant.
6. Nondisclosure: The Consultant and RJL agree that they
a. will not , either during the term of this Agreement, or thereafter, disclose in any manner whatsoever, any secret or confidential information or know-how concerning the business or products of McCormick (Confidential Information);
2
b. will not, at any time use any Confidential Information for any commercial purpose whatsoever, except in the performance of this Agreement; and
c. will immediately return all Confidential Information in their possession to McCormick upon request and will not thereafter retain copies of any such information whatsoever.
For purposes of this Agreement, Confidential Information shall not include any information which is in or becomes part of the public domain through no fault of the Consultant or RJL, or which is disclosed to Consultant or RJL by a third party having no obligation of confidentiality to McCormick.
7. Disclosure and Ownership of Inventions/Execution of Documents.
a. Consultant and RJL will promptly disclose in writing to McCormick all writings, inventions, improvements or discoveries (collectively, Inventions) whether copyrightable or patentable or not, which arise out of any services performed during the Term.
b. Any and all inventions that arise out of any services performed during the Term, including any and all inventions which arise after the termination of this Agreement and which were made with the use of any information obtained from McCormick during the Term, are the exclusive property of McCormick.
c. Consultant and RJL agree, at the request and the expense of McCormick, to sign and execute all instruments that, in McCormicks reasonable opinion, are necessary to carry out the intention of this Agreement, including all assignments and other papers necessary to vest the entire right, title and interest in the Inventions in McCormick. Consultant will do all lawful acts and sign all other papers McCormick may reasonably request relating to applications for patents, trademarks, and copyrights, both United States and foreign, and providing for the protection of McCormicks right, title or interest in any of said matters.
8. Non-Exclusivity/Covenant Not to Compete. McCormick understands and agrees that, except as set forth in the next sentence, Consultant shall not be prevented or barred from rendering services of any nature for or on behalf of any other person, firm, corporation or entity, subject to Consultants obligation to maintain the confidentiality of McCormicks trade secret information pursuant to Section 6 hereof. The Consultant and RJL hereby covenant and agree that they will not, without the prior written consent of McCormick, at any time during the Term of this Agreement, or for a period of one year following the expiration or termination of this Agreement, as an employee, consultant, director or otherwise, either individually or in partnership or jointly or in conjunction with any person or persons, firm or association, syndicate, company or corporation, as principal, agent, shareholder or in any manner whatsoever, carry on or be engaged in or
3
concerned with or interested in or advise, any business which competes with or is otherwise similar to the business carried on by McCormick.
9. Assignment. This Agreement shall not be assigned by the Consultant without the prior written consent of McCormick.
10. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Maryland.
11. Notices. Any notice or other communication, other than routine communications, between the parties shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if mailed first class, postage prepaid, certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, to the other party at its or her address as it or Consultant may have furnished to the other party in writing for such purpose.
12. Amendment. This Agreement may not be amended except in a writing signed by the respective parties hereto.
13. Severability. In the event any provision or any portion of any provision of this Agreement is found to be unenforceable or invalid, such provision or such portion of such provision shall be severable from this Agreement and shall not affect the enforceability or validity of any other provision or other portion of such provision contained in this Agreement.
14. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof.
15. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by the parties in counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
16. Survival of Certain Provisions. The provisions of Sections 6, 7 and 8 of this Agreement shall survive the expiration and/or termination of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, McCormick and Consultant have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first above written.
|
McCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Alan D. Wilson |
|
|
|
Alan D. Wilson |
|
|
|
President |
|
4
|
|
||
|
CKB CONSULTING LLC |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Robert J. Lawless |
|
|
|
Robert J. Lawless |
|
|
|
President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Lawless |
(LS) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Lawless |
|
5
EXHIBIT 13
Annual Report to Stockholders
Exhibit 13
A TASTE FOR THE FUTURE
CHINESE FIVE-SPICE
Chinese Five-Spice balances equal parts anise, Szechuan peppercorn, cinnamon, cloves and fennel seed into a blend that is pungent, fragrant, hot and slightly sweet all at once. This years annual report is scented with Chinese Five-Spice.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
for the year ended November 30 (millions except per share data) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
% change |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,916.2 |
|
$ |
2,716.4 |
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gross profit |
|
1,191.8 |
|
1,114.6 |
|
6.9 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gross profit margin |
|
40.9 |
% |
41.0 |
% |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating income |
|
354.2 |
|
269.6 |
|
31.4 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Operating income margin |
|
12.1 |
% |
9.9 |
% |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
230.1 |
|
202.2 |
|
13.8 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings per share diluted |
|
1.73 |
|
1.50 |
|
15.3 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Average shares outstanding diluted |
|
132.7 |
|
135.0 |
|
(1.7 |
%) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dividends paid |
|
$ |
103.6 |
|
$ |
95.0 |
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dividends paid per share |
|
.80 |
|
.72 |
|
11.1 |
% |
These financial results include the impact of activities related to our restructuring plan.
In 2007, these activities reduced operating income by $34.0 million, net income by $24.2 million and diluted earnings per share by $0.18. In 2006, these activities reduced operating income by $84.1 million, net income by $30.3 million and diluted earnings per share by $0.22.
On a comparable basis, excluding the impact of restructuring activities, diluted earnings per share rose 11.6% in 2007.
All around the world, people seeking bold, exotic and exciting flavors are turning to McCormick. Inside this report we provide a taste for the future a look ahead at the trends and opportunities that are driving our growth.
CONTENTS
Letter to Shareholders 2
Bob and Alan team up in their letter to shareholders to discuss our progress in 2007, strategies for growth and business outlook.
Discussion with Management Committee 5
Join our executives as they sit down to address some of the most commonly asked questions from investors.
A Journey with Bob Lawless 14
We recall Bobs many contributions during his 30-year career and time as CEO of McCormick.
Managements Discussion and Analysis 15
This section begins with a company description and includes information about business segments, 2007 financial results and much more.
Directors and Officers 34
A profile of our Board of Directors and list of executive officers are presented along with our governance statement.
Financial Information 36
The 2007 financial statements, accompanying notes and reports of both management and the auditors are in this section.
Investor Information 61
Investors can find company contact and related information.
1
Fellow Shareholders...
Based on the strength and momentum of our business and the commitment of its leadership, your company is well-positioned for long-term sales and profit growth on a global basis. We exceeded key 2007 financial goals and made excellent progress during the year with initiatives to increase sales, reduce costs and expand our markets. In addition, we took the next step in an orderly transition of the executive team.
We are excited about our prospects as we look across our business and to 2008 and beyond. Through this letter and the discussion that follows, we want to share that excitement and give you a taste for the future.
Growth in global markets
We are achieving good sales growth in each region and segment of our business.
Consumer sales rose 6% in North America, driven by pricing, new products, effective marketing programs and, in the first half of the year, the incremental impact of our acquisition of Simply Asia Foods. At the same time, our industrial business in North America achieved higher sales to food manufacturers, though the gains were offset in part by sales to restaurants, which were affected by industry weakness in 2007.
Our business in Europe is turning a corner as a result of stronger marketing support and greater focus on our primary markets. With favorable foreign exchange rates, price increases and higher volume in both France and the U.K. we increased consumer sales 11%. Strong sales of condiments and seasonings for snack products, along with favorable foreign exchange rates, fueled a 20% increase in the industrial business in Europe. And expansion in China was a primary factor behind an increase of 20% in sales across both segments in the Asia Pacific region.
Exceeded key 2007 financial goals
Financial results in 2007 exceeded a number of our key objectives. We increased sales 7%, surpassing our goal of 4 to 6%. And cost savings related to a three-year restructuring program were $35 million in 2007, $5 million ahead of target and pushing cumulative savings from the program to $45 million. Increased costs for raw materials offset a portion of these cost savings. We have also taken certain pricing actions to provide an additional offset to higher costs.
Earnings per share were $1.73. On a comparable basis, excluding the impact of restructuring activities in 2007 and 2006, this was a 12% improvement, above our initial goal to increase earnings per share by 8 to 10%.
The Company again generated a significant amount of cash, funding $157 million of share repurchases and a 9% increase in dividends paid our 21st consecutive year of dividend increases. With the Boards approval, we have increased dividends per share at a 14% compound annual growth rate for the past five years.
Positioned for the future
The same growth strategy that has driven our success for a decade continues to set our future direction: improve margins, invest in the business, and increase sales and profits.
Margin improvement is a key element of our success. A restructuring program that includes consolidating our global manufacturing and eliminating administrative redundancies is on track to deliver at least $50 million in annual savings by the end of 2008. In addition, we are reducing complexity by selectively eliminating certain products and customers. These actions have increased average sales per customer for our U.S. industrial business by 51% in 2007 when compared to 2005. We see additional opportunities to improve efficiency and optimize our supply chain across our global operations.
Cost savings such as these were key to offsetting higher raw material costs in 2007. We are also using a portion of our margin improvement to invest in the growth of our business, funding marketing support, product innovation and other areas that offer the greatest potential to increase sales.
|
The same growth strategy that has driven our success for a decade continues to set our future direction.
2
Robert J. Lawless and Alan D. Wilson
To drive consumer demand, we are revitalizing our venerable brands in worldwide markets. The most significant of these efforts is under way in the United States the largest and most profitable market for our consumer business where a gravity-fed merchandising system is being installed in 12,000 to 14,000 supermarkets. The innovative product display is increasing purchases by consumers and reducing restocking time for the retailers. In Europe, we are driving sales of our Schwartz® brand in the U.K. and Ducros® brand in France with improved merchandising systems and increased advertising.
Product innovation is also driving sales as we build upon platforms such as health and wellness, convenience and ethnic flavors, and meet consumer desire for reduced fat and sodium with flavorful products in both our consumer and industrial businesses. And as time-pressed consumers turn more and more to grilling, slow cookers and seafood preparation, we are responding with additional flavor solutions. In North America, 2007 sales of seafood complements grew by 6%, grilling products by 7% and slow cooker seasonings by 17%. Across all businesses, new products launched in the last three years added 10% to 2007 sales.
Since 2002, the Company has achieved an average annual increase in net sales of 7%. One-fourth of this increase has been driven by acquisitions.
Emerging markets offer an opportunity for rapid sales growth, as evidenced by the 23% growth of our business in China in 2007. We are focused on additional markets with similar growth characteristics, such as India, as we strive to double our sales in the Asia Pacific region over the next five years.
Acquisitions are also an integral part of our growth strategy. We are particularly interested in acquiring leading brands in regions where we have low penetration, and niche products in more developed markets. Above all else, however, flavor is the defining factor in all of our targeting efforts. Altogether, acquisitions have added one-fourth of our sales increase in the past five years, and we are working to sustain this level of contribution. As evidence of our continued progress, in November 2007, we were pleased to sign an agreement to purchase the Lawrys business with annual sales of approximately $150 million.
A look ahead
Over the years, our business has faced challenges from higher costs, difficult economic conditions, aggressive competitors and demanding customers. We have weathered cost pressures and weak economies, and have the margin improvement potential to do so in the future. We are staying ahead of our competitors and creating value for our
3
customers by continuing to develop new capabilities in areas such as quality, service, systems, marketing and innovation.
Our leading market position, effective growth strategy, strong balance sheet and focus on flavor have positioned us well. Once we complete our restructuring program in 2008, we expect our sales initiatives to drive sales growth of 4 to 6% annually. These higher sales and improved margins should generate an increase of 9 to 11% in earnings per share.
As always, McCormicks engaged employees are at the center of our success. Throughout our operations, we interact in a participative manner based on our Multiple Management Board approach. In 2007 we celebrated the 75th anniversary of this problem-solving and professional development system, which is deeply ingrained in our corporate culture.
Strong, far-sighted leadership is also essential to continued success. Our Board is comprised of experienced business leaders and we are pleased to welcome Joseph McGrath, President & CEO of Unisys Corporation as a new director. Over the past year we completed the transition of our executive team. Following his promotion to President & COO at the end of 2006, Alan became a member of the Board in November and was appointed President & CEO as of January 1, 2008. Bob retired at the beginning of the new year but continues to serve as Chairman of the Board.
In addition, Gordon Stetz, who has provided key financial leadership to our U.S. and international operations for two decades, was promoted to CFO following the announcement of Fran Continos upcoming retirement from the Company and the Board. During his ten years at McCormick, Fran was instrumental in establishing common systems and processes throughout our operations with our B2K program, strengthening internal controls and building a terrific financial team. Frans involvement has led to success with our acquisition strategy and, since 2004, he has led our strategic planning effort at the Company. We thank him for his many contributions.
The executive team that will take this Company forward has been an integral part of setting our direction, formulating programs and achieving great execution in recent years. We approach the years ahead with excitement and tremendous optimism.
Our business is well-positioned with leading brands and a focus on flavor. An effective and sustainable strategy sets our direction. Motivated and energetic employees move us forward. We are confident in our ability to build shareholder value.
It promises to be a future as bold and exciting as the flavors upon which McCormick & Company has built its success since 1889.
Robert J. Lawless, Chairman of the Board
Alan D. Wilson, President and CEO
OUR VISION
McCormick will be the leading global supplier of value-added flavor solutions. Building on strong brands and innovative products, we will be the recognized leader in providing superior quality, value and service to customers and consumers around the world. |
4
Left to Right:
Francis A. Contino, Executive Vice President Strategic Planning
Lawrence E. Kurzius, President Europe, Middle East & Africa
Charles T. Langmead, President U.S. Industrial Group
Robert J. Lawless, Chairman of the Board
Gordon M. Stetz, Executive Vice President Chief Financial Officer
Mark T. Timbie, President North American Consumer Foods
Alan D. Wilson, President & Chief Executive Officer
Join McCormicks Management Committee and Bob Lawless as they address some of the questions shareholders ask most often. These are arranged by topic...
|
PAGES 6, 7 AND 8 |
|
|
|
Sales growth and flavor trends |
|
|
|
|
PAGES 9 AND 10 |
|
|
|
Supply chain and sustainability |
|
|
|
|
PAGE 11 |
|
|
|
Longer-term financial projections |
|
|
|
|
PAGES 12 AND 13 |
|
|
|
McCormick as a company and an investment |
5
With an expanded array of organic products, the introduction of exotic sea salts and growing interest in TV cooking shows, we grew U.S. sales of our gourmet products 12% in 2007.
Brand spending behind print ads has one of the highest returns as measured by incremental sales. Shown here is an ad for some of our popular seasoning mixes.
You have achieved good sales growth in the past. Looking ahead, what do you believe will be the primary drivers of future sales growth?
MARK > In the United States we are revitalizing our entire spice and seasoning line to bring renewed interest and excitement to the category.
This initiative tackles some of the foremost consumer issues with an easy-to-open flip-top cap and an easier-to-shop merchandising system. With this system we can prominently feature new items such as our tabletop spices, seasoned pepper blends or roasting rubs. For our grocery customers, the system is reducing out-of-stock situations and reducing restock time by up to 40%. We have installed 8,500 stores and aim to convert another 3,500 to 5,500.
CHUCK > For our U.S. industrial business, strong customer relationships continue to be the critical factor in achieving our growth targets.
On average, our share of business with strategic customers is about 25%. To grow this, we are guided by the customers view of what is important as we build upon our strong foundation of trust, innovative processes and efficient supply chain initiatives.
This partnership model led to the successful design and implementation of our new Create IT® process. Together with the customers marketing and innovation teams, we start with idea generation and move quickly and efficiently through product development, consumer validation and commercialization. In this way our customers are reducing their development cost and getting successful products to market ahead of their competition. The benefit to McCormick is a greater share of our customers business and our participation in products that succeed in the marketplace over a longer time horizon.
ALAN > With the goal of improving both sales growth and profitability, we are completing a transformation of our U.S. industrial business that began in 2006. Chuck and his team have reduced the number of customers we serve by 31% and reduced the number of products sold by 20%. In very short order, we have better aligned our resources, particularly in product innovation, behind our strategic customers.
Product innovation is also a key initiative to drive sales of our consumer business. We have had considerable success building upon a number of product platforms.
|
In recent years 10% of our global sales came from products that we have introduced in the last three years.
6
.
As part of our Create IT process, we bring together culinary chefs, sensory experts and flavor technologists to discuss trends and develop winning new product ideas.
MARK > Our GrillMates® line in the U.S. is a good example. It began in the early 1990s with a single seasoning blend that originated in Canada. Today 31 GrillMates items include marinades, rubs, reduced sodium varieties and more. Year after year we have grown sales of these products at a rapid pace, and annual sales are now $35 million.
Following the acquisition of the Ducros brand in Europe, we introduced three Ducros grinders in the U.S. under the McCormick label. Six years later, these products have reached $22 million in sales with 14 varieties.
We have also been expanding our products designed for consumers of Hispanic descent. These products now account for 8% of U.S. consumer sales, and they grew 11% in 2007.
BOB > The Hispanic items we offer include mayonnaise and marmalade imported from McCormick de Mexico. This 60-year-old joint venture has made McCormick the leading brand in Mexico, and Hispanic consumers in many U.S. markets actively seek these products. This highly successful joint venture now accounts for most of our income from unconsolidated operations, which in 2007 comprised nearly 10% of our earnings per share.
We cant overlook two other avenues of sales growth our marketing programs and acquisitions.
ALAN > We have increased our level of brand support in recent years and are getting better each year at measuring the effectiveness of our spending. We are seeing the best returns from our public relations activity, print advertising and television advertising.
As for acquisitions, theyve accounted for one-fourth of our 7% average annual sales growth in the past five years and will continue to be a key part of our sales growth. Our recently announced agreement to acquire the Lawrys business is evidence of our continued progress with acquisitions. In our developed markets, we are seeking niche brands that have a distinct flavor profile. In markets where we currently have low penetration, including emerging markets, we are targeting leading brands.
Besides acquisitions, how will you grow sales outside North America?
LAWRENCE > Europe is our second-largest market, contributing 25% of Company sales. Many of the same consumer business initiatives we talked about for North America are driving our growth in this market.
New merchandising systems introduced in the U.K. and France are designed to simplify the shopping experience, reduce labor and optimize our shelf space. Product innovation includes an award-winning spice package, easy-to-use
7
We are gaining distribution of our products in Chinas street markets which are a frequent stop for consumers.
In Europe we are growing sales with increased brand support, improved merchandising systems and the introduction of innovative new products.
Toppers® and a relaunch of our successful grinders. Brand support includes TV advertising featuring our chef character in France, and both TV and radio advertising in the U.K. We have just launched a print advertising campaign in the U.K. that will be rolled out more broadly across Europe in 2008.
GORDON > Having just returned from several years in Europe, I can tell you first-hand that we have turned a corner with this business. We have reduced complexity, focused on our most profitable businesses, built our brands and developed our people capabilities.
The most striking example of our progress is in our industrial business, where we have gone from approximately 500 customers in 2003 to 50 customers by the end of 2007. In this market as well, we are focused on the largest customers with the greatest potential for growth.
LAWRENCE > These customers are the leaders in their industry, and many of them have multinational businesses. In addition to a strong top-to-top relationship, we are supporting them from our locations around the world with product innovation and production.
ALAN > This is certainly true in China and was really the origin of our business there about 15 years ago. We built a facility to support the expansion of industrial customers in this region and from this same facility, launched a line of consumer products that is profitable and growing rapidly.
China, together with Australia and other countries in the region, comprised 6% of 2007 sales. Our goal is to more than double our sales in the Asia Pacific region by 2012. We expect to continue our rapid pace of both consumer and industrial sales growth in China and to expand into other markets with good growth characteristics, such as India.
Across all markets, what eating trends are you watching most closely?
ALAN > McCormick is on the leading edge of flavor. Every year we bring together top chefs to discuss the hottest trends and develop our McCormick Flavor ForecastTM, which is eagerly awaited by professional chefs and food editors.
I would say consumers interest in health and wellness is the number-one trend. We recently launched the McCormick Science Institute to advance the health benefits of natural spices and herbs. As consumers work to reduce their intake of fat, salt or sugar, McCormick is ideally suited as an expert in natural spices and herbs.
8
Members of our global financial team met in 2007. The discussion included using the power of our systems to lower costs in the supply chain.
Over the past few years, much of your time has been spent on restructuring the Company. With this program nearly complete, are there more opportunities to improve the supply chain?
FRAN > Toward the end of 2005, we announced an ambitious three-year restructuring program that included actions to consolidate facilities and eliminate administrative redundancies. Our goal was to realize annual cost savings of $50 million by the end of 2008.
Thanks to the hard work of our employees and diligent planning and management of this program, we have made terrific progress. By the end of 2007 we had already achieved annual savings of $45 million, and we expect up to $10 million more in 2008.
While we have made great strides in improving our supply chain and profit margins with this program and other initiatives, we still see lots of opportunities ahead opportunities in areas like procurement, manufacturing, distribution, sales and marketing, and administration.
CHUCK > In the U.S. industrial business, our resources are focused on our most important customers. By reducing the overall number of customers and products, we have been able to close facilities and lower our cost to serve. In 2007, the margin improvement from these actions was largely offset by significant commodity cost increases on certain product categories and customers. As commodity costs moderate, as pricing actions are fully implemented and as we experience continued success in delivering value added products, we will make further progress toward higher sustainable margins for the industrial business.
In addition to lowering our costs, we are also reducing the level of inventory on hand. Again, this was partially offset in 2007 by higher prices for many raw materials, but our supply chain initiatives are leading to reduced time supply and lower safety stock levels.
ALAN > In addition to our U.S. industrial business, there are opportunities to lower inventory and total working capital in all of our operations around the world.
Following the implementation of SAP, our first priority was to improve processes and identify and achieve expense reductions. As Fran indicated, our restructuring program was an important step in this direction.
McCormick expects to reach up to $55 million in annual savings in 2008, ahead of its $50 million goal.
9
Our spice buyers work with growers around the world to procure consistent high-quality ingredients.
McCormick is an industry leader in designing techniques to test the quality and consistency of our ingredients.
As we continue up the learning curve with our systems, I have challenged employees across all locations and functions to increase their proficiency and apply these tools in new ways. I am convinced that this will lead to additional insights about our business and opportunities to lower costs.
GORDON > In 2008 we are changing our incentive program to align everyone in the organization with working capital management. We are adding a capital cost for the amount of assets, net of liabilities, that are managed by our operating units.
Our business generates a significant amount of cash. We can take this to the next level with better supply chain management, which means lower costs and better management of our working capital.
What is McCormick doing in the area of sustainability?
ALAN > Our business was built on a cultural foundation of concern for one another. For 75 years, our Multiple Management philosophy has encouraged the involvement of employees in community service activities as well as at all levels of the Company. We are open in our communications, value diversity among our employees and provide many opportunities for learning and development.
Global sourcing is a core competency for our business. We firmly believe that providing assistance to the communities that supply our raw materials and manufacture our products will enable them to improve their productivity and their living conditions. For more than 20 years we have provided training for agriculture and processing of spices and herbs and have improved food safety, quality and yield. This is critical to our continued growth and success.
LAWRENCE > Having led our consumer business in the U.S. and now both our consumer and industrial businesses in Europe, I am keenly aware of our reputation as a reliable supplier of high-quality products. This is a real advantage as we compete against smaller suppliers that do not have a close connection to the source of their raw materials or the same degree of quality assurance that we can provide.
ALAN > In 2007 we set goals to monitor our impact on the environment. We have introduced metrics that will measure our progress in several key areas: solid waste reduction, energy use reduction, lower greenhouse gas emissions and the development of fair trade for selected commodities.
At McCormick, we dont view sustainability as a side issue, but as something that is an integral part of our business and essential to our success.
10
We are expanding acquired businesses with new product introductions such asThai Kitchen®meal kits, Zatarains® reduced sodium rice mixes and Silvo® Toppers.
In 2007 you shared some financial projections beyond 2008. Please help me understand how you will achieve 9 to 11% growth in earnings per share?
BOB > Id like to explain how we developed the longer-term financial projections for the business and why we decided to communicate them to investors. Fiscal year 2007 marked the mid-way point in our three-year restructuring program. During this period, sales and profits were somewhat curtailed by our rationalization of smaller and less profitable customers and products.
As part of our strategic planning process we asked our leadership team to take a look ahead at their portfolio of products, growth prospects and supply chain initiatives. With good visibility, each operating group developed projections for sales growth, margin improvement and increased operating income that were then consolidated for the total Company.
We recognized that many of our shareholders would benefit from learning and understanding our longer-term outlook.
GORDON > Investors have asked if we think some of our projections are overly ambitious. We dont think so.
We expect to grow sales 4 to 6% annually. As Alan indicated earlier, we have achieved average annual sales growth of 7% for the past five years, with one-fourth of this increase coming from acquisitions.
MARK > The largest part of the 4 to 6% sales increase will come from a 2 to 3% increase in our base business. Our revitalization of packaging, products and merchandising is lifting sales of the entire category for our core consumer businesses. In addition, we are working to build our market share with more effective advertising. The introduction of new products will add another 1 to 2% to sales.
GORDON > Over time, we believe we can increase gross profit margins by half a percentage point per year. About half of this increase will come from our supply chain initiatives. The other half will result from the faster growth of our consumer business, which has a higher margin than the industrial business.
As part of our growth strategy, we intend to invest a portion of this margin improvement back in the business to build for the future. Higher margins will also contribute to a 9 to 11% annual increase in earnings per share.
DRIVING SALES GROWTH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Business Increase |
|
2-3 |
% |
New Products |
|
1-2 |
% |
Acquisitions |
|
1-3 |
% |
Distribution Expansion |
|
0-1 |
% |
Pricing |
|
0-1 |
% |
Beyond 2008, once our restructuring program is complete, we expect to grow annual sales 4-6%.
11
With a leading share, it is our responsibility to bring innovation, news and excitement to consumers.
Our Multiple Management Board in Mexico is one of 13 around the world. This is a team-based system that allows a diverse cross-section of employees to develop and work on projects to improve nearly any aspect of the business.
What distinguishes McCormick from other companies?
LAWRENCE > We operate from a position of strength in our primary markets. We have the number-one market share in the U.S., Canada, U.K., France and China, as well as several smaller markets.
As the clear category leader, we supply our retail customers with the entire range of spice and seasoning products, from premium gourmet items to value-priced store brands. Among packaged food companies, this is an enviable position.
CHUCK > Our business is all about flavor. Datamonitor recently reported that 41% of U.S.and European consumers have tried food with new and exotic flavors in the last 12 months.
We dont sell a single type of product. Rather, flavor is something that spans all types of food and all types of eating occasions. Our two business segments consumer and industrial connect us to a wide array of products where we can add great taste. Whether it is a meal at home, a night out or a snack on-the-go, we have an opportunity to provide the flavor.
We like to say, No matter where or what you eat, each day you are likely to enjoy something flavored by McCormick.
ALAN > As described earlier, we have a unique expertise in the sourcing of spices and herbs from locations around the world.
Consumer interest in natural spices and herbs fits perfectly with our capabilities in this regard. For our industrial business, quality and reliability are paramount. Our customers know that McCormick understands the importance of a brand and will apply rigorous standards to the products we supply.
A side benefit of our global sourcing effort is that we have an established link with several of the emerging markets that we have targeted for expansion.
MARK > McCormick also has a unique position in the area of acquisitions. As a mid-size food company, we are targeting a number of brands and businesses of a size that might not interest larger food companies. In fact, some of the smaller businesses these larger companies might shed as they refine their portfolio of products would be meaningful additions to our Company.
FRAN > We have maintained a strong balance sheet that has afforded us an excellent credit rating and leverage for acquisitions such as Lawrys. While some investors have asked why we have not increased our debt and been more aggressive with share repurchases, we prefer to maintain our financial flexibility.
12
Between our consumer and industrial businesses, no matter where or what you eat, each day you are likely to enjoy something flavored by McCormick.
We will continue to use our strong cash flow wisely by balancing dividends, capital expenditures, acquisitions and stock repurchases.
What else should a prospective investor know about McCormick?
GORDON > McCormick has been aggressive in pursuing margin improvement. We have been willing to challenge all areas of our business, including systems, facilities and organization. We see opportunities ahead to optimize our business.
While our financial objectives may seem aggressive, we are convinced they are achievable. Sales growth of 4 to 6% and earnings per share growth of 9 to11% are in line with our long-term track record. The momentum and initiatives underway give us the confidence to set and share these long-term projections.
BOB > This confidence is based on the abilities and enthusiasm of McCormick employees around the world, as well as the experience and motivation of the leadership team.
Throughout the Company, we have a deep culture of hard work and ethics that has endured significant changes to the business. Our Multiple Management philosophy lays the foundation by encouraging the participation and inclusion of all employees.
Im pleased that we have seamlessly transitioned to a new executive team. This team has the drive and knowledge to lead McCormick through its next generation of growth.
Alan > Our strategy for growth is to improve margins, invest in the business and grow sales and profits. Its a simple strategy, but one that is known and understood by our employees around the world. It has been behind our success in nearly tripling earnings per share and more than doubling the market capitalization of this Company in the past 10 years.
This strategy is both effective and sustainable, and it will guide us through McCormicks next period of growth.
13
A Journey with Bob Lawless
Bob Lawless retirement as Chief Executive Officer concluded a 30-year career as an active McCormick employee in which he brought a boundless energy to each goal he pursued. Over the past 11 years as President and CEO, he led the transformation of the Company solidifying its position as an industry leader and a global company on the move.
Bobs global travels gave him the opportunity to interact with thousands of McCormick employees worldwide. It was through such regular contact with the vast employee population that he communicated his passion to grow McCormick. The regular employee interaction also confirmed to him that measures to contemporize the business be made in harmony with the Shared Values and culture of this unique company. The results have been impressive.
He drove initiatives that brought the Companys commitment to innovation to new levels. Technologically, the Company made tremendous strides under Bobs leadership. His approach to acquisitions brought resounding success as companies purchased under Bobs tenure were assimilated seamlessly and brought the desired return. His support of building brands and serving customers on a global basis met with repeated success. As a result, recognition from industry groups and major customers was a regular occurrence during Bobs tenure.
And stockholders enjoyed the benefits of the Lawless years as well. Since 1996, the stock price has tripled and the quarterly dividend is now $0.22 up from $0.07 per share.
Bobs impact over the years went beyond the walls of McCormick. His spirit of community service inspired many McCormick employees to follow his lead and volunteer helping those less fortunate. McCormick has a tradition of charitable giving, and Bob was a committed steward of that legacy during his years as Company leader.
During Bob Lawless time with McCormick, he has lived the Companys Shared Values and leaves a lasting impact on the business. Bob, weve enjoyed The Journey. Thanks and best wishes from the entire McCormick family.
QUARTERLY
DIVIDEND
HAS TRIPLED
Since 1996, the stock price has tripled and the quarterly dividend is now $0.22 up from $0.07 per share.
14
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The purpose of the Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) is to provide an understanding of McCormicks business, financial results and financial condition.
The MD&A is organized as follows:
Page 15 Business Overview describes our global operations, strategy, growth initiatives and segments.
Page 18 Results of Operation compares the financial results for 2007 to 2006 and also compares financial results for 2006 to 2005.
Page 22 Liquidity and Financial Condition supplies information regarding our cash flow and financing.
Page 25 Acquisitions profiles a 2007 agreement to acquire the Lawrys business and our 2006 acquisition of Simply Asia Foods.
Page 26 Restructuring Activities reviews our three-year plan to improve margins.
Page 28 A graph showing Stock Price Performance, is followed by our assessment of Market Risk Sensitivity, our Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments, the impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements, our use of Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions, and our comments regarding Forward-Looking Information.
The information in the charts and tables in the MD&A are for the years ended November 30. All dollars are in millions, except per share data. Unless otherwise indicated, the results include the impact of our restructuring activities for all years presented.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Business Description
McCormick is a global leader in the manufacture, marketing and distribution of spices, herbs, seasonings and other flavors to the entire food industry. Customers range from retail outlets and food service providers to food manufacturers. Founded in 1889 and built on a culture of Multiple Management, we have approximately 7,500 employees.
Our major sales, distribution and production facilities are located in North America and Europe. Additional facilities are based in Mexico, Central America, Australia, China, Singapore, Thailand and South Africa. In 2007, 41% of sales were outside the United States.
We operate in two business segments, consumer and industrial. Consistent with market conditions in each segment, our consumer business has a higher overall profit margin than our industrial business.
Across both segments, we have the customer base and product breadth to participate in all types of eating occasions, whether it is cooking at home, dining out, purchasing a quick service meal or enjoying a snack.
A Sustainable Strategy
Our strategy to improve margins, invest in our business and increase sales and profits has been behind our success over the past 10 years and is our plan for growth in the future.
During the past five years, this strategy has led to average annual sales growth of 7% with acquisitions driving approximately one quarter of the increase. Gross profit margin has risen from 39.1% in 2002 to 40.9% in 2007 and driven increases in operating income and net income.
15
We are increasing margins with cost-savings programs, new capabilities and improved processes. Our acquisition of high-margin brands and introduction of higher-margin, more value-added new products are also lifting margins. As we reduce the number of lower-margin products and customers, we are eliminating complexity and further boosting margins.
A portion of the cost savings associated with our actions is being used to fund product development and brand support. During the past five years, we have increased research and development expense 57%. In 2007, we spent $55 million in advertising to consumers, compared to $27 million in 2002. These are effective investments that are driving sales and profit growth at McCormick.
Key Growth Initiatives
Key initiatives underway to grow sales and profits include:
· A restructuring program to improve our global supply chain was announced in 2005 and will extend through 2008. This plan is reducing our complexity and creating an organization more focused on growth opportunities. We expect to reach up to $55 million in annual cost savings, ahead of our initial goal of $50 million.
· We are building consumer interest by revitalizing our consumer brands. Currently under way is the revitalization of McCormick brand spices and seasonings in the United States. Along with new packaging, we are installing new shelving systems in 12,000 to 14,000 stores to make shopping easier for the consumer and restocking easier for grocers. A similar effort is under way that is designed to drive growth of our Schwartz brand in the U.K. and the Ducros brand in France.
· As a leader in our industry, we watch the latest trends to direct our product development activity. Consumer demand for wellness, freshness, convenience, ethnic flavors and more, guide our new products. Innovation at McCormick extends to grinders and other new packaging, and to distribution, such as our penetration of the more frequently shopped street markets in China.
· Through acquisitions we are adding leading brands to extend our reach into new geographic regions where we currently have little or no distribution. We have a particular interest in emerging markets that offer high growth potential. In our developed markets, we are seeking brands that have a niche position and meet a growing consumer trend.
Our Financial Objectives
With good visibility into our business prospects and operating environment, we use growth objectives as internal goals and to provide a financial outlook for our shareholders. Upon completion in 2008 of our three-year restructuring program, we expect to grow sales annually by 4 to 6% and achieve an annual increase of 9 to 11% in earnings per share.
Our business generates strong cash flow. Actions to grow net income and improve working capital are designed to lead to higher levels of cash. We have paid dividends each year since 1925 and have increased the annual dividend in each of the last 21 years. In the future, we expect to increase dividends at a rate similar to the increase in earnings per share.
Additional cash is being used to fund strategic acquisitions and capital projects. A share repurchase program is lowering shares outstanding and improving value for McCormick shareholders.
During the past five years, 86% of cash from operations directly benefited shareholders in the form of dividends and share repurchases.
16
BUSINESS SEGMENTS AT A GLANCE
Consumer Business
From locations around the world, our consumer brands reach nearly 100 countries.
Customers: |
|
A variety of retail outlets that include grocery, mass merchandise, warehouse clubs, discount and drug stores, served directly and indirectly through distributors or wholesalers. |
|
|
|
Products: |
|
Spices, herbs, extracts, seasoning blends, sauces, marinades and specialty foods. Both branded and private label products are supplied. |
|
|
|
Market position: |
|
A 40 to 70% market share in primary markets. As the category leader, can more efficiently develop and support our brands. |
|
|
|
Competitors: |
|
More than 250 other brands in U.S. and more in international markets. Some are owned by large food manufacturers, while others are supplied by small privately owned companies. |
|
|
|
Growth: |
|
Developing innovative products, increasing marketing effectiveness, expanding distribution and acquiring leading brands and niche products. |
|
|
|
Industrial Business |
||
|
|
|
We provide a wide range of products to multi-national food manufacturers and restaurants. |
||
|
|
|
Customers: |
|
Food manufacturers and the food service industry. Food service customers are supplied both directly and indirectly through distributors. |
|
|
|
Products: |
|
Seasoning blends, natural spices and herbs, wet flavors, coating systems and compound flavors. |
|
|
|
Market position: |
|
A leading supplier to many of the large multi-national food manufacturers and restaurants. Have one of the broadest ranges of flavor solutions in the industry and expertise in sensory, culinary and other areas. |
|
|
|
Competitors: |
|
Tend to specialize in one or several ranges of products. Some competitors are publicly held flavor companies, while others are small privately owned firms. |
|
|
|
Growth: |
|
Supporting the global expansion of customers, building current and new strategic partnerships, developing consumer-preferred, value-added products. |
17
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 2007 COMPARED TO 2006
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,916.2 |
|
$ |
2,716.4 |
|
Percent growth |
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
||
The increase in sales for 2007 was due to pricing actions taken to offset higher material cost, favorable product mix and higher volumes (including the 0.9% impact of Simply Asia Foods, acquired in June of 2006). Favorable foreign exchange rates added 2.9% for the year. The 2007 sales also reflect the impact of actions to eliminate low margin business, which lowered sales approximately 1%.
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
Gross profit |
|
$ |
1,191.8 |
|
$ |
1,114.6 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
40.9 |
% |
41.0 |
% |
||
Gross profit margin in 2007 decreased 0.1 percentage point. Included in cost of goods sold were restructuring charges for production facilities that are being closed. These charges in 2007 were less than in 2006 and increased gross profit margin by 0.4 percentage point. Cost savings related to restructuring activity lowered cost of goods sold, adding nearly 1.0 percentage point to gross profit margin. Gross profit margin was unfavorably impacted by higher material costs in 2007 that were only partially offset by price increases. Production costs in certain facilities were also affected by incremental costs early in 2007 to maintain customer service during our facility consolidation.
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
Selling, general & administrative expense (SG&A) |
|
$ |
806.9 |
|
$ |
772.6 |
|
Percent of net sales |
|
27.7 |
% |
28.4 |
% |
||
Selling, general and administrative expenses were higher in 2007 than 2006 on a dollar basis but declined as a percentage of net sales. As a percentage of net sales, administrative expense decreased while distribution, selling, promotion, advertising and research and development in total were relatively unchanged. The decrease in administrative expense during 2007 was driven by the benefit of expense reductions from our restructuring program.
The following is a summary of restructuring activities:
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
Pre-tax restructuring charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Recorded in cost of goods sold |
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
Other restructuring charges |
|
30.7 |
|
72.4 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Reduction in operating income |
|
34.0 |
|
84.1 |
|
||
Income tax effect |
|
(10.6 |
) |
(27.0 |
) |
||
Loss (gain) on sale of unconsolidated operations, net of tax |
|
.8 |
|
(26.8 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Reduction in net income |
|
$ |
24.2 |
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Reduction in earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
.18 |
|
$ |
.22 |
|
Pre-tax restructuring charges for both 2007 and 2006 related to actions under our restructuring program to consolidate our global manufacturing, rationalize our distribution facilities, improve our go-to-market strategy and eliminate administrative redundancies. The gain on the sale of unconsolidated operations in 2006 is primarily for the redemption of our ownership investment in Signature Brands LLC (Signature). More details of the restructuring charges are discussed later in MD&A and in note 3 of the financial statements.
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
Interest expense |
|
$ |
60.6 |
|
$ |
53.7 |
|
Other income, net |
|
8.8 |
|
7.1 |
|
||
The increase in interest expense was due to higher average short-term borrowings and higher short-term interest rates in 2007 when compared to 2006. However, these effects were partially offset by the refinancing of higher interest rate long-term debt in 2006, which has reduced the average interest rate on our total debt in 2007 when compared to 2006.
The increase in other income was due to higher interest income.
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
Income from consolidated operations before income taxes |
|
$ |
302.4 |
|
$ |
223.0 |
|
Income taxes |
|
92.2 |
|
64.7 |
|
||
Effective tax rate |
|
30.5 |
% |
29.0 |
% |
||
The increase in the effective tax rate was due to a reduction in discrete tax benefits in 2007. The 2006 discrete items of $5.2 million included the favorable resolution of an international tax audit, a reduction of accruals recorded for state tax audits and additional tax benefit related to the closure of our operation in Finland. Income taxes in 2007
18
included $1.9 million for discrete tax benefits, primarily the result of new tax legislation enacted in The Netherlands, the UK and the U.S. We expect the tax rate in 2008 to be slightly higher than the 30.5% effective rate in 2007.
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
Income from unconsolidated operations |
|
$ |
21.4 |
|
$ |
19.9 |
|
Minority interest |
|
.7 |
|
2.8 |
|
||
Combined |
|
$ |
20.7 |
|
$ |
17.1 |
|
Income from unconsolidated operations and minority interest, combined, increased 21% in 2007 compared to 2006. This increase was driven primarily by the move from an unprofitable unconsolidated joint venture in Asia to a licensing agreement in the fourth quarter of 2006, as well as the performance of our joint venture in Mexico due to strong mayonnaise sales.
The following table outlines the major components of the change in diluted earnings per share from 2006 to 2007:
2006 Earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
Increase (decrease) impact on EPS: |
|
|
|
|
Increased sales and operating income exclusive of restructuring |
|
.18 |
|
|
Restructuring costs |
|
.04 |
|
|
Income from unconsolidated operations |
|
.03 |
|
|
Higher interest expense |
|
(.03 |
) |
|
Effect of lower shares outstanding |
|
.03 |
|
|
Increase in tax rate |
|
(.02 |
) |
|
2007 Earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
1.73 |
|
CONSUMER BUSINESS
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,671.3 |
|
$ |
1,556.4 |
|
Percent growth |
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
||
Operating income, excluding restructuring activities |
|
313.9 |
|
278.0 |
|
||
Operating income margin, excluding restructuring activities |
|
18.8 |
% |
17.9 |
% |
||
Favorable foreign exchange rates added 3.1% to consumer sales in 2007 compared to 2006. The remaining increase of 4.3% was driven by higher pricing, favorable product mix, the acquisition of Simply Asia Foods (acquired in June 2006) which added 1.5% to net sales and volume from brand revitalization, effective marketing programs and new products.
In the Americas, consumer business sales increased 5.6%. Together favorable foreign exchange rates and incremental sales from Simply Asia Foods added 2.6% to net sales. Pricing on certain items such as pepper and favorable product mix further increased sales. Higher volumes of Hispanic items, the expanded organic line, grinders and seafood items were offset by lower volumes on other items including pepper, warehouse club products and the discontinuance of certain underperforming products.
In Europe, consumer sales rose 11.4%, of which 9.1% was due to favorable foreign exchange rates. The remaining increase of 2.3% was due primarily to pricing actions and volume increases in the U.K. and France. During 2007, these increases were offset in part by the impact of a competitive situation in The Netherlands and our action to close our business in Finland which both occurred in 2006.
Sales in the Asia/Pacific region increased 12.1%, with 8.4% due to favorable foreign exchange rates. Sales in China grew at a double-digit rate due to expanded distribution and marketing support behind our core spice and seasoning products, along with increases in a number of condiments and sauces. Sales growth in China was offset in part by lower sales of our branded spices and herbs in Australia due to the move by a large retailer earlier in 2007 to introduce a private label line of spices and herbs.
The increase in operating income excluding restructuring activities was driven by strong sales performance and cost reduction efforts. When comparing operating income margin excluding restructuring activities, higher sales, pricing actions and cost savings from our restructuring program more than offset increases in raw materials and fuel.
INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,244.9 |
|
$ |
1,160.0 |
|
Percent growth |
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
||
Operating income, excluding restructuring activities |
|
74.3 |
|
75.7 |
|
||
Operating income margin, excluding restructuring activities |
|
6.0 |
% |
6.5 |
% |
||
The 7.3% sales increase was driven by higher pricing to reflect the increased costs of pepper as well as certain commodities including cheese, soybean oil and flour.
19
Favorable foreign exchange rates added 2.8% to sales, while actions to eliminate lower margin products decreased sales approximately 2%.
Sales in the Americas rose 1.9% with favorable foreign exchange rates adding 0.5%. In this region, customer and product rationalization reduced sales approximately 2%. The remaining increase was primarily due to price increases. During 2007 new products and other volume gains with sales to food manufacturers were offset by weakness in the restaurant industry.
In Europe, sales increased 20.1%, which included a favorable foreign exchange rate impact of 9.2%. In this region, customer and product rationalization reduced sales approximately 2%. The remaining increase of approximately 13% was mostly volume-related due to increases in snack seasonings and products sold to quick service restaurants.
In the Asia/Pacific region, sales increased 25.8% with 8.0% from foreign exchange rates. Rapid expansion of industrial business, especially in China with quick service restaurant customers, contributed to sales in this region.
Operating income excluding restructuring activities decreased in both dollar terms and in terms of margin. Higher material costs during the year more than offset the benefit of our 7.3% sales increase and the cost savings from our restructuring activities. At the end of 2007 and into early 2008, we took further pricing actions in response to higher costs.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 2006 COMPARED TO 2005
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,716.4 |
|
$ |
2,592.0 |
|
Percent growth |
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
||
Key initiatives that drove sales in 2006 included higher volume driven by acquisitions, new products and effective marketing programs, as well as pricing actions taken early in the year. Sales from Simply Asia Foods, acquired in the third quarter of 2006, contributed 0.7% to the sales increase. Foreign exchange rates had an unfavorable effect on sales in the first half of 2006 and a favorable effect on reported sales in the second half of the year. On a full year basis, the sales effect of foreign exchange rates was slightly favorable.
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
Gross profit |
|
$ |
1,114.6 |
|
$ |
1,036.6 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
41.0 |
% |
40.0 |
% |
||
The increase in margin was attributable to initiatives to reduce costs, pricing actions taken early in 2006 in response to the higher costs of certain materials, employee benefits and energy, as well as a more favorable product mix. Included in cost of goods sold were restructuring charges for production facilities that were being closed. These charges reduced gross profit margin in 2006 by 0.5%. Also, gross profit margin in 2005 was negatively impacted by higher costs of vanilla.
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
SG&A |
|
$ |
772.6 |
|
$ |
681.9 |
|
Percent of net sales |
|
28.4 |
% |
26.3 |
% |
||
The increase in SG&A was primarily due to increased incentive compensation on higher earnings, as well as stock-based compensation and higher advertising costs. Stock-based compensation of $22.0 million, which accounted for a 0.8 percentage point increase as a percentage of net sales, was recorded in 2006 as a result of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 123(R) effective December 1, 2005 (see note 9 of the financial statements). Advertising expense increased by $12.7 million, adding another 0.5 percentage point increase to SG&A as a percentage of net sales, as we spent at a higher level to support our consumer brands.
The following is a summary of restructuring activities:
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
Pre-tax restructuring charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Recorded in cost of goods sold |
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
|
|
|
Other restructuring charges |
|
72.4 |
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
|
Reduction in operating income |
|
84.1 |
|
11.2 |
|
||
Income tax effect |
|
(27.0 |
) |
(3.7 |
) |
||
Gain on sale of unconsolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
||
operations, net of tax |
|
(26.8 |
) |
|
|
||
Reduction in net income |
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
Reduction in earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
.22 |
|
$ |
.05 |
|
Pre-tax restructuring charges for both 2006 and 2005 related to actions under our restructuring plans to consolidate our global manufacturing, rationalize our distribution
20
facilities, improve our go-to-market strategy and eliminate administrative redundancies. The gain on the sale of unconsolidated operations in 2006 was primarily for the redemption of our ownership investment in Signature and, to a lesser extent, the exit of our consumer joint venture in Japan. More details of the restructuring charges are discussed later in MD&A and in note 3 of the financial statements.
Interest expense in 2006 increased $5.5 million. Higher interest rates on our variable rate debt during 2006 accounted for most of this increase. Average borrowings during the year increased slightly.
Other income increased to $7.1 million in 2006 compared to $0.4 million in 2005 due mostly to higher interest income.
The effective tax rate was 29.0% in 2006 down from 32.7% in 2005. This decrease was due to both the mix of earnings among the different tax jurisdictions in which we do business and several discrete tax benefits. The discrete items were the favorable resolution of an international tax audit for $3.5 million, a $1.0 million reduction of accruals recorded for state tax audits and a $0.6 million additional tax benefit related to the closure of our operation in Finland.
We participated in two separate joint ventures with the same joint venture partner, Hero A.G. We owned 50% of Signature and 51% of Dessert Products International, S.A.S. (DPI). Signature is a cake decorating business in the U.S. and DPI markets the Vahine® brand of dessert aids in France and other European countries.
In the second quarter of 2006 we received the remaining 49% share of DPI in redemption of our 50% ownership investment in Signature. Since this transaction happened early in the year, it resulted in a decrease in our income from unconsolidated operations but also decreased the negative impact of our minority interest reported in the income statement. Excluding these effects, the increase in unconsolidated income was mainly from our joint venture in Mexico where stronger mayonnaise sales and moderate soybean oil prices contributed to the improved performance of this joint venture.
The following table outlines the major components of the changes in diluted earnings per share from 2005 to 2006:
2005 Earnings per share - diluted |
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) impact on EPS: |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring costs |
|
(.17 |
) |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
(.11 |
) |
|
Increased sales and operating income exclusive of restructuring and stock-based compensation |
|
.10 |
|
|
Lower tax rate |
|
.06 |
|
|
Effect of lower shares outstanding |
|
.04 |
|
|
Other |
|
.02 |
|
|
2006 Earnings per share - diluted |
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
CONSUMER BUSINESS
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,556.4 |
|
$ |
1,478.3 |
|
Percent growth |
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
||
Operating income, excluding restructuring activities |
|
278.0 |
|
288.0 |
|
||
Operating income margin, excluding restructuring activities |
|
17 9 |
% |
19.5 |
% |
||
We began recording stock-based compensation expense in 2006. Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in the consumer business operating results was $13.9 million.
Higher volume, pricing actions and a favorable product mix added 5.3%, while foreign exchange rates had no effect on sales. This included sales from Simply Asia Foods, acquired in June 2006, which added 1.3% to sales.
In the Americas, consumer business sales increased 8.1%, with 1.9% of the sales increase attributable to the Simply Asia Foods acquisition and 0.6% from favorable foreign exchange. The majority of the increase was driven by higher volume from new product introductions and more effective marketing, as well as pricing actions in the U.S. taken early in 2006. In 2006, we grew sales of Hispanic products, GrillMates, lower sodium items and slow cooker seasonings, with new varieties and marketing support. Print advertisements helped drive sales of gourmet products and gravy items. A new program, across our entire line of products, encouraged consumers to replace out-of-date spices and herbs. During the fourth quarter of 2005 , demand for our McCormick and Zatarains consumer products in the Gulf region of the U.S. was lower due to the effects of Hurricane Katrina. This had a positive impact when 2006 is compared to 2005.
21
In Europe, sales declined 0.8%, with unfavorable foreign exchange rates reducing sales 1.5%. Lower distribution in The Netherlands and our decision to close our operations in Finland early in 2006 reduced sales. In the U.K., sales of Schwartz branded herbs and spices were strong, but were offset in part by weaker performance in dry seasoning mixes and some non-core wet products. In France, higher sales in 2006 were led by core spice and seasoning products.
Sales in the Asia/Pacific region increased 1.1%, including a decline of 0.5% due to unfavorable foreign exchange rates. The sales contribution from China was particularly strong in 2006, partially offset by a decline in Australia.
The decrease in operating income and operating income margin, excluding restructuring charges was driven by stock-based compensation expense, increased incentive compensation expense and increased advertising expense in 2006, partially offset by strong sales performance and cost reduction efforts.
INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,160.0 |
|
$ |
1,113.7 |
|
Percent growth |
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
||
Operating income, excluding restructuring activities |
|
75.7 |
|
66.7 |
|
||
Operating income margin, excluding restructuring activities |
|
6.5 |
% |
6.0 |
% |
||
We began recording stock-based compensation expense in 2006. Total stock-based compensation expense recorded in the industrial business operating results was $8.1 million.
Higher volumes related to new product introductions was the primary driver of the sales increase while favorable foreign exchange rates added 0.4%. As part of the global industrial strategy, certain low margin business was eliminated which reduced sales by approximately 1% in 2006.
Sales in the Americas rose 4.9% with favorable foreign exchange rates adding 0.7%. This increase reflects higher sales to strategic customers. Sales to food manufacturers led this increase with particular strength in snack seasonings and new flavors for beverages and other consumer products. We increased sales to both quick service and casual dining restaurants. Sales of our seasoning and coating systems for chicken were especially strong. We also benefited from higher volume and a price increase implemented earlier in 2006 for products sold to food service distributors. In this region, customer and product rationalization reduced sales approximately 1.0%.
In Europe, sales increased 4.1%, which was negatively impacted by an unfavorable foreign exchange rate impact of 1.3%. Some of the same types of products as in the Americas drove the increase in Europe, including snack seasonings and products to flavor chicken sold through the food service channel. In this region, customer and product rationalization reduced sales approximately 1.0%.
In the Asia/Pacific region, sales declined 2.4%, including a favorable foreign exchange rate effect which increased sales 1.3%. The main reason for this decline was the loss of certain low margin products in Australia, which began in the first quarter of 2006. In China, we continued to grow sales to both food service customers and food manufacturers.
The higher operating income and operating income margin, excluding restructuring activities, was driven by higher sales and gross profit margin, partially offset by stock-based compensation and higher incentive compensation accruals due to the higher profit level. Cost savings from our restructuring plan and a focus on strategic customers lifted margins in 2006. Also, the industrial business was negatively impacted in 2005 by several factors including extreme volatility in the vanilla market.
LIQUIDITY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
224.5 |
|
$ |
310.8 |
|
$ |
332.2 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(92.8 |
) |
(172.1 |
) |
(70.0 |
) |
|||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(152.1 |
) |
(127.2 |
) |
(294.4 |
) |
|||
We generate strong cash flow from operations which enables us to fund operating projects and investments that are designed to meet our growth objectives, make substantial share repurchases, increase our dividend and fund capital projects and restructuring costs.
22
In the cash flow statement, the changes in operating assets and liabilities are presented excluding the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, as these do not reflect actual cash flows. Accordingly, the amounts in the cash flow statement do not agree with changes in the operating assets and liabilities that are presented in the balance sheet.
Operating Cash Flow When 2007 is compared to 2006, most of the decrease in operating cash flow was due to $30 million in increased payments made in 2007 for incentive compensation based upon 2006 operating results and $41 million in higher income tax payments made in 2007 when compared to 2006. Also impacting 2007 cash flow is a higher level of receivables in 2007 due to higher sales and the timing of sales within the year. When 2006 cash provided by operations is compared to 2005, the decrease was primarily the result of spending on restructuring of $55.9 million and lower dividends from unconsolidated operations, offset by higher operating income, exclusive of restructuring. In total, changes in operating assets and liabilities were comparable between 2006 and 2005. However, increases in inventories attributable to a build-up in anticipation of production transfer from facilities that will be closed, as well as increased purchases of certain raw materials, were offset by an increase in other accrued liabilities in 2006 as compared to 2005. The increase in other accrued liabilities was due to increased incentive compensation and restructuring charges.
Investing Cash Flow The reduction in investing cash flows in 2007 compared to 2006 is due to a decrease in cash used for acquisitions of businesses. Cash outflow for the acquisitions of businesses was primarily the purchase of Thai Kitchen in Europe in 2007, the Simply Asia Foods asset purchase in 2006 and a small business purchase in France in 2005 (see note 2 of the financial statements). Also, included in 2006 was $9.2 million in net proceeds from the redemption of a joint venture (see note 3 of the financial statements). Net capital expenditures (capital expenditures less proceeds from the sale of fixed assets) were $76.9 million in 2007, $78.7 million in 2006 and $64.5 million in 2005. The increase in net capital expenditures for 2007 and 2006 compared to 2005 is mainly due to increased spending under our restructuring program. We expect 2008 net capital expenditures to be slightly in excess of depreciation and amortization.
Financing Cash Flow We increased our total borrowings $65.5 million in 2007 compared to an increase of $77.2 million in 2006 and a decrease of $67.6 million in 2005. The main cause of the increase in 2007 was to fund our share repurchase program. The increase in 2006 was to fund the Simply Asia Foods asset purchase for $97.6 million. In 2006, we issued $100 million of 5.80% senior notes due 2011. Net interest payments are payable semi-annually in arrears in January and July of each year. Also, in 2006, we issued $200 million of 5.20% senior notes due 2015. Net interest payments are payable semi-annually in arrears in June and December of each year. The net proceeds from the $200 million offering were used to pay down $195 million of long-term debt which matured in 2006. In 2005, we paid off $30 million of medium-term notes at maturity.
The following table outlines the activity in our share repurchase programs:
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|||
Number of shares of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
common stock |
|
4.3 |
|
4.4 |
|
5.4 |
|
|||
Dollar amount |
|
$ |
157.0 |
|
$ |
155.9 |
|
$ |
185.6 |
|
Net share repurchases are net of proceeds from exercised stock options. Net capital expenditures are net of proceeds from the sale of fixed assets.
23
In the fourth quarter of 2005, we completed our $300 million share repurchase authorization and began to buy against our $400 million authorization approved by the Board of Directors in June 2005. As of November 30, 2007, $49 million remained under the $400 million share repurchase program. The pace of share repurchases in 2008 will be moderated in anticipation of the Lawrys acquisition (see note 2 of the financial statements). The common stock issued in 2007, 2006 and 2005 relates to our stock compensation plans.
Our dividend history over the last three years is as follows:
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|||
Total dividends paid |
|
$ |
103.6 |
|
$ |
95.0 |
|
$ |
86.2 |
|
Dividends paid per share |
|
.80 |
|
.72 |
|
.64 |
|
|||
Percentage increase per share |
|
11.1 |
% |
12.5 |
% |
14.3 |
% |
|||
In November 2007, the Board of Directors approved a 10.0% increase in the quarterly dividend from $0.20 to $0.22 per share. During the last five years, dividends per share have risen at a compound annual rate of 14.9%.
Cash payments to pension plans, including unfunded plans, were $41.6 million in 2007, $41.2 million in 2006 and $32.8 million in 2005. During 2007, our primary U.S. defined benefit pension plan moved from underfunded to overfunded status driven by good return on plan assets, a change in the liability due to the impact of a higher discount rate and a cash contribution of $22.0 million. Because of the current overfunded status of this pension plan as of November 30, 2007, it is likely that the 2008 pension plan contributions will be significantly less than in 2007. Future increases or decreases in pension liabilities and required cash contributions are highly dependent on changes in interest rates and the actual return on plan assets. We base our investment of plan assets, in part, on the duration of each plans liabilities. Across all plans, approximately 62% of assets are invested in equities, 32% in fixed income investments and 6% in other investments.
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Debt-to-total-capital ratio |
|
39.8 |
% |
41.0 |
% |
40.7 |
% |
The decrease in our debt-to-total-capital ratio in 2007 (total capital includes debt, minority interest and shareholders equity) was the result of a significant increase in shareholders equity of $151.8 million, partially offset by an increase in our total debt. A large increase in equity was due to the effect of foreign currency translation adjustments and the increase in debt was due to funding our share repurchase program. During the year, the level of our short-term debt varies and it is usually lower at the end of the year. The average short-term borrowings outstanding for the year ended November 30, 2007 and 2006 were $369.4 million and $271.9 million, respectively.
The reported values of our assets and liabilities held in our non-U.S. subsidiaries and affiliates have been significantly affected by fluctuations in foreign exchange rates between periods. During the year ended November 30, 2007, the exchange rates for the Euro, British pound sterling and Canadian dollar were substantially higher versus the U.S. dollar than in 2006. Exchange rate fluctuations resulted in an increase in accounts receivable of $23 million, inventory of $15 million, goodwill of $61 million and other comprehensive income of $123 million since November 30, 2006.
In August 2007, we entered into $150 million of forward treasury lock agreements to manage the interest rate risk associated with the forecasted issuance of $250 million of fixed rate medium-term notes issued subsequent to our 2007 fiscal year-end. We cash settled these treasury lock agreements for a loss of $10.5 million simultaneous with the issuance of the medium-term notes and effectively fixed the interest rate on the $250 million notes at a weighted average fixed rate of 6.25%. We had designated these outstanding forward treasury lock agreements, which were terminated on December 4, 2007, as cash flow hedges. The loss on these agreements will be deferred in other comprehensive income and will be amortized over the 10-year life of the medium-term notes as a component of interest expense. Hedge ineffectiveness of these agreements was not material in 2007. A portion of the proceeds of this $250 million debt issuance will be used to repay $150 million of notes maturing in 2008.
24
In March 2006, we entered into interest rate swap contracts for a total notional amount of $100 million to receive interest at 5.20% and pay a variable rate of interest based on three-month LIBOR minus .05%. We designated these swaps, which expire on December 15, 2015, as fair value hedges of the changes in fair value of $100 million of the $200 million 5.20% medium-term notes due 2015 that we issued in December 2005. As of November 30, 2007, the fair value of these swap contracts was an unrealized gain of $4.9 million, which was offset by a corresponding increase in value of the hedged debt. Any unrealized gain or loss on these swaps will be offset by a corresponding increase or decrease in value of the hedged debt. No hedge ineffectiveness was recognized as these interest rate swaps qualify for the shortcut treatment.
We have available credit facilities with domestic and foreign banks for various purposes. In July 2007, we entered into a $500 million five-year revolving credit agreement with various domestic banks for general business purposes. Our current pricing under the new credit agreement, on a fully drawn basis, is LIBOR plus 0.25%. The agreement, which replaces a previously existing $400 million revolving credit agreement, expires in July 2012, and supports our commercial paper borrowing arrangement. The amount of unused credit facilities at November 30, 2007 was $605.8 million. We believe that internally generated funds and the existing sources of liquidity under our credit facilities are sufficient to meet current liquidity needs and fund ongoing operations.
In November 2007, we entered into a definitive agreement to purchase the assets of Lawrys for $605 million in cash. Upon the closing of this transaction (expected in the second half of fiscal year 2008), we will finance this purchase through cash from operations, bank lines and commercial paper borrowings. Additional bank facilities are being negotiated and we anticipate no difficulties in obtaining financing. Post-closing, an appropriate longer-term capital structure will be put in place.
ACQUISITIONS
Acquisitions of new brands are part of our strategy to improve margins and increase sales and profits.
On November 13, 2007, we signed a definitive agreement with Unilever to purchase the assets of the Lawrys business for $605 million in cash. The transaction is expected to close in 2008. Lawrys manufactures and sells a variety of marinades and seasoning blends under the well-known Lawrys® and Adolphs® brands. The acquisition includes the rights to the brands as well as related inventory and a small number of dedicated production lines. It does not include any manufacturing facilities or employees. The closing of the Lawrys acquisition is subject to the expiration or termination of the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) waiting period and other customary closing conditions. We have agreed to pay Unilever a $30 million termination fee, subject to certain limited conditions, in the event that HSR clearance is not obtained.
On June 27, 2006, we purchased the assets of the Simply Asia Foods business for $97.6 million in cash. The $97.6 million purchase price was initially funded with commercial paper. In July 2006, we issued $100 million of 5.80% senior notes due 2011 to pay down this commercial paper debt. This business operates in North America and has been included in our consumer segment since the date of acquisition. Simply Asia Foods develops, imports and markets a line of authentic, easy-to-prepare Asian products under the Thai Kitchen® and Simply Asia® brands. Its primary products include noodle and soup bowls, meal kits, coconut milk, and various sauces and pastes. In 2007, we completed the final valuation of assets for Simply Asia Foods which resulted in $4.8 million being allocated to tangible net assets, $28.2 million allocated to other intangibles assets and $64.6 million allocated to goodwill. This valuation was not significantly different than the preliminary valuation. The value for brands and other intangible assets consists of $12.1 million which is amortizable and $16.1 million which is non-amortizable.
On July 30, 2007, we purchased Thai Kitchen SA for $12.8 million in cash, a business which operates the Thai Kitchen brand in Europe. This acquisition complements our U.S. purchase of Simply Asia Foods in 2006. The annual sales are approximately $7 million.
On August 1, 2006, we invested $5.0 million in an industrial joint venture in South Africa.
25
RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES
As part of our plan to improve margins, we announced in September 2005 significant actions to improve the effectiveness of our supply chain and reduce costs. At that time, we also stated that a comprehensive review of our global industrial business was under way to identify improvements. These actions were included in the comprehensive restructuring plan which the Board of Directors approved in November 2005. As part of this plan, over a three-year period, we are consolidating our global manufacturing, rationalizing our distribution facilities, improving our go-to-market strategy, eliminating administrative redundancies and rationalizing our joint venture partnerships. In addition, for the industrial business, we are reallocating resources to key customers and taking pricing actions on lower volume products to meet new margin targets. Through 2008, these actions are intended to reduce the number of industrial business customers and products in the U.S. by approximately 25%. Sales related to these customers and products represented approximately 2 to 5% of industrial business sales in the U.S. As these sales had minimal profit, this reduction is expected to lead to higher margins. These reductions also led to the consolidation of certain manufacturing facilities.
The restructuring plan is reducing complexity and increasing the organizational focus on growth opportunities in both the consumer and industrial businesses. We are projecting up to $55 million ($37 million after-tax) of annual cost savings by the end of 2008. In 2006, we realized $10 million ($7 million after-tax) of savings and another $35 million ($24 million after-tax) in 2007. This has improved margins and increased earnings per share, offset higher costs, as well as allowed us to invest a portion of these savings in sales growth drivers such as brand advertising. These savings are reflected in both cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses in the income statement.
Total pre-tax charges under this restructuring plan are estimated to be $115 to $125 million with approximately 65% related to the consumer segment and 35% related to the industrial segment. Of these charges, we expect that $85 to $90 million will consist of severance and other personnel costs and $50 to $55 million of other exit costs. Asset write-offs are expected to be $10 to $15 million, exclusive of the $34 million gain on our redemption of Signature in 2006.
Restructuring charges to date include $10.7 million recorded in 2005, $50.1 million recorded during 2006 (including the gain on Signature) and $34.8 million recorded in 2007. For the total plan, the cash related portion of the charges will be $95 to $105 million, with total cash spent to date of $83.3 million, after offsetting the $9.2 million in net cash received from the redemption of Signature. This program is expected to be completed by the end of fiscal year 2008.
We are funding this spending through internally generated funds. A significant portion of the cash expenditures are for employee severance. The actions being taken pursuant to the restructuring plan are expected to eliminate 1,200 positions over the three-year period. Of the expected global workforce reduction, 1,015 positions have been eliminated as of November 30, 2007.
Joint Venture Transactions Previously, we participated in two separate joint ventures with the same joint venture partner, Hero A.G. We owned 50% of Signature and 51% of DPI. In 2006, we received the remaining 49% share of DPI in redemption of our 50% ownership investment in Signature. In addition, we received $9.2 million in cash with this transaction.
In recording this transaction, we valued both the investment received and the investment given at their fair value. On the disposition of our Signature investment, the fair value of our investment was $56.0 million as compared to our book value of this unconsolidated subsidiary of $21.7 million. After consideration of transaction costs of $0.6 million
We expect to reach up to $55 million in annual savings in 2008, ahead of our $50 million goal.
26
and taxes of $7.2 million, we recorded a net after-tax gain of $26.5 million which is shown on the line entitled (Loss) gain on sale of unconsolidated operations in our income statement. On the acquisition of the 49% minority interest of DPI, the fair value of these shares was assessed at $46.9 million. Since this business was consolidated, the book value of this 49% share was shown as $29.9 million of minority interest on our balance sheet. After consideration of transaction costs of $0.7 million, we allocated $17.7 million to goodwill. The impact of increasing our share in DPI and disposing of Signature on future net income is not material.
In 2006, in connection with exiting an unconsolidated joint venture in Japan, we recorded a net gain of $0.3 million, after- tax. Finalization of these unconsolidated joint venture transactions resulted in a loss of $0.8 million, after tax, in 2007.
These actions are part of our plan to simplify our joint venture structure under the restructuring program and focus on those areas we believe have strong growth potential.
Other Restructuring Costs In 2007, we recorded restructuring charges of $34.0 million, of which $30.7 million is reflected in restructuring charges and $3.3 million is reflected in cost of goods sold in our income statement. We recorded $14.9 million of severance costs, primarily associated with the reduction of administrative personnel in the U.S. and Europe. In addition, we recorded $16.7 million of other exit costs resulting from the closure of manufacturing facilities in Salinas, California and Hunt Valley, Maryland and the consolidation of production facilities in Europe. The remaining $2.4 million of asset write-downs is comprised of inventory write-offs as a result of the closure of the manufacturing facilities in Salinas, California and Hunt Valley, Maryland and accelerated depreciation of assets, mostly offset by the asset gain from the sale of our manufacturing facility in Paisley, Scotland.
In 2006, we recorded restructuring charges, exclusive of the gain on Signature, of $84.1 million, of which $72.4 million is reflected in restructuring charges and $11.7 million is reflected in cost of goods sold in our income statement. We recorded $54.9 million of severance costs and special early retirement benefits associated with our voluntary separation program in several functions in the U.S.; closures of manufacturing facilities in Salinas, California; Hunt Valley, Maryland; Sydney, Australia; Paisley, Scotland; and Kerava, Finland; and reorganization of administrative functions in Europe. In addition, we recorded $15.7 million of other exit costs associated with the consolidation of production facilities and the reorganization of the sales and distribution networks in the U.S. and Europe and contract termination costs associated with customers and distributors in connection with the closure of the business in Finland. The $13.5 million of restructuring charges for asset write-downs is primarily accelerated depreciation related to the closure of manufacturing facilities in Salinas, California and Hunt Valley, Maryland, the closure of the plants in Paisley, Scotland and Kerava, Finland and inventory write-offs as a result of the plant closings. These expenses were partially offset by net gains on the disposition of assets.
In 2005, we recorded $10.7 million of charges as a result of actions taken under the restructuring plan. These charges included certain severance costs associated with the closing of our consumer manufacturing plant in Salinas, California, closing costs for a small plant in Belgium and costs associated with the reorganization of the sales and distribution networks in the U.S. and Europe.
In our income statement, restructuring charges under this program are displayed in three line items. The gain related to our disposition of Signature and a joint venture in Japan as described under joint venture transactions is on the line entitled (Loss) gain on sale of unconsolidated operations. Other restructuring costs are included in restructuring charges and cost of goods sold.
The business segment components of the restructuring charges recorded in 2007, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|||
Consumer |
|
$ |
23.8 |
|
$ |
57.1 |
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
Industrial |
|
10.2 |
|
27.0 |
|
.2 |
|
|||
Total restructuring charges |
|
$ |
34.0 |
|
$ |
84.1 |
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
The restructuring charges recorded in the consumer business include severance costs and special early retirement benefits associated with our voluntary separation program in several functions in the U.S. and Europe; consolidation of certain manufacturing facilities in Europe; and closures of manufacturing facilities in Salinas, California, Sydney, Australia, and Kerava, Finland.
27
The restructuring charges recorded in the industrial business include severance costs and special early retirement benefits associated with our voluntary separation program in several functions in the U.S. and Europe; closures of manufacturing facilities in Hunt Valley, Maryland, and Paisley, Scotland (offset by the asset gain) including other exit and inventory write-off costs and accelerated depreciation of assets.
During the year ended November 30, 2005, we recorded restructuring charges of $0.5 million in connection with a previous restructuring plan.
PERFORMANCE GRAPH SHAREHOLDER RETURN
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly change in McCormicks cumulative total shareholder return (stock price appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends) on McCormicks Common Stock with (1) the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poors 500 Stock Price Index, assuming reinvestment of dividends, and (2) the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poors Packaged Foods & Meats Index, assuming reinvestment of dividends.
COMPARISON OF 5-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among McCormick & Co., Inc., the S&P 500 Stock Price Index and the S&P Packaged Foods & Meats Index
*The graph assumes that $100 was invested on November 30, 2002 in McCormick Common Stock, the Standard & Poors 500 Stock Price Index and the Standard & Poors Packaged Foods & Meats Index, and that all dividends were reinvested through November 30, 2007.
MARKET RISK SENSITIVITY
We utilize derivative financial instruments to enhance our ability to manage risk, including foreign exchange and interest rate exposures, which exist as part of our ongoing business operations. We do not enter into contracts for trading purposes, nor are we a party to any leveraged derivative instrument. The use of derivative financial instruments is monitored through regular communication with senior management and the utilization of written guidelines. The information presented below should be read in conjunction with notes 6 and 7 of the financial statements.
Foreign Exchange Risk We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency in the following main areas: cash flows related to raw material purchases; the translation of foreign currency earnings to U.S. dollars; the value of foreign currency investments in subsidiaries and unconsolidated affiliates and cash flows related to repatriation of these investments. Primary exposures include the U.S. dollar versus the Euro, British pound sterling, Australian dollar, Canadian dollar, Mexican peso, Chinese renminbi and Thai baht. We routinely enter into foreign currency exchange contracts to facilitate managing foreign currency risk.
During 2007, the foreign currency translation component in other comprehensive income was principally related to the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on our net investments in France, the U.K., Canada and Australia. We did not hedge our net investments in subsidiaries and unconsolidated affiliates.
The following table summarizes the foreign currency exchange contracts held at November 30, 2007. All contracts are valued in U.S. dollars using year-end 2007 exchange rates and have been designated as hedges of foreign currency transactional exposures, firm commitments or anticipated transactions, all with a maturity period of less than one year.
28
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE CONTRACTS AT NOVEMBER 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
contractual |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Currency |
|
Notional |
|
exchange rate |
|
Fair |
|
|||
Currency sold |
|
received |
|
value |
|
(USD/fc) |
|
value |
|
|||
Euro |
|
USD |
|
$ |
19.5 |
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
British pound sterling |
|
USD |
|
12.6 |
|
2.00 |
|
(.3 |
) |
|||
Canadian dollar |
|
USD |
|
24.0 |
|
.95 |
|
(1.2 |
) |
|||
We have a number of smaller contracts with an aggregate notional value of $7.0 million to purchase or sell various other currencies, such as the Australian dollar and the Japanese yen as of November 30, 2007. The aggregate fair value of these contracts was $(0.1) million at November 30, 2007.
At November 30, 2006, we had foreign currency exchange contracts for the Euro, British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, Australian dollar, Japanese yen and Singapore dollar with a notional value of $47.9 million, all of which matured in 2006. The aggregate fair value of these contracts was $(0.2) million at November 30, 2006.
Contracts with durations which are less than 5 days and used for short-term cash flow funding are not included in the notes or table above.
Interest Rate Risk Our policy is to manage interest rate risk by entering into both fixed and variable rate debt arrangements. We also use interest rate swaps to minimize worldwide financing costs and to achieve a desired mix of fixed and variable rate debt. The table that follows provides principal cash flows and related interest rates, excluding the effect of interest rate swaps and the amortization of any discounts or fees, by fiscal year of maturity at November 30, 2007 and 2006. For foreign currency-denominated debt, the information is presented in U.S. dollar equivalents. Variable interest rates are based on the weighted-average rates of the portfolio at the end of the year presented.
YEAR OF MATURITY AT NOVEMBER 30, 2007
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Fair value |
|
|||||||
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
.4 |
|
$ |
50.4 |
|
$ |
.4 |
|
$ |
100.1 |
|
$ |
405.0 |
|
$ |
556.3 |
|
$ |
572.7 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
0.09 |
% |
3.32 |
% |
0.00 |
% |
5.80 |
% |
6.17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Variable rate |
|
$ |
149.2 |
|
|
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
163.2 |
|
$ |
163.2 |
|
|||
Average interest rate |
|
5.28 |
% |
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
YEAR OF MATURITY AT NOVEMBER 30, 2006
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Fair value |
|
|||||||
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
.5 |
|
$ |
150.4 |
|
$ |
50.4 |
|
$ |
.4 |
|
$ |
355.0 |
|
$ |
556.7 |
|
$ |
572.9 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
2.26 |
% |
6.78 |
% |
3.32 |
% |
0.00 |
% |
5.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Variable rate |
|
$ |
80.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
|
|
$ |
94.9 |
|
$ |
94.9 |
|
|||
Average interest rate |
|
5.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
5.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
The table above displays the debt by the terms of the original debt instrument without consideration of interest rate swaps and any loan discounts or origination fees. Interest rate swaps have the following effects. The variable interest rate on $75 million of commercial paper is hedged by interest rate swaps through 2011. Net interest payments on the $75 million will be fixed at 6.35% during this period. Interest rate swaps, settled upon the issuance of the medium-term notes maturing in 2008, effectively fixed the interest rate on $150 million of notes at a weighted-average fixed rate of 7.71%. The fixed interest rate on $50 million of 3.35% medium-term notes due in 2009 is effectively converted to a variable rate by interest rate swaps through 2009. Net interest payments are based on LIBOR minus 0.21% during this period. The fixed interest rate on $100 million of the 5.20% medium-term note due in 2015 is effectively converted to a variable rate by interest rate swaps through 2015. Net interest payments are based on LIBOR minus 0.05% during this period.
In December 2007 we issued $250 million of 5.75% medium-term notes due in 2017. Forward treasury lock agreements, of $150 million, settled upon the issuance of these medium-term notes, effectively fixed the interest rate on the full $250 million of notes at a weighted-average fixed rate of 6.25%. A portion of the net proceeds of these medium-term notes will be used to pay down $150 million of current maturity of long-term debt maturing in 2008. As a result, the current portion of medium-term notes maturing in 2008 were classified in the Thereafter totals in the table above to reflect the 2017 maturity date of the new issuance. On a pro forma basis, after giving consideration to the issuance of the $250 million of medium-term notes and the repayment of the $150 million of medium-term notes, the Thereafter totals for 2007 would be $505.0 million of fixed rate debt at an average interest rate of 5.77%.
29
Commodity Risk We Purchase certain raw materials which are subject to price volatility caused by weather, market conditions, growing and harvesting conditions, governmental actions and other factors beyond our control. Our most significant raw materials are cheese, pepper, soybean oil, wheat, sweeteners, garlic, capsicums and onion. While future movements of raw material costs are uncertain, we respond to this volatility in a number of ways, including strategic raw material purchases, purchases of raw material for future delivery and customer price adjustments. We have not used derivatives to manage the volatility related to this risk.
Credit Risk The customers of our consumer business are predominantly food retailers and food wholesalers. Consolidations in these industries have created larger customers, some of which are highly leveraged. In addition, competition has increased with the growth in alternative channels including mass merchandisers, dollar stores, warehouse clubs and discount chains. This has caused some customers to be less profitable and increased our exposure to credit risk. We continually evaluate and monitor our credit exposure to our customers and believe that the risks have been adequately provided for in our bad debt allowance.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS
The following table reflects a summary of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of November 30, 2007:
CONTRACTUAL CASH OBLIGATIONS DUE BY YEAR
|
|
|
|
Less |
|
|
|
|
|
More |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
than 1 |
|
1-3 |
|
3-5 |
|
than 5 |
|
|||||
|
|
Total |
|
year |
|
years |
|
years |
|
years |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
149.2 |
|
$ |
149.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Long-term debt (a) |
|
570.3 |
|
.4 |
|
$ |
64.8 |
|
$ |
100.1 |
|
$ |
405.0 |
|
||
Operating leases |
|
57.7 |
|
19.0 |
|
26.2 |
|
11.7 |
|
.8 |
|
|||||
Interest payments |
|
197.9 |
|
29.1 |
|
45.0 |
|
35.7 |
|
88.1 |
|
|||||
Raw material purchase obligations (b) |
|
251.7 |
|
251.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other purchase obligations (c) |
|
2.1 |
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
1,228.9 |
|
$ |
451.5 |
|
$ |
136.0 |
|
$ |
147.5 |
|
$ |
493.9 |
|
(a) Includes $150 million of debt due in less than 1 year in the More than 5 years category based on our ability and intent to refinance this amount for this term.
(b) Raw material purchase obligations outstanding as of year-end may not be indicative of outstanding obligations throughout the year due to our response to varying raw material cycles.
(c) Other purchase obligations primarily consist of advertising media commitments.
In 2008, our pension and postretirement funding is expected to be approximately $22 million. Pension and postretirement funding can vary significantly each year due to changes in legislation and our significant assumptions. As a result, we have not presented pension and postretirement funding in the table above.
COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS EXPIRATION BY YEAR
|
|
|
|
Less |
|
|
|
|
|
More |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
than 1 |
|
1-3 |
|
3-5 |
|
than 5 |
|
|||
|
|
Total |
|
year |
|
years |
|
years |
|
years |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Guarantees |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby and trade letters of credit |
|
30.7 |
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Lines of credit |
|
605.8 |
|
105.8 |
|
|
|
$ |
500.0 |
|
|
|
||
Total commercial commitments |
|
$ |
638.0 |
|
$ |
138.0 |
|
|
|
$ |
500.0 |
|
|
|
30
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of November 30, 2007 and 2006.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements This standard outlines the accounting and reporting for ownership interest in a subsidiary held by parties other than the parent. SFAS No. 160 is effective for our our first quarter of 2010. We have not yet determined the impact from adoption of this new accounting pronouncement on our financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations. This standard establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. This statement also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No.141R is effective for us for acquisitions made after November 30, 2009. We have not yet determined the impact from adoption of this new accounting pronouncement on our financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. This standard requires us to (a) record an asset or a liability on our balance sheet for our pension plans overfunded or underfunded status (b) record any changes in the funded status of our pension and postretirement plans in the year in which the changes occur (reported in comprehensive income) and (c) measure our pension and postretirement assets and liabilities at November 30 versus our current measurement date of September 30. The requirements to record the funded status and provide additional disclosures are effective this year and are further disclosed in note 8 of the financial statements. Changes in funded status will be recorded beginning in 2008. The requirement to change our measurement date will be effective beginning with our year ending November 30, 2009. The impact of measuring the funded status as of November 30 will be dependent upon interest rates, market performance and other factors at the measurement date and therefore cannot be determined.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This standard defines fair value and provides guidance for measuring fair value and the necessary disclosures. This standard does not require any new fair value measurements but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. In December 2007, the FASB proposed a one-year deferral for non-financial assets and liabilities to comply with SFAS No. 157. If adopted as proposed, SFAS No. 157 will be effective for our first quarter ending February 29, 2008 for all financial assets and liabilities and effective for non-financial assets and liabilities for our first quarter ending February 28, 2009. We do not expect any material impact from initial adoption of this new accounting pronouncement on our financial statements for our first quarter ending February 29, 2008. We have not yet determined the impact on our financial statements from adoption of SFAS No.157 as it pertains to non-financial assets and liabilities for our first quarter ending February 28, 2009.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes when it is uncertain how an income or expense item should be treated on an income tax return. FIN 48 describes when and in what amounts an uncertain tax item should be recorded in the financial statements, provides guidance on recording interest and penalties and provides guidance on accounting and reporting for income taxes in interim periods. FIN 48 is effective for our first quarter ending February 29, 2008. Based on our estimates we anticipate that we will record a charge to retained earnings for uncertain tax positions in the range of $7 to $12 million upon adoption of FIN 48.
31
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS
In preparing the financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), we are required to make estimates and assumptions that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenue and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information disclosed by us, including information about contingencies, risk and financial condition. We believe, given current facts and circumstances, our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, adhere to GAAP and are consistently applied. Inherent in the nature of an estimate or assumption is the fact that actual results may differ from estimates, and estimates may vary as new facts and circumstances arise. In preparing the financial statements, we make routine estimates and judgments in determining the net realizable value of accounts receivable, inventory, fixed assets and prepaid allowances. We believe our most critical accounting estimates and assumptions are in the following areas:
Customer Contracts
In several of our major markets, the consumer business sells our products by entering into annual or multi-year contracts with our customers. These contracts include provisions for items such as sales discounts, marketing allowances and performance incentives. The discounts, allowances and incentives are expensed based on certain estimated criteria such as sales volume of indirect customers, customers reaching anticipated volume thresholds and marketing spending. We routinely review these criteria and make adjustments as facts and circumstances change.
Goodwill and Intangible Asset Valuation
We review the carrying value of goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets and conduct tests of impairment on an annual basis as described below. We will also test for impairment if events or circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit or the non-amortizable intangible asset is below its carrying amount.
Goodwill Impairment
We have concluded that our reporting units are the same as our business segments utilizing the guidance under SFAS No.142. We calculate fair value by using a discounted cash flow model of a reporting unit and then compare that to the carrying amount of the reporting unit, including intangible assets and goodwill. An impairment charge would be recognized to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value. As of November 30, 2007, we have $879.5 million of goodwill recorded in our balance sheet. Our testing indicates that the current fair values of our reporting units are significantly in excess of carrying values and accordingly management believes that only significant changes in the cash flow assumptions would result in an impairment of goodwill.
Non-Amortizable Intangible Asset Impairment
Our non-amortizable intangible assets consist of brand names and trademarks. We calculate fair value by using a discounted cash flow model or royalty savings method and then compare that to the carrying amount of the non-amortizable intangible asset. As of November 30, 2007, we have $177.7 million of brand name assets and trademarks recorded in our balance sheet and none of the balances exceed their estimated fair values. We intend to continue to support our brand names. The fair value of non-amortizable intangible assets are sensitive to the assumption of future sales derived from the intangible asset and changes in discount rates used in the cash flow model.
Income Taxes
We estimate income taxes and file tax returns in each of the taxing jurisdictions in which we operate and are required to file a tax return. At the end of each year, an estimate for income taxes is recorded in the financial statements. Tax returns are generally filed in the third or fourth quarter of the subsequent year. A reconciliation of the estimate to the final tax return is done at that time which will result in changes to the original estimate. We
32
are subject to tax audits in each of the jurisdictions, which could result in changes to the taxes previously estimated. The amount of these changes could vary by jurisdiction and are recorded when they are probable and estimable. Income tax expense for 2007 includes $1.5 million of adjustments from prior year estimates to actual filings or tax audits. Management has recorded valuation allowances to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In doing so, management has considered future taxable income and on-going tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance.
Pension and Postretirement Benefits
Pension and other postretirement plans costs require the use of assumptions for discount rates, investment returns, projected salary increases, mortality rates and health care cost trend rates. The actuarial assumptions used in our pension and postretirement benefit reporting are reviewed annually and compared with external benchmarks to ensure that they appropriately account for our future pension and postretirement benefit obligations. While we believe that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences between assumed and actual experience may affect our operating results. A 1% change in the actuarial assumption for the discount rate would impact pension and postretirement benefit expense by approximately $13 million. A 1% change in the expected return on plan assets would impact pension expense by approximately $5 million. In addition, see the preceding sections of MD&A and note 8 of the financial statements for a discussion of these assumptions and the effects on the financial statements.
Stock-Based Compensation
In the first quarter of 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. This statement required us to expense the fair value of grants of various stock-based compensation programs over the vesting period of the awards. We estimate the fair value of our stock-based compensation using fair value pricing models which require the use of significant assumptions for expected volatility of stock, life of options, dividend yield and risk-free interest rate. The significant assumptions used are disclosed in note 9 of the financial statements.
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain statements contained in this report, including those related to the expected results of operations of businesses acquired by us, the expected impact of the prices of raw materials on our results of operations and gross margins, the expected margin improvements, expected trends in net sales and earnings performance and other financial measures, annualized savings and other benefits from our streamlining and restructuring activities, the holding period and market risks associated with financial instruments, the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations, the adequacy of internally generated funds and existing sources of liquidity, such as our ability to issue additional debt or equity securities, and our expectations regarding purchasing shares of our common stock under the existing authorizations are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21(E) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements are based on managements current views and assumptions and involve risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect expected results. Operating results may be materially affected by external factors such as: competitive conditions, customer relationships and financial condition, availability and cost of raw and packaging materials, governmental actions and political events, and economic conditions, including fluctuations in interest and foreign currency exchange rates. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
33
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
John P. Bilbrey
James T. Brady
J. Michael Fitzpatrick
Freeman A. Hrabowski III |
|
Robert J. Lawless
Michael D. Mangan
Joseph W. McGrath
|
|
Margaret M.V. Preston
George A. Roche
William E. Stevens
Alan D.Wilson |
34
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
John P. Bilbrey 51 |
|
Joseph W. McGrath 55 |
|
Alan D. Wilson |
Senior Vice President |
|
President & Chief Executive Officer |
|
President & |
The Hershey Company |
|
Unisys Corporation |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
President Hershey North America |
|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
|
|
Hershey, Pennsylvania |
|
Director since 2007 |
|
Paul C. Beard |
Director since 2005 |
|
Compensation Committee |
|
Vice President |
Nominating / Corporate Governance |
|
|
|
Finance & Treasurer |
Committee |
|
Margaret M.V. Preston 50 |
|
|
|
|
Market Executive |
|
Francis A. Contino |
James T. Brady 67 |
|
The Private Bank of America |
|
Executive Vice President |
Managing Director, Mid-Atlantic |
|
Banc of America Investment |
|
Strategic Planning |
Ballantrae International, Ltd. |
|
Services, Inc. |
|
|
Ijamsville, Maryland |
|
New York, New York |
|
Kenneth A. Kelly, Jr. |
Director since 1998 |
|
Director since 2003 |
|
Vice President & Controller |
Audit Committee* |
|
Nominating / Corporate Governance |
|
|
|
|
Committee |
|
Lawrence E. Kurzius |
J. Michael Fitzpatrick 61 |
|
|
|
President Europe, |
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer |
|
George A. Roche 66 |
|
Middle East & Africa |
Citadel Plastics Holdings, Inc. |
|
Chairman of the Board & President |
|
|
Radnor, Pennsylvania |
|
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (retired) |
|
Charles T. Langmead |
Director since 2001 |
|
Baltimore, Maryland |
|
President |
Audit Committee |
|
Director since 2007 |
|
U.S. Industrial Group |
|
|
Compensation Committee |
|
|
Freeman A. Hrabowski, III 57 |
|
|
|
Cecile K. Perich |
President |
|
William E. Stevens 65 |
|
Vice President |
University of Maryland |
|
Chairman, BBI Group |
|
Human Relations |
Baltimore County |
|
St. Louis, Missouri |
|
|
Baltimore, Maryland |
|
Director since 1988 |
|
Robert W. Skelton |
Director since 1997 |
|
Compensation Committee* |
|
Senior Vice President, |
Nominating / Corporate Governance |
|
|
|
General Counsel & Secretary |
Committee* |
|
Alan D.Wilson 50 |
|
|
|
|
President & |
|
Gordon M. Stetz |
Robert J. Lawless 61 |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Executive Vice President & |
Chairman of the Board |
|
McCormick & Company, Inc. |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Chief Executive Officer (retired) |
|
Director since 2007 |
|
|
McCormick & Company, Inc. |
|
|
|
Mark T.Timbie |
Director since 1994 |
|
|
|
President North American |
|
|
|
|
Consumer Foods |
Michael D. Mangan 51 |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
The Black & Decker Corporation |
|
|
|
|
Towson, Maryland |
|
|
|
|
Director since 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Audit Committee |
|
|
|
|
*Denotes committee chairman
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
McCormicks mission is to enhance shareholder value. McCormick employees conduct business under the leadership of the Chief Executive Officer and the oversight and direction of the Board of Directors. Both management and the Board of Directors believe that the creation of long-term shareholder value requires us to conduct our business honestly and ethically and in accordance with applicable laws. We also believe that shareholder value is well served if the interests of our employees, customers, suppliers, consumers, and the communities in which we live, are appropriately addressed.
McCormicks success is grounded in its value system as evidenced by our core values.
We are open and honest in business dealings inside and outside McCormick. We are dependable and truthful and keep our promises.
Our employees and our Board of Directors are committed to growing our business in accordance with our governance structure, principles and code of ethics.
35
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
37 |
Report of Management |
|
|
37 |
Report of Independent Registered Accounting Firms |
|
|
39 |
Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
39 |
Consolidated Income Statement |
|
|
40 |
Consolidated Balance Sheet |
|
|
41 |
Consolidated Cash Flow Statement |
|
|
42 |
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity |
|
|
43 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
43 |
Note 1 |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
45 |
Note 2 |
Acquisitions |
|
45 |
Note 3 |
Restructuring Activities |
|
47 |
Note 4 |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
|
47 |
Note 5 |
Investments in Affiliates |
|
48 |
Note 6 |
Financing Arrangements |
|
49 |
Note 7 |
Financial Instruments |
|
50 |
Note 8 |
Employee Benefit and Retirement Plans |
|
54 |
Note 9 |
Stock-based Compensation |
|
56 |
Note 10 |
Income Taxes |
|
57 |
Note 11 |
Earnings per Share |
|
57 |
Note 12 |
Capital Stocks |
|
57 |
Note 13 |
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
57 |
Note 14 |
Business Segments and Geographic Areas |
|
59 |
Note 15 |
Supplemental Financial Statement Data |
|
59 |
Note 16 |
Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited) |
|
60 |
Historical Financial Summary |
|
36
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT
We are responsible for the preparation and integrity of the consolidated financial statements appearing in our Annual Report. The consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles and include amounts based on managements estimates and judgments. All other financial information in this report has been presented on a basis consistent with the information included in the financial statements.
We are also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. We maintain a system of internal control that is designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the fair and reliable preparation and presentation of the consolidated financial statements, as well as to safeguard assets from unauthorized use or disposition.
Our control environment is the foundation for our system of internal control over financial reporting and is embodied in our Business Ethics Policy. It sets the tone of our organization and includes factors such as integrity and ethical values. Our internal control over financial reporting is supported by formal policies and procedures which are reviewed, modified and improved as changes occur in business conditions and operations.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed solely of independent directors, meets periodically with members of management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors to review and discuss internal control over financial reporting and accounting and financial reporting matters. The independent auditors and internal auditors report to the Audit Committee and accordingly have full and free access to the Audit Committee at any time.
We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Although there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal control over financial reporting, based on our evaluation, we have concluded with reasonable assurance that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of November 30, 2007.
Our internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2007 has been audited by Ernst &Young LLP.
|
|
Alan D.Wilson President & Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Gordon M. Stetz Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Kenneth A. Kelly, Jr. Vice President & Controller, Chief Accounting Officer |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of McCormick & Company, Incorporated
We have audited McCormick& Company, Incorporateds internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2007, based on the criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). McCormick & Company, Incorporateds management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
37
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, McCormick & Company, Incorporated maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2007 based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries as of November 30, 2007 and 2006 and the related consolidated income statement, statement of changes in shareholders equity and cash flow statement for each of the three years in the period ended November 30, 2007, and our report dated January 22, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Baltimore, Maryland |
January 22, 2008 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Consolidated Financial Statements
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of McCormick & Company, Incorporated
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries as of November 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated income statement, statement of changes in shareholders equity, and cash flow statement for each of the three years in the period ended November 30, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries at November 30, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended November 30, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in note 8 of the notes to consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for defined benefit post retirement plans upon adoption of the recognition and related disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans on November 30, 2007.
As discussed in note 9 of the notes to consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for stock-based compensation upon adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.123(R), Share-Based Payment on December 1, 2005.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated January 22, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Baltimore, Maryland |
January 22, 2008 |
38
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
for the year ended November 30 (millions except per share data) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,916.2 |
|
$ |
2,716.4 |
|
$ |
2,592.0 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
1,724.4 |
|
1,601.8 |
|
1,555.4 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Gross profit |
|
1,191.8 |
|
1,114.6 |
|
1,036.6 |
|
|||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
806.9 |
|
772.6 |
|
681.9 |
|
|||
Restructuring charges |
|
30.7 |
|
72.4 |
|
11.2 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating income |
|
354.2 |
|
269.6 |
|
343.5 |
|
|||
Interest expense |
|
60.6 |
|
53.7 |
|
48.2 |
|
|||
Other income, net |
|
8.8 |
|
7.1 |
|
.4 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Income from consolidated operations before income taxes |
|
302.4 |
|
223.0 |
|
295.7 |
|
|||
Income taxes |
|
92.2 |
|
64.7 |
|
96.7 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income from consolidated operations |
|
210.2 |
|
158.3 |
|
199.0 |
|
|||
(Loss) gain on sale of unconsolidated operations |
|
(.8 |
) |
26.8 |
|
|
|
|||
Income from unconsolidated operations |
|
21.4 |
|
19.9 |
|
20.6 |
|
|||
Minority interest |
|
.7 |
|
2.8 |
|
4.7 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income |
|
$ |
230.1 |
|
$ |
202.2 |
|
$ |
214.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
$ |
1.53 |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
Earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
1.73 |
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, pages 43-59.
39
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
at November 30 (millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
45.9 |
|
$ |
49.0 |
|
Receivables, less allowances of $5.7 for 2007 and $5.9 for 2006 |
|
456.5 |
|
379.1 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
430.2 |
|
405.7 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
50.5 |
|
65.6 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
983.1 |
|
899.4 |
|
||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
487.6 |
|
469.5 |
|
||
Goodwill, net |
|
879.5 |
|
803.8 |
|
||
Intangible assets, net |
|
207.5 |
|
193.6 |
|
||
Prepaid allowances |
|
39.3 |
|
45.5 |
|
||
Investments and other assets |
|
190.5 |
|
156.2 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,787.5 |
|
$ |
2,568.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Short-term borrowings |
|
$ |
149.2 |
|
$ |
80.8 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
.4 |
|
.6 |
|
||
Trade accounts payable |
|
243.3 |
|
224.4 |
|
||
Other accrued liabilities |
|
468.4 |
|
474.7 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
861.3 |
|
780.5 |
|
||
Long-term debt |
|
573.5 |
|
569.6 |
|
||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
257.7 |
|
281.0 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
1,692.5 |
|
1,631.1 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Minority interest |
|
9.9 |
|
3.6 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, no par value; authorized 320.0 shares; issued and outstanding: 200712.8 shares, 200613.2 shares |
|
201.0 |
|
177.9 |
|
||
Common stock non-voting, no par value; authorized 320.0 shares; issued and outstanding: 2007115.0 shares, 2006116.9 shares |
|
300.0 |
|
266.4 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
323.8 |
|
348.7 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
260.3 |
|
140.3 |
|
||
Total shareholders equity |
|
1,085.1 |
|
933.3 |
|
||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,787.5 |
|
$ |
2,568.0 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, pages 43-59.
40
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT
for the year ended November 30 (millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income |
|
$ |
230.1 |
|
$ |
202.2 |
|
$ |
214.9 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
82.6 |
|
84.3 |
|
74.6 |
|
|||
Stock-based compensation |
|
21.4 |
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
|||
Loss (gain) on sale of unconsolidated operations |
|
.8 |
|
(26.8 |
) |
|
|
|||
Deferred income taxes |
|
(12.0 |
) |
(26.0 |
) |
5.9 |
|
|||
Income from unconsolidated operations |
|
(21.4 |
) |
(19.9 |
) |
(20.6 |
) |
|||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Receivables |
|
(51.6 |
) |
14.9 |
|
16.8 |
|
|||
Inventories |
|
(7.9 |
) |
(42.3 |
) |
(3.0 |
) |
|||
Prepaid allowances |
|
7.3 |
|
(3.1 |
) |
14.5 |
|
|||
Trade accounts payable |
|
8.9 |
|
19.1 |
|
9.4 |
|
|||
Other assets and liabilities |
|
(53.2 |
) |
65.1 |
|
(9.5 |
) |
|||
Dividends received from unconsolidated affiliates |
|
19.5 |
|
18.4 |
|
29.2 |
|
|||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
224.5 |
|
310.8 |
|
332.2 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Acquisitions of businesses |
|
(15.9 |
) |
(102.6 |
) |
(5.5 |
) |
|||
Capital expenditures |
|
(78.5 |
) |
(84.8 |
) |
(66.8 |
) |
|||
Proceeds from redemption of joint venture |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
|||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
1.6 |
|
6.1 |
|
2.3 |
|
|||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(92.8 |
) |
(172.1 |
) |
(70.0 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Short-term borrowings, net |
|
66.0 |
|
(24.8 |
) |
(34.8 |
) |
|||
Long-term debt borrowings |
|
|
|
299.7 |
|
|
|
|||
Long-term debt repayments |
|
(.5 |
) |
(197.7 |
) |
(32.8 |
) |
|||
Proceeds from exercised stock options |
|
43.0 |
|
46.5 |
|
45.0 |
|
|||
Common stock acquired by purchase |
|
(157.0 |
) |
(155.9 |
) |
(185.6 |
) |
|||
Dividends paid |
|
(103.6 |
) |
(95.0 |
) |
(86.2 |
) |
|||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(152.1 |
) |
(127.2 |
) |
(294.4 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
17.3 |
|
7.2 |
|
(7.8 |
) |
|||
Increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(3.1 |
) |
18.7 |
|
(40.0 |
) |
|||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
49.0 |
|
30.3 |
|
70.3 |
|
|||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
45.9 |
|
$ |
49.0 |
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, pages 43-59.
41
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(millions) |
|
Common |
|
Common |
|
Common |
|
Retained |
|
Accumulated |
|
Total |
|
||||
Balance, November 30, 2004 |
|
14.6 |
|
120.9 |
|
$ |
336.0 |
|
$ |
434.1 |
|
$ |
119.6 |
|
$ |
889.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214.9 |
|
|
|
214.9 |
|
||||
Currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97.4 |
) |
(97.4 |
) |
||||
Change in derivative financial instruments, net of tax of $3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
6.2 |
|
||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.8 |
) |
(.8 |
) |
||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122.9 |
|
||||
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88.5 |
) |
|
|
(88.5 |
) |
||||
Shares purchased and retired |
|
(.2 |
) |
(5.2 |
) |
(12.0 |
) |
(175.1 |
) |
|
|
(187.1 |
) |
||||
Shares issued, including tax benefit of $13.8 |
|
1.7 |
|
.8 |
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
||||
Equal exchange |
|
(1.6 |
) |
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Balance, November 30, 2005 |
|
14.5 |
|
118.1 |
|
$ |
386.9 |
|
$ |
385.4 |
|
$ |
27.6 |
|
$ |
799.9 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202.2 |
|
|
|
202.2 |
|
||||
Currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110.0 |
|
110.0 |
|
||||
Change in derivative financial instruments, net of tax of $1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
2.3 |
|
||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.4 |
|
.4 |
|
||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314.9 |
|
||||
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97.1 |
) |
|
|
(97.1 |
) |
||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
||||
Shares purchased and retired |
|
(.8 |
) |
(3.6 |
) |
(16.6 |
) |
(141.8 |
) |
|
|
(158.4 |
) |
||||
Shares issued, including tax benefit of $9.5 |
|
1.4 |
|
.5 |
|
49.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
||||
Equal exchange |
|
(1.9 |
) |
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Balance, November 30, 2006 |
|
13.2 |
|
116.9 |
|
$ |
444.3 |
|
$ |
348.7 |
|
$ |
140.3 |
|
$ |
933.3 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230.1 |
|
|
|
230.1 |
|
||||
Currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123.2 |
|
123.2 |
|
||||
Change in derivative financial instruments, net of tax of $4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
(8.5 |
) |
||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax of $30.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54.6 |
|
54.6 |
|
||||
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399.4 |
|
||||
Adjustment from the adoption of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49.3 |
) |
(49.3 |
) |
||||
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105.6 |
) |
|
|
(105.6 |
) |
||||
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
||||
Shares purchased and retired |
|
(.6 |
) |
(3.9 |
) |
(18.7 |
) |
(149.4 |
) |
|
|
(168.1 |
) |
||||
Shares issued, including tax benefit of $9.4 |
|
1.5 |
|
.7 |
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
||||
Equal exchange |
|
(1.3 |
) |
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Balance, November 30, 2007 |
|
12.8 |
|
115.0 |
|
$ |
501.0 |
|
$ |
323.8 |
|
$ |
260.3 |
|
$ |
1,085.1 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, pages 43-59.
42
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Consolidation
The financial statements include the accounts of our majority-owned or controlled subsidiaries and affiliates. Intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Investments in unconsolidated affiliates, over which we exercise significant influence, but not control, are accounted for by the equity method. Accordingly, our share of net income or loss of unconsolidated affiliates is included in consolidated net income.
Use of Estimates
Preparation of financial statements that follow accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and notes. Actual amounts could differ from these estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of 3 months or less are classified as cash equivalents.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using standard or average costs which approximate the first-in, first-out costing method.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is stated at historical cost and depreciated over its estimated useful life using the straight-line method for financial reporting and both accelerated and straight-line methods for tax reporting. The estimated useful lives range from 20 to 40 years for buildings and 3 to 12 years for machinery, equipment and computer software.
Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
Capitalized Software Development Costs
We capitalize costs of software developed or obtained for internal use. Capitalized software development costs include only (1) direct costs paid to others for materials and services to develop or buy the software, (2) payroll and payroll-related costs for employees who work directly on the software development project and (3) interest costs while developing the software. Capitalization of these costs stops when the project is substantially complete and ready for use. Software is amortized using the straight-line method over a range of 3 to 8 years, but not exceeding the expected life of the product. We capitalized $19.9 million of software during the year ended November 30, 2007, $15.4 million during the year ended November 30, 2006 and $23.5 million during the year ended November 30, 2005.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We review the carrying value of goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets and conduct tests of impairment on an annual basis as described below. We also test for impairment if events or circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit or the non-amortizable intangible asset is below its carrying amount. Separable intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized over those lives.
Goodwill Impairment
We have concluded that our reporting units used to measure goodwill values are the same as our business segments. We calculate fair value of a reporting unit by using a discounted cash flow model and then compare that to the carrying amount of the reporting unit, including intangible assets and goodwill. An impairment charge would be recognized to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value.
Non-Amortizable Intangible Asset Impairment
Our non-amortizable intangible assets consist of brand names and trademarks. We calculate fair value by using a discounted cash flow model or royalty savings method and then compare that to the carrying amount of the non-amortizable intangible asset. If the carrying amount of the non-amortizable intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge is recorded to the extent the recorded non-amortizable intangible asset exceeds the fair value.
Prepaid Allowances
Prepaid allowances arise when we prepay sales discounts and marketing allowances to certain customers on multi-year sales contracts. These costs are capitalized and amortized against net sales. The majority of our contracts are for a specific committed customer sales volume while others are for a specific time duration. Prepaid allowances on volume based contracts are amortized based on the actual volume of customer purchases, while prepaid allowances on time based contracts are amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the contract. The amounts reported in the balance sheet are stated at the
43
lower of unamortized cost or our estimate of the net realiziable value of these allowances.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when we have an agreement with the customer, the product has been delivered to the customer, the sales price is fixed and collectibility is reasonably assured. We reduce revenue for estimated product returns, allowances and price discounts based on historical experience.
Trade allowances, consisting primarily of customer pricing allowances, merchandising funds and consumer coupons, are offered through various programs to customers and consumers. Revenue is recorded net of trade allowances.
Receivables are amounts billed and currently due from customers. We have an allowance for doubtful accounts to reduce our receivables to their net realizable value. We estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts based on our history of collections and the aging of our receivables.
Shipping and Handling
Shipping and handling costs are included in selling, general and administrative expense in the income statement. Shipping and handling expense was $81.9 million, $81.7 million and $77.3 million for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expense in the income statement. Research and development expense was $49.3 million, $45.0 million and $43.1 million for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Advertising
Advertising costs, which include the development and production of ads and the communication of ads through print and television, are expensed in the period the ad first runs. Advertising expense is included in selling, general and administrative expense in the income statement. Advertising expense was $54.7 million, $57.9 million and $45.2 million for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements This standard outlines the accounting and reporting for ownership interest in a subsidiary held by parties other than the parent. SFAS No. 160 is effective for our first quarter of 2010. We have not yet determined the impact from adoption of this new accounting pronouncement on our financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations. This standard establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. This statement also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No.141R is effective for us for acquisitions made after November 30, 2009. We have not yet determined the impact from adoption of this new accounting pronouncement on our financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. This standard requires us to (a) record an asset or a liability on our balance sheet for our pension plans overfunded or underfunded status (b) record any changes in the funded status of our pension and postretirement plans in the year in which the changes occur (reported in comprehensive income) and (c) measure our pension and postretirement assets and liabilities at November 30 versus our current measurement date of September 30. The requirements to record the funded status and provide additional disclosures are effective this year and are further disclosed in note 8. Changes in funded status will be recorded beginning in 2008. The requirement to change our measurement date will be effective beginning with our year ending November 30, 2009. The impact of measuring the funded status as of November 30 will be dependent upon interest rates, market performance and other factors at the measurement date and therefore cannot be determined.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This standard defines fair value and provides guidance for measuring fair value and the necessary disclosures. This standard does not require any new fair value measurements but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. In December 2007, the FASB proposed a one-year deferral for
44
non-financial assets and liabilities to comply with SFAS No.157. If adopted as proposed, SFAS No.157 will be effective for our first quarter ending February 29, 2008 for all financial assets and liabilities and effective for non-financial assets and liabilities for our first quarter ending February 28, 2009. We do not expect any material impact from initial adoption of this new accounting pronouncement on our financial statements for our first quarter ending February 29, 2008. We have not yet determined the impact on our financial statements from adoption of SFAS No.157 as it pertains to non-financial assets and liabilities for our first quarter ending February 28, 2009.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes when it is uncertain how an income or expense item should be treated on an income tax return. FIN 48 describes when, and in what amounts, an uncertain tax item should be recorded in the financial statements, provides guidance on recording interest and penalties and provides guidance on accounting and reporting for income taxes in interim periods. FIN 48 is effective for our first quarter ending February 29, 2008. Based on our estimates we anticipate that we will record a charge to retained earnings for uncertain tax positions in the range of $7 to $12 million upon adoption of FIN48.
2. ACQUISITIONS
On November 13, 2007, we signed a definitive agreement with Unilever to purchase the assets of the Lawrys business for $605 million in cash. The transaction is expected to close in 2008. Lawrys manufactures and sells a variety of marinades and seasoning blends under the well-known Lawrys® and Adolphs® brands. The acquisition includes the rights to the brands as well as related inventory and a small number of dedicated production lines. It does not include any manufacturing facilities or employees. The closing of the Lawrys acquisition is subject to the expiration or termination of the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) waiting period and other customary closing conditions. We have agreed to pay Unilever a $30 million termination fee, subject to certain limited conditions, in the event that HSR clearance is not obtained.
On June 27, 2006, we purchased the assets of the Simply Asia Foods business for $97.6 million in cash. The $97.6 million purchase price was initially funded with commercial paper. In July 2006, we issued $100 million of 5.80% senior notes due 2011 to pay down this commercial paper debt. This business operates in North America and has been included in our consumer segment since the date of acquisition. Simply Asia Foods develops, imports and markets a line of authentic, easy-to-prepare Asian products under the Thai Kitchen® and Simply Asia® brands. Its primary products include noodle and soup bowls, meal kits, coconut milk, and various sauces and pastes. In 2007, we completed the final valuation of assets for Simply Asia Foods which resulted in $4.8 million being allocated to tangible net assets, $28.2 million allocated to other intangibles assets and $64.6 million allocated to goodwill. This valuation was not significantly different than the preliminary valuation. The value for brands and other intangible assets consists of $12.1 million which is amortizable over an average life of 15 years and $16.1 million which is non-amortizable. For tax purposes, goodwill resulting from this acquisition is deductible.
On July 30, 2007, we purchased Thai Kitchen SA for $12.8 million in cash, a business which operates the Thai Kitchen brand in Europe. This acquisition complements our U.S. purchase of Simply Asia Foods in 2006. The annual sales are approximately $7 million.
On August 1, 2006, we invested $5.0 million in an industrial joint venture in South Africa.
3. RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES
In November of 2005, the Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan under which we are consolidating our global manufacturing, rationalizing our distribution facilities, improving our go-to-market strategy, eliminating administrative redundancies and rationalizing our joint venture partnerships. We estimate total pre-tax charges of $115 to $125 million under this program, inclusive of the $34 million pre-tax gain on the redemption of our Signature Brands, L.L.C. (Signature) joint venture (see discussion below) recorded in 2006. The segment breakdown of the total charges is expected to be approximately 65% related to the consumer segment and 35% related to the industrial segment. Of these charges, we expect $85 to $90 million will consist of severance and other personnel costs and $50 to $55 million of other exit costs. Asset write-offs are expected to be $10 to $15 million, exclusive of the $34 million pre-tax gain on the redemption of Signature. We expect the cash related portion of the charges will be $95 to $105 million. The actions being taken are expected to reduce positions by approximately 1,200 by November 2008.
From inception of the project in November 2005, we have incurred $95.6 million of restructuring charges, including the $33.7 million gain recorded on the
45
redemption of our Signature investment in 2006 and other joint ventures in 2006 and 2007. Of the expected position reduction of approximately 1,200, 1,015 have been eliminated as of November 2007.
Joint Venture Transactions Previously, we participated in two separate joint ventures with the same joint venture partner, Hero A.G. We owned 50% of Signature and 51% of Dessert Products International, S.A.S. (DPI). Signature is a cake decorating business in the U.S. and DPI markets the Vahine® brand of dessert aids in France and other European countries.
In 2006, we received the remaining 49% share of DPI in redemption of our 50% ownership investment in Signature. In addition, we received $9.2 million in cash with this transaction.
In recording this transaction, we valued both the investment received and the investment given at their fair value. On the disposition of our Signature investment, the fair value of our investment was $56.0 million as compared to our book value of this unconsolidated subsidiary of $21.7 million. After consideration of transaction costs of $0.6 million and taxes of $7.2 million, we recorded a net after-tax gain of $26.5 million which is shown on the line entitled (Loss) gain on sale of unconsolidated operations in our income statement. On the acquisition of the 49% minority interest of DPI, the fair value of these shares was assessed at $46.9 million. Since this business was consolidated, the book value of this 49% share was shown as $29.9 million of minority interest on our balance sheet. After consideration of transaction costs of $0.7 million, we allocated $17.7 million to goodwill. The impact of increasing our share in DPI and disposing of Signature on future net income is not material.
In 2006, in connection with exiting an unconsolidated joint venture in Japan, we recorded a net gain of $0.3 million, after-tax. Finalization of these unconsolidated joint venture transactions resulted in a loss of $0.8 million, after-tax, in 2007.
These actions are part of our plan to simplify our joint venture structure under the restructuring program and focus on those areas we believe have strong growth potential.
Other Restructuring Costs In 2007, we recorded restructuring charges of $34.0 million ($23.6 million after-tax), of which $30.7 million is reflected in restructuring charges and $3.3 million is reflected in cost of goods sold in our income statement. We recorded $14.9 million of severance costs, primarily associated with the reduction of administrative personnel in the U.S. and Europe. In addition, we recorded $16.7 million of other exit costs resulting from the closure of manufacturing facilities in Salinas, California and Hunt Valley, Maryland and the consolidation of production facilities in Europe. The remaining $2.4 million of asset write-downs is comprised of inventory write-offs as a result of the closure of the manufacturing facilities in Salinas, California and Hunt Valley, Maryland and accelerated depreciation of assets, mostly offset by the asset gain from the sale of our manufacturing facility in Paisley, Scotland.
In 2006, we recorded restructuring charges, exclusive of the gain on Signature, of $84.1 million ($57.1 million after-tax), of which $72.4 million is reflected in restructuring charges and $11.7 million is reflected in cost of goods sold in our income statement. We recorded $54.9 million of severance costs and special early retirement benefits associated with our voluntary separation program in several functions in the U.S.; closures of manufacturing facilities in Salinas, California; Hunt Valley, Maryland; Sydney, Australia; Paisley, Scotland; and Kerava, Finland; and reorganization of administrative functions in Europe. In addition, we recorded $15.7 million of other exit costs associated with the consolidation of production facilities and the reorganization of the sales and distribution networks in the U.S. and Europe and contract termination costs associated with customers and distributors in connection with the closure of the business in Finland. The $13.5 million of restructuring charges for asset write-downs is primarily accelerated depreciation related to the closure of manufacturing facilities in Salinas, California and Hunt Valley, Maryland, the closure of the plants in Paisley, Scotland and Kerava, Finland and inventory write-offs as a result of the plant closings. These expenses were partially offset by net gains on the disposition of assets.
In 2005, we recorded $10.7 million ($7.2 million after-tax) of charges as a result of actions taken under the restructuring plan. These charges included certain severance costs associated with the closing of our consumer manufacturing plant in Salinas, California, closing costs for a small plant in Belgium and costs associated with the reorganization of the sales and distribution networks in the U.S. and Europe.
46
The business segment components of the restructuring charges recorded in 2007, 2006 and 2005 are as follows :
(millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|||
Consumer |
|
$ |
23.8 |
|
$ |
57.1 |
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
Industrial |
|
10.2 |
|
27.0 |
|
.2 |
|
|||
Total restructuring charges |
|
$ |
34.0 |
|
$ |
84.1 |
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
The restructuring charges recorded in the consumer business include severance costs and special early retirement benefits associated with our voluntary separation program in several functions in the U.S. and Europe; consolidation of certain manufacturing facilities in Europe; and closure of manufacturing facilities in Salinas, California, Sydney, Australia, and Kerava, Finland.
The restructuring charges recorded in the industrial business include severance costs and special early retirement benefits associated with our voluntary separation program in several functions in the U.S. and Europe; closures of manufacturing facilities in Hunt Valley, Maryland, and Paisley, Scotland (offset by the asset gain) including other exit and inventory write-off costs and accelerated depreciation of assets.
During 2007 and 2006, we spent $42.2 million and $39.5 million, respectively, in cash on the restructuring plan. From inception of the project in November 2005, $83.3 million in cash has been spent on the restructuring plan, including the $9.2 million net cash received on redemption of our Signature investment in 2006.
The major components of the restructuring charges and the remaining accrual balance relating to the 2005 restructuring plan as of November 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007 follow:
(millions) |
|
Severance |
|
Asset |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
||||
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Restructuring charges |
|
$ |
8.1 |
|
$ |
.5 |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
Amounts utilized |
|
(.1 |
) |
(.5 |
) |
(1.4 |
) |
(2.0 |
) |
||||
|
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
|
|
$ |
.7 |
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Restructuring charges |
|
$ |
54.9 |
|
$ |
13.5 |
|
$ |
15.7 |
|
$ |
84.1 |
|
Amounts utilized |
|
(42.6 |
) |
(13.5 |
) |
(13.3 |
) |
(69.4 |
) |
||||
|
|
$ |
20.3 |
|
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
$ |
23.4 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Restructuring charges |
|
$ |
14.9 |
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
$ |
16.7 |
|
$ |
34.0 |
|
Amounts utilized |
|
(28.1 |
) |
(2.4 |
) |
(19.4 |
) |
(49.9 |
) |
||||
|
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
|
$ |
.4 |
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
During the year ended November 30, 2005, we recorded restructuring charges of $0.5 million in connection with a previous restructuring plan.
4. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following table displays intangible assets as of November 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
||||
(millions) |
|
amount |
|
amortization |
|
amount |
|
amortization |
|
||||
Amortizable intangible assets |
|
$ |
36.9 |
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
$ |
27.8 |
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
Non-amortizable intangible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Goodwill |
|
965.5 |
|
86.0 |
|
885.1 |
|
81.3 |
|
||||
Brand names |
|
168.0 |
|
|
|
160.6 |
|
|
|
||||
Trademarks |
|
10.6 |
|
.9 |
|
9.5 |
|
.8 |
|
||||
|
|
1,144.1 |
|
86.9 |
|
1,055.2 |
|
82.1 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total goodwill and intangible assets |
|
$ |
1,181.0 |
|
$ |
94.0 |
|
$ |
1,083.0 |
|
$ |
85.6 |
|
Intangible asset amortization expense was $3.2 million, $1.8 million and $0.5 million for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. At November 30, 2007, amortizable intangible assets have an average remaining life of approximately 12 years.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the years ended November 30, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||||||||
(millions) |
|
Consumer |
|
Industrial |
|
Consumer |
|
Industrial |
|
||||
Beginning of year |
|
$ |
754.7 |
|
$ |
49.1 |
|
$ |
619.5 |
|
$ |
44.4 |
|
Goodwill acquired |
|
11.9 |
|
5.1 |
|
82.4 |
|
|
|
||||
Goodwill disposed |
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
||||
Other |
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Foreign currency fluctuations |
|
57.7 |
|
2.8 |
|
54.6 |
|
4.7 |
|
||||
End of year |
|
$ |
822.5 |
|
$ |
57.0 |
|
$ |
754.7 |
|
$ |
49.1 |
|
5. INVESTMENTS IN AFFILIATES
Summarized year-end information from the financial statements of unconsolidated affiliates representing 100% of the businesses follows:
(millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|||
Net sales |
|
$ |
415.7 |
|
$ |
435.7 |
|
$ |
460.3 |
|
Gross profit |
|
168.6 |
|
167.9 |
|
183.7 |
|
|||
Net income |
|
44.2 |
|
39.8 |
|
41.3 |
|
|||
Current assets |
|
$ |
170.3 |
|
$ |
154.1 |
|
$ |
181.5 |
|
Noncurrent assets |
|
54.0 |
|
53.0 |
|
99.0 |
|
|||
Current liabilities |
|
101.4 |
|
75.1 |
|
102.4 |
|
|||
Noncurrent liabilities |
|
9.9 |
|
8.8 |
|
13.9 |
|
The results for 2006 include income activity for our investment in Signature only through the date of its redemption in the second quarter of 2006 (see note 3). Our share of undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates was $46.6 million at November 30, 2007. Royalty income from unconsolidated affiliates was $11.4 million, $11.1 million and $10.5 million for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
47
6. FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
Our outstanding debt is as follows:
(millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Commercial paper (1) |
|
$ |
145.7 |
|
$ |
78.6 |
|
Other |
|
3.5 |
|
2.2 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
149.2 |
|
$ |
80.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted-average interest rate of short-term borrowings at year-end |
|
5.28 |
% |
5.51 |
% |
||
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
||
6.80% medium-term notes due 2008 (2) |
|
$ |
150.0 |
|
$ |
149.8 |
|
3.35% medium-term notes due 2009 (3) |
|
49.9 |
|
48.6 |
|
||
5.80% medium-term notes due 2011 |
|
100.0 |
|
100.0 |
|
||
5.20% medium-term notes due 2015 (4) |
|
203.7 |
|
201.0 |
|
||
7.63%-8.12% medium-term notes due 2024 |
|
55.0 |
|
55.0 |
|
||
Other |
|
15.3 |
|
15.8 |
|
||
|
|
573.9 |
|
570.2 |
|
||
Less current portion |
|
.4 |
|
.6 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
573.5 |
|
$ |
569.6 |
|
(1) The variable interest rate on $75 million of commercial paper is hedged by interest rate swaps through 2011. Net interest payments are fixed at 6.35% during this period.
(2) Interest rate swaps, settled upon the issuance of the medium-term notes, effectively fixed the interest rate on $150 million of the notes at a weighted average fixed rate of 7.71%.
(3) The fixed interest rate on the 3.35% medium-term notes due in 2009 is effectively converted to a variable rate by interest rate swaps through 2009. Net interest payments are based on LIBOR minus .21% during this period.
(4) The fixed interest rate on $100 million of the 5.20% medium-term notes due in 2015 is effectively converted to a variable rate by interest rate swaps through 2015. Net interest payments are based on LIBOR minus .05% during this period.
Subsequent to our 2007 fiscal year end, we issued $250 million of 5.75% medium-term notes which are due in 2017. These notes were also subject to an interest rate hedge as further discussed in note 7. The net proceeds will be used to repay $150 million of debt maturing in 2008 with the remainder used to repay short-term debt. Since we have the ability and intent to refinance, $150 million of current maturity of long-term debt has been classified as long-term debt in the 2007 balance sheet and included in maturities based on a 2017 due date.
Maturities of long-term debt, not including the $250 million notes issued in December 2007, during the years subsequent to November 30, 2008 are as follows (in millions):
2009 $50.4
2010 $14.4
2011 $100.1
2012
Thereafter $405.0
In July 2006, we issued $100 million of 5.80% medium-term notes due 2011. Net interest is payable semi-annually in arrears in January and July of each year. The net proceeds from this offering were used to pay down the commercial paper debt placed in June 2006 for the acquisition of Simply Asia Foods.
In December 2005, we issued $200 million of 5.20% medium-term notes due 2015. Net interest is payable semi-annually in arrears in June and December of each year. The net proceeds from this offering were used to pay down long-term debt which matured in 2006.
We have available credit facilities with domestic and foreign banks for various purposes. In July 2007, we entered into a $500 million five-year revolving credit agreement with various domestic banks for general business purposes. Our current pricing under the new credit agreement, on a fully drawn basis, is LIBOR plus 0.25%. The agreement, which replaces a previously existing $400 million revolving credit agreement, expires in July 2012. The amount of unused credit facilities at November 30, 2007 was $605.8 million, of which $500.0 million supports a commercial paper borrowing arrangement. Of these unused facilities, $105.8 million expire in 2008 and $500.0 million expire in 2012. Some credit facilities issuance require a commitment fee. Annualized commitment fees at November 30, 2007 and 2006 were $0.3 million.
Rental expense under operating leases was $27.0 million in 2007, $25.4 million in 2006 and $24.6 million in 2005. Future annual fixed rental payments for the years ending November 30 are as follows (in millions):
2008 $19.0
2009 $14.3
2010 $11.9
2011 $ 7.4
2012 $ 4.3
Thereafter $ .8
At November 30, 2007, we had guarantees outstanding of $1.5 million with terms of one year or less. At November 30, 2007 and 2006, we had outstanding letters of credit of $30.7 million and $28.7 million, respectively.
48
These letters of credit typically act as a guarantee of payment to certain third parties in accordance with specified terms and conditions. The unused portion of our letter of credit facility was $5.3 million at November 30, 2007.
7. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
We use derivative financial instruments to enhance our ability to manage risk, including foreign currency and interest rate exposures, which exists as part of our ongoing business operations. We do not enter into contracts for trading purposes, nor are we a party to any leveraged derivative instrument. The use of derivative financial instruments is monitored through regular communication with senior management and the use of written guidelines.
All derivatives are recognized at fair value in the balance sheet and recorded in either other assets or other accrued liabilities.
Foreign Currency
We are potentially exposed to foreign currency fluctuations affecting net investments, transactions and earnings denominated in foreign currencies. We selectively hedge the potential effect of these foreign currency fluctuations by entering into foreign currency exchange contracts with highly-rated financial institutions.
Contracts which are designated as hedges of anticipated purchases denominated in a foreign currency (generally purchases of raw materials in U.S. dollars by operating units outside the U.S.) are considered cash flow hedges. The gains and losses on these contracts are deferred in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in cost of goods sold, at which time the net amount deferred in other comprehensive income is also recognized in cost of goods sold. Gains and losses from hedges of assets, liabilities or firm commitments are recognized through income, offsetting the change in fair value of the hedged item.
At November 30, 2007, we had foreign currency exchange contracts maturing within one year to purchase or sell $63.1 million of foreign currencies versus $47.9 million at November 30, 2006. All of these contracts were designated as hedges of anticipated purchases denominated in a foreign currency to be completed within one year or hedges of foreign currency denominated assets or liabilities. Hedge ineffectiveness was not material.
Interest Rates
We finance a portion of our operations with both fixed and variable rate debt instruments, primarily commercial paper, notes and bank loans. We utilize interest rate swap agreements to minimize worldwide financing costs and to achieve a desired mix of variable and fixed rate debt.
In August 2007, we entered into $150 million of forward treasury lock agreements to manage the interest rate risk associated with the forecasted issuance of $250 million of fixed rate medium-term notes issued subsequent to our 2007 fiscal year-end. We cash settled these treasury lock agreements for a loss of $10.5 million simultaneous with the issuance of the medium-term notes and effectively fixed the interest rate on the $250 million notes at a weighted average fixed rate of 6.25%. We had designated these outstanding forward treasury lock agreements, which were terminated on December 4, 2007, as cash flow hedges. The loss on these agreements will be deferred in other comprehensive income and will be amortized over the 10-year life of the medium-term notes as a component of interest expense. Hedge ineffectiveness of these agreements was not material in 2007.
In March 2006, we entered into interest rate swap contracts for a total notional amount of $100 million to receive interest at 5.20% and pay a variable rate of interest based on three-month LIBOR minus .05%. We designated these swaps, which expire on December 15, 2015, as fair value hedges of the changes in fair value of $100 million of the $200 million 5.20% medium term notes due 2015 that we issued in December 2005. Any unrealized gain or loss on theses swaps will be offset by a corresponding increase or decrease in value of the hedged debt. No hedge ineffectiveness is recognized as the interest rate swaps qualify for shortcut treatment.
In 2004, we entered into an interest rate swap contract with a total notional amount of $50 million to receive interest at 3.36% and pay a variable rate of interest based on six-month LIBOR minus 0.21%. We designated this swap, which expires on April 15, 2009, as a fair value hedge of the changes in fair value of the $50 million of medium-term notes maturing on April 15, 2009. No hedge ineffectiveness is recognized as the interest rate swap qualifies for shortcut treatment.
The variable interest on $75 million of commercial paper is hedged by forward starting interest rate swaps for the period through 2011. Net interest payments on this commercial paper are effectively fixed at 6.35% during the period. The unrealized gain or loss on these swaps is recorded in other comprehensive income, as we intend to hold these interest rate swaps until maturity and maintain
49
$75 million of commercial paper outstanding through 2011 Hedge ineffectiveness was not material. Subsequent to the starting date of these swaps, the net cash settlements are reflected in interest expense in the applicable period.
In 2001, we incurred a $14.7 million loss on the settlement of swaps used to hedge the 2001 issuance of $294 million of medium-term notes. The loss on these swaps was deferred in other comprehensive income and is being amortized over the five to seven year life of the medium-term notes as a component of interest expense. Amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income to interest expense for settled interest rate swaps were $1.1 million, $1.6 million and $2.5 million in the years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and are included in the net change in unrealized gain or loss on derivative financial instruments in the statement of shareholders equity.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amount and fair value of financial instruments at November 30, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
||||
(millions) |
|
amount |
|
value |
|
amount |
|
value |
|
||||
Other investments |
|
$ |
52.9 |
|
$ |
52.9 |
|
$ |
44.5 |
|
$ |
44.5 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
573.9 |
|
586.7 |
|
570.2 |
|
587.0 |
|
||||
Derivative related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest rates |
|
(10.8 |
) |
(10.8 |
) |
(3.9 |
) |
(3.9 |
) |
||||
Foreign currencies |
|
(2.7 |
) |
(2.7 |
) |
(.2 |
) |
(.2 |
) |
||||
Because of their short-term nature, the amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, receivables, short-term borrowings and trade accounts payable approximate fair value. The fair values of other investments are based on quoted market prices from various stock and bond exchanges. The long-term debt fair values are based on quotes for like instruments with similar credit ratings and terms. The interest rate and foreign currency derivatives are based on quoted market prices from various banks for similar instruments.
Investments in affiliates are not readily marketable, and it is not practicable to estimate their fair value. Other investments are comprised of fixed income and equity securities held on behalf of employees in certain employee benefit plans and are stated at fair value on the balance sheet. The cost of these investments was $46.9 million and $41.0 million at November 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
We are potentially exposed to concentrations of credit risk with trade accounts receivable, prepaid allowances and financial instruments. Because we have a large and diverse customer base with no single customer accounting for a significant percentage of trade accounts receivable and prepaid allowances, there was no material concentration of credit risk in these accounts at November 30, 2007. We evaluate the credit worthiness of the counterparties to financial instruments and consider nonperformance credit risk to be remote.
8. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AND RETIREMENT PLANS
We sponsor defined benefit pension plans in the U.S. and certain foreign locations. In addition, we sponsor 401(k) retirement plans in the U.S. and contribute to government-sponsored retirement plans in locations outside the U.S. We also currently provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits to certain U.S. employees.
Effective November 30, 2007, we adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. SFAS No. 158 requires us to record the funded status of our pension and other postretirement plans on our November 30, 2007 balance sheet, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. The funded status of defined benefit pension plans is measured under the statement as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligation. The funded status of other postretirement benefit plans is measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation.
The incremental effects of adopting the provisions of SFAS No. 158 on our balance sheet at November 30, 2007 are presented in the following table. The balances in the table represent the totals for the defined benefit and postretirement medical and life insurance plans for employees. The adoption of SFAS No.158 had no effect on our income statement for the year ended November 30, 2007 or any prior period presented, and it will not affect the Companys operating results in future periods.
50
|
|
Balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
prior to |
|
Effect of |
|
Balances |
|
|||
|
|
adopting |
|
adopting |
|
as reported at |
|
|||
(millions) |
|
SFAS 158 |
|
SFAS 158 |
|
Nov. 30, 2007 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Prepaid postretirement benefit cost |
|
$ |
65.0 |
|
$ |
(52.4 |
) |
$ |
12.6 |
|
Intangible asset |
|
.8 |
|
(.8 |
) |
|
|
|||
Deferred income tax asset |
|
11.2 |
|
27.2 |
|
38.4 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Accrued postretirement benefit liability |
|
155.9 |
|
23.3 |
|
179.2 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Shareholdersequity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
25.0 |
|
49.3 |
|
74.3 |
|
|||
Included in accumulated other comprehensive income at November 30, 2007 is $112.5 million ($74.3 million net of tax) related to net unrecognized actuarial losses and unrecognized prior service credit that have not yet been recognized in net periodic pension or postretirement benefit cost. We expect to recognize $6.2 million ($4.1 million net of tax) of net actuarial losses and prior service credit in net periodic pension and postretirement benefit cost during 2008.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
A September 30 measurement date is used to value plan assets and obligations for all of our defined benefit pension plans.
The significant assumptions used to determine benefit obligations are as follows:
|
|
United States |
|
International |
|
||||
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Discount rate-funded plan |
|
6.9 |
% |
6.1 |
% |
5.6 |
% |
5.0 |
% |
Discount rate-unfunded plan |
|
6.6 |
% |
5.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Salary scale |
|
4.0 |
% |
4.0 |
% |
3.0-4.5 |
% |
3.0-4.3 |
% |
Expected return on plan assets |
|
8.5 |
% |
8.5 |
% |
6.7 |
% |
6.6 |
% |
The expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption is based on weighted-average expected returns for each asset class. Expected returns reflect a combination of historical performance analysis and forward-looking views of the financial markets, and include input from actuaries, investment service firms and investment managers.
Our pension expense was as follows:
|
|
United States |
|
International |
|
||||||||||||||
(millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
11.8 |
|
$ |
13.2 |
|
$ |
11.9 |
|
$ |
7.8 |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
Interest costs |
|
24.5 |
|
22.1 |
|
20.7 |
|
11.3 |
|
9.1 |
|
8.0 |
|
||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(24.7 |
) |
(22.5 |
) |
(20.3 |
) |
(10.8 |
) |
(7.8 |
) |
(7.4 |
) |
||||||
Amortization of prior service costs |
|
.1 |
|
.1 |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
.1 |
|
|
|
||||||
Curtailment loss |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
.1 |
|
|
|
||||||
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
10.0 |
|
10.5 |
|
11.4 |
|
3.3 |
|
3.0 |
|
1.2 |
|
||||||
Special termination benefits |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
.1 |
|
.1 |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
$ |
21.7 |
|
$ |
30.3 |
|
$ |
23.7 |
|
$ |
11.8 |
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
The $6.8 million expense for special termination benefits in 2006 was a result of the closing of our manufacturing facility in Salinas, California and our voluntary separation program.
Rollforwards of the benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets and a reconciliation of the pension plans funded status at the measurement date, September 30, follow:
|
|
United States |
|
International |
|
||||||||
(millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||||
Change in benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year |
|
$ |
412.0 |
|
$ |
378.1 |
|
$ |
206.2 |
|
$ |
174.0 |
|
Service cost |
|
11.8 |
|
13.2 |
|
7.8 |
|
6.3 |
|
||||
Interest costs |
|
24.5 |
|
22.1 |
|
11.3 |
|
9.1 |
|
||||
Employee contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
1.7 |
|
||||
Plan changes and other |
|
|
|
|
|
.5 |
|
|
|
||||
Curtailment gain |
|
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
(.7 |
) |
||||
Special termination benefits |
|
.6 |
|
6.8 |
|
.1 |
|
.1 |
|
||||
Actuarial (gain)/loss |
|
(31.5 |
) |
16.7 |
|
(19.5 |
) |
4.6 |
|
||||
Benefits paid |
|
(25.8 |
) |
(18.7 |
) |
(6.7 |
) |
(5.5 |
) |
||||
Foreign currency impact |
|
|
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
16.6 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Benefit obligation at end of year |
|
$ |
391.6 |
|
$ |
412.0 |
|
$ |
217.8 |
|
$ |
206.2 |
|
Change in fair value of plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
|
$ |
309.7 |
|
$ |
273.4 |
|
$ |
148.7 |
|
$ |
113.3 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
50.9 |
|
31.0 |
|
11.1 |
|
11.6 |
|
||||
Employer contributions |
|
22.0 |
|
22.0 |
|
17.1 |
|
17.2 |
|
||||
Employee contributions |
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
1.7 |
|
||||
Benefits paid |
|
(23.6 |
) |
(16.7 |
) |
(6.7 |
) |
(5.5 |
) |
||||
Foreign currency impact |
|
|
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
10.4 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
|
$ |
359.0 |
|
$ |
309.7 |
|
$ |
183.6 |
|
$ |
148.7 |
|
Funded status |
|
$ |
(32.6 |
) |
$ |
(102.3 |
) |
$ |
(34.2 |
) |
$ |
(57.5 |
) |
Unrecognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
|
124.1 |
|
|
|
64.2 |
|
||||
Unrecognized prior service cost |
|
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
.6 |
|
||||
Employer contributions |
|
.1 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
1.4 |
|
||||
Net amount recognized |
|
$ |
(32.5 |
) |
$ |
22.1 |
|
$ |
(31.8 |
) |
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Pension plans in which accumulated benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
exceeded plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Accumulated benefit obligation |
|
$ |
41.0 |
|
$ |
361.8 |
|
$ |
135.6 |
|
$ |
176.2 |
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
|
309.7 |
|
111.6 |
|
135.4 |
|
51
In 2007, the primary U.S. pension plan moved from an underfunded to an overfunded status.
Amounts recorded in the balance sheet consist of the following:
|
|
United States |
|
International |
|
||||||||
(millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||||
Prepaid pension cost |
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
$ |
.2 |
|
|
Accrued pension liability |
|
(43.2 |
) |
$ |
(52.0 |
) |
(33.7 |
) |
(39.4 |
) |
|||
Intangible assets |
|
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
.6 |
|
||||
Deferred income taxes |
|
20.9 |
|
27.2 |
|
13.8 |
|
14.3 |
|
||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
35.4 |
|
46.6 |
|
33.0 |
|
33.0 |
|
||||
Included in the United States in the preceding table is a benefit obligation of $43.2 million and $42.9 million for 2007 and 2006, respectively, related to a nonqualified defined benefit plan pursuant to which we will pay supplemental pension benefits to certain key employees upon retirement based upon employees years of service and compensation. The accrued liability related to this plan was $43.1 million and $40.4 million as of November 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The assets related to this plan are held in a Rabbi Trust and accordingly have not been included in the preceding table. These assets were $38.1 million and $31.6 million as of November 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The accumulated benefit obligation is the present value of pension benefits (whether vested or unvested) attributed to employee service rendered before the measurement date and based on employee service and compensation prior to that date. The accumulated benefit obligation differs from the projected benefit obligation in that it includes no assumption about future compensation levels. The accumulated benefit obligation for the U.S. pension plans was $347.2 million and $361.8 million as of September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for the international pension plan was $198.0 million and $188.1 million as of November 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Our actual and target weighted-average asset allocations of U.S. pension plan assets as of September 30, 2007 and 2006, by asset category, were as follows:
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
||
Asset Category |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Target |
|
Equity securities |
|
64.0 |
% |
66.3 |
% |
70 |
% |
Debt securities |
|
26.4 |
% |
25.2 |
% |
20 |
% |
Other |
|
9.6 |
% |
8.5 |
% |
10 |
% |
Total |
|
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
100 |
% |
The average actual and target asset allocations of the international pension plans assets as of November 30, 2007 and 2006, by asset category, were as follows:
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
|
||
Asset Category |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Target |
|
Equity securities |
|
56.9 |
% |
56.7 |
% |
56 |
% |
Debt securities |
|
42.9 |
% |
43.1 |
% |
44 |
% |
Other |
|
.2 |
% |
.2 |
% |
|
|
Total |
|
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
100 |
% |
The investment objectives of the pension benefit plans are to secure the benefit obligations to participants at a reasonable cost to us. The goal is to optimize the long-term return on plan assets at a moderate level of risk, by balancing higher-returning assets such as equity securities, with less volatile assets, such as fixed income securities. The assets are managed by professional investment firms and performance is evaluated quarterly against specific benchmarks.
Equity securities in the U.S. plan included McCormick stock with a fair value of $16.8 million (0.4 million shares and 4.8% of total U.S. pension plan assets) and $16.1 million (0.4 million shares and 5.0% of total U.S. pension plan assets) at November 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Dividends paid on these shares were $0.4 million in 2007 and $0.6 million in 2006.
Pension benefit payments in our major plans are made from assets of the pension plans. It is anticipated that future benefit payments for the U.S. plans for the next 10 fiscal years will be as follows:
|
|
United States |
|
|
(millions) |
|
Expected Payments |
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
16.7 |
|
2009 |
|
17.8 |
|
|
2010 |
|
19.2 |
|
|
2011 |
|
21.1 |
|
|
2012 |
|
23.5 |
|
|
2013-2017 |
|
146.5 |
|
|
It is anticipated that future benefit payments for the international plans for the next 10 fiscal years will be as follows:
|
|
International |
|
|
(millions) |
|
Expected Payments |
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
2009 |
|
7.2 |
|
|
2010 |
|
8.1 |
|
|
2011 |
|
9.1 |
|
|
2012 |
|
9.8 |
|
|
2013-2017 |
|
56.6 |
|
|
52
In 2008, we expect to contribute approximately $2.5 million to our U.S. pension plans, including no contributions to our qualified plan as we are currently overfunded and $2.5 million to our plan that has assets held in a Rabbi Trust. In addition, we expect to contribute approximately $13 million to our international pension plans in 2008.
401(k) Retirement Plans
For the U.S. McCormick 401(k) Retirement Plan, we match 100% of the participants contribution up to the first 3% of the participants salary, and 50% of the next 2% of a participants salary. Certain of our U.S. subsidiaries sponsor separate 401(k) retirement plans. Our contributions charged to expense under all 401(k) Retirement Plans were $5.7 million, $5.6 million and $5.7 million in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
At the participants election, 401(k) Retirement Plans held 3.0 million shares, with a fair value of $113.3 million, of our stock at November 30, 2007. Dividends paid on these shares in 2007 were $2.5 million.
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
We currently provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits to certain U.S. employees who were covered under the active employees plan and retire after age 55 with at least 10 years of service (earned after age 45). The benefits provided under these plans are based primarily on age at date of retirement. These benefits are not pre-funded but paid as incurred.
Our other postretirement benefit expense follows:
(millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|||
Service cost |
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
Interest costs |
|
5.7 |
|
5.6 |
|
5.0 |
|
|||
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
(1.1 |
) |
(1.1 |
) |
(1.1 |
) |
|||
Amortization of losses |
|
.8 |
|
.9 |
|
.2 |
|
|||
Postretirement benefit expense |
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
Rollforwards of the benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets and a reconciliation of the plans funded status at November 30, the measurement date, follow:
(millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
Change in benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year |
|
$ |
102.1 |
|
$ |
97.3 |
|
Service cost |
|
3.5 |
|
3.6 |
|
||
Interest costs |
|
5.7 |
|
5.6 |
|
||
Employee contributions |
|
3.1 |
|
2.6 |
|
||
Medicare prescription subsidy |
|
.4 |
|
|
|
||
Plan amendments |
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
||
Mortality assumption change |
|
|
|
(.1 |
) |
||
Trend rate assumption change |
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
||
Actuarial (gain) loss |
|
(8.0 |
) |
1.8 |
|
||
Benefits paid |
|
(9.3 |
) |
(8.7 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Benefit obligation at end of year |
|
$ |
102.6 |
|
$ |
102.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Change in fair value of plan assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Employer contributions |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
$ |
6.1 |
|
Employee contributions |
|
3.1 |
|
2.6 |
|
||
Medicare prescription subsidy |
|
.4 |
|
|
|
||
Benefits paid |
|
(9.3 |
) |
(8.7 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Funded status |
|
$ |
(102.6 |
) |
$ |
(102.1 |
) |
Unrecognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
||
Unrecognized prior service cost |
|
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other postretirement benefit liability |
|
$ |
(102.6 |
) |
$ |
(89.7 |
) |
Estimated future benefit payments (net of employee contributions) for the next 10 fiscal years are as follows:
|
|
Retiree |
|
Retiree Life |
|
|
|
|||
(millions) |
|
Medical |
|
Insurance |
|
Total |
|
|||
2008 |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
$ |
.9 |
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
2009 |
|
6.6 |
|
1.0 |
|
7.6 |
|
|||
2010 |
|
7.1 |
|
1.0 |
|
8.1 |
|
|||
2011 |
|
7.5 |
|
1.1 |
|
8.6 |
|
|||
2012 |
|
7.9 |
|
1.1 |
|
9.0 |
|
|||
2013-2017 |
|
44.7 |
|
6.1 |
|
50.8 |
|
|||
The assumed discount rate was 6.3% and 5.9% for 2007 and 2006, respectively.
For 2008, the assumed annual rate of increase in the cost of covered health care benefits is 9.8% (8.0% last year). It is assumed to decrease gradually to 5.0% in the year 2014 (5.0% by 2011 last year) and remain at that level thereafter. Changing the assumed health care cost trend would have the following effect:
|
|
1-Percentage- |
|
1-Percentage- |
|
||
(millions) |
|
point increase |
|
point decrease |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Effect on total of service and interest cost components in 2007 |
|
$ |
.4 |
|
$ |
(.4 |
) |
Effect on benefit obligation as of November 30, 2007 |
|
4.3 |
|
(3.9 |
) |
||
53
9. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
In 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. This statement requires us to expense the fair value of grants of various stock-based compensation programs over the vesting period of the awards. We used the Modified Prospective Application transition method whereby we did not restate prior year financial statements. Compensation expense is calculated and recorded beginning in 2006 as follows:
Awards Granted After November 30, 2005 Awards are calculated at their fair value at date of grant. The resulting compensation expense is recorded in the income statement ratably over the shorter of the period until vesting or the employees retirement eligibility date. For employees eligible for retirement on the date of grant, compensation expense is recorded immediately.
Awards Granted Prior to November 30, 2005 Awards were calculated at their fair value at the date of original grant. Compensation expense for the unvested portion of these options at December 1, 2005 is recorded in the income statement ratably over the remaining vesting period without regard to the employees retirement eligibility. Upon retirement, any unrecorded compensation expense will be recorded immediately.
For all grants, the amount of compensation expense to be recorded is adjusted for an estimated forfeiture rate which is based on historical data.
The table below presents the impact of stock-based compensation expense for 2007 and 2006. Only nominal amounts of stock-based compensation expense were charged against income in 2005 as we applied the provisions of APB No. 25 to this period.
(millions except per share data) |
|
SG&A |
|
Restructuring |
|
Total |
|
|||
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Reduction to income from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
consolidated operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
before income taxes |
|
$ |
21.2 |
|
$ |
.2 |
|
$ |
21.4 |
|
Reduction to net income |
|
14.7 |
|
.1 |
|
14.8 |
|
|||
Reduction to earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Basic |
|
.11 |
|
|
|
.11 |
|
|||
Diluted |
|
.11 |
|
|
|
.11 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Reduction to income from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
consolidated operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
before income taxes |
|
$ |
22.0 |
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
$ |
24.9 |
|
Reduction to net income |
|
15.1 |
|
2.0 |
|
17.1 |
|
|||
Reduction to earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Basic |
|
.11 |
|
.02 |
|
.13 |
|
|||
Diluted |
|
.11 |
|
.01 |
|
.13 |
|
The stock-based compensation expense recorded in restructuring charges was for the acceleration of vesting in accordance with the provisions of the award for employees who were part of our severance charges (see note 3).
Total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense at November 30, 2007 and 2006 was $11.6 million and $19.5 million, respectively, and the weighted-average period over which these will be recognized are 1.1 years and 1.3 years, respectively.
SFAS No. 123(R) also requires that the tax benefit from the exercise of options in excess of the tax benefit from the compensation expense recorded for those options be included in the cash flow statement as a cash inflow from financing activities. In 2005, these tax benefits had been reflected as a cash inflow from operations. The 2005 cash flow statement has not been restated. This excess tax benefit was $9.4 million, $9.5 million and $13.8 million for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
We have two types of stock-based compensation awards: restricted stock units (RSUs) and stock options, including grants under an employee stock purchase plan (ESPP). Below, we have summarized the key terms and methods of valuation for our stock-based compensation awards:
RSUs
RSUs are valued at the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant. Substantially all of the RSUs vest over a two-year term and are expensed ratably over that period, subject to the retirement eligibility rules discussed above.
Stock Options
ESPP We have an ESPP which enables employees to purchase McCormick common stock non-voting at the lower of the stock price at the grant date or purchase date. This plan has a two-year term and is expensed ratably over the life of the grant. Historically, we have adopted a new ESPP upon the expiration of an existing plan. The last plan was offered in May 2007.
We value our ESPP using the Black-Scholes option pricing model which uses the assumptions shown in the table
54
below. We use the Black-Scholes model as opposed to a lattice pricing model since employee exercise patterns, which are considered in a lattice model, are not relevant to this plan. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury two-year rate in effect at the time of grant.
Other Option Plans Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the stock at the date of grant. Substantially all of the options granted are exercisable ratably over a four-year vesting period.
The fair value of the options are estimated using a lattice option pricing model which also uses the assumptions in the table below. We believe the lattice model provides a better estimated fair value of our options as it uses a range of possible outcomes over an option term and can be adjusted for changes in certain assumptions over time. Expected volatilities are based on the historical performance of our stock. We also use historical data to estimate the timing and amount of option exercises and forfeitures within the valuation model. The expected term of the options is an output of the option pricing model and estimates the period of time that options are expected to remain unexercised. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
The per share weighted-average fair value for all options granted was $6.83, $7.47 and $7.05 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These fair values were computed using the following range of assumptions for our various stock compensation plans for the years ended November 30:
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rates |
|
4.5- 5.1 |
% |
4.5- 4.7 |
% |
2.4-4.2 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
2.0 - 2.1 |
% |
2.0 |
% |
1.7 - 1.9 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
13.4 - 24.9 |
% |
18.2 - 25.6 |
% |
12.4 - 20.5 |
% |
Expected lives |
|
1.9 - 5.3 years |
|
5.4 years |
|
1.9-5.9 years |
|
Under our stock option plans, we may issue shares on a net basis at the request of the option holder. This occurs by netting the option cost in shares from the shares exercised.
A summary of our stock option activity for the years ended November 30 follows:
(shares in millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
average |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
exercise |
|
|||
|
|
Shares |
|
price |
|
Shares |
|
price |
|
Shares |
|
price |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Beginning of year |
|
15.8 |
|
$ |
25.31 |
|
17.5 |
|
$ |
24.58 |
|
17.4 |
|
$ |
21.81 |
|
Granted |
|
.8 |
|
$ |
38.20 |
|
.6 |
|
$ |
32.96 |
|
2.7 |
|
$ |
37.91 |
|
Exercised |
|
(2.1 |
) |
$ |
21.60 |
|
(2.0 |
) |
$ |
19.76 |
|
(2.4 |
) |
$ |
19.07 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(.3 |
) |
$ |
35.19 |
|
(.3 |
) |
$ |
34.25 |
|
(.2 |
) |
$ |
28.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
End of year |
|
14.2 |
|
$ |
26.38 |
|
15.8 |
|
$ |
25.31 |
|
17.5 |
|
$ |
24.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Exercisable end of year |
|
11.6 |
|
$ |
24.30 |
|
11.3 |
|
$ |
22.57 |
|
10.2 |
|
$ |
20.47 |
|
As of November 30, 2007, the intrinsic value (the difference between the exercise price and the market price) for options outstanding was $168.8 million and the intrinsic value for options exercisable was $161.4 million. The total intrinsic value of all options exercised during the years ended November 30, 2007 and 2006 was $33.2 million and $29.7 million, respectively. A summary of our stock options outstanding and exercisable at November 30, 2007 follows:
(shares in millions) |
|
Options outstanding |
|
Options exercisable |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Weighted- |
|
|||
Range of |
|
|
|
average |
|
average |
|
|
|
average |
|
average |
|
|||
exercise |
|
|
|
remaining |
|
exercise |
|
|
|
remaining |
|
exercise |
|
|||
price |
|
Shares |
|
life (yrs) |
|
price |
|
Shares |
|
life (yrs) |
|
price |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
$ |
11.00-$17.84 |
|
1.6 |
|
1.6 |
|
$ |
13.77 |
|
1.6 |
|
1.6 |
|
$ |
13.77 |
|
$ |
17.85- $24.68 |
|
5.8 |
|
4.0 |
|
$ |
20.91 |
|
5.8 |
|
4.0 |
|
$ |
20.91 |
|
$ |
24.69-$31.51 |
|
3.4 |
|
5.4 |
|
$ |
30.54 |
|
2.7 |
|
5.2 |
|
$ |
30.52 |
|
$ |
31.52-$38.35 |
|
3.4 |
|
6.8 |
|
$ |
37.46 |
|
1.5 |
|
5.9 |
|
$ |
37.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
14.2 |
|
4.7 |
|
$ |
26.38 |
|
11.6 |
|
4.2 |
|
$ |
24.30 |
|
A summary of our RSU activity for the years ended November 30, 2007 and 2006 follows:
(shares in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
||
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
average |
|
||
|
|
|
|
grant date |
|
|
|
grant date |
|
||
|
|
Shares |
|
fair value |
|
Shares |
|
fair value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Outstanding beginning of year |
|
279.8 |
|
$ |
32.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
257.2 |
|
$ |
38.28 |
|
289.6 |
|
$ |
32.88 |
|
Vested |
|
(157.2 |
) |
$ |
33.08 |
|
(2.7 |
) |
$ |
32.83 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(6.7 |
) |
$ |
35.17 |
|
(7.1 |
) |
$ |
32.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Outstanding end of year |
|
373.1 |
|
$ |
36.47 |
|
279.8 |
|
$ |
32.88 |
|
No RSUs were issued in 2005.
55
In 2005, we applied the intrinsic value based method of accounting for stock options under APB No. 25. Accordingly, no compensation expense was recognized for these stock options since all options granted have an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying stock on the grant date. If compensation expense had been recognized based on the estimate of the fair value of each option granted in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148, our net income would have been reduced to the following pro forma amounts:
(millions except per share data) |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income as reported |
|
$ |
214.9 |
|
Add: stock-based compensation recorded, net of tax |
|
.2 |
|
|
Deduct: stock-based compensation expense, net of tax |
|
(14.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
200.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
Basic pro forma |
|
1.49 |
|
|
Diluted as reported |
|
1.56 |
|
|
Diluted pro forma |
|
1.45 |
|
Pro forma compensation expense recognized under SFAS No.123 did not consider potential forfeitures and amortizes the compensation expense for retiree eligible individuals over the vesting period without considering the acceleration of vesting for retirement eligible employees. These computational differences and the differences in the terms and nature of 2007 and 2006 stock-based compensation awards create incomparability between the pro forma stock compensation presented above and the stock compensation recognized in 2007 and 2006.
10. INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
(millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Federal |
|
$ |
80.6 |
|
$ |
70.5 |
|
$ |
62.5 |
|
State |
|
9.3 |
|
6.9 |
|
4.8 |
|
|||
International |
|
14.3 |
|
13.3 |
|
23.5 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
104.2 |
|
90.7 |
|
90.8 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Federal |
|
(11.8 |
) |
(18.2 |
) |
10.1 |
|
|||
State |
|
(1.4 |
) |
(1.8 |
) |
1.0 |
|
|||
International |
|
1.2 |
|
(6.0 |
) |
(5.2 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
(12.0 |
) |
(26.0 |
) |
5.9 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total income taxes |
|
$ |
92.2 |
|
$ |
64.7 |
|
$ |
96.7 |
|
The components of income from consolidated operations before income taxes follow:
(millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|||
Pretax income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
United States |
|
$ |
212.4 |
|
$ |
153.5 |
|
$ |
208.6 |
|
International |
|
90.0 |
|
69.5 |
|
87.1 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
$ |
302.4 |
|
$ |
223.0 |
|
$ |
295.7 |
|
A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory rate with the effective tax rate follows:
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal statutory tax rate |
|
35.0 |
% |
35.0 |
% |
35.0 |
% |
State income taxes, net of federal benefits |
|
1.7 |
|
1.3 |
|
1.3 |
|
Tax effect of international operations |
|
(4.2 |
) |
(5.7 |
) |
(3.3 |
) |
Tax credits |
|
(.8 |
) |
|
|
(.3 |
) |
U.S. manufacturing deduction |
|
(.9 |
) |
(.8 |
) |
|
|
Other, net |
|
(.3 |
) |
(.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
30.5 |
% |
29.0 |
% |
32.7 |
% |
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are comprised of the following:
(millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Employee benefit liabilities |
|
$ |
88.4 |
|
$ |
80.5 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
26.9 |
|
27.8 |
|
||
Inventory |
|
8.1 |
|
7.7 |
|
||
Net operating and capital loss carryforwards |
|
7.1 |
|
7.1 |
|
||
Other |
|
3.5 |
|
3.5 |
|
||
Valuation allowance |
|
(6.2 |
) |
(6.3 |
) |
||
|
|
127.8 |
|
120.3 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation |
|
39.3 |
|
47.9 |
|
||
Intangible assets |
|
77.5 |
|
72.4 |
|
||
Other |
|
6.5 |
|
5.7 |
|
||
|
|
123.3 |
|
126.0 |
|
||
Net deferred tax asset (liability) |
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
$ |
(5.7 |
) |
At November 30, 2007, our non-U.S. subsidiaries have tax loss carryforwards of $16.3 million. Of these carryforwards, $0.4 million expire through 2011, $6.2 million through 2021 and $9.7 million may be carried forward indefinitely. The current statutory rates in these countries range from 25.5% to 34%.
At November 30, 2007, our non-U.S. subsidiaries have capital loss carryforwards of $14.8 million. Of these carryforwards, $2.2 million expire in 2009 and $12.6 million
56
may be carried forward indefinitely. The current statutory rates in these countries range from 15% to 28%.
A valuation allowance has been provided to record deferred tax assets at their net realizable value. The $0.1 million net decrease in the valuation allowance was due to an additional valuation allowance of $1.1 million related to losses generated in 2007 which may not be realized in future periods, $0.5 million additional valuation allowance requirement related to prior years, and higher foreign currency exchange rates, offset by a decrease in the valuation allowance of $1.7 million. The $1.7 million decrease primarily relates to the utilization of tax losses and the disposition of a non-U.S. subsidiary.
U.S. income taxes are not provided for unremitted earnings of international subsidiaries and affiliates where our intention is to reinvest these earnings permanently or to repatriate the earnings when it is tax effective to do so. Accordingly, we believe that any U.S. tax on repatriated earnings would be substantially offset by U.S. foreign tax credits. Unremitted earnings of such entities were $434.4 million at November 30, 2007.
11. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The reconciliation of shares outstanding used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended November 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005 follows:
(millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Average shares outstanding basic |
|
129.3 |
|
131.8 |
|
134.5 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and ESPP |
|
3.4 |
|
3.2 |
|
3.6 |
|
Average shares outstanding diluted |
|
132.7 |
|
135.0 |
|
138.1 |
|
12. CAPITAL STOCKS
Holders of Common Stock have full voting rights except that (1) the voting rights of persons who are deemed to own beneficially 10% or more of the outstanding shares of Common Stock are limited to 10% of the votes entitled to be cast by all holders of shares of Common Stock regardless of how many shares in excess of 10% are held by such person; (2) we have the right to redeem any or all shares of stock owned by such person unless such person acquires more than 90% of the outstanding shares of each class of our common stock; and (3) at such time as such person controls more than 50% of the vote entitled to be cast by the holders of outstanding shares of Common Stock, automatically, on a share-for-share basis, all shares of Common Stock Non-Voting will convert into shares of Common Stock.
Holders of Common Stock Non-Voting will vote as a separate class on all matters on which they are entitled to vote. Holders of Common Stock Non-Voting are entitled to vote on reverse mergers and statutory share exchanges where our capital stock is converted into other securities or property, dissolution of the Company and the sale of substantially all of our assets, as well as forward mergers and consolidation of the Company.
13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
During the normal course of our business, we are occasionally involved with various claims and litigation. Reserves are established in connection with such matters when a loss is probable and the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. No reserves are established for losses which are only reasonably possible. The determination of probability and the estimation of the actual amount of any such loss is inherently unpredictable, and it is therefore possible that the eventual outcome of such claims and litigation could exceed the estimated reserves, if any. However, we believe that the likelihood that any such excess might have a material adverse effect on our financial statements is remote.
14. BUSINESS SEGMENTS AND GEOGRAPHIC AREAS
Business Segments
We operate in two business segments: consumer and industrial. The consumer and industrial segments manufacture, market and distribute spices, herbs, seasoning blends and other flavors throughout the world. The consumer segment sells to retail outlets, including grocery, mass merchandise, warehouse clubs, discount and drug stores under the McCormick® brand and a variety of brands around the world, including Zatarains®, Simply Asia, Thai Kitchen, Ducros®, Vahine, Silvo® , Club House® and Schwartz®. The industrial segment sells to other food manufacturers and the food service industry both directly and indirectly through distributors.
In each of our segments, we produce and sell many individual products which are similar in composition and nature. It is impractical to segregate and identify revenue and profits for each of these individual product lines.
57
We measure segment performance based on operating income excluding restructuring charges from our restructuring programs as this activity is managed separately from the business segment. Although the segments are managed separately due to their distinct distribution channels and marketing strategies, manufacturing and warehousing are often integrated to maximize cost efficiencies. We do not segregate jointly utilized assets by individual segment for internal reporting, evaluating performance or allocating capital. Asset-related information has been disclosed in aggregate.
We have a customer in our industrial segment which is 10% of consolidated sales.
Accounting policies for
measuring segment operating income and assets are substantially consistent with
those described in
note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Because of manufacturing
integration for certain products within the segments, products are not sold
from one segment to another but rather inventory is transferred at cost.
Intersegment sales are not material. Corporate assets include cash, deferred taxes,
certain investments and fixed assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
||||||
(millions) |
|
Consumer |
|
Industrial |
|
Food |
|
& Other |
|
Total |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,671.3 |
|
$ |
1,244.9 |
|
$ |
2,916.2 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,916.2 |
|
||
Operating income excluding restructuring charges |
|
313.9 |
|
74.3 |
|
388.2 |
|
|
|
388.2 |
|
||||||
Income from unconsolidated operations |
|
16.8 |
|
4.6 |
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
||||||
Goodwill, net |
|
822.5 |
|
57.0 |
|
879.5 |
|
|
|
879.5 |
|
||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
2,568.2 |
|
$ |
219.3 |
|
2,787.5 |
|
|||||
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
63.8 |
|
14.7 |
|
78.5 |
|
||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
65.6 |
|
17.0 |
|
82.6 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,556.4 |
|
$ |
1,160.0 |
|
$ |
2,716.4 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,716.4 |
|
||
Operating income excluding restructuring charges |
|
278.0 |
|
75.7 |
|
353.7 |
|
|
|
353.7 |
|
||||||
Income from unconsolidated operations |
|
15.9 |
|
4.0 |
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
||||||
Goodwill, net |
|
754.7 |
|
49.1 |
|
803.8 |
|
|
|
803.8 |
|
||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
2,372.0 |
|
$ |
196.0 |
|
2,568.0 |
|
|||||
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
77.7 |
|
7.1 |
|
84.8 |
|
||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
70.8 |
|
13.5 |
|
84.3 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,478.3 |
|
$ |
1,113.7 |
|
$ |
2,592.0 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,592.0 |
|
||
Operating income excluding restructuring charges |
|
288.0 |
|
66.7 |
|
354.7 |
|
|
|
354.7 |
|
||||||
Income from unconsolidated operations |
|
17.5 |
|
3.1 |
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
||||||
Goodwill, net |
|
619.5 |
|
44.4 |
|
663.9 |
|
|
|
663.9 |
|
||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
2,122.7 |
|
$ |
150.0 |
|
2,272.7 |
|
|||||
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
63.9 |
|
2.9 |
|
66.8 |
|
||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
11.0 |
|
74.6 |
|
||||||
A reconciliation of operating income excluding restructuring charges (which we use to measure segment profitability) to operating income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(millions) |
|
Total |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income,excluding restructuring charges |
|
$ |
388.2 |
|
Less: Restructuring charges |
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
354.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income, excluding restructuring charges |
|
$ |
353.7 |
|
Less: Restructuring charges |
|
84.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
269.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income, excluding restructuring charges |
|
$ |
354.7 |
|
Less: Restructuring charges |
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
343.5 |
|
Geographic Areas
We have net sales and long-lived assets in the following geographic areas:
|
|
United |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
||||
(millions) |
|
States |
|
Europe |
|
countries |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,722.4 |
|
$ |
736.5 |
|
$ |
457.3 |
|
$ |
2,916.2 |
|
Long-lived assets |
|
633.1 |
|
829.0 |
|
112.5 |
|
1,574.6 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,678.7 |
|
$ |
643.6 |
|
$ |
394.1 |
|
$ |
2,716.4 |
|
Long-lived assets |
|
647.1 |
|
723.2 |
|
96.6 |
|
1,466.9 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,581.4 |
|
$ |
638.1 |
|
$ |
372.5 |
|
$ |
2,592.0 |
|
Long-lived assets |
|
546.7 |
|
635.4 |
|
90.9 |
|
1,273.0 |
|
Long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization.
58
15. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT DATA
Supplemental income statement, balance sheet and cash flow information follows:
(millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Finished products |
|
$ |
222.0 |
|
$ |
219.1 |
|
Raw materials and work-in-process |
|
208.2 |
|
186.6 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
430.2 |
|
$ |
405.7 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
$ |
21.6 |
|
Other current assets |
|
39.7 |
|
44.0 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
50.5 |
|
$ |
65.6 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
30.4 |
|
$ |
28.0 |
|
Buildings |
|
288.4 |
|
263.8 |
|
||
Machinery and equipment |
|
460.3 |
|
431.1 |
|
||
Software |
|
198.2 |
|
177.0 |
|
||
Construction in progress |
|
51.6 |
|
66.0 |
|
||
Accumulated depreciation |
|
(541.3 |
) |
(496.4 |
) |
||
|
|
$ |
487.6 |
|
$ |
469.5 |
|
Investments and other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Investments in affiliates |
|
$ |
55.1 |
|
$ |
51.8 |
|
Other investments |
|
52.9 |
|
44.5 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
82.5 |
|
59.9 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
190.5 |
|
$ |
156.2 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Payroll and employee benefits |
|
$ |
104.9 |
|
$ |
105.5 |
|
Sales allowances |
|
148.4 |
|
124.6 |
|
||
Income taxes |
|
29.1 |
|
44.2 |
|
||
Other |
|
186.0 |
|
200.4 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
468.4 |
|
$ |
474.7 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Pension |
|
$ |
80.6 |
|
$ |
104.2 |
|
Postretirement benefits |
|
92.8 |
|
89.7 |
|
||
Deferred taxes |
|
54.9 |
|
68.1 |
|
||
Other |
|
29.4 |
|
19.0 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
257.7 |
|
$ |
281.0 |
|
(millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|||
Depreciation |
|
$ |
69.7 |
|
$ |
73.7 |
|
$ |
64.5 |
|
Interest paid |
|
60.6 |
|
52.1 |
|
49.1 |
|
|||
Income taxes paid |
|
112.1 |
|
70.9 |
|
78.9 |
|
|||
Interest capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|||
(millions) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax where applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
$ |
346.6 |
|
$ |
223.4 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
(2.1 |
) |
.2 |
|
||
Fair value of open interest rate swaps |
|
(9.9 |
) |
(3.1 |
) |
||
Unamortized value of settled interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
(.7 |
) |
||
Pension and other postretirement costs |
|
(74.3 |
) |
(79.5 |
) |
||
|
|
$ |
260.3 |
|
$ |
140.3 |
|
Dividends paid per share were $0.80 in 2007, $0.72 in 2006 and $0.64 in 2005.
16. SELECTED QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)
(millions except per share data) |
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
||||
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
652.6 |
|
$ |
687.2 |
|
$ |
716.2 |
|
$ |
860.1 |
|
Gross profit |
|
264.4 |
|
271.8 |
|
284.3 |
|
371.3 |
|
||||
Operating income |
|
66.4 |
|
66.9 |
|
88.9 |
|
132.0 |
|
||||
Net income |
|
44.2 |
|
41.4 |
|
56.8 |
|
87.6 |
|
||||
Basic earnings per share |
|
.34 |
|
.32 |
|
.44 |
|
.69 |
|
||||
Diluted earnings per share |
|
.33 |
|
.31 |
|
.43 |
|
.67 |
|
||||
Dividends paid per share Common Stock and Common Stock Non-Voting |
|
.20 |
|
.20 |
|
.20 |
|
.20 |
|
||||
Market price Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
High |
|
39.49 |
|
39.00 |
|
38.50 |
|
38.29 |
|
||||
Low |
|
37.80 |
|
36.71 |
|
34.27 |
|
34.33 |
|
||||
Market price Common Stock Non-Voting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
High |
|
39.58 |
|
39.18 |
|
38.43 |
|
38.69 |
|
||||
Low |
|
37.90 |
|
36.69 |
|
34.16 |
|
34.41 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
609.7 |
|
$ |
639.9 |
|
$ |
663.1 |
|
$ |
803.7 |
|
Gross profit |
|
239.1 |
|
250.6 |
|
269.3 |
|
355.6 |
|
||||
Operating income |
|
24.3 |
|
54.7 |
|
64.2 |
|
126.5 |
|
||||
Net income |
|
14.4 |
|
61.6 |
|
43.1 |
|
83.1 |
|
||||
Basic earnings per share |
|
.11 |
|
.47 |
|
.33 |
|
.64 |
|
||||
Diluted earnings per share |
|
.11 |
|
.46 |
|
.32 |
|
.62 |
|
||||
Dividends paid per share Common Stock and Common Stock Non-Voting |
|
.18 |
|
.18 |
|
.18 |
|
.18 |
|
||||
Market price Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
High |
|
33.50 |
|
35.17 |
|
36.25 |
|
38.75 |
|
||||
Low |
|
29.80 |
|
32.70 |
|
32.52 |
|
36.31 |
|
||||
Market price Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Non-Voting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
High |
|
33.37 |
|
35.35 |
|
36.42 |
|
38.92 |
|
||||
Low |
|
29.82 |
|
32.72 |
|
32.54 |
|
36.42 |
|
59
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL SUMMARY
(millions except per share and ratio data) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||||
For the Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
2,916.2 |
|
$ |
2,716.4 |
|
$ |
2,592.0 |
|
$ |
2,526.2 |
|
$ |
2,269.6 |
|
Percent increase |
|
7.4 |
% |
4.8 |
% |
2.6 |
% |
11.3 |
% |
11.0 |
% |
|||||
Operating income |
|
354.2 |
|
269.6 |
|
343.5 |
|
332.7 |
|
295.5 |
|
|||||
Income from unconsolidated operations |
|
21.4 |
|
19.9 |
|
20.6 |
|
14.6 |
|
16.4 |
|
|||||
Net income from continuing operations |
|
230.1 |
|
202.2 |
|
214.9 |
|
214.5 |
|
199.2 |
|
|||||
Net income |
|
230.1 |
|
202.2 |
|
214.9 |
|
214.5 |
|
210.8 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Earnings per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
1.73 |
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.09 |
|
|||||
Accounting change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|||||
Net income |
|
1.73 |
|
1.50 |
|
1.56 |
|
1.52 |
|
1.48 |
|
|||||
Earnings per share basic |
|
1.78 |
|
1.53 |
|
1.60 |
|
1.57 |
|
1.51 |
|
|||||
Common dividends declared |
|
.82 |
|
.74 |
|
.66 |
|
.58 |
|
.49 |
|
|||||
Market Non-Voting closing price end of year |
|
38.21 |
|
38.72 |
|
31.22 |
|
36.45 |
|
28.69 |
|
|||||
Book value per share |
|
8.51 |
|
7.17 |
|
6.03 |
|
6.57 |
|
5.50 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
At Year-End |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,787.5 |
|
$ |
2,568.0 |
|
$ |
2,272.7 |
|
$ |
2,369.6 |
|
$ |
2,145.5 |
|
Current debt |
|
149.6 |
|
81.4 |
|
106.1 |
|
173.2 |
|
171.0 |
|
|||||
Long-term debt |
|
573.5 |
|
569.6 |
|
463.9 |
|
465.0 |
|
448.6 |
|
|||||
Shareholders equity |
|
1,085.1 |
|
933.3 |
|
799.9 |
|
889.7 |
|
755.2 |
|
|||||
Total capital |
|
1,818.1 |
|
1,587.9 |
|
1,399.1 |
|
1,558.9 |
|
1,397.0 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Financial Measures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Percentage of net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gross profit |
|
40.9 |
% |
41.0 |
% |
40.0 |
% |
39.9 |
% |
39.6 |
% |
|||||
Operating income |
|
12.1 |
% |
9.9 |
% |
13.3 |
% |
13.2 |
% |
13.0 |
% |
|||||
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
78.5 |
|
$ |
84.8 |
|
$ |
66.8 |
|
$ |
62.7 |
|
$ |
83.0 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
82.6 |
|
84.3 |
|
74.6 |
|
72.0 |
|
65.3 |
|
|||||
Common share repurchases |
|
157.0 |
|
155.9 |
|
185.6 |
|
173.8 |
|
120.6 |
|
|||||
Debt-to-total-capital |
|
39.8 |
% |
41.0 |
% |
40.7 |
% |
40.9 |
% |
44.4 |
% |
|||||
Average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic |
|
129.3 |
|
131.8 |
|
134.5 |
|
137.0 |
|
139.2 |
|
|||||
Diluted |
|
132.7 |
|
135.0 |
|
138.1 |
|
141.3 |
|
142.6 |
|
The historical financial summary includes the following impact of restructuring activities and in 2004 the net gain from a special credit:
(millions except per share data) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||||
Operating income |
|
$ |
(34.0 |
) |
$ |
(84.1 |
) |
$ |
(11.2 |
) |
$ |
2.5 |
|
$ |
(5.5 |
) |
Net income |
|
(24.2 |
) |
(30.3 |
) |
(7.5 |
) |
1.2 |
|
(3.6 |
) |
|||||
Earnings per share |
|
(.18 |
) |
(.22 |
) |
(.05 |
) |
.01 |
|
(.03 |
) |
|||||
In 2006, McCormick began to record stock-based compensation expense as explained in note 9 of the financial statements. Prior year results have not been adjusted. Stock-based compensation reduced operating income by $21.2 million, net income by $14.7 million and earnings per share by $0.11 in 2007. Stock-based compensation reduced operating income by $22.0 million, net income by $15.1 million and earnings per share by $0.11 in 2006.
In 2003, McCormick sold its packaging segment and Jenks Sales Brokers in the U.K. and 2002 was restated for these discontinued operations. Also in 2003, McCormick consolidated the lessor of a leased distribution center which was recorded as an accounting change.
Total capital includes debt, minority interest and shareholders equity.
An eleven-year financial summary is available at ir.mccormick.com, as well as a report on EVA (Economic Value Added) and return on invested capital.
60
INVESTOR INFORMATION
World Headquarters
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
18 Loveton Circle
Sparks, MD 21152-6000
U.S.A.
(410) 771-7301
www.mccormick.com
Stock Information
New York Stock Exchange
Symbol: MKC
Anticipated Dividend Dates 2008
Record Date |
|
Payment Date |
4/14/08 |
|
4/25/08 |
7/07/08 |
|
7/21/08 |
10/03/08 |
|
10/17/08 |
12/31/08 |
|
1/16/09 |
McCormick has paid dividends every year since 1925.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
621 East Pratt Street
Baltimore, MD 21202
Certifications
The Company has filed the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer certifications required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in its Form 10-K. Additionally, the Chief Executive Officer has provided the required annual certifications to the New York Stock Exchange.
Investor Inquiries
Our investor website, ir.mccormick.com, has our corporate governance principles, as well as annual reports, Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) filings, press releases, webcasts and other information.
To obtain without cost a copy of the annual report filed with the SEC on Form 10-K or for general questions about McCormick or information in our annual or quarterly reports, contact Investor Relations at the world headquarters address, investor website or telephone:
Report ordering:
Proxy materials: (800) 579-1639
Other materials: (800) 424-5855 or (410) 771-7537
Investor and securities analysts inquiries:
(410) 771-7244
Registered Shareholder Inquiries
For questions on your account, statements, dividend payments, reinvestment and direct deposit, and for address changes, lost certificates, stock transfers, ownership changes or other administrative matters, contact our transfer agent.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Shareowner Services
161 North Concord Exchange Street
South St.Paul, MN 55075-1139
(877) 778-6784, or (651) 450-4064
www.wellsfargo.com/shareownerservices
You may access your account information via the Internet at www.shareowneronline.com
Investor Services Plan (Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Purchase Plan)
The Company offers an Investor Services Plan which provides shareholders of record the opportunity to automatically reinvest dividends, make optional cash purchases of stock, place stock certificates into safekeeping and sell shares through the Plan. Individuals who are not current shareholders may purchase their initial shares directly through the Plan. All transactions are subject to the limitations set forth in the Plan prospectus, which may be obtained by contacting Wells Fargo Shareowner Services at:
(877) 778-6784 or (651) 450-4064
www.wellsfargo.com/shareownerservices
Annual Meeting
The annual meeting of shareholders will be held at 10 a.m., Wednesday, April 2, 2008, at Marriotts Hunt Valley Inn, 245 Shawan Road(Exit 20A off I-83 north of Baltimore), Hunt Valley, Maryland 21031.
Online Receipt of Annual Report and Proxy Statement
If you would like to access next years proxy statement and annual report via the Internet, you may enroll on the website below: enroll.icsdelivery.com/mkc
Unlock a world of exciting flavor possibilities for your favorite dishes with the new McCormick Cooking With Flavor cookbook. Bring simple and basic recipes to life with innovative flavor creations. Get your copy by visiting www.mccormick.com or bookstores nationwide. Retail price is $24.95 U.S./$29.95 Canada.
Adler Design Group designed this years report.
61
McCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED 18 LOVETON CIRCLE SPARKS MARYLAND 21152-6000 U.S.A. 410-771-7301 WWW.MCCORMICK.COM
62
EXHIBIT 21
Subsidiaries of The Registrant
The following is a listing of Subsidiaries of the Registrant including the name under which they do business and their jurisdictions of incorporation. Certain subsidiaries are not listed since, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary as of December 31, 2007.
Company Name |
|
Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|
|
|
La Cie McCormick Canada Co. |
|
Province of Nova Scotia, Canada |
McCormick (Guangzhou) Food Company Limited |
|
Peoples Republic of China |
McCormick (U.K.) Ltd. |
|
Scotland |
McCormick Cyprus Limited |
|
Cyprus |
McCormick de Centro America, S.A. de C.V. |
|
El Salvador |
McCormick Europe, Ltd. |
|
England |
McCormick Foods Australia Pty. Ltd. |
|
Australia |
McCormick France Holdings S.A.S. |
|
France |
McCormick France, S.A.S. |
|
France |
McCormick Global Ingredients Limited |
|
Cayman |
McCormick Ingredients Southeast Asia Private Limited |
|
Republic of Singapore |
McCormick International Holdings Ltd. |
|
England |
McCormick Pesa, S.A. de C.V. |
|
Mexico |
McCormick South Africa Pty Limited |
|
South Africa |
McCormick Switzerland GmbH |
|
Switzerland |
Mojave Foods Corporation |
|
Maryland |
Shanghai McCormick Foods Company Limited |
|
Peoples Republic of China |
Simply Asia Foods, Inc. |
|
Delaware |
Uniqsauces |
|
England |
Zatarains Brands, Inc. |
|
Delaware |
EXHIBIT 23
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries of our reports dated January 22, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders of McCormick & Company, Incorporated.
Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and subsidiaries listed in Item 15(a). This schedule is the responsibility of McCormick & Company, Incorporateds management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, as to which the date is January 22, 2008, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of McCormick & Company, Incorporated and in the related Prospectuses (if applicable):
Form |
|
Registration Number |
|
Date Filed |
S-3ASR |
|
333-147809 |
|
12/4/07 |
S-8 |
|
333-142020 |
|
4/11/07 |
S-8 |
|
333-123808 |
|
4/4/05 |
S-8 POS |
|
333-104084 |
|
3/23/05 |
S-3 |
|
333-122366 |
|
1/28/05 |
S-8 |
|
333-114094 |
|
3/31/04 |
S-8 |
|
333-104084 |
|
3/28/03 |
S-3/A |
|
333-46490 |
|
1/23/01 |
S-8 |
|
333-93231 |
|
12/21/99 |
S-8 |
|
333-74963 |
|
3/24/99 |
S-3 |
|
333-47611 |
|
3/9/98 |
S-8 |
|
333-23727 |
|
3/21/97 |
S-3 |
|
33-66614 |
|
7/27/93 |
S-3 |
|
33-40920 |
|
5/29/91 |
S-8 |
|
33-33724 |
|
3/2/90 |
S-3 |
|
33-32712 |
|
12/21/89 |
S-3 |
|
33-24660 |
|
3/16/89 |
S-3 |
|
33-24659 |
|
9/15/88 |
S-8 |
|
33-24658 |
|
9/15/88 |
of our reports dated January 22, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of McCormick & Company, Incorporated incorporated herein by reference, our report dated January 22, 2008, with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of McCormick & Company, Incorporated, incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of McCormick & Company, Incorporated.
|
|
|
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|
|
Baltimore, Maryland
January 28, 2008
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
I, Alan D. Wilson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of McCormick & Company, Incorporated (the registrant);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
Date: January 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alan D. Wilson |
|
|
|
|
|
Alan D. Wilson |
|
|
|
|
|
President & Chief |
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
I, Gordon M. Stetz, Jr. certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of McCormick & Company, Incorporated (the registrant);
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
Date: January 28, 2008 |
|
/s/ Gordon M. Stetz, Jr. |
|
|
|
Gordon M. Stetz, Jr. |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President |
|
|
|
& Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of McCormick & Company, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending November 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alan D. Wilson, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
/s/ Alan D. Wilson |
|
|
Alan D. Wilson |
|
|
President & Chief |
|
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Date: January 28, 2008 |
|
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of McCormick & Company, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending November 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gordon M. Stetz, Jr., Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
/s/ Gordon M. Stetz, Jr. |
|
|
Gordon M. Stetz, Jr. |
|
|
Executive Vice President |
|
|
& Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
Date: January 28, 2008 |
|